D-I-TASSER P22736-D3

D-I-TASSER results for P22736-D3

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>P22736 (240 residues)
ASPANLLTSLVRAHLDSGPSTAKLDYSKFQELVLPHFGKEDAGDVQQFYDLLSGSLEVIR
KWAEKIPGFAELSPADQDLLLESAFLELFILRLAYRSKPGEGKLIFCSGLVLHRLQCARG
FGDWIDSILAFSRSLHSLLVDVPAFACLSALVLITDRHGLQEPRRVEELQNRIASCLKEH
VAAVAGEPQPASCLSRLLGKLPELRTLCTQGLQRIFYLKLEDLVPPPPIIDKIFMDTLPF

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| ASPANLLTSLVRAHLDSGPSTAKLDYSKFQELVLPHFGKEDAGDVQQFYDLLSGSLEVIRKWAEKIPGFAELSPADQDLLLESAFLELFILRLAYRSKPGEGKLIFCSGLVLHRLQCARGFGDWIDSILAFSRSLHSLLVDVPAFACLSALVLITDRHGLQEPRRVEELQNRIASCLKEHVAAVAGEPQPASCLSRLLGKLPELRTLCTQGLQRIFYLKLEDLVPPPPIIDKIFMDTLPF
Prediction	CCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHCHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHCHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCSSSCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCC
Confidence	988999999999976328852432201157777887886437999999999999999999999829771029999999999960399999999997257898121047701378899886899999999999999986599899999888764077778867799999999999999999998558995257999999986899999999999999864159988169999999814899
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| ASPANLLTSLVRAHLDSGPSTAKLDYSKFQELVLPHFGKEDAGDVQQFYDLLSGSLEVIRKWAEKIPGFAELSPADQDLLLESAFLELFILRLAYRSKPGEGKLIFCSGLVLHRLQCARGFGDWIDSILAFSRSLHSLLVDVPAFACLSALVLITDRHGLQEPRRVEELQNRIASCLKEHVAAVAGEPQPASCLSRLLGKLPELRTLCTQGLQRIFYLKLEDLVPPPPIIDKIFMDTLPF
Prediction	853441143005113633544452534524534456354543520330041014103300410230110470336011200220300000010011112353203204422134431442023003002301420340413432000000001034333163462044014201400220034334333222100200310330340044003201213144614034003202465178
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180                 200                 220                 240

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHCHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHCHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCSSSCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCC
ASPANLLTSLVRAHLDSGPSTAKLDYSKFQELVLPHFGKEDAGDVQQFYDLLSGSLEVIRKWAEKIPGFAELSPADQDLLLESAFLELFILRLAYRSKPGEGKLIFCSGLVLHRLQCARGFGDWIDSILAFSRSLHSLLVDVPAFACLSALVLITDRHGLQEPRRVEELQNRIASCLKEHVAAVAGEPQPASCLSRLLGKLPELRTLCTQGLQRIFYLKLEDLVPPPPIIDKIFMDTLPF

1qkuA

0.25

0.24

7.36

1.50

DEthreader

STADQMVSALLDAE--PPI----L-YSE--YDPT-RP-FSEASMMGLLTNLADRELVHMINWAKRVPGFVDLTLHDQVHLLECAWLEILMIGLVWRSMEHPGKLLFAPNLLLDRNQGKCVMVEIFDMLLATSSRFRMMNLQGEEFVCLKSIILLNSGYTFSEKDHIHRVLDKITDTLIHLMAK-AGLTQQHQRLAQLLLILSHIRHMSNKGMEHLYSMKCKNVVPLYDLLLEMLDAHRLH

1pduA

0.55

0.53

15.13

2.06

SPARKS-K

--AISLITALVRSHVDTTPDP-----SCLDYSHYEEQSMSEADKVQQFYQLLTSSVDVIKQFAEKIPGYFDLLPEDQELLFQSASLELFVLRLAYRARIDDTKLIFCNGTVLHRTQCLRSFGEWLNDIMEFSRSLHNLEIDISAFACLCALTLITERHGLREPKKVEQLQMKIIGSLRDHVTYNAEAQKKQHYFSRLLGKLPELRSLSVQGLQRIFYLKLEDLVPAPALIENMFVTT---

3ltxA

0.20

0.18

5.87

1.16

MapAlign

--TVTILQALNKAA--LPV------LE-SHHNHGQPP--TKVHLLNSLVKLAERELVHLINWAKNVPGYTDLSLSDQVHLIECCWMELLLLNCAFRSHGG-KSLAFAPDLVLDRSSWSTVMTEIFEQVAAVSEQMMQNHLHKDELLLLQAMVLVNAERRLASYNQIFNMQQSLLDAIVDTAQKYHPD--NVRHVPAVLLLLTHIRQAGERGIAFFQRLKSEGVVTFCDLLKEMLDAQ---

1xdkB

0.30

0.29

8.86

0.72

CEthreader

AELDDLTEKIRKAHQETFPSLCQLGKYT-TNSSADHRVRLDLGLWDKFSELATKCIIKIVEFAKRLPGFTGLTIADQITLLKAACLDILILRICTRYTPEQDTMTFSDGLTLNRTQMHNAGGPLTDLVFTFANQLLPLEMDDTETGLLSAICLICDRQDLEEPTKVDKLQEPLLEALKIYIRKR--RPSKPHMFPKILMKITDLRSISAKGAERVITLKMEIPGSMPPLIQEMLENSEGH

2qw4A

0.99

0.95

26.61

1.91

MUSTER

----NLLTSLVRAHLDSGPSTAKLDYSKFQELVLPHFGKEDAGDVQQFYDLLSGSLEVIRKWAEKIPGFAELSPADQDLLLESAFLELFILRLAYRSKPGEGKLIFCSGLVLHRLQCARGFGDWIDSILAFSRSLHSLLVDVPAFACLSALVLITDRHGLQEPRRVEELQNRIASCLKEHVAAV---AGPASCLSRLLGKLPELRTLCTQGLQRIFYLKLEDLVPPPPIIDKIFMDT---

1ovlE

0.67

0.66

18.76

2.10

HHsearch

RLPSSLISALVRAHVDSNPAMTSLDYSRFQANPDYQMSGDDTQHIQQFYDLLTGS-EIIRGWAEKIPGFADLPKADQDLLFESAFLELFVLRLAYRSNPVEGKLIFCNGVVLHRLQCVRGFGEWIDSIVEFSSNLQN-NIDISAFSCIAALA-VTERHGLKEPKRVEELQNKIVNCLKDHVTFNNGGLNRPNYLSKLLGKLPELRTLCTQGLQRIFYLKLEDLVPPPAIIDKLFLDTLPF

2qw4A

0.99

0.95

26.50

2.87

FFAS-3D

----NLLTSLVRAHLDSGPSTAKLDYSKFQELVLPHFGKEDAGDVQQFYDLLSGSLEVIRKWAEKIPGFAELSPADQDLLLESAFLELFILRLAYRSKPGEGKLIFCSGLVLHRLQCARGFGDWIDSILAFSRSLHSLLVDVPAFACLSALVLITDRHGLQEPRRVEELQNRIASCLKEHVAA---VAGPASCLSRLLGKLPELRTLCTQGLQRIFYLKLEDLVPPPPIIDKIFMDT---

1r1kD

0.26

0.25

7.59

1.57

EigenThreader

ANQKSLIARLVWYQEGYEQPSEEDLKRVTQT-------WDSDMPFRQITEMTILTVQLIVEFAKGLPGFAKISQSDQITLLKACSSEVMMLRVARRYDAATDSVLFANNQAYTRDNYRKAMAYVIEDLLHFCRCMYSMMMDNVHYALLTAIVIFSDRPGLEQPLLVEEIQRYYLNTLRVYILNQNSASRCAVIFGKILGILTEIRTLGMQNSNMCISLKL-KNRKLPPFLEEIW--DVA-

4rzfA

1.00

0.97

27.07

1.67

CNFpred

---ANLLTSLVRAHLDSGPSTAKLDYSKFQELVLPHFGKEDAGDVQQFYDLLSGSLEVIRKWAEKIPGFAELSPADQDLLLEWAFLELFILRLAYRSKPGEGKLIFCSGLVLHRLQCARGFGDWIDSILAFSRSLHSLLVDVPAFACLSALVLITDRHGLQEPRRVEELQNRIASCLKEHVAAVAG----ASCLSRLLGKLPELRTLCTQGLQRIFYLKLEDLVPPPPIIDKIFMDTLPF

1pq6B

0.26

0.25

7.72

1.50

DEthreader

AAQELMIQQLVAAQLQCNKRSFSDQPKVT-PWPLGADPQARQQRFAHFTELAIISVQEIVDFAKQVPGFLQLGREDQIALLKASTIEIMLLETARRYNHETECITFLKDFTYSKDDFHRLQVEFINPIFEFSRAMRRLGLDDAEYALLIAINIFSARPNVQEPGRVEALQQPYVEALLSYTRIKR-PQDQ-LRFPRMLMKLVSLRTLSSVHSEQVFALRLQDK-KLPPLLSEIWD--VH-

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.933

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	2qw4A	0.94	0.99	0.987	0.958	model1_2qw4A.pdb.gz
2	1ovlE	0.91	1.93	0.662	0.971	model1_1ovlE.pdb.gz
3	1pduA	0.89	2.06	0.565	0.958	model1_1pduA.pdb.gz
4	7wnhA	0.89	1.72	0.690	0.938	model1_7wnhA.pdb.gz
5	1xdkB	0.88	2.33	0.301	0.983	model1_1xdkB.pdb.gz
6	1pq6B	0.84	2.86	0.259	0.967	model1_1pq6B.pdb.gz
7	6fzfA	0.84	2.99	0.231	0.967	model1_6fzfA.pdb.gz
8	4nqaB	0.83	2.85	0.257	0.954	model1_4nqaB.pdb.gz
9	3a40X	0.83	2.86	0.201	0.963	model1_3a40X.pdb.gz
10	1r1kD	0.83	2.54	0.257	0.925	model1_1r1kD.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0003700	0.74	transcription factor activity, sequence-specific DNA binding
GO:0097159	0.71	organic cyclic compound binding
GO:0004871	0.66	signal transducer activity
GO:0000981	0.60	RNA polymerase II transcription factor activity, sequence-specific DNA binding
GO:1901363	0.59	heterocyclic compound binding
GO:0003676	0.56	nucleic acid binding
GO:0003677	0.54	DNA binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0065007	0.87	biological regulation
GO:0050789	0.86	regulation of biological process
GO:0050794	0.79	regulation of cellular process
GO:0019222	0.78	regulation of metabolic process
GO:0060255	0.77	regulation of macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0010468	0.75	regulation of gene expression
GO:0048518	0.73	positive regulation of biological process
GO:0080090	0.70	regulation of primary metabolic process
GO:0031323	0.70	regulation of cellular metabolic process
GO:0009987	0.69	cellular process
GO:0010556	0.68	regulation of macromolecule biosynthetic process
GO:2000112	0.67	regulation of cellular macromolecule biosynthetic process
GO:0051171	0.67	regulation of nitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:0009893	0.67	positive regulation of metabolic process
GO:0010604	0.66	positive regulation of macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0006355	0.66	regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
GO:0044699	0.65	single-organism process
GO:0010628	0.65	positive regulation of gene expression
GO:0048522	0.63	positive regulation of cellular process
GO:0031325	0.58	positive regulation of cellular metabolic process
GO:0045893	0.57	positive regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
GO:0006357	0.51	regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter
GO:0050896	0.50	response to stimulus

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	1.00	cell part
GO:0044424	0.99	intracellular part
GO:0043229	0.85	intracellular organelle
GO:0043231	0.84	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0005634	0.82	nucleus
GO:0044422	0.58	organelle part
GO:0044446	0.57	intracellular organelle part
GO:0044428	0.51	nuclear part

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.173	1u3rA	0.812	2.70	0.227	0.933	2.3.1.48	NA
2	0.060	1sojL	0.416	5.25	0.065	0.637	3.1.4.17	NA
3	0.060	1ffuB	0.419	5.81	0.052	0.704	1.2.99.2	NA
4	0.060	1ogyA	0.417	6.01	0.071	0.717	1.7.99.4	147
5	0.060	1kqfA	0.455	5.45	0.063	0.725	1.2.1.2	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.69	4lbdA	0.875	2.15	0.319	0.967	1.16	961	complex1.pdb.gz	52,55,89,90,93,96,106,107,120,121,124,211,218,230
2	0.66	1xdkB	0.876	2.33	0.301	0.983	1.04	REA	complex2.pdb.gz	18,52,55,86,89,90,93,120,121,124
3	0.64	1pq6D	0.807	2.50	0.262	0.908	1.08	965	complex3.pdb.gz	48,49,51,52,55,58,86,89,90,93,96,104,106,117,124,128,129,211,226,234
4	0.63	3kfcA	0.831	2.59	0.267	0.938	1.03	61X	complex4.pdb.gz	45,48,51,52,54,55,86,89,92,93,96,106,121,211,214,215,218,234
5	0.60	1s0zA	0.833	2.80	0.201	0.963	0.94	EB1	complex5.pdb.gz	18,45,49,51,52,55,89,92,93,97,104,113,118,124,128,211,234
6	0.42	3ipuB	0.810	2.92	0.257	0.929	0.96	O40	complex6.pdb.gz	51,52,86,89,93,96,121,124,211,218,226
7	0.37	3a2iA	0.833	2.76	0.202	0.958	0.94	TEJ	complex7.pdb.gz	18,45,49,52,55,89,90,92,97,104,117,211
8	0.36	3dr1A	0.805	2.81	0.203	0.933	0.93	C5D	complex8.pdb.gz	18,45,51,52,55,92,97,128,211,215,218,230,234
9	0.35	2zmjA	0.812	2.82	0.197	0.942	0.89	MI4	complex9.pdb.gz	17,45,49,52,55,86,92,93,96,104,117,128,211,215,230,234

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.