D-I-TASSER A6NJG2-D2

D-I-TASSER results for A6NJG2-D2

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>A6NJG2 (87 residues)
RPDAPWRLRELSGAEEWEMESGSGCTNLNNNSSGTTAWRAASAVGATAVETSRRVAASRT
KAKDTAGSRVAQMHSLFRHLFPSFQDR

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 \| \| \| \| RPDAPWRLRELSGAEEWEMESGSGCTNLNNNSSGTTAWRAASAVGATAVETSRRVAASRTKAKDTAGSRVAQMHSLFRHLFPSFQDR
Prediction	CCCCCHHHHHHCCCCCCSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHCCCHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHHHHHHCHHCCCC
Confidence	999873167741752004416887778888874302240456444311232156540303554410332567889999971120479
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 \| \| \| \| RPDAPWRLRELSGAEEWEMESGSGCTNLNNNSSGTTAWRAASAVGATAVETSRRVAASRTKAKDTAGSRVAQMHSLFRHLFPSFQDR
Prediction	867445425625436525355567445454444333343334434353353535445544544543454344042114312422578
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80

                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCHHHHHHCCCCCCSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHCCCHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHHHHHHCHHCCCC
RPDAPWRLRELSGAEEWEMESGSGCTNLNNNSSGTTAWRAASAVGATAVETSRRVAASRTKAKDTAGSRVAQMHSLFRHLFPSFQDR

2dfsA

0.08

3.14

1.17

DEthreader

WPLRNPD-ILVALS-SRWTYQFGIFFRAGQAYLEKAKLRAA-CIRIQKTIRGWLMRKKYMRMRRAAITIQRYVRGHQARCYATFLRR

2g18G

0.07

2.86

0.54

CEthreader

YVEGRLEGEKLTIENRCYQTPQFRKMHLELAKVGNMLDILHCCDLVGGRGQISAAIADLSPVHLDRTLPESYNSALTSLNTLNFSQP

2xd8A

0.02

1.62

0.60

EigenThreader

NANQGRSNLSTGTGYGGATDKYALYLKLFSGEMFKGSSAFVYDLSKKIGYALAEKYDPGGNESDAFTASALVNAFYDAAAAMDEKGV

6ftg3

0.12

0.10

3.68

0.36

FFAS-3D

-------FLITGGIIYDVIVEPPGSMTDEHGHQRPVAFLAYRVNGQYIMEGLASSFRSNAPNIPKLNRFLLLFIGFVCVLLSFF---

5cwcA2

0.14

0.13

4.30

0.82

SPARKS-K

---TSSEVLELAICVENAQREGYDISEACRAAAEAFAGITSSETLKRAIEEIRKRVEEAQREGND-------ISEACRQAAEEFRKK

1fgxA

0.21

0.05

1.46

0.36

CNFpred

--------------------------------------------------------------------RQEHLKYWLYYLHPILQRQ

4dvyP

0.10

0.09

3.39

1.00

DEthreader

--REH-LEKEVEKKLESKSNKM---EAKAANSQKDIFLINKEANRDARAIAYTQNLKGIKRELSDKLEKISKDLKDFSKSFDEFK--

2vf8B1

0.03

1.93

0.74

MapAlign

GFSPNTPEGACPECHGLGRVYTISEECPLCHGKRLGLDITELSRLPLARVSELLRPYAEEREPGHAERQRMAADLVKRLDVLLHLGL

4qn8A2

0.18

0.16

5.23

0.56

MUSTER

---DSEILHQLT---SRIELSPPGDRNTFRGSSLEKAFLAFE---AHYPTKAEEHFNSTRVRTEFPGNDIDNLKAVLNPIIAFFQS-

5kkpA1

0.19

0.10

3.34

0.49

HHsearch

---PSEDIFTVLTAEEKQR--------------T----S---------VAI-----EVIEDTK----EKRTIIHQAIKSLFPGLETK

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.578

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	6bfiA	0.51	4.02	0.095	0.919	model1_6bfiA.pdb.gz
2	5tsiA	0.50	3.70	0.071	0.862	model1_5tsiA.pdb.gz
3	3f6kA	0.49	3.61	0.037	0.862	model1_3f6kA.pdb.gz
4	6tgbA	0.48	4.14	0.059	0.931	model1_6tgbA.pdb.gz
5	8gh6A	0.48	4.20	0.035	0.885	model1_8gh6A.pdb.gz
6	7px0A	0.46	4.62	0.071	0.943	model1_7px0A.pdb.gz
7	7syfA1	0.46	4.21	0.057	0.862	model1_7syfA1.pdb.gz
8	7cpxA	0.46	3.84	0.036	0.782	model1_7cpxA.pdb.gz
9	6mf0A	0.46	4.42	0.057	0.966	model1_6mf0A.pdb.gz
10	7vppA	0.45	4.48	0.036	0.862	model1_7vppA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0043169	0.36	cation binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0071548	0.12	response to dexamethasone
GO:0071400	0.12	cellular response to oleic acid
GO:0071377	0.12	cellular response to glucagon stimulus
GO:0071320	0.12	cellular response to cAMP
GO:0070409	0.12	carbamoyl phosphate biosynthetic process
GO:0070365	0.12	hepatocyte differentiation
GO:0060416	0.12	response to growth hormone
GO:0055081	0.12	anion homeostasis
GO:0050667	0.12	homocysteine metabolic process
GO:0046209	0.12	nitric oxide metabolic process
GO:0045909	0.12	positive regulation of vasodilation
GO:0044344	0.12	cellular response to fibroblast growth factor stimulus
GO:0043200	0.12	response to amino acid
GO:0042594	0.12	response to starvation
GO:0042493	0.12	response to drug
GO:0032496	0.12	response to lipopolysaccharide
GO:0032094	0.12	response to food
GO:0019433	0.12	triglyceride catabolic process
GO:0019240	0.12	citrulline biosynthetic process
GO:0014075	0.12	response to amine
GO:0010043	0.12	response to zinc ion
GO:0009636	0.12	response to toxic substance
GO:0007494	0.12	midgut development
GO:0006541	0.12	glutamine metabolic process
GO:0006526	0.12	arginine biosynthetic process
GO:0006207	0.12	'de novo' pyrimidine nucleobase biosynthetic process
GO:0005980	0.12	glycogen catabolic process
GO:0000050	0.12	urea cycle

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	1.00	intracellular part
GO:0044444	0.90	cytoplasmic part
GO:0044446	0.70	intracellular organelle part
GO:0043231	0.70	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0016020	0.60	membrane
GO:0044428	0.50	nuclear part
GO:0032991	0.50	macromolecular complex
GO:0031974	0.50	membrane-enclosed lumen
GO:0005737	0.50	cytoplasm

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	2ajqA	0.386	4.59	0.047	0.736	2.7.7.7	NA
2	0.060	1zumI	0.393	3.75	0.035	0.644	1.2.1.3	NA
3	0.060	1bi9D	0.382	3.80	0.024	0.644	1.2.1.36 1.2.1.-	NA
4	0.060	2o36A	0.393	3.39	0.061	0.655	3.4.24.15	NA
5	0.060	2z1qB	0.385	3.85	0.048	0.655	1.3.99.3	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.01	2fmm9	0.213	3.15	0.014	0.310	0.76	III	complex1.pdb.gz	34,35,36,37,39,40,41,42,43,44
2	0.01	1r9tA	0.375	4.31	0.035	0.678	0.41	ZN	complex2.pdb.gz	19,21,25
3	0.01	2j7uA	0.414	4.26	0.057	0.770	0.43	ZN	complex3.pdb.gz	18,22,25
4	0.01	1vs82	0.230	3.56	0.000	0.368	0.52	III	complex4.pdb.gz	5,9,12,13,19,20
5	0.01	2hgu3	0.241	4.48	0.068	0.460	0.75	III	complex5.pdb.gz	1,2,22,25

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.