D-I-TASSER A6NIM6-D2

D-I-TASSER results for A6NIM6-D2

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>A6NIM6 (283 residues)
ELHVEDTTFFLTLLPLFIFQLLYRMCIMQIPSGYYLQTMNSNLNLDGFLLPIAVMNAISS
LPLLILAPFLEYFSTCLFPSKRVGSFLSTCIIAGNLFAALSVMIAGFFEIHRKHFPAVEQ
PLSGKVLTVSSMPCFYLILQYVLLGVAETLVNPALSVISYRFVPSNVRGTSMNFLTLFNG
FGCFTGALLVKLVYLISDGNWFPNTLNKGNLESFFFFLASLTLLNVLGFCSVSQRYCNLN
HFNAQNIRGSNLEETLLLHEKSLKFYGSIQEFSSSIDLWETAL

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| ELHVEDTTFFLTLLPLFIFQLLYRMCIMQIPSGYYLQTMNSNLNLDGFLLPIAVMNAISSLPLLILAPFLEYFSTCLFPSKRVGSFLSTCIIAGNLFAALSVMIAGFFEIHRKHFPAVEQPLSGKVLTVSSMPCFYLILQYVLLGVAETLVNPALSVISYRFVPSNVRGTSMNFLTLFNGFGCFTGALLVKLVYLISDGNWFPNTLNKGNLESFFFFLASLTLLNVLGFCSVSQRYCNLNHFNAQNIRGSNLEETLLLHEKSLKFYGSIQEFSSSIDLWETAL
Prediction	CCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCSSCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHSSSSCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHCC
Confidence	9339999999999999999999999999630189999986257889842143577653799999999998630321568898999745899998999999999999999998741110255466888888710679999999999999999888999999988845567999999999999999888998765420443334333332037899999999999999999999987322541101110244302456765410233677665443310233059
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| ELHVEDTTFFLTLLPLFIFQLLYRMCIMQIPSGYYLQTMNSNLNLDGFLLPIAVMNAISSLPLLILAPFLEYFSTCLFPSKRVGSFLSTCIIAGNLFAALSVMIAGFFEIHRKHFPAVEQPLSGKVLTVSSMPCFYLILQYVLLGVAETLVNPALSVISYRFVPSNVRGTSMNFLTLFNGFGCFTGALLVKLVYLISDGNWFPNTLNKGNLESFFFFLASLTLLNVLGFCSVSQRYCNLNHFNAQNIRGSNLEETLLLHEKSLKFYGSIQEFSSSIDLWETAL
Prediction	8631430110020111321322000020031121120022023303333033000101311100000000121012224446331332223011100000010000000222230012222033434432300001003110000000001210111201430143030101011110203113000001220331234410353035221210000002302211220200011033355455564555546553445555263455346365315425447
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180                 200                 220                 240                 260                 280

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCSSCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHSSSSCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHCC
ELHVEDTTFFLTLLPLFIFQLLYRMCIMQIPSGYYLQTMNSNLNLDGFLLPIAVMNAISSLPLLILAPFLEYFSTCLFPSKRVGSFLSTCIIAGNLFAALSVMIAGFFEIHRKHFPAVEQPLSGKVLTVSSMPCFYLILQYVLLGVAETLVNPALSVISYRFVPSNVRGTSMNFLTLFNGFGCFTGALLVKLVYLISDGNWFPNTLNKGNLESFFFFLASLTLLNVLGFCSVSQRYCNLNHFNAQNIRGSNLEETLLLHEKSLKFYGSIQEFSSSIDLWETAL

4cl4A1

0.18

0.14

4.71

1.17

DEthreader

LTDVEEVKQIVRMLPIWATCILFWTVHAQLTTLSVAQSETLDRSIGSFEIPPASMAVFYVGGLLLTTAVYDRVAIRLCKNYPHGLRPLQRIGLGLFFGSMAMAVAALVELKRLRTAHAH-------------GFYLLIPQYLIVGIGEALIYTGQLDFFLRECPKGMKGMSTGLLLSTLALGFFFSSVLVTIVEKFTGH---ADD-L-NKGRLYNFYWLVAVLALNFLIFLVFSKWYVYKEKR--L-------------------------------------

4cl4A1

0.23

0.19

5.87

1.85

SPARKS-K

LTDVEEVKQIVRMLPIWATCILFWTVHAQLTTLSVAQSETLDRSIGSFEIPPASMAVFYVGGLLLTTAVYDRVAIRLCKKLPHGLRPLQRIGLGLFFGSMAMAVAALVELKRLRTAHAH-------------GFYLLIPQYLIVGIGEALIYTGQLDFFLRECPKGMKGMSTGLLLSTLALGFFFSSVLVTIVEKFTAHPWIADDLNKGRLYNFYWLVAVLVALNFLIFLVFSKWYVYKEKRL----------------------------------------

6ei3A

0.20

0.16

5.10

0.68

MapAlign

-AAVDGVRALLRVLVIFALVTPFFSLFDQKASTWVLQGREMRM---PAWFTASQMQALNPLLVMLLIPFNNLVLYPLLRRLGWEPTSLRRMTSGIAFSGVAWIAVGAIQVAMD--------------GGEPMHIAWQILPYALLTFGEVLVSATGIEFAYSQAPPSMKGVVMSFWYLTTTVGNLWVLLSNVAVRNAT-VTSHIADTGLSEAAFLMFFFAAFAFLAALAFGLYARRYRMVDNYRPANL------------------------------------

6ei3A

0.19

0.16

5.11

0.43

CEthreader

DAAVDGVRALLRVLVIFALVTPFFSLFDQKASTWVLQGREMRM---PAWFTASQMQALNPLLVMLLIPFNNLVLYPLLRRLGWEPTSLRRMTSGIAFSGVAWIAVGAIQVAMD--------------GGEPMHIAWQILPYALLTFGEVLVSATGIEFAYSQAPPSMKGVVMSFWYLTTTVGNLWVLLSNVAVRNATVTSH-IADTGLSEAAFLMFFFAAFAFLAALAFGLYARRYRMVDNYRPANLYFQ---------------------------------

4cl4A1

0.23

0.19

5.87

1.48

MUSTER

LTDVEEVKQIVRMLPIWATCILFWTVHAQLTTLSVAQSETLDRSIGSFEIPPASMAVFYVGGLLLTTAVYDRVAIRLCKKLPHGLRPLQRIGLGLFFGSMAMAVAALVELKRLRTAH-------------AHGFYLLIPQYLIVGIGEALIYTGQLDFFLRECPKGMKGMSTGLLLSTLALGFFFSSVLVTIVEKFTGHPWIADDLNKGRLYNFYWLVAVLVALNFLIFLVFSKWYVYKEKRL----------------------------------------

4cl4A1

0.23

0.19

5.87

2.22

HHsearch

LTDVEEVKQIVRMLPIWATCILFWTVHAQLTTLSVAQSETLDRSIGSFEIPPASMAVFYVGGLLLTTAVYDRVAIRLCKKLFNGLRPLQRIGLGLFFGSMAMAVAALVELKRLRTA-------------HAHGFYLLIPQYLIVGIGEALIYTGQLDFFLRECPKGMKGMSTGLLLSTLALGFFFSSVLVTIVEKFTGHPWIADDLNKGRLYNFYWLVAVLVALNFLIFLVFSKWYVYKEKRL----------------------------------------

4cl4A1

0.24

0.19

5.96

2.87

FFAS-3D

LTDVEEVKQIVRMLPIWATCILFWTVHAQLTTLSVAQSETLDRSIGSFEIPPASMAVFYVGGLLLTTAVYDRVAIRLCKKLPHGLRPLQRIGLGLFFGSMAMAVAALVELKR-------------LRTAHAHGFYLLIPQYLIVGIGEALIYTGQLDFFLRECPKGMKGMSTGLLLSTLALGFFFSSVLVTIVEKFTAHPWIADDLNKGRLYNFYWLVAVLVALNFLIFLVFSKWYVYKEKR-----------------------------------------

6ei3A

0.19

0.16

5.02

1.10

EigenThreader

DAAVDGVRALLRVLVIFALVTPFFSLFDQKASTWVLQGREMR---MPAWFTASQMQALNPLLVMLLIPFNNLVLYPLLRRLGWEPTSLRRMTSGIAFSGVAWIAVGAIQVAMDGG--------------EPMHIAWQILPYALLTFGEVLVSATGIEFAYSQAPPSMKGVVMSFWYLTTTVGNLWVLLSNVAVRN-ATVTSHIADTGLSEAAFLMFFFAAFAFLAALAFGLYARR--YRMVDNYRPANLYFQ-------------------------------

6ei3A

0.21

0.16

5.07

1.58

CNFpred

DAAVDGVRALLRVLVIFALVTPFFSLFDQKASTWVLQGREMRMPA---WFTASQMQALNPLLVMLLIPFNNLVLYPLLRRLGWEPTSLRRMTSGIAFSGVAWIAVGAIQVAMDGG--------------EPMHIAWQILPYALLTFGEVLVSATGIEFAYSQAPPSMKGVVMSFWYLTTTVGNLWVLLSNVAVRNATVTSHIADTG-LSEAAFLMFFFAAFAFLAALAFGLYARRYR----------------------------------------------

4cl4A

0.18

0.14

4.71

1.17

DEthreader

LTDVEEVKQIVRMLPIWATCILFWTVHAQLTTLSVAQSETLDRSIGSFEIPPASMAVFYVGGLLLTTAVYDRVAIRLCKNYPHGLRPLQRIGLGLFFGSMAMAVAALVELKRLRTAHAH-------------GFYLLIPQYLIVGIGEALIYTGQLDFFLRECPKGMKGMSTGLLLSTLALGFFFSSVLVTIVEKFTGH---ADD-L-NKGRLYNFYWLVAVLALNFLIFLVFSKWYVYKEKR--L-------------------------------------

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.7661

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	4cl4A	0.73	2.22	0.178	0.799	model1_4cl4A.pdb.gz
2	6ei3A	0.72	2.39	0.190	0.784	model1_6ei3A.pdb.gz
3	4ikvA2	0.68	2.03	0.186	0.742	model1_4ikvA2.pdb.gz
4	4w6vA	0.64	2.58	0.164	0.728	model1_4w6vA.pdb.gz
5	2xutA2	0.62	2.30	0.231	0.682	model1_2xutA2.pdb.gz
6	4q65A	0.61	2.67	0.124	0.682	model1_4q65A.pdb.gz
7	4apsA	0.59	2.72	0.160	0.664	model1_4apsA.pdb.gz
8	1wygA	0.36	5.98	0.028	0.587	model1_1wygA.pdb.gz
9	3crlB	0.29	5.84	0.017	0.470	model1_3crlB.pdb.gz
10	2gupA2	0.21	4.68	0.077	0.290	model1_2gupA2.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0022892	0.99	substrate-specific transporter activity
GO:0022891	0.89	substrate-specific transmembrane transporter activity
GO:0015075	0.78	ion transmembrane transporter activity
GO:0008509	0.73	anion transmembrane transporter activity
GO:0015103	0.67	inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activity
GO:0015112	0.63	nitrate transmembrane transporter activity
GO:0015291	0.59	secondary active transmembrane transporter activity
GO:0015293	0.53	symporter activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0006810	0.89	transport
GO:0044699	0.78	single-organism process
GO:0071705	0.74	nitrogen compound transport
GO:0009987	0.72	cellular process
GO:0006811	0.70	ion transport
GO:0050896	0.67	response to stimulus
GO:0044763	0.64	single-organism cellular process
GO:0006820	0.63	anion transport
GO:0071702	0.62	organic substance transport
GO:0008152	0.57	metabolic process
GO:0006857	0.57	oligopeptide transport
GO:0071704	0.55	organic substance metabolic process
GO:0015698	0.54	inorganic anion transport
GO:0065007	0.52	biological regulation
GO:0015706	0.52	nitrate transport
GO:0055085	0.51	transmembrane transport
GO:0044237	0.50	cellular metabolic process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	1.00	cell part
GO:0016020	1.00	membrane
GO:0044425	0.84	membrane part
GO:0005886	0.84	plasma membrane
GO:0016021	0.83	integral component of membrane
GO:0044424	0.66	intracellular part

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	2fpqA	0.383	5.89	0.049	0.622	3.4.24.69	NA
2	0.060	1ygeA	0.399	6.09	0.057	0.650	1.13.11.12	NA
3	0.060	1q8iA	0.355	6.32	0.061	0.590	2.7.7.7	143
4	0.060	2p0mA	0.412	5.96	0.062	0.668	1.13.11.33	NA
5	0.060	2z8yD	0.388	5.98	0.041	0.629	1.2.7.4 1.2.99.2	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.01	2a06P	0.401	5.68	0.065	0.622	0.68	CDL	complex1.pdb.gz	21,25,181,184
2	0.01	1ppjC	0.402	5.53	0.062	0.608	0.64	CDL	complex2.pdb.gz	92,93,94,97,142,146
3	0.01	3h1jP	0.401	5.72	0.051	0.622	0.64	CDL	complex3.pdb.gz	26,185,189
4	0.01	3zuyA	0.431	5.66	0.029	0.678	0.88	PTY	complex4.pdb.gz	29,184,185,187,188
5	0.01	3h1jC	0.400	5.71	0.051	0.622	0.93	CDL	complex5.pdb.gz	29,182,186,189,190
6	0.01	1sqpC	0.400	5.46	0.062	0.604	0.88	CDL	complex6.pdb.gz	18,19,178,181,182,185
7	0.01	3h1jC	0.400	5.71	0.051	0.622	0.62	HEM	complex7.pdb.gz	29,30,33,36,38,98,101,105,106,108,109,140,141,144,147

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.