D-I-TASSER O95972-D2

D-I-TASSER results for O95972-D2

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>O95972 (127 residues)
TRQADGISAEVTASSSKHSGPENNQCSLHPFQISFRQLGWDHWIIAPPFYTPNYCKGTCL
RVLRDGLNSPNHAIIQNLINQLVDQSVPRPSCVPYKYVPISVLMIEANGSILYKEYEGMI
AESCTCR

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 \| \| \| \| \| \| TRQADGISAEVTASSSKHSGPENNQCSLHPFQISFRQLGWDHWIIAPPFYTPNYCKGTCLRVLRDGLNSPNHAIIQNLINQLVDQSVPRPSCVPYKYVPISVLMIEANGSILYKEYEGMIAESCTCR
Prediction	CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSSHHHCCCCCCSSCCCCSSCSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSCCCCSSSSSSCCSSSSSCSCC
Confidence	9655565433345554557888897078999974444388640326984040010252788865568887402455555641777789987126512456799994899399998089286211168
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 \| \| \| \| \| \| TRQADGISAEVTASSSKHSGPENNQCSLHPFQISFRQLGWDHWIIAPPFYTPNYCKGTCLRVLRDGLNSPNHAIIQNLINQLVDQSVPRPSCVPYKYVPISVLMIEANGSILYKEYEGMIAESCTCR
Prediction	7555674667445645665667644033361303055143542343054132320313142334753433311244434443446632410011363441300011674413245166020651638
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSSHHHCCCCCCSSCCCCSSCSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSCCCCSSSSSSCCSSSSSCSCC
TRQADGISAEVTASSSKHSGPENNQCSLHPFQISFRQLGWDHWIIAPPFYTPNYCKGTCLRVLRDGLNSPNHAIIQNLINQLVDQSVPRPSCVPYKYVPISVLMIEANGSILYKEYEGMIAESCTCR

2pjyA

0.31

0.25

7.61

1.00

DEthreader

-----------------F-NLEE-NCCVRPLYIDFRDLGWK-WVHEPKGYYANFCSGPCPY-LR--SADTTHSTVLGLYNTLNPEASASPCCVPQDLEPLTILYYV-GRTPKVEQLSNMVVKSCKCS

1m4uL

0.37

0.32

9.60

4.73

SPARKS-K

---------------ENSSSDQRQACKKHELYVSFRDLGWQDWIIAPEGYAAYYCEGECAFPLNSYMNATNHAIVQTLVHFINPETVPKPCCAPTQLNAISVLYFDDSSNVILKKYRNMVVRACGCH

4n1dA

0.34

0.28

8.48

1.05

MapAlign

----------------------KSSCKRHPLYVDFNLIGWGSWIIYPKQYNAYRCEGECPNPVGEEFHPTNHAYIQSLLKRYQPHRVPSTCCVPTELSAISMLYLDENEKVVLKNYQDMVVEGCGCR

4n1dA

0.34

0.28

8.48

0.97

CEthreader

----------------------KSSCKRHPLYVDFNLIGWGSWIIYPKQYNAYRCEGECPNPVGEEFHPTNHAYIQSLLKRYQPHRVPSTCCVPTELSAISMLYLDENEKVVLKNYQDMVVEGCGCR

1m4uL

0.37

0.32

9.60

3.24

MUSTER

---------------ENSSSDQRQACKKHELYVSFRDLGWQDWIIAPEGYAAYYCEGECAFPLNSYMNATNHAIVQTLVHFINPETVPKPCCAPTQLNAISVLYFDDSSNVILKKYRNMVVRACGCH

3rjrA

0.24

0.23

7.13

3.05

HHsearch

NGHGMNRPATPLERANYCFSSTEKNCCVRQLYIDFRDLGW-KWIHEPKGYHANFCLGPCPYIWSL---DTQYSKVLALYNQHNPGASAAPCCVPQALEPLPIVYYVGRK-PKVEQLSNMIVRSCKCS

1m4uL

0.37

0.32

9.60

1.87

FFAS-3D

---------------ENSSSDQRQACKKHELYVSFRDLGWQDWIIAPEGYAAYYCEGECAFPLNSYMNATNHAIVQTLVHFINPETVPKPCCAPTQLNAISVLYFDDSSNVILKKYRNMVVRACGCH

1m4uL

0.37

0.32

9.60

0.93

EigenThreader

---------------ENSSSDQRQACKKHELYVSFRDLGWQDWIIAPEGYAAYYCEGECAFPLNSYMNATNHAIVQTLVHFINPETVPKPCCAPTQLNAISVLYFDDSSNVILKKYRNMVVRACGCH

4midA

0.42

0.35

10.18

3.37

CNFpred

---------------------LKSSCKRHPLYVDFSDVGWNDWIIAPSGYHANYCDGECPFPLADHLNSTNHAIVQTLVNSVNS-KIPKACCVPTKLRPMSMLYYDDGQNIIKKDIQNMIVEECGCS

1waqA

0.37

0.28

8.43

1.00

DEthreader

---------------------A--RCSRKALHVNFKDMGWDDWIIAPLEYEAFHCEGLCEFPLRS-EPTAIQTLMNSMDP--E---TPPTCCVPTRLSPISILFIDSANNVVYKQYEDMVVESCGCR

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.7209

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	2qcqB	0.80	1.30	0.336	0.843	model1_2qcqB.pdb.gz
2	1m4uL	0.79	1.42	0.366	0.858	model1_1m4uL.pdb.gz
3	4n1dA	0.79	1.00	0.343	0.827	model1_4n1dA.pdb.gz
4	3bmpA	0.78	1.23	0.406	0.835	model1_3bmpA.pdb.gz
5	6sf1B	0.76	1.07	0.437	0.811	model1_6sf1B.pdb.gz
6	1zkzA	0.73	1.73	0.387	0.827	model1_1zkzA.pdb.gz
7	2b0uA	0.70	2.57	0.304	0.850	model1_2b0uA.pdb.gz
8	2pjyA	0.69	1.92	0.288	0.795	model1_2pjyA.pdb.gz
9	3hh2A	0.67	2.48	0.284	0.795	model1_3hh2A.pdb.gz
10	3rjrA2	0.61	2.38	0.284	0.732	model1_3rjrA2.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0005102	0.98	receptor binding
GO:0005160	0.94	transforming growth factor beta receptor binding
GO:0005125	0.84	cytokine activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0065007	0.99	biological regulation
GO:0050789	0.99	regulation of biological process
GO:0050794	0.98	regulation of cellular process
GO:0044699	0.95	single-organism process
GO:0009987	0.90	cellular process
GO:0032502	0.89	developmental process
GO:0048522	0.88	positive regulation of cellular process
GO:0044767	0.88	single-organism developmental process
GO:0031323	0.88	regulation of cellular metabolic process
GO:0080090	0.87	regulation of primary metabolic process
GO:0060255	0.87	regulation of macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0044763	0.87	single-organism cellular process
GO:0007165	0.86	signal transduction
GO:0048583	0.85	regulation of response to stimulus
GO:0031325	0.85	positive regulation of cellular metabolic process
GO:0010604	0.85	positive regulation of macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0048856	0.83	anatomical structure development
GO:0023051	0.82	regulation of signaling
GO:0010646	0.82	regulation of cell communication
GO:0048869	0.81	cellular developmental process
GO:0009967	0.81	positive regulation of signal transduction
GO:0051246	0.80	regulation of protein metabolic process
GO:0019220	0.80	regulation of phosphate metabolic process
GO:0001934	0.79	positive regulation of protein phosphorylation
GO:0042981	0.78	regulation of apoptotic process
GO:0043408	0.77	regulation of MAPK cascade
GO:0090100	0.75	positive regulation of transmembrane receptor protein serine/threonine kinase signaling pathway
GO:0060395	0.74	SMAD protein signal transduction
GO:0010862	0.74	positive regulation of pathway-restricted SMAD protein phosphorylation
GO:0048468	0.70	cell development
GO:0009889	0.70	regulation of biosynthetic process
GO:0010556	0.69	regulation of macromolecule biosynthetic process
GO:0007167	0.67	enzyme linked receptor protein signaling pathway
GO:0007178	0.66	transmembrane receptor protein serine/threonine kinase signaling pathway
GO:0031326	0.65	regulation of cellular biosynthetic process
GO:0019219	0.64	regulation of nucleobase-containing compound metabolic process
GO:0006355	0.63	regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
GO:0006357	0.56	regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter
GO:0030509	0.50	BMP signaling pathway

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044421	0.97	extracellular region part
GO:0005615	0.91	extracellular space
GO:0044464	0.70	cell part
GO:0044424	0.56	intracellular part

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.437	1lx5A	0.783	0.91	0.385	0.819	2.7.11.30	26,55,57,59,92,94,124
2	0.372	1ktzA	0.555	1.79	0.338	0.630	2.7.11.30	26,55,92,94,99,119,124
3	0.060	1dgjA	0.420	5.27	0.025	0.827	1.2.-.-	NA
4	0.060	1gz7A	0.432	4.83	0.032	0.772	3.1.1.3	NA
5	0.060	1n63B	0.472	4.87	0.050	0.874	1.2.99.2	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.25	2h620	0.776	1.01	0.413	0.819	1.54	III	complex1.pdb.gz	31,40,52,53,54,71,72,75,76,78,87,88,91,93,94,97,117,118,119,121,127
2	0.25	2goo2	0.774	1.06	0.413	0.819	1.48	III	complex2.pdb.gz	46,48,98,99,100,101,103,110,111,112,113,115,122
3	0.24	2h643	0.774	1.31	0.410	0.827	1.45	III	complex3.pdb.gz	37,38,40,43,102,116,119
4	0.08	2goo6	0.767	1.03	0.417	0.811	1.58	III	complex4.pdb.gz	27,61,62,63,64,65,66,69,71,74,78,82,83
5	0.06	1nys0	0.585	1.73	0.400	0.653	1.11	III	complex5.pdb.gz	90,91,93,117,118,127
6	0.05	1s4y1	0.576	3.03	0.333	0.740	1.09	III	complex6.pdb.gz	31,38,40,43,50,53,54,91,93,102,118,119,121,127

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.