D-I-TASSER P00973-D1

D-I-TASSER results for P00973-D1

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>P00973 (155 residues)
MMDLRNTPAKSLDKFIEDYLLPDTCFRMQINHAIDIICGFLKERCFRGSSYPVCVSKVVK
GGSSGKGTTLRGRSDADLVVFLSPLTTFQDQLNRRGEFIQEIRRQLEACQRERAFSVKFE
VQAPRWGNPRALSFVLSSLQLGEGVEFDVLPAFDA

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MMDLRNTPAKSLDKFIEDYLLPDTCFRMQINHAIDIICGFLKERCFRGSSYPVCVSKVVKGGSSGKGTTLRGRSDADLVVFLSPLTTFQDQLNRRGEFIQEIRRQLEACQRERAFSVKFEVQAPRWGNPRALSFVLSSLQLGEGVEFDVLPAFDA
Prediction	CCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSCCCCCCCSCCCCCCSSSSSSSCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSCCCCCCSSSSSSSCCCC
Confidence	98711298899999999973999689999999999999999997435888884379999704457764447996238999955997258999999999999999999998620568458995036789846999999378787089999826679
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MMDLRNTPAKSLDKFIEDYLLPDTCFRMQINHAIDIICGFLKERCFRGSSYPVCVSKVVKGGSSGKGTTLRGRSDADLVVFLSPLTTFQDQLNRRGEFIQEIRRQLEACQRERAFSVKFEVQAPRWGNPRALSFVLSSLQLGEGVEFDVLPAFDA
Prediction	74604713064014104620414650253035005201510464125477451302300412334421303551301000003405316543542450053026204412563516151424467463230020203055374404020111358
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSCCCCCCCSCCCCCCSSSSSSSCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSCCCCCCSSSSSSSCCCC
MMDLRNTPAKSLDKFIEDYLLPDTCFRMQINHAIDIICGFLKERCFRGSSYPVCVSKVVKGGSSGKGTTLRGRSDADLVVFLSPLTTFQDQLNRRGEFIQEIRRQLEACQRERAFSVKFEVQAPRWGNPRALSFVLSSLQLGEGVEFDVLPAFDA

4xq7A

0.26

0.25

7.56

1.33

DEthreader

YST--PAS--RLDSFVAQWLQPHREWKEEVLDAVRTVEEFLRQE--HFQGQDVRVLKVVKVGSFGNGTVLRSTREVELVAFLSCFHSFQEAAKHHKDVLRLIWKTMWQSQDLLDLGLDLRMEQR---VPDALVFTIQTRGTAEPITVTIVPAYRA

4xq7A1

0.28

0.23

7.11

1.99

SPARKS-K

---------------------PHREWKEEVLDAVRTVEEFLRQEHFQGQD--VRVLKVVKVGSFGNGTVLRSTREVELVAFLSCFHSFQEAAKHHKDVLRLIWKTMWQSQDLLDLGLEDLRMEQ--RVPDALVFTIQTRGTAEPITVTIVPAYRA

4xq7A

0.29

0.28

8.45

0.89

MapAlign

-QELYSTPASRLDSFVAQWLQPHREWKEEVLDAVRTVEEFLRQEHF--QGQDVRVLKVVKVGSFGNGTVLRSTREVELVAFLSCFHSFQEAAKHHKDVLRLIWKTMWQSQDLLDLGLDLRME---QRVPDALVFTIQTRGTAEPITVTIVPAYRA

4xq7A

0.29

0.28

8.63

0.84

CEthreader

-QELYSTPASRLDSFVAQWLQPHREWKEEVLDAVRTVEEFLRQEHFQGQ--DVRVLKVVKVGSFGNGTVLRSTREVELVAFLSCFHSFQEAAKHHKDVLRLIWKTMWQSQDLLDLGLEDLRME--QRVPDALVFTIQTRGTAEPITVTIVPAYRA

4xq7A

0.29

0.28

8.63

1.68

MUSTER

-QELYSTPASRLDSFVAQWLQPHREWKEEVLDAVRTVEEFLRQEHFQGQ--DVRVLKVVKVGSFGNGTVLRSTREVELVAFLSCFHSFQEAAKHHKDVLRLIWKTMWQSQDLLDLGLEDLR--MEQRVPDALVFTIQTRGTAEPITVTIVPAYRA

4s3nA

0.37

0.34

10.16

2.13

HHsearch

-MDLYSTPAAALDRFVARKLQPRKEFVEKARRALGALAAALRER-P-------RVLKTVKGGSSGRGTALKGGCDSELVIFLDCFKSYVDQRARRAEILSEMRASLESWWQNPVPGLRLTFP--EQSVPGALQFRLTSVDLEDWMDVSLVPAFNV

4xq7A1

0.28

0.23

7.11

1.73

FFAS-3D

---------------------PHREWKEEVLDAVRTVEEFLRQEHFQGQD--VRVLKVVKVGSFGNGTVLRSTREVELVAFLSCFHSFQEAAKHHKDVLRLIWKTMWQSQDLLDLGLEDLRME--QRVPDALVFTIQTRGTAEPITVTIVPAYRA

4xq7A

0.29

0.27

8.25

1.10

EigenThreader

-QELYSTPASRLDSFVAQWLQPHREWKEEVLDAVRTVEEFLRQE-----HQDVRVLKVVKVGSFGNGTVLRSTREVELVAFLSCFHSFQEAAKHHKDVLRLIWKTMWQDLLDLGLEDLRMEQR----VPDALVFTIQTRGTAEPITVTIVPAYRA

4ig8A

1.00

0.95

26.55

1.71

CNFpred

--DLRNTPAKSLDKFIEDYLLPDTCFRMQINHAIDIICGFLKERCFRGSSYPVCVSKVVKGGSSGKGTTLRGRSDADLVVFLSPLTTFQDQLNRRGEFIQEIRRQLEACQRERAFSVKFE------GNPRALSFVLSSLQLGEGVEFDVLPAFDA

4m5dA

0.12

4.08

1.33

DEthreader

----KSIFKLQIDELLEQV-KLKQKHVLKVEKFLHKLYDILQEI--PDWENYKKP-DISLIGSFALAGIYQPGSSIDTLLTMPELFDFLRCLHKRSVYLAYLTHHLLILLKKDKLDLQLEYSYDNDPLLPILRISCSKDYNFYKFSINLLIGFPV

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.8324

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	4xq7A	0.88	1.71	0.282	0.961	model1_4xq7A.pdb.gz
2	4m5dA4	0.78	2.66	0.112	0.942	model1_4m5dA4.pdb.gz
3	4s3nA	0.76	2.56	0.364	0.903	model1_4s3nA.pdb.gz
4	1px5B	0.75	2.64	0.721	0.903	model1_1px5B.pdb.gz
5	4nxtA	0.72	2.68	0.118	0.890	model1_4nxtA.pdb.gz
6	4woyA2	0.62	3.02	0.105	0.800	model1_4woyA2.pdb.gz
7	1uddA	0.35	4.82	0.056	0.574	model1_1uddA.pdb.gz
8	2bg5A	0.34	4.81	0.056	0.561	model1_2bg5A.pdb.gz
9	5eogA2	0.34	4.53	0.038	0.529	model1_5eogA2.pdb.gz
10	1sftA1	0.33	5.36	0.008	0.587	model1_1sftA1.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:1901363	0.85	heterocyclic compound binding
GO:0097159	0.85	organic cyclic compound binding
GO:0003824	0.83	catalytic activity
GO:0016772	0.80	transferase activity, transferring phosphorus-containing groups
GO:0003676	0.80	nucleic acid binding
GO:0001730	0.79	2'-5'-oligoadenylate synthetase activity
GO:0003723	0.78	RNA binding
GO:0003725	0.75	double-stranded RNA binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0009987	0.97	cellular process
GO:0050896	0.87	response to stimulus
GO:0044419	0.87	interspecies interaction between organisms
GO:0009615	0.86	response to virus
GO:0008152	0.79	metabolic process
GO:0065007	0.78	biological regulation
GO:0050789	0.78	regulation of biological process
GO:0071704	0.77	organic substance metabolic process
GO:0050794	0.77	regulation of cellular process
GO:0044238	0.77	primary metabolic process
GO:0044237	0.77	cellular metabolic process
GO:0044699	0.76	single-organism process
GO:0048523	0.71	negative regulation of cellular process
GO:0048525	0.70	negative regulation of viral process
GO:0006807	0.70	nitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:0034641	0.69	cellular nitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:1901360	0.68	organic cyclic compound metabolic process
GO:0044763	0.68	single-organism cellular process
GO:0045071	0.67	negative regulation of viral genome replication
GO:0006139	0.67	nucleobase-containing compound metabolic process
GO:0044710	0.66	single-organism metabolic process
GO:1901576	0.65	organic substance biosynthetic process
GO:0044249	0.65	cellular biosynthetic process
GO:0044271	0.64	cellular nitrogen compound biosynthetic process
GO:0034654	0.62	nucleobase-containing compound biosynthetic process
GO:0006950	0.62	response to stress
GO:0002376	0.62	immune system process
GO:0051607	0.61	defense response to virus
GO:0044281	0.60	small molecule metabolic process
GO:1901564	0.59	organonitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:1901566	0.58	organonitrogen compound biosynthetic process
GO:0044711	0.57	single-organism biosynthetic process
GO:0006796	0.57	phosphate-containing compound metabolic process
GO:0006164	0.56	purine nucleotide biosynthetic process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	1.00	intracellular part
GO:0005737	0.87	cytoplasm
GO:0043226	0.63	organelle
GO:0043229	0.61	intracellular organelle
GO:0043227	0.58	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0043231	0.56	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1bpxA	0.599	3.50	0.114	0.793	2.7.7.7	148
2	0.060	2ckjA	0.472	5.12	0.063	0.819	1.17.1.4 1.17.3.2	NA
3	0.060	2zt5A	0.488	4.67	0.034	0.793	6.1.1.14	NA
4	0.060	1wleB	0.474	4.83	0.088	0.793	6.1.1.11	68,73
5	0.060	3lssB	0.482	4.55	0.041	0.806	6.1.1.11	60

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.21	1fa0A	0.665	2.77	0.133	0.819	1.12	3AT	complex1.pdb.gz	61,62,63,74,75,77
2	0.14	2bpfA	0.587	3.33	0.121	0.761	0.88	MG	complex2.pdb.gz	63,75,77
3	0.14	8icfA	0.572	3.08	0.114	0.729	0.99	DTP	complex3.pdb.gz	63,66,74,75

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.