D-I-TASSER O15528-D2

D-I-TASSER results for O15528-D2

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>O15528 (213 residues)
ERCSFSPWTEHRRCRQRACGLLTAEGEEWQRLRSLLAPLLLRPQAAARYAGTLNNVVCDL
VRRLRRQRGRGTGPPALVRDVAGEFYKFGLEGIAAVLLGSRLGCLEAQVPPDTETFIRAV
GSVFVSTLLTMAMPHWLRHLVPGPWGRLCRDWDQMFAFAQRHVERREAEAAMRNGGQPEK
DLESGAHLTHFLFREELPAQSILGNVTELLLAG

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| ERCSFSPWTEHRRCRQRACGLLTAEGEEWQRLRSLLAPLLLRPQAAARYAGTLNNVVCDLVRRLRRQRGRGTGPPALVRDVAGEFYKFGLEGIAAVLLGSRLGCLEAQVPPDTETFIRAVGSVFVSTLLTMAMPHWLRHLVPGPWGRLCRDWDQMFAFAQRHVERREAEAAMRNGGQPEKDLESGAHLTHFLFREELPAQSILGNVTELLLAG
Prediction	CCCCCHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCSSCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHCC
Confidence	999874899999983889763218964899999982087569799999999999999999999999983235789852048999999999999999828984645677866899999999999999999975337887607867999999999999999999999999999850345433310256999999819989999999999999729
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| ERCSFSPWTEHRRCRQRACGLLTAEGEEWQRLRSLLAPLLLRPQAAARYAGTLNNVVCDLVRRLRRQRGRGTGPPALVRDVAGEFYKFGLEGIAAVLLGSRLGCLEAQVPPDTETFIRAVGSVFVSTLLTMAMPHWLRHLVPGPWGRLCRDWDQMFAFAQRHVERREAEAAMRNGGQPEKDLESGAHLTHFLFREELPAQSILGNVTELLLAG
Prediction	835716204301633746200000416403410430244034353044015204410440052036115665654421220242033001210020012330312456346404300400330041013133333323313264034024004302510241044115414565565565555321103401667703362021003204348
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180                 200

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCSSCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHCC
ERCSFSPWTEHRRCRQRACGLLTAEGEEWQRLRSLLAPLLLRPQAAARYAGTLNNVVCDLVRRLRRQRGRGTGPPALVRDVAGEFYKFGLEGIAAVLLGSRLGCLEAQVPPDTETFIRAVGSVFVSTLLTMAMPHWLRHLVPGPWGRLCRDWDQMFAFAQRHVERREAEAAMRNGGQPEKDLESGAHLTHFLFREELPAQSILGNVTELLLAG

3na0A

0.24

0.23

7.31

1.33

DEthreader

PERFLIPWVAYHQYYQRPIGVLLKKSAAWKKDRVALNQEVMAPEATKNFLPLLDAVSRDFVSVLHRRIKKAGSGN-YSGDISDDLFRFAFESITNVIFGERQGMLEEVVNPEAQRFIDAIYQMFHTSVPML-NLPPLFLFRTKTWKDHVAAWDVIFSKADIYTQNFYWELRQKG--SVHHD--YRGILYRLLGDSKMSFEDIKANVTEMLAGG

3k9vA2

0.26

0.24

7.39

1.33

SPARKS-K

--LEIKPWKAYRDHRNEAYGLMILEGQEWQRVRSAFQKKLMKPVEIMKLDKKINEVLADFLERMDELCDERGR----IPDLYSELNKWSFESICLVLYEKRFGLLQKETEEEALTFITAIKTMMSTFGKMMTPVELHKRLNTKVWQAHTLAWDTIFKSVKPCIDNRLQRYSQQPGA---------DFLCDIYQQDHLSKKELYAAVTELQLAA

4dvqA

0.25

0.24

7.43

0.87

MapAlign

-RMILEPWVAYRQHRGHKCGVFLLNGPEWRFNRLRLNPDVLSPKAVQRFLPMVDAVARDFSQALKKKV-LQNARGSLTLDVQPSIFHYTIEASNLALFGERLGLVGHSPSSASLNFLHALEVMFKSTVQLMFMRSLSRWISPKVWKEHFEAWDCIFQYGDNCIQKIYQELAF------NRPQHYTGIVAELLLKAELSLEAIKANSMELTAGS

4dvqA

0.25

0.24

7.56

0.61

CEthreader

CRMILEPWVAYRQHRGHKCGVFLLNGPEWRFNRLRLNPDVLSPKAVQRFLPMVDAVARDFSQALKKKVLQNA-RGSLTLDVQPSIFHYTIEASNLALFGERLGLVGHSPSSASLNFLHALEVMFKSTVQLMFMPSLSRWISPKVWKEHFEAWDCIFQYGDNCIQKIYQELAFN------RPQHYTGIVAELLLKAELSLEAIKANSMELTAGS

3na0A

0.25

7.69

1.24

MUSTER

ERFLIPPWVAYHQYYQRPIGVLLKKSAAWKKDRVALNQEVMAPEATKNFLPLLDAVSRDFVSVLHRRIKK-AGSGNYSGDISDDLFRFAFESITNVIFGERQGMLEEVVNPEAQRFIDAIYQMFHTSVPMLNLPDLFRLFRTKTWKDHVAAWDVIFSKADIYTQNFYWELRQK----GSVHHDYRGILYRLLGDSKMSFEDIKANVTEMLAGG

3k9vA2

0.26

0.24

7.39

1.34

HHsearch

--LEIKPWKAYRDHRNEAYGLMILEGQEWQRVRSAFQ-KKLKPVEIMKLDKKINEVLADFLERMDELCD----ERGRIPDLYSELNKWSFESICLVLYEKRFGLLQKETEEEALTFITAIKTMMSTFGKMMVTPELHKRLNTKVWQAHTLAWDTIFKSVKPCIDNRLQRYSQQ---------PGADFLCDIYQQDHLSKKELYAAVTELQLAA

3k9vA2

0.26

0.24

7.52

2.52

FFAS-3D

---EIKPWKAYRDHRNEAYGLMILEGQEWQRVRSAFQKKLMKPVEIMKLDKKINEVLADFLERMDELCDERGR----IPDLYSELNKWSFESICLVLYEKRFGLLQKETEEEALTFITAIKTMMSTFGKMMVTPELHKRLNTKVWQAHTLAWDTIFKSVKPCIDNRLQRYSQQPGA---------DFLCDIYQQDHLSKKELYAAVTELQLAA

3na0A

0.24

0.23

7.18

1.35

EigenThreader

ERFLIPPWVAYHQYYQRPIGVLLKKSAAWKKDRVALNQEVMAPEATKNLPLLDAVSRDFVSVLHRRIKKAGSGNYSGDIS--DDLFRFAFESITNVIFGERQGMLEEVVNPEAQRFIDAIYQMFHTSVPMLLPPDLFRLFRTKTWKDHVAAWDVIFSKADIYTQNFYWELRQKGSVHHD----YRGILYRLLGDSKMSFEDIKANVTEMLAGG

4zgxA

0.25

0.24

7.56

1.23

CNFpred

CRMILEPWVAYRQHRGHKCGVFLLNGPEWRFNRLRLNPDVLSPKAVQRFLPMVDAVARDFSQALKKKVL-QNARGSLTLDVQPSIFHYTIEASNLALFGERLGLVGHSPSSASLNFLHALEVMFKSTVQLMFMPSLSRWISPKVWKEHFEAWDCIFQYGDNCIQKIYQELAFNRP------QHYTGIVAELLLKAELSLEAIKANSMELTAGS

4dvqA

0.22

0.21

6.65

1.33

DEthreader

PCRMI--LEPWVAYRQHKCGVFLLNGPEWRFNRLRLNPDVLSPKAVQRFLPMVDAVARDFSQALKKKVLQNA-GSLTLD-VQPSIFHYTIEASNLALFGERLGLVGHSPSSASLNFLHALEVMFKSTVQLM-FMPRLSRISPKVWKEHFEAWDCIFQYGDNCIQKIYQELAFNR----PQ--HYTGIVAELLLKAELSLEAIKANSMELTAGS

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.8085

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	3na0A	0.92	1.39	0.255	0.977	model1_3na0A.pdb.gz
2	4dvqA	0.91	1.37	0.252	0.967	model1_4dvqA.pdb.gz
3	3k9vA	0.83	2.19	0.260	0.939	model1_3k9vA.pdb.gz
4	1tqnA	0.74	3.07	0.176	0.892	model1_1tqnA.pdb.gz
5	1jipA	0.67	2.57	0.192	0.784	model1_1jipA.pdb.gz
6	1n97A	0.65	2.22	0.195	0.747	model1_1n97A.pdb.gz
7	1odoA	0.64	3.05	0.145	0.779	model1_1odoA.pdb.gz
8	1q5eA	0.64	3.57	0.176	0.822	model1_1q5eA.pdb.gz
9	2c7xA	0.63	3.16	0.156	0.784	model1_2c7xA.pdb.gz
10	1ulwA	0.63	3.18	0.102	0.784	model1_1ulwA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0016491	1.00	oxidoreductase activity
GO:0004497	0.93	monooxygenase activity
GO:0016705	0.88	oxidoreductase activity, acting on paired donors, with incorporation or reduction of molecular oxygen
GO:0016709	0.70	oxidoreductase activity, acting on paired donors, with incorporation or reduction of molecular oxygen, NAD(P)H as one donor, and incorporation of one atom of oxygen
GO:0097159	0.68	organic cyclic compound binding
GO:1901363	0.67	heterocyclic compound binding
GO:0008395	0.67	steroid hydroxylase activity
GO:0016713	0.62	oxidoreductase activity, acting on paired donors, with incorporation or reduction of molecular oxygen, reduced iron-sulfur protein as one donor, and incorporation of one atom of oxygen
GO:0020037	0.61	heme binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044699	0.98	single-organism process
GO:0008152	0.97	metabolic process
GO:0071704	0.96	organic substance metabolic process
GO:0044710	0.96	single-organism metabolic process
GO:0009987	0.95	cellular process
GO:0008202	0.95	steroid metabolic process
GO:0044763	0.94	single-organism cellular process
GO:0044237	0.93	cellular metabolic process
GO:0065007	0.90	biological regulation
GO:0044281	0.90	small molecule metabolic process
GO:1901615	0.88	organic hydroxy compound metabolic process
GO:0065008	0.84	regulation of biological quality
GO:1901576	0.81	organic substance biosynthetic process
GO:0044249	0.81	cellular biosynthetic process
GO:1901362	0.80	organic cyclic compound biosynthetic process
GO:0008610	0.80	lipid biosynthetic process
GO:0006694	0.79	steroid biosynthetic process
GO:0050896	0.74	response to stimulus
GO:1902652	0.72	secondary alcohol metabolic process
GO:0042221	0.72	response to chemical
GO:0010033	0.71	response to organic substance
GO:1901700	0.69	response to oxygen-containing compound
GO:0042446	0.69	hormone biosynthetic process
GO:0034754	0.69	cellular hormone metabolic process
GO:0006700	0.68	C21-steroid hormone biosynthetic process
GO:0016125	0.63	sterol metabolic process
GO:0008203	0.61	cholesterol metabolic process
GO:0042180	0.59	cellular ketone metabolic process
GO:0009719	0.58	response to endogenous stimulus
GO:0043434	0.57	response to peptide hormone
GO:0008211	0.57	glucocorticoid metabolic process
GO:0034650	0.55	cortisol metabolic process
GO:0051716	0.54	cellular response to stimulus
GO:0006704	0.54	glucocorticoid biosynthetic process
GO:0071375	0.53	cellular response to peptide hormone stimulus
GO:0044550	0.53	secondary metabolite biosynthetic process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	1.00	cell part
GO:0044424	0.99	intracellular part
GO:0044444	0.97	cytoplasmic part
GO:0044446	0.86	intracellular organelle part
GO:0016020	0.82	membrane
GO:0044429	0.79	mitochondrial part
GO:0031090	0.75	organelle membrane
GO:0031966	0.74	mitochondrial membrane
GO:0005743	0.68	mitochondrial inner membrane
GO:0043229	0.54	intracellular organelle
GO:0043231	0.53	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1xqdA	0.627	3.10	0.090	0.779	1.7.99.7	53
2	0.060	3i3kA	0.697	2.88	0.112	0.840	1.14.13.70	NA
3	0.060	3dbmA	0.636	3.44	0.093	0.807	4.2.1.92	92,97
4	0.060	3e6iA	0.743	2.69	0.138	0.887	1.14.13.-	NA
5	0.060	1q5eA	0.639	3.57	0.176	0.822	1.14.-.-	106

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.19	2p85C	0.760	2.50	0.159	0.887	0.71	IND	complex1.pdb.gz	208,211,212
2	0.15	3k9vA	0.835	2.19	0.260	0.939	0.69	CPS	complex2.pdb.gz	2,8,22,82,83,86,121,124
3	0.13	2fdwD	0.760	2.52	0.153	0.887	0.51	UUU	complex3.pdb.gz	2,22,23,33,124,208,211,212,213
4	0.06	3k9yA	0.842	2.14	0.265	0.939	0.86	CM5	complex4.pdb.gz	89,90,92,94,97,98

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.