D-I-TASSER O00255

D-I-TASSER results for O00255

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: O00255
Protein Name: Menin
Gene Name: MEN1

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>O00255 (615 residues)
MGLKAAQKTLFPLRSIDDVVRLFAAELGREEPDLVLLSLVLGFVEHFLAVNRVIPTNVPE
LTFQPSPAPDPPGGLTYFPVADLSIIAALYARFTAQIRGAVDLSLYPREGGVSSRELVKK
VSDVIWNSLSRSYFKDRAHIQSLFSFITGWSPVGTKLDSSGVAFAVVGACQALGLRDVHL
ALSEDHAWVVFGPNGEQTAEVTWHGKGNEDRRGQTVNAGVAERSWLYLKGSYMRCDRKME
VAFMVCAINPSIDLHTDSLELLQLQQKLLWLLYDLGHLERYPMALGNLADLEELEPTPGR
PDPLTLYHKGIASAKTYYRDEHIYPYMYLAGYHCRNRNVREALQAWADTATVIQDYNYCR
EDEEIYKEFFEVANDVIPNLLKEAASLLEAGEERPGEQSQGTQSQGSALQDPECFAHLLR
FYDGICKWEEGSPTPVLHVGWATFLVQSLGRFEGQVRQKVRIVSREAEAAEAEEPWGEEA
REGRRRGPRRESKPEEPPPPKKPALDKGLGTGQGAVSGPPRKPPGTVAGTARGPEGGSTA
QVPAPTASPPPEGPVLTFQSEKMKGMKELLVATKINSSAIKLQLTAQSQVQMKKQKVSTP
SDYTLSFLKRQRKGL

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	O00255-D1	1-615	615		MGLKAAQKTLFPLRSIDDVVRLFAAELGREEPDLVLLSLVLGFVEHFLAVNRVIPTNVPELTFQPSPAPDPPGGLTYFPVADLSIIAALYARFTAQIRGAVDLSLYPREGGVSSRELVKKVSDVIWNSLSRSYFKDRAHIQSLFSFITGWSPVGTKLDSSGVAFAVVGACQALGLRDVHLALSEDHAWVVFGPNGEQTAEVTWHGKGNEDRRGQTVNAGVAERSWLYLKGSYMRCDRKMEVAFMVCAINPSIDLHTDSLELLQLQQKLLWLLYDLGHLERYPMALGNLADLEELEPTPGRPDPLTLYHKGIASAKTYYRDEHIYPYMYLAGYHCRNRNVREALQAWADTATVIQDYNYCREDEEIYKEFFEVANDVIPNLLKEAASLLEAGEERPGEQSQGTQSQGSALQDPECFAHLLRFYDGICKWEEGSPTPVLHVGWATFLVQSLGRFEGQVRQKVRIVSREAEAAEAEEPWGEEAREGRRRGPRRESKPEEPPPPKKPALDKGLGTGQGAVSGPPRKPPGTVAGTARGPEGGSTAQVPAPTASPPPEGPVLTFQSEKMKGMKELLVATKINSSAIKLQLTAQSQVQMKKQKVSTPSDYTLSFLKRQRKGL

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.836

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	3u84A	0.78	1.86	0.947	0.795	model1_3u84A.pdb.gz
2	7o9tA	0.73	0.99	0.991	0.742	model1_7o9tA.pdb.gz
3	3re2A	0.68	1.81	0.530	0.706	model1_3re2A.pdb.gz
4	6bq1A2	0.40	6.50	0.040	0.564	model1_6bq1A2.pdb.gz
5	4kf7A	0.40	6.38	0.053	0.561	model1_4kf7A.pdb.gz
6	6g7eB	0.38	6.66	0.047	0.550	model1_6g7eB.pdb.gz
7	7pw4A	0.38	7.16	0.075	0.579	model1_7pw4A.pdb.gz
8	7kiyA	0.38	7.60	0.046	0.605	model1_7kiyA.pdb.gz
9	4xriA	0.38	6.81	0.064	0.546	model1_4xriA.pdb.gz
10	4fgvA	0.38	7.25	0.043	0.566	model1_4fgvA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0097159	0.86	organic cyclic compound binding
GO:1901363	0.85	heterocyclic compound binding
GO:0003824	0.84	catalytic activity
GO:0003676	0.84	nucleic acid binding
GO:0044877	0.83	macromolecular complex binding
GO:0003677	0.83	DNA binding
GO:0044212	0.82	transcription regulatory region DNA binding
GO:0018024	0.82	histone-lysine N-methyltransferase activity
GO:0003690	0.82	double-stranded DNA binding
GO:0003682	0.82	chromatin binding
GO:0000403	0.81	Y-form DNA binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0080090	1.00	regulation of primary metabolic process
GO:0060255	1.00	regulation of macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0048523	1.00	negative regulation of cellular process
GO:0031323	1.00	regulation of cellular metabolic process
GO:0006355	0.97	regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
GO:0009987	0.89	cellular process
GO:0008152	0.86	metabolic process
GO:0044260	0.85	cellular macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0044238	0.85	primary metabolic process
GO:0016043	0.84	cellular component organization
GO:0051726	0.83	regulation of cell cycle
GO:0043933	0.83	macromolecular complex subunit organization
GO:0006464	0.83	cellular protein modification process
GO:0045786	0.82	negative regulation of cell cycle
GO:0006357	0.79	regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter
GO:0018193	0.78	peptidyl-amino acid modification
GO:0008285	0.78	negative regulation of cell proliferation
GO:0006325	0.78	chromatin organization
GO:0034968	0.77	histone lysine methylation

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044428	1.00	nuclear part
GO:0043234	0.96	protein complex
GO:0035097	0.95	histone methyltransferase complex
GO:0000785	0.91	chromatin

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1b0pA	0.334	7.80	0.037	0.538	1.2.7.1	NA
2	0.060	1s5jA	0.322	8.06	0.069	0.530	2.7.7.7	NA
3	0.060	3ff6A	0.321	7.81	0.048	0.519	6.4.1.2 6.3.4.14	286
4	0.060	2z8gB	0.313	7.97	0.059	0.519	3.2.1.57	NA
5	0.060	1pg3B	0.333	7.47	0.059	0.514	6.2.1.1	43,188

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Click to view	Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
	1	0.01	1o6oA	0.354	6.58	0.058	0.507	0.41	III	complex1.pdb.gz	90,162,165,168,169

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.