D-I-TASSER O60315-D7

D-I-TASSER results for O60315-D7

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>O60315 (66 residues)
RKVYQYSNSRSPSLERSSKPLAPNSNPPTKDSLLPRSPVKPMDSITSPSIAELHNSVTNC
DPPLRL

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 \| \| \| RKVYQYSNSRSPSLERSSKPLAPNSNPPTKDSLLPRSPVKPMDSITSPSIAELHNSVTNCDPPLRL
Prediction	CCCSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCC
Confidence	950323788899877788767778999982123446998877777784268875110137987779
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 \| \| \| RKVYQYSNSRSPSLERSSKPLAPNSNPPTKDSLLPRSPVKPMDSITSPSIAELHNSVTNCDPPLRL
Prediction	854363656444425464563456454344642445441543452454424513542652554367
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60

                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCC
RKVYQYSNSRSPSLERSSKPLAPNSNPPTKDSLLPRSPVKPMDSITSPSIAELHNSVTNCDPPLRL

1e8lA

0.06

2.64

0.56

CEthreader

AAMKRHGLDNYRGYSLGNWVCAAKFESNFNTQATNRNTDGSTDYGILQINSRWWCNDGRTPGSRNL

1vw42

0.05

2.17

0.58

EigenThreader

PKL----LKLAREDLIKHQTIEKCWSIYQQQQRERRNLQLELQYKSIERSMNLLQELSPRLFEAAN

6zu9O

0.13

0.12

4.21

0.29

FFAS-3D

RKKKVYTTPKKIKHKHKKVKLAVLSKVDAEGKVTKLRRECSNPTCGAGVFLANHKDRLYCGK----

3hgfC

0.09

3.44

1.18

SPARKS-K

-KKIENIVTKIDKKKYIYKEKDKTSLEEVKNINMSYGKSLNKKKKSENMIKSMEKYIKDLDEIKEQ

2ahmA

0.17

0.05

1.50

0.50

CNFpred

------------------------------------------------QCVQLHNDILLAKDTTEA

6elzJ

0.03

1.70

1.00

DEthreader

--HARVQL-H----EMVKSDHMDKKGIASDKKEEARRRQLK-GKVQNATLQKRQLEKRETLEKIKS

6w1cE

0.00

0.95

0.84

MapAlign

---HTKIRYAEGHDIAEAARSTLKVHSSSECTVTGTMGHFILAKCPPGERISVSFVDSKNEHRTCR

2k4fA

0.12

0.11

3.73

0.82

MUSTER

-----CSKNRKAKAKPVTRGTGAGSRPRGQNKERPPPVPNPDYEPIRKGQRDLYSGLNQRAV----

4j7bC

0.34

0.18

5.44

0.54

HHsearch

-----------------------------LDDLVAESPRKNMDGIAVPDEREFDIEADMR--PHEL

6w1cE3

0.06

2.64

0.56

CEthreader

ENIQADATDGTLKIQFASQIGLTKTDTHDHTKIRYAEGHDIAEAARSTLKVHISVSFVDSKNEHRT

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.5462

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	1qwtA	0.48	3.57	0.061	0.849	model1_1qwtA.pdb.gz
2	5hkqI	0.48	3.92	0.047	0.909	model1_5hkqI.pdb.gz
3	1v31A	0.47	3.41	0.048	0.788	model1_1v31A.pdb.gz
4	4q7oA	0.47	3.57	0.050	0.849	model1_4q7oA.pdb.gz
5	4gfhA4	0.47	3.69	0.065	0.833	model1_4gfhA4.pdb.gz
6	3kheB	0.47	3.76	0.035	0.833	model1_3kheB.pdb.gz
7	1w36E	0.47	3.71	0.046	0.833	model1_1w36E.pdb.gz
8	7ap2A	0.47	3.24	0.063	0.803	model1_7ap2A.pdb.gz
9	6ycxA	0.47	3.39	0.033	0.833	model1_6ycxA.pdb.gz
10	2l5yA	0.47	3.08	0.033	0.758	model1_2l5yA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0000981	1.00	RNA polymerase II transcription factor activity, sequence-specific DNA binding
GO:0098772	0.53	molecular function regulator
GO:0030234	0.52	enzyme regulator activity
GO:0019208	0.51	phosphatase regulator activity
GO:0001227	0.51	transcriptional repressor activity, RNA polymerase II transcription regulatory region sequence-specific binding
GO:0003705	0.50	transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II distal enhancer sequence-specific binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0048856	1.00	anatomical structure development
GO:0001667	1.00	ameboidal-type cell migration
GO:0044767	0.76	single-organism developmental process
GO:0016043	0.76	cellular component organization
GO:0048869	0.75	cellular developmental process
GO:0044707	0.75	single-multicellular organism process
GO:0009653	0.75	anatomical structure morphogenesis
GO:0048646	0.74	anatomical structure formation involved in morphogenesis
GO:0032989	0.74	cellular component morphogenesis
GO:0007389	0.74	pattern specification process
GO:0001756	0.73	somitogenesis
GO:0001755	0.73	neural crest cell migration
GO:0065007	0.71	biological regulation
GO:0050789	0.69	regulation of biological process
GO:0050794	0.66	regulation of cellular process
GO:0048518	0.61	positive regulation of biological process
GO:0019222	0.61	regulation of metabolic process
GO:0048522	0.60	positive regulation of cellular process
GO:0031323	0.60	regulation of cellular metabolic process
GO:0080090	0.59	regulation of primary metabolic process
GO:0060255	0.59	regulation of macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0031325	0.58	positive regulation of cellular metabolic process
GO:2000112	0.57	regulation of cellular macromolecule biosynthetic process
GO:0051171	0.57	regulation of nitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:0010604	0.57	positive regulation of macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0010468	0.57	regulation of gene expression
GO:0051173	0.56	positive regulation of nitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:0048519	0.56	negative regulation of biological process
GO:0031328	0.56	positive regulation of cellular biosynthetic process
GO:0010557	0.56	positive regulation of macromolecule biosynthetic process
GO:0006355	0.56	regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
GO:0048523	0.55	negative regulation of cellular process
GO:0045893	0.55	positive regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
GO:0051128	0.53	regulation of cellular component organization
GO:0045944	0.53	positive regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter
GO:0045595	0.53	regulation of cell differentiation
GO:0031324	0.53	negative regulation of cellular metabolic process
GO:0010605	0.53	negative regulation of macromolecule metabolic process
GO:1903056	0.52	regulation of melanosome organization
GO:0097324	0.52	melanocyte migration
GO:0048731	0.52	system development
GO:0048066	0.52	developmental pigmentation
GO:0048023	0.52	positive regulation of melanin biosynthetic process
GO:0045636	0.52	positive regulation of melanocyte differentiation
GO:0000122	0.52	negative regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0005634	1.00	nucleus

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1rptA	0.425	3.75	0.082	0.758	3.1.3.2	NA
2	0.060	1xagA	0.440	3.45	0.000	0.742	4.2.3.4	NA
3	0.060	1zpdA	0.432	3.82	0.034	0.818	4.1.1.1	NA
4	0.060	2q5lA	0.433	3.70	0.034	0.773	4.1.1.74 4.1.1.43	NA
5	0.060	2wnsB	0.435	3.61	0.106	0.818	2.4.2.10	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

No Binding sites was predicted

Click to view	Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.