D-I-TASSER O43390-D3

D-I-TASSER results for O43390-D3

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>O43390 (99 residues)
SVANNRLFVGSIPKNKTKENILEEFSKVTEGLVDVILYHQPDDKKKNRGFCFLEYEDHKS
AAQARRRLMSGKVKVWGNVVTVEWADPVEEPDPEVMAKV

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 \| \| \| \| SVANNRLFVGSIPKNKTKENILEEFSKVTEGLVDVILYHQPDDKKKNRGFCFLEYEDHKSAAQARRRLMSGKVKVWGNVVTVEWADPVEEPDPEVMAKV
Prediction	CCCCCSSSSCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCSSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCSSCCSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCHHHHCCC
Confidence	999988998399999999999999998689848999984898899875389999799999999999974898155890889985478877896775149
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 \| \| \| \| SVANNRLFVGSIPKNKTKENILEEFSKVTEGLVDVILYHQPDDKKKNRGFCFLEYEDHKSAAQARRRLMSGKVKVWGNVVTVEWADPVEEPDPEVMAKV
Prediction	857633010010356144720461257216404403024147566442000002043472044026404766141453503053064665556742667
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80

                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCSSSSCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCSSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCSSCCSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCHHHHCCC
SVANNRLFVGSIPKNKTKENILEEFSKVTEGLVDVILYHQPDDKKKNRGFCFLEYEDHKSAAQARRRLMSGKVKVWGNVVTVEWADPVEEPDPEVMAKV

4wijA

0.18

0.16

5.26

1.33

DEthreader

-THAAALSVRNLSPYVSNELLEEAFSQFG-PIERAVVIVDDR--GRSTGKGIVEFASKPAARKAFERCSEGVFLLTPRPVIVEPLEQLDDEDG------

6korA1

0.91

0.83

23.27

1.83

SPARKS-K

--SNNRLFVGSIPKSKTKEQILEEFSKVTEGLTDVILYHQPDDKKKNRGFCFLEYEDHKTAAQARRRLMSGKVKVWGNVGTVEWADPIEDPD-------

5uz5A

0.13

0.11

3.85

0.53

MapAlign

-DPYRTIFIGRLPYDLDEIELQKYFV-KFGEIEKIRIVKD-KITQKSKGYAFIVFKDPISSKMAFKEIGVRGIQIKDRICIVDIERG------------

5uz5A

0.14

0.12

4.13

0.31

CEthreader

TDPYRTIFIGRLPYDLDEIELQKYFVKFG-EIEKIRIVKDK-ITQKSKGYAFIVFKDPISSKMAFKEIGVRGIQIKDRICIVDIERG------------

6korA1

0.91

0.83

23.27

1.76

MUSTER

--SNNRLFVGSIPKSKTKEQILEEFSKVTEGLTDVILYHQPDDKKKNRGFCFLEYEDHKTAAQARRRLMSGKVKVWGNVGTVEWADPIEDPD-------

5uz5A

0.16

0.13

4.38

0.83

HHsearch

TDPYRTIFIGRLPYDLDEIELQKYFVKF-GEIEKIRIVKDKI-TQKSKGYAFIVFKDPISSKMAFKEIR-GI-QIKDRICIVDIERG------------

6korA1

0.91

0.83

23.27

1.87

FFAS-3D

--SNNRLFVGSIPKSKTKEQILEEFSKVTEGLTDVILYHQPDDKKKNRGFCFLEYEDHKTAAQARRRLMSGKVKVWGNVGTVEWADPIEDPD-------

6c8u1

0.17

0.16

5.31

0.60

EigenThreader

QSNAGKMFIGGLSWQTSPDSLRDYFS-KFGEIRECMVMRDP-TTKRSRGFGFVTFADPASVDKVLGQ---PHHELDSKTIDPKVAFPRAQPKMVTRTKK

6korA

0.85

0.83

23.33

1.53

CNFpred

--SNNRLFVGSIPKSKTKEQILEEFSKVTEGLTDVILYHQPDDKKKNRGFCFLEYEDHKTAAQARRRLMSGKVKVWGNVGTVEWADPIEDPD-AKVKVL

3sdeA2

0.18

0.16

5.25

1.33

DEthreader

-THGAALTVKNLSPVVSNELLEQAFSQFG-PVEKAVVVVDD-R-GRATGKGFVEFAAKPPARKALERCGDGAFLLTPRPVIVEPMEQFDDED-------

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.94

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	6korA	0.82	1.65	0.792	0.909	model1_6korA.pdb.gz
2	7eu0M1	0.78	2.39	0.103	0.980	model1_7eu0M1.pdb.gz
3	2disA	0.74	2.37	0.495	0.869	model1_2disA.pdb.gz
4	4wijA	0.73	2.31	0.167	0.899	model1_4wijA.pdb.gz
5	5ca5A	0.73	2.37	0.135	0.899	model1_5ca5A.pdb.gz
6	7sp0A	0.72	2.36	0.167	0.889	model1_7sp0A.pdb.gz
7	3sdeA	0.72	2.21	0.167	0.889	model1_3sdeA.pdb.gz
8	6wmzD	0.72	2.36	0.198	0.899	model1_6wmzD.pdb.gz
9	1x5sA	0.72	2.45	0.217	0.889	model1_1x5sA.pdb.gz
10	4a8xA	0.72	2.03	0.193	0.869	model1_4a8xA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0003676	0.98	nucleic acid binding
GO:0003723	0.97	RNA binding
GO:0044822	0.82	poly(A) RNA binding
GO:0003729	0.57	mRNA binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0009987	0.96	cellular process
GO:0008152	0.84	metabolic process
GO:0044238	0.83	primary metabolic process
GO:0044237	0.83	cellular metabolic process
GO:0043170	0.83	macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0044260	0.82	cellular macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0034641	0.81	cellular nitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:0090304	0.80	nucleic acid metabolic process
GO:0016070	0.79	RNA metabolic process
GO:0016071	0.69	mRNA metabolic process
GO:0006396	0.57	RNA processing
GO:0065007	0.51	biological regulation
GO:0006397	0.51	mRNA processing

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	1.00	intracellular part
GO:0044446	0.95	intracellular organelle part
GO:0044428	0.94	nuclear part
GO:0032991	0.85	macromolecular complex
GO:0043226	0.62	organelle
GO:0030529	0.62	intracellular ribonucleoprotein complex
GO:0043229	0.61	intracellular organelle
GO:0005681	0.55	spliceosomal complex

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.215	2e5gA	0.627	2.30	0.146	0.778	2.7.7.52	8,35,54,82
2	0.121	3cnqP	0.498	2.59	0.127	0.677	3.4.21.62	72,82
3	0.067	1mwyA	0.504	2.56	0.119	0.677	3.6.3.3 3.6.3.5	NA
4	0.066	2av5A	0.579	2.65	0.092	0.788	3.1.26.5	NA
5	0.066	2ko1A	0.502	3.74	0.167	0.818	2.7.6.5	26,36,73,79,81,83

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.12	2rraA	0.685	2.31	0.241	0.859	0.97	QNA	complex1.pdb.gz	10,11,38,49,50,52,54,79,81,83,84,85,86
2	0.07	2x1aA	0.695	2.14	0.230	0.859	1.18	QNA	complex2.pdb.gz	11,12,13,14,49
3	0.05	1oo01	0.666	2.06	0.267	0.818	0.93	III	complex3.pdb.gz	6,8,34,36,38,41,43,48,50,52,54,83,84
4	0.05	1pgzA	0.692	2.22	0.245	0.849	0.92	UUU	complex4.pdb.gz	6,8,10,11,34,36,38,48,49,50,52,78,81,83,84,85,86
5	0.05	2rqcA	0.678	2.35	0.149	0.849	0.95	QNA	complex5.pdb.gz	6,8,10,14,34,35,36,38,39,44,48,50,52,54,81,83,85,86
6	0.04	2fy1A	0.663	3.24	0.223	0.950	0.94	RQA	complex6.pdb.gz	6,8,10,11,14,36,38,39,40,49,50,52,81,83,84,85,86
7	0.04	1a9n1	0.656	2.85	0.184	0.849	1.00	III	complex7.pdb.gz	19,20,22,23,31,74,75,76,77
8	0.04	1a9nB	0.656	2.85	0.184	0.849	0.99	RQA	complex8.pdb.gz	8,10,11,14,15,17,22,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,48,50,52,78,81,83,84,85,86,87,88

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.