D-I-TASSER O00305-D1

D-I-TASSER results for O00305-D1

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>O00305 (74 residues)
MSSSSYAKNGTADGPHSPTSQVARGTTTRRSRLKRSDGSTTSTSFILRQGSADSYTSRPS
DSDVSLEEDREAIR

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 \| \| \| MSSSSYAKNGTADGPHSPTSQVARGTTTRRSRLKRSDGSTTSTSFILRQGSADSYTSRPSDSDVSLEEDREAIR
Prediction	CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHCCCCCHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHCC
Confidence	98776544554557777422213653100022124688855663000135554456788877764244366519
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 \| \| \| MSSSSYAKNGTADGPHSPTSQVARGTTTRRSRLKRSDGSTTSTSFILRQGSADSYTSRPSDSDVSLEEDREAIR
Prediction	86644444543473345425535554454444145564544544432443445544544565525166456438
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60

                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHCCCCCHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHCC
MSSSSYAKNGTADGPHSPTSQVARGTTTRRSRLKRSDGSTTSTSFILRQGSADSYTSRPSDSDVSLEEDREAIR

2d46A

0.60

0.35

10.07

1.14

SPARKS-K

-------------------------------GSHMYDNLYLHGIEDSEAGSADSYTSRPSDSDVSLEEDREAIR

2d46A

0.96

0.34

9.47

1.24

CNFpred

------------------------------------------------AGSADSYTSRPSDSDVSLEEDREAIR

2d46A

0.60

0.35

10.07

2.42

HHsearch

-------------------------------GSHMYDNLYLHGIEDSEAGSADSYTSRPSDSDVSLEEDREAIR

4firA

0.08

3.19

0.51

CEthreader

QARIAEEAGAVAVMALAPVEKIQEIMDAVTIPVMAKCRMIDESEAPFVCGAAAMIRTKGEAGTGNIIEAVRHVR

4hpqC

0.04

2.09

0.48

EigenThreader

TTKLRIREWQKFQSKLHFVLDCIQQQTKFLSEILLREGIGRNLIEEEWSQTVLVRLVNDMKFWQNEITKMMNKL

2d46A

0.93

0.34

9.49

0.56

FFAS-3D

-----------------------------------------------EAGSADSYTSRPSDSDVSLEEDREAIR

5yfpE6

0.12

0.11

3.84

0.87

SPARKS-K

--TVNYDKEINKRVLLDKYKEKLSTNTASDIDNSPNSPYILEILKIMFLGIVDSYM----EIALEVAYWKICKV

2huoA

0.29

0.07

2.05

0.32

CNFpred

---------------------------------------------------------DESDPDVDFPNSFHAFQ

2pfmA

0.03

1.68

0.83

DEthreader

YTRMGIW-LYILQA-EIIKDNF-VS-LANAKHTFPMKRNMTRGIYSQRVMLTLIDKGMVRAYIQPKAMEAWETQ

2ww5A

0.04

2.05

0.92

MapAlign

---MAQNEWIYDSNYKSWFYLKSDGAYAHQEWQLIGNKWYYFKKWGYMAKSQWQGSYFLNGQGAMIQNYLKSDG

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.474

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	1n63B3	0.46	4.19	0.027	0.919	model1_1n63B3.pdb.gz
2	5y6qC	0.46	4.34	0.054	0.919	model1_5y6qC.pdb.gz
3	3vstA1	0.46	3.97	0.068	0.865	model1_3vstA1.pdb.gz
4	3hx4A	0.45	3.55	0.044	0.797	model1_3hx4A.pdb.gz
5	1sb3D	0.45	4.24	0.000	0.905	model1_1sb3D.pdb.gz
6	6wjvA	0.45	3.45	0.086	0.784	model1_6wjvA.pdb.gz
7	1qhtA3	0.45	3.15	0.054	0.757	model1_1qhtA3.pdb.gz
8	3gniA	0.45	4.10	0.066	0.797	model1_3gniA.pdb.gz
9	1t3qB	0.44	4.42	0.014	0.919	model1_1t3qB.pdb.gz
10	3bg9A	0.44	3.79	0.041	0.811	model1_3bg9A.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0005245	0.99	voltage-gated calcium channel activity
GO:0008331	0.85	high voltage-gated calcium channel activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044699	0.96	single-organism process
GO:0009987	0.85	cellular process
GO:0065007	0.84	biological regulation
GO:0050789	0.83	regulation of biological process
GO:0016043	0.80	cellular component organization
GO:0044763	0.79	single-organism cellular process
GO:0034765	0.75	regulation of ion transmembrane transport
GO:0007268	0.75	chemical synaptic transmission
GO:0051924	0.74	regulation of calcium ion transport
GO:0032412	0.74	regulation of ion transmembrane transporter activity
GO:1901385	0.73	regulation of voltage-gated calcium channel activity
GO:0007528	0.73	neuromuscular junction development

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0005891	1.00	voltage-gated calcium channel complex

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	3g0eA	0.430	4.11	0.068	0.851	2.7.10.1	37
2	0.060	1rm6A	0.457	4.25	0.000	0.905	1.3.99.20	NA
3	0.060	3hx4A	0.454	3.55	0.044	0.797	2.7.11.17	43
4	0.060	3a3jA	0.426	3.98	0.072	0.838	3.4.16.4	NA
5	0.060	2qf7B	0.439	3.49	0.041	0.784	6.4.1.1	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.08	1aq1A	0.438	4.06	0.100	0.838	0.30	STU	complex1.pdb.gz	8,9,10,38,48,49,50,54
2	0.01	3qyzA	0.388	4.65	0.068	0.878	0.15	Z8B	complex2.pdb.gz	61,62,69,72
3	0.01	2ojjA	0.412	4.41	0.069	0.865	0.20	82A	complex3.pdb.gz	13,39,46,47,50,52,54
4	0.01	2vtnA	0.349	4.04	0.052	0.662	0.24	LZ7	complex4.pdb.gz	47,48,49,50,51
5	0.01	1oiqA	0.435	3.56	0.088	0.770	0.30	HDU	complex5.pdb.gz	55,64,65,66
6	0.01	2r3jA	0.321	4.83	0.031	0.743	0.23	SCJ	complex6.pdb.gz	47,48,49,50,51,58
7	0.01	2b55A	0.398	4.60	0.056	0.851	0.28	D31	complex7.pdb.gz	33,39,56,66
8	0.01	2bhhA	0.443	3.97	0.100	0.838	0.31	RYU	complex8.pdb.gz	31,46,47,48,50,53,55
9	0.01	3is5E	0.342	4.16	0.000	0.662	0.23	ANP	complex9.pdb.gz	38,51,54
10	0.01	2vtqA	0.406	4.41	0.042	0.851	0.24	LZA	complex10.pdb.gz	13,39,49,50,51,52

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.