D-I-TASSER P22792-D3

D-I-TASSER results for P22792-D3

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>P22792 (142 residues)
ETVAEGTFAHLSNLRSLMLSYNAITHLPAGIFRDLEELVKLYLGSNNLTALHPALFQNLS
KLELLSLSKNQLTTLPEGIFDTNYNLFNLALHGNPWQCDCHLAYLFNWLQQYTDRLLNIQ
TYCAGPAYLKGQVVPALNEKQL

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| ETVAEGTFAHLSNLRSLMLSYNAITHLPAGIFRDLEELVKLYLGSNNLTALHPALFQNLSKLELLSLSKNQLTTLPEGIFDTNYNLFNLALHGNPWQCDCHLAYLFNWLQQYTDRLLNIQTYCAGPAYLKGQVVPALNEKQL
Prediction	CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSCCCCCCCCCCHHHHCCCCCCCSSSSCCCCCCCCCCSHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCSSSCCCCCCCCCSSCCCCHHHC
Confidence	9879886678878989889999688579998998756779668999697159120167788988788899798689124257989989882499766755117999999982676467741766985349917420594229
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| ETVAEGTFAHLSNLRSLMLSYNAITHLPAGIFRDLEELVKLYLGSNNLTALHPALFQNLSKLELLSLSKNQLTTLPEGIFDTNYNLFNLALHGNPWQCDCHLAYLFNWLQQYTDRLLNIQTYCAGPAYLKGQVVPALNEKQL
Prediction	8534753166255044030450305413752256045044020550304413741066055044040461304312630146053044030471343340402202400563464146441314315616534045146778
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSCCCCCCCCCCHHHHCCCCCCCSSSSCCCCCCCCCCSHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCSSSCCCCCCCCCSSCCCCHHHC
ETVAEGTFAHLSNLRSLMLSYNAITHLPAGIFRDLEELVKLYLGSNNLTALHPALFQNLSKLELLSLSKNQLTTLPEGIFDTNYNLFNLALHGNPWQCDCHLAYLFNWLQQYTDRLLNIQTYCAGPAYLKGQVVPALNEKQL

4rcaB

0.29

8.79

1.50

DEthreader

ISFRKQTFLGLDDLEYLQADFNLLRDIDPGAFQDLNKLEVLILNDNLISTLPANVFQYV-PITHLDLRGNRLKTLPYEVLEQIPGIAEILLEDNPWDCTCDLLSLKEWLENIPKNALIGRVVCEAPTRLQGKDLNETTEQDL

3zyiA3

0.28

0.27

8.19

2.55

SPARKS-K

KDMPN--LTPLVGLEELEMSGNHFPEIRPGSFHGLSSLKKLWVMNSQVSLIERNAFDGLASLVELNLAHNNLSSLPHDLFTPLRYLVELHLHHNPWNCDCDILWLAWWLREYIS---TCCGRCHAPMHMRGRYLVEVDQASF

1p8tA

0.34

0.33

9.92

0.58

MapAlign

QALPDDTFRDLGNLTHLFLHGNRISSVPERAFRGLHSLDRLLLHQNRVAHVHPHAFRDLGRLMTLYLFANNLSALPTEALAPLRALQYLRLNDNPWVCDCRARPLWAWLQKF-RGSS-SEVPCSLPQRLAGRDLKRLAANDL

1p8tA2

0.34

0.33

9.92

0.41

CEthreader

QALPDDTFRDLGNLTHLFLHGNRISSVPERAFRGLHSLDRLLLHQNRVAHVHPHAFRDLGRLMTLYLFANNLSALPTEALAPLRALQYLRLNDNPWVCDCRARPLWAWLQKFRGSS--SEVPCSLPQRLAGRDLKRLAANDL

3rfjA2

0.35

0.34

10.10

2.19

MUSTER

QSLPDGVFDKLTNLTYLYLYHNQLQSLPKGVFDKLTNLTRLDLDNNQLQSLPEGVFDKLTQLKQLSLNDNQLKSVPDGVFDRLTSLTHIWLLNNPWDCACDILYLSRWISQHPGLVDPDSARCSG----TNTPVRAVTEAST

5y31B

0.31

9.35

0.91

HHsearch

TEISEGSFLFTPSLQLLLFTSNSFDVISDDAFIGLPHLEYLFIENNNIKSISRHTFRGLKSLIHLSLANNNLQTLPKDIFKGLDSLTNVDLRGNSFNCDCKLKWLVEWLGHTNATV--EDIYCEGPPEYKKRKINSLSSKDF

1p8tA2

0.34

10.11

1.73

FFAS-3D

RSVDPATFHGLGRLHTLHLDRCGLQELGPGLFRGLAALQYLYLQDNALQALPDHAFRDLGRLMTLYLFANNLSALPTEALAPLRALQYLRLNDNPWVCDCRARPLWAWLQKFR--GSSSEVPCSLPQRLAGRDLKRLAANDL

4rcaB2

0.28

0.27

8.39

0.73

EigenThreader

KSFRKQTFLGLDDLEYLQADFNLLRDIDPGAFQDLNKLEVLILNDNLISTLPANVFQYV-PITHLDLRGNRLKTLPYEVLEQIPGIAEILLEDNPWDCTCDLLSLKEWLENIPKNALIGRVVAPTR--LQGKDLNETTEQDL

4p91A

0.33

0.32

9.73

5.21

CNFpred

LHLQDDLFADLANLSHLFLHGNRLRLLTEHVFRGLGSLDRLLLHGNRLQGVHRAAFHGLSRLTILYLFNNSLASLPGEALADLPALEFLRLNANPWACDCRARPLWAWFQRARVS--SSDVTCATPPERQGRDLRTLRDTDF

4rcaB2

0.29

8.79

1.50

DEthreader

ISFRKQTFLGLDDLEYLQADFNLLRDIDPGAFQDLNKLEVLILNDNLISTLPANVFQYV-PITHLDLRGNRLKTLPYEVLEQIPGIAEILLEDNPWDCTCDLLSLKEWLENIPKNALIGRVVCEAPTRLQGKDLNETTEQDL

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.9089

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	1p8tA2	0.96	0.80	0.336	0.986	model1_1p8tA2.pdb.gz
2	2v9tB	0.94	1.05	0.329	0.986	model1_2v9tB.pdb.gz
3	4p8sA2	0.94	1.11	0.329	0.986	model1_4p8sA2.pdb.gz
4	4rcaB	0.94	1.21	0.291	0.993	model1_4rcaB.pdb.gz
5	5a5cA	0.93	1.27	0.312	0.993	model1_5a5cA.pdb.gz
6	4y61B	0.92	1.20	0.317	0.979	model1_4y61B.pdb.gz
7	1w8aA	0.92	1.34	0.264	0.986	model1_1w8aA.pdb.gz
8	4rcwA	0.91	1.41	0.291	0.993	model1_4rcwA.pdb.gz
9	2wfhA	0.91	1.49	0.293	0.986	model1_2wfhA.pdb.gz
10	2v70A	0.91	1.39	0.329	0.986	model1_2v70A.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0098772	0.49	molecular function regulator
GO:1901363	0.48	heterocyclic compound binding
GO:0097159	0.48	organic cyclic compound binding
GO:0030234	0.48	enzyme regulator activity
GO:0097367	0.46	carbohydrate derivative binding
GO:0004857	0.46	enzyme inhibitor activity
GO:0004860	0.45	protein kinase inhibitor activity
GO:0036094	0.34	small molecule binding
GO:0032555	0.33	purine ribonucleotide binding
GO:0032550	0.32	purine ribonucleoside binding
GO:0035639	0.31	purine ribonucleoside triphosphate binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0065007	0.82	biological regulation
GO:0050789	0.80	regulation of biological process
GO:0050794	0.79	regulation of cellular process
GO:0009987	0.71	cellular process
GO:0044699	0.66	single-organism process
GO:0007165	0.66	signal transduction
GO:0044763	0.59	single-organism cellular process
GO:0032502	0.53	developmental process
GO:0044767	0.52	single-organism developmental process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	0.96	cell part
GO:0044424	0.83	intracellular part
GO:0005737	0.49	cytoplasm
GO:0044444	0.38	cytoplasmic part
GO:0016020	0.34	membrane
GO:0044421	0.33	extracellular region part
GO:0043226	0.30	organelle

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	2qx3A	0.576	4.45	0.068	0.930	4.2.2.2	NA
2	0.060	1m6bB	0.555	4.19	0.126	0.866	2.7.10.1	17,36
3	0.060	1vblA	0.595	4.01	0.073	0.944	4.2.2.2	NA
4	0.060	1bheA	0.566	4.52	0.074	0.922	3.2.1.15	NA
5	0.060	1k5cA	0.559	4.05	0.046	0.873	3.2.1.15	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.07	3a79B	0.816	1.93	0.258	0.930	1.55	UUU	complex1.pdb.gz	44,45,66,68,90,92
2	0.06	2z62A	0.837	1.82	0.299	0.944	0.77	UUU	complex2.pdb.gz	6,7,9,31,33
3	0.05	2z66B	0.811	2.42	0.255	0.993	0.90	UUU	complex3.pdb.gz	20,40,42,44,64,66,90
4	0.05	2z7xB	0.812	1.87	0.275	0.922	0.68	UUU	complex4.pdb.gz	29,30,53,57,79
5	0.04	2z82A	0.782	2.86	0.206	0.937	0.68	PDJ	complex5.pdb.gz	2,8,17,19,46,59,67,71,72,73,74,76,79
6	0.04	3a7cA	0.779	2.74	0.206	0.930	0.66	PDK	complex6.pdb.gz	23,24,25,26,28,47,49,50,71
7	0.03	1a9n0	0.681	3.47	0.167	0.908	0.69	III	complex7.pdb.gz	40,46,64,66,88,92,116

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.