D-I-TASSER O00519-D2

D-I-TASSER results for O00519-D2

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>O00519 (272 residues)
GTDIGGSIRFPSSFCGICGLKPTGNRLSKSGLKGCVYGQEAVRLSVGPMARDVESLALCL
RALLCEDMFRLDPTVPPLPFREEVYTSSQPLRVGYYETDNYTMPSPAMRRAVLETKQSLE
AAGHTLVPFLPSSAGKLWELQHEIEVYRKTVIAQWRALDLDVVLTPMLAPALDLNAPGRA
TGAVSYTMLYNCLDFPAGVVPVTTVTAEDEAQMEHYRGYFGDIWDKMLQKGMKKSVGLPV
AVQCVALPWQEELCLRFMREVERLMTPEKQSS

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| GTDIGGSIRFPSSFCGICGLKPTGNRLSKSGLKGCVYGQEAVRLSVGPMARDVESLALCLRALLCEDMFRLDPTVPPLPFREEVYTSSQPLRVGYYETDNYTMPSPAMRRAVLETKQSLEAAGHTLVPFLPSSAGKLWELQHEIEVYRKTVIAQWRALDLDVVLTPMLAPALDLNAPGRATGAVSYTMLYNCLDFPAGVVPVTTVTAEDEAQMEHYRGYFGDIWDKMLQKGMKKSVGLPVAVQCVALPWQEELCLRFMREVERLMTPEKQSS
Prediction	CCCCCCHHHHHHHHCCCSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHCCCCCCCCSSSSSCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCSSSSSCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCHCCCCC
Confidence	98555124431332697154199997589998776643245656147644989999999999818898667987789884111136889808999586478899999999999999999861998999348326899999999999999999974134643112455411555415899999999999999858998974898989764567765444212335620046998889984465665698748999999999999973311689
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| GTDIGGSIRFPSSFCGICGLKPTGNRLSKSGLKGCVYGQEAVRLSVGPMARDVESLALCLRALLCEDMFRLDPTVPPLPFREEVYTSSQPLRVGYYETDNYTMPSPAMRRAVLETKQSLEAAGHTLVPFLPSSAGKLWELQHEIEVYRKTVIAQWRALDLDVVLTPMLAPALDLNAPGRATGAVSYTMLYNCLDFPAGVVPVTTVTAEDEAQMEHYRGYFGDIWDKMLQKGMKKSVGLPVAVQCVALPWQEELCLRFMREVERLMTPEKQSS
Prediction	83340000000001000000200310002331302032242231100100210400200240013440353112213130354257434412101044242230242024004301732562403001212212320200221222112211331454524210011002012222222001001100011013020000001303346364264143103202201120104324334423424031342242430240025015555668
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180                 200                 220                 240                 260

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCCHHHHHHHHCCCSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHCCCCCCCCSSSSSCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCSSSSSCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCHCCCCC
GTDIGGSIRFPSSFCGICGLKPTGNRLSKSGLKGCVYGQEAVRLSVGPMARDVESLALCLRALLCEDMFRLDPTVPPLPFREEVYTSSQPLRVGYYETDNYTMPSPAMRRAVLETKQSLEAAGHTLVPFLPSSAGKLWELQHEIEVYRKTVIAQWRALDLDVVLTPMLAPALDLNAPGRATGAVSYTMLYNCLDFPAGVVPVTTVTAEDEAQMEHYRGYFGDIWDKMLQKGMKKSVGLPVAVQCVALPWQEELCLRFMREVERLMTPEKQSS

2wj2A

0.83

0.82

23.13

1.50

DEthreader

GTDIGGSIRFPSAFCGICGLKPTGNRLSKSGLKGCVYGQTAVQLSLGPMARDVESLALCLKALLCEHLFTLDPTVPPLPFREEVYRSSRPLRVGYYETDNYTMPSPAMRRALIETKQRLEAAGHTLIPFLNNPYEVTGGNLLEIEMYRQSVIAQWKAMNLDVLLTPMLGPALDLNTPGRATGAVSYTMLYNCLDFPAGVVPVTTVTAEDDAQMELYKGYFGDIWDIILKKAMKNSVGLPVAVQCVALPWQEELCLRFMREVEQLMTPQ-KQ-

2wj2A

0.85

23.83

1.86

SPARKS-K

GTDIGGSIRFPSAFCGICGLKPTGNRLSKSGLKGCVYGQTAVQLSLGPMARDVESLALCLKALLCEHLFTLDPTVPPLPFREEVYRSSRPLRVGYYETDNYTMPSPAMRRALIETKQRLEAAGHTLIPFLPNNIPYALELQHEIEMYRQSVIAQWKAMNLDVLLTPMLGPALDLNTPGRATGAVSYTMLYNCLDFPAGVVPVTTVTAEDDAQMELYKGYFGDIWDIILKKAMKNSVGLPVAVQCVALPWQEELCLRFMREVEQLMTPQKQP-

2wj2A

0.87

0.85

23.81

1.53

MapAlign

GTDIGGSIRFPSAFCGICGLKPTGNRLSKSGLKGCVYGQTAVQLSLGPMARDVESLALCLKALLCEHLFTLDPTVPPLPFREEVYRSSRPLRVGYYETDNYTMPSPAMRRALIETKQRLEAAGHTLIPFLPNSAEKLWKLQHEIEMYRQSVIAQWKAMNLDVLLTPMLGPALDLNTPGRATGAVSYTMLYNCLDFPAGVVPVTTVTAEDDAQMELYKGYFGDIWDIILKKAMKNSVGLPVAVQCVALPWQEELCLRFMREVEQLM-------

2wj2A

0.86

24.12

1.31

CEthreader

GTDIGGSIRFPSAFCGICGLKPTGNRLSKSGLKGCVYGQTAVQLSLGPMARDVESLALCLKALLCEHLFTLDPTVPPLPFREEVYRSSRPLRVGYYETDNYTMPSPAMRRALIETKQRLEAAGHTLIPFLPNNAEKLWKLQHEIEMYRQSVIAQWKAMNLDVLLTPMLGPALDLNTPGRATGAVSYTMLYNCLDFPAGVVPVTTVTAEDDAQMELYKGYFGDIWDIILKKAMKNSVGLPVAVQCVALPWQEELCLRFMREVEQLMTPQKQP-

2wj2A

0.86

24.22

1.40

MUSTER

GTDIGGSIRFPSAFCGICGLKPTGNRLSKSGLKGCVYGQTAVQLSLGPMARDVESLALCLKALLCEHLFTLDPTVPPLPFREEVYRSSRPLRVGYYETDNYTMPSPAMRRALIETKQRLEAAGHTLIPFLPNSAEKLWKLQHEIEMYRQSVIAQWKAMNLDVLLTPMLGPALDLNTPGRATGAVSYTMLYNCLDFPAGVVPVTTVTAEDDAQMELYKGYFGDIWDIILKKAMKNSVGLPVAVQCVALPWQEELCLRFMREVEQLMTPQKQP-

2wj2A

0.86

0.85

24.03

2.70

HHsearch

GTDIGGSIRFPSAFCGICGLKPTGNRLSKSGLKGCVYGQTAVQLSLGPMARDVESLALCLKALLCEHLFTLDPTVPPLPFREEVYRSSRPLRVGYYETDNYTMPSPAMRRALIETKQRLEAAGHTLIPFLPNNIPKLWKLQHEIEMYRQSVIAQWKAMNLDVLLTPMLGPALDLNTPGRATGAVSYTMLYNCLDFPAGVVPVTTVTAEDDAQMELYKGYFGDIWDIILKKAMKNSVGLPVAVQCVALPWQEELCLRFMREVEQLMTPQKQP-

2gi3A1

0.19

0.18

5.71

1.93

FFAS-3D

GSDTGGSVRQPASLCGVVGYKPTYGLVSRYGLVA----FASSLDQIGPITKTVRDAAI-LEIISGRDENDATTVNRKVDFLSEIEEGVSG-KFAVPEEIYEHDIEEGVSERFEEALKLLERLGAKVERVKIPHIKYSVATYYVIAPAEASGEEVRRRII--GTFTLSAAYYEAYFNKAKVRRKISDELNEVLSQYDAILTPTSPVTDIFTIPAN-------LAGLPAISVPFGFSNNLPVGVQVIGRRFADGKVFRIARAIEKNSPYNENG-

2wj2A

0.81

22.83

1.90

EigenThreader

PQSMFSYDCFPSAFCGICGLKPTGNRLSKSGLKGCVYGQTAVQLSLGPMARDVESLALCLKALLCEHLFTLDPTVPPLPFREEVYRSSRPLRVGYYETDNYTMPSPAMRRALIETKQRLEAAGHTLIPFLPNNIPYALEVQHEIEMYRQSVIAQWKAMNLDVLLTPMLGPALDLNTPGRATGAVSYTMLYNCLDFPAGVVPVTTVTAEDDAQMELYKGYFGDIWDIILKKAMKNSVGLPVAVQCVALPWQEELCLRFMREVEQLMTPQKQP-

3qj8A

0.86

0.85

24.02

2.32

CNFpred

GTDIGGSIRFPSAFCGICGLKPTGNRLSKSGLKGCVYGQTAVQLSLGPMARDVESLALCLKALLCEHLFTLDPTVPPLPFREEVYRSSRPLRVGYYETDNYTMPSPAMRRALIETKQRLEAAGHTLIPFLP-SAEKLWKLQHEIEMYRQSVIAQWKAMNLDVLLTPMLGPALDLNTPGRATGAISYTVLYNCLDFPAGVVPVTTVTAEDDAQMELYKGYFGDIWDIILKKAMKNSVGLPVAVQCVALPWQEELCLRFMREVEQLMTPQKQ--

4wj3A

0.25

0.21

6.62

1.33

DEthreader

GTDTGGSIRQPAALTNLTGIKPTYGRVSRWGMIAYA--SS--LDQGGPLARTAEDCALMLGVMAG--FDPKDSSVEQPVDDLAALQKPSGLRIGLPREYFGAGLDSRIADAVLAVVEELKTLGATVKDISLPQHPAVYQAQKIRRLIKNDFVSAFA-E-VDVILGPTTNPAWKIEKDPSQYLEDIYTITANLAGLPGLSMPAGFVD------------------------------GLPVGVQLLAPYFQEGRLLNVAHQYQQVSDWHTRTA

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.8947

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	2wj2A	0.99	0.61	0.845	0.996	model1_2wj2A.pdb.gz
2	3a2pA	0.78	2.48	0.252	0.868	model1_3a2pA.pdb.gz
3	3kfuE	0.77	2.30	0.305	0.849	model1_3kfuE.pdb.gz
4	3h0lA	0.77	2.40	0.231	0.853	model1_3h0lA.pdb.gz
5	2gi3A	0.77	2.36	0.206	0.853	model1_2gi3A.pdb.gz
6	3ip4A	0.77	2.53	0.226	0.857	model1_3ip4A.pdb.gz
7	4wj3A	0.77	2.42	0.248	0.853	model1_4wj3A.pdb.gz
8	3a1iA2	0.77	2.42	0.248	0.853	model1_3a1iA2.pdb.gz
9	5i8iA1	0.76	2.53	0.171	0.860	model1_5i8iA1.pdb.gz
10	6dhvA	0.76	2.51	0.289	0.842	model1_6dhvA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0003824	1.00	catalytic activity
GO:0016810	0.95	hydrolase activity, acting on carbon-nitrogen (but not peptide) bonds
GO:0016811	0.94	hydrolase activity, acting on carbon-nitrogen (but not peptide) bonds, in linear amides
GO:0004040	0.62	amidase activity
GO:0017064	0.57	fatty acid amide hydrolase activity
GO:0016879	0.55	ligase activity, forming carbon-nitrogen bonds
GO:0016884	0.54	carbon-nitrogen ligase activity, with glutamine as amido-N-donor

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0009987	0.97	cellular process
GO:0044237	0.95	cellular metabolic process
GO:0071704	0.92	organic substance metabolic process
GO:0044763	0.89	single-organism cellular process
GO:0044281	0.87	small molecule metabolic process
GO:0006082	0.79	organic acid metabolic process
GO:0044238	0.76	primary metabolic process
GO:0019752	0.76	carboxylic acid metabolic process
GO:0044248	0.72	cellular catabolic process
GO:1901575	0.67	organic substance catabolic process
GO:0032787	0.64	monocarboxylic acid metabolic process
GO:0006807	0.63	nitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:0044282	0.62	small molecule catabolic process
GO:0006631	0.62	fatty acid metabolic process
GO:1901564	0.61	organonitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:0009062	0.60	fatty acid catabolic process
GO:0034641	0.56	cellular nitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:0044249	0.52	cellular biosynthetic process
GO:1901576	0.50	organic substance biosynthetic process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	1.00	intracellular part
GO:0044444	0.76	cytoplasmic part
GO:0044422	0.73	organelle part
GO:0043229	0.71	intracellular organelle
GO:0043231	0.64	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0044425	0.58	membrane part
GO:0016020	0.58	membrane
GO:0044446	0.57	intracellular organelle part
GO:0031090	0.57	organelle membrane

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.067	2gi3A	0.777	2.33	0.205	0.860	6.3.5.-	5,6,7
2	0.060	3cuzA	0.413	6.75	0.043	0.765	2.3.3.9	NA
3	0.060	1mc1B	0.374	5.98	0.051	0.607	6.3.3.4	4,31
4	0.060	3a1kA	0.766	2.42	0.252	0.853	3.5.1.4	5,6,7
5	0.060	4kbpA	0.375	5.85	0.041	0.603	3.1.3.2	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.88	3k84B	0.973	0.63	0.850	0.982	0.99	K84	complex1.pdb.gz	2,3,4,5,6,7,44,101,181,188,224
2	0.80	3qkvA	0.977	0.74	0.840	0.989	0.83	QKV	complex2.pdb.gz	4,5,6,7,181,184
3	0.74	3ppmA	0.987	0.65	0.845	0.996	0.83	JG1	complex3.pdb.gz	2,4,7,33,34,44,181,188
4	0.14	1mt50	0.968	0.66	0.846	0.978	1.03	III	complex4.pdb.gz	30,36,37,38,39,40,70,72,73,74,77,78,141,142,148,149,152,156,247,248,249

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.