D-I-TASSER P24387-D2

D-I-TASSER results for P24387-D2

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>P24387 (140 residues)
CNVISQTPNGKFTLVVPHQHRNCSFSIIYPVVIKISDLTLGHVNGLQLKKSSAGCEGIGD
FVELLGGTGLDPSKMTPLADLCYPFHGPAQMKVGCDNTVVRMVSSGKHVNRVTFEYRQLE
PYELENPNGNSIGEFCLSGL

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| CNVISQTPNGKFTLVVPHQHRNCSFSIIYPVVIKISDLTLGHVNGLQLKKSSAGCEGIGDFVELLGGTGLDPSKMTPLADLCYPFHGPAQMKVGCDNTVVRMVSSGKHVNRVTFEYRQLEPYELENPNGNSIGEFCLSGL
Prediction	CCSSSCCCCCCSSSSCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCSSSHHHHCCCCCCCCSSSCCCCSSSSSSSCCCCSSSSSSSSSSCCHHHHCCCCCCCHHHHHCCCC
Confidence	94651389875688727843341799997489999998615424543334557778878769985878988434567124206799743057516972999985487246999999718943411456786334203689
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| CNVISQTPNGKFTLVVPHQHRNCSFSIIYPVVIKISDLTLGHVNGLQLKKSSAGCEGIGDFVELLGGTGLDPSKMTPLADLCYPFHGPAQMKVGCDNTVVRMVSSGKHVNRVTFEYRQLEPYELENPNGNSIGEFCLSGL
Prediction	33333534743120203544440100013323130331312335535275345407434230322424413353043123003334642433131531101010234241302020341465417436554145223667
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCSSSCCCCCCSSSSCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCSSSHHHHCCCCCCCCSSSCCCCSSSSSSSCCCCSSSSSSSSSSCCHHHHCCCCCCCHHHHHCCCC
CNVISQTPNGKFTLVVPHQHRNCSFSIIYPVVIKISDLTLGHVNGLQLKKSSAGCEGIGDFVELLGGTGLDPSKMTPLADLCYPFHGPAQMKVGCDNTVVRMVSSGKHVNRVTFEYRQLEPYELENPNGNSIGEFCLSGL

2qqmA

0.13

0.11

3.94

1.17

DEthreader

CSQNYTTPSGVIKSPKYPNSLECTYIVFASIILEFESFDLE------P-D-GMFC--RYDRLEIWDGF-VGP--H-IGR-YCGQK-TPGRIRSSSGILSMVFYTDSAIAKGFSANYSVLQSSTPCSGMLLLGCEV-----

4gz9A

0.15

0.13

4.35

1.22

CNFpred

CSQNYTAPTGVIKSPGYPNSLECTYIIFAEIILEFESFDLEQDS---NPPGGMFCR--YDRLEIWDG---FPEVGPHIGRYCGQKT-PGRIRSSSGVLSMVFYTD-IAKEGFSANYSVLQSSISE-------DFKCMEAL

3kq4B

0.16

0.14

4.51

1.00

DEthreader

CGGNLTTSSGTFISPNYYHSSECYWWLKSAFELEFKDFHL-------EH-HPNCT--L-DYLAVYDGPSNSH--LL-TQ-LCGDE-KPPLIRSSGDSMFIKLRTDEGQQGGFKAEYRQTCENV--VIVNQGILE-I-Y--

2qqmA1

0.14

0.11

3.88

0.95

SPARKS-K

CSQNYTTPSGVIKSPGYPNSLECTYIVFAPIILEFESFDLE-------PDGGMFCR--YDRLEIWDGF---PDVGPHIGRYCG-QKTPGRIRSSSGILSMVFYTDAIAKEGFSANYSVLQSSVS----------------

2qqmA

0.14

0.11

3.93

0.89

MapAlign

CSQNYTTPSGVIKSKYP-NSLECTYIVFSEIILEFESFDLEPD---------GGMFCRYDRLEIWDGFPDVG--P-HIGRYCGQKT-PGRIRSSSGILSMVFYTDSAIAKGFSANYSVLGCKITDYPCSGML--------

2qqmA1

0.13

0.10

3.49

0.80

CEthreader

CSQNYTTPSGVIKSPKYPNSLECTYIVFSEIILEFESFDLEPDGG---------MFCRYDRLEIWDGFPDV---GPHIGRYCGQ-KTPGRIRSSSGILSMVFYTDSAIAKGFSANYSVLQSSVS----------------

6fzvD

0.20

0.18

5.71

0.51

MUSTER

CGGDVKGESGYVA-NLYPPNKECIWTITVPVSLSFRVFDL---------ELHPACR--YDALEVFAGSGTSG---QRLGRFCGTFR-PAPLVAPGNQVTLRMTTDEGRGFLLWYSGRAFCGGRLEKAQGNWPESDYPPGI

3kq4B

0.14

0.13

4.37

0.80

HHsearch

CLQDYTDDLGTFTSPNYPNNWECIYRITVRIAVHFTNFSLEEAI-------GNYY---TDFLEIRDGGYE---KSPLLGIFYGSNL-PPTIISHSNKLWLKFKSDQIDTSGFSAYWDGSHLEHLAVYDGHLLTQLCGDEK

5fwsA2

0.16

0.11

3.80

0.43

FFAS-3D

CGGNYSAMSSVVYSDTYATGRVCYWTIRVPIHFSFPLFDI---------------RDSADMVELLDGYTHRVLARF-----HGRSRPPLSFNVSLDFVILYFFSDRINQAQFAVLYQAVK--------------------

2qqmA1

0.13

0.10

3.49

0.90

EigenThreader

CSQNYTTPSGVIKSEKYPNSLECTYIVFAEIILEFESFDLEPD---------GGMFCRYDRLEIWDGFPDVG--PHIGR-YCGQ-KTPGRIRSSSGILSMVFYTDSAIAKGFSANYSVLQ---SSVS-------------

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.7391

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	2qqmA	0.73	2.42	0.132	0.857	model1_2qqmA.pdb.gz
2	3kq4B	0.72	2.55	0.154	0.864	model1_3kq4B.pdb.gz
3	2qqoA	0.69	2.49	0.114	0.800	model1_2qqoA.pdb.gz
4	2wnoA	0.68	1.81	0.160	0.757	model1_2wnoA.pdb.gz
5	4gzaH	0.66	1.83	0.165	0.736	model1_4gzaH.pdb.gz
6	4lmfA3	0.64	2.24	0.114	0.743	model1_4lmfA3.pdb.gz
7	3demA2	0.64	2.09	0.127	0.729	model1_3demA2.pdb.gz
8	1nziB	0.63	2.81	0.138	0.764	model1_1nziB.pdb.gz
9	1nt0A2	0.62	1.81	0.082	0.693	model1_1nt0A2.pdb.gz
10	1sddB1	0.46	3.78	0.029	0.686	model1_1sddB1.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0042562	1.00	hormone binding
GO:0051424	0.93	corticotropin-releasing hormone binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0010817	1.00	regulation of hormone levels
GO:0050789	0.96	regulation of biological process
GO:0050794	0.95	regulation of cellular process
GO:0044699	0.95	single-organism process
GO:0009987	0.95	cellular process
GO:1901700	0.94	response to oxygen-containing compound
GO:0065009	0.94	regulation of molecular function
GO:0051239	0.94	regulation of multicellular organismal process
GO:0048519	0.94	negative regulation of biological process
GO:0044763	0.94	single-organism cellular process
GO:0044708	0.94	single-organism behavior
GO:0044707	0.94	single-multicellular organism process
GO:0033993	0.94	response to lipid
GO:0014070	0.94	response to organic cyclic compound
GO:0009725	0.94	response to hormone
GO:0007165	0.94	signal transduction
GO:0006810	0.94	transport
GO:2000310	0.93	regulation of N-methyl-D-aspartate selective glutamate receptor activity
GO:1900011	0.93	negative regulation of corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor activity
GO:0097211	0.93	cellular response to gonadotropin-releasing hormone
GO:0071392	0.93	cellular response to estradiol stimulus
GO:0071391	0.93	cellular response to estrogen stimulus
GO:0071356	0.93	cellular response to tumor necrosis factor
GO:0071320	0.93	cellular response to cAMP
GO:0071314	0.93	cellular response to cocaine
GO:0071277	0.93	cellular response to calcium ion
GO:0051460	0.93	negative regulation of corticotropin secretion
GO:0048149	0.93	behavioral response to ethanol
GO:0045055	0.93	regulated exocytosis
GO:0035865	0.93	cellular response to potassium ion
GO:0035690	0.93	cellular response to drug
GO:0033554	0.93	cellular response to stress
GO:0009755	0.93	hormone-mediated signaling pathway
GO:0007565	0.93	female pregnancy
GO:0006954	0.93	inflammatory response
GO:0001963	0.93	synaptic transmission, dopaminergic
GO:0002125	0.67	maternal aggressive behavior
GO:0008152	0.58	metabolic process
GO:0042445	0.50	hormone metabolic process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0005615	1.00	extracellular space
GO:0044464	0.97	cell part
GO:0044444	0.95	cytoplasmic part
GO:0044446	0.94	intracellular organelle part
GO:0005634	0.94	nucleus
GO:0043679	0.93	axon terminus
GO:0043204	0.93	perikaryon
GO:0043196	0.93	varicosity
GO:0031045	0.93	dense core granule
GO:0030425	0.93	dendrite
GO:0005874	0.93	microtubule
GO:0005794	0.93	Golgi apparatus
GO:0005783	0.93	endoplasmic reticulum
GO:0005771	0.93	multivesicular body
GO:0005767	0.93	secondary lysosome
GO:0005622	0.93	intracellular

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1unbA	0.512	4.07	0.088	0.779	1.14.20.1	NA
2	0.060	1os7A	0.512	3.48	0.064	0.729	1.14.11.17	NA
3	0.060	1st8A	0.549	3.64	0.074	0.786	3.2.1.80	NA
4	0.060	1apqA	0.162	3.62	0.000	0.229	3.4.21.41 3.4.21.42	138
5	0.060	1olrA	0.496	3.27	0.028	0.707	3.2.1.4	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.03	2qqmA	0.735	2.42	0.132	0.857	0.49	UUU	complex1.pdb.gz	43,60,104,105,106
2	0.03	3pobA	0.629	2.20	0.139	0.721	0.76	III	complex2.pdb.gz	42,47,48,60
3	0.01	1uzyA	0.546	3.47	0.055	0.771	0.41	UUU	complex3.pdb.gz	59,106,107,109

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.