D-I-TASSER P43652-D5

D-I-TASSER results for P43652-D5

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>P43652 (278 residues)
RPKDLSLREGKFTDSENVCQERDADPDTFFAKFTFEYSRRHPDLSIPELLRIVQIYKDLL
RNCCNTENPPGCYRYAEDKFNETTEKSLKMVQQECKHFQNLGKDGLKYHYLIRLTKIAPQ
LSTEELVSLGEKMVTAFTTCCTLSEEFACVDNLADLVFGELCGVNENRTINPAVDHCCKT
NFAFRRPCFESLKADKTYVPPPFSQDLFTFHADMCQSQNEELQRKTDRFLVNLVKLKHEL
TDEELQSLFTNFANVVDKCCKAESPEVCFNEESPKIGN

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| RPKDLSLREGKFTDSENVCQERDADPDTFFAKFTFEYSRRHPDLSIPELLRIVQIYKDLLRNCCNTENPPGCYRYAEDKFNETTEKSLKMVQQECKHFQNLGKDGLKYHYLIRLTKIAPQLSTEELVSLGEKMVTAFTTCCTLSEEFACVDNLADLVFGELCGVNENRTINPAVDHCCKTNFAFRRPCFESLKADKTYVPPPFSQDLFTFHADMCQSQNEELQRKTDRFLVNLVKLKHELTDEELQSLFTNFANVVDKCCKAESPEVCFNEESPKIGN
Prediction	CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCHHHCHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCHHHHHHCCCCHHHHCHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHCCCCHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHCC
Confidence	93238974212489389999877547889999999998307767699999999999999999965799488987899999999999999999999999997748899999999997667999899999999999999986289863332205199999999971378877726877327970232114762888889999998822168975764366366899999999999983899999999999999999999994369867778867766269
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| RPKDLSLREGKFTDSENVCQERDADPDTFFAKFTFEYSRRHPDLSIPELLRIVQIYKDLLRNCCNTENPPGCYRYAEDKFNETTEKSLKMVQQECKHFQNLGKDGLKYHYLIRLTKIAPQLSTEELVSLGEKMVTAFTTCCTLSEEFACVDNLADLVFGELCGVNENRTINPAVDHCCKTNFAFRRPCFESLKADKTYVPPPFSQDLFTFHADMCQSQNEELQRKTDRFLVNLVKLKHELTDEELQSLFTNFANVVDKCCKAESPEVCFNEESPKIGN
Prediction	74771455256127475105405744441034000210242371213101310530350054007474265015524540452054025104530530561355302220002003311715273025004401500440173675341156104200430054365543274045007662444330055054265233360455414245510545665344213410020023316033510440154035005400747537411565356368
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180                 200                 220                 240                 260

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCHHHCHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCHHHHHHCCCCHHHHCHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHCCCCHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHCC
RPKDLSLREGKFTDSENVCQERDADPDTFFAKFTFEYSRRHPDLSIPELLRIVQIYKDLLRNCCNTENPPGCYRYAEDKFNETTEKSLKMVQQECKHFQNLGKDGLKYHYLIRLTKIAPQLSTEELVSLGEKMVTAFTTCCTLSEEFACVDNLADLVFGELCGVNENRTINPAVDHCCKTNFAFRRPCFESLKADKTYVPPPFSQDLFTFHADMCQSQNEELQRKTDRFLVNLVKLKHELTDEELQSLFTNFANVVDKCCKAESPEVCFNEESPKIGN

1n5uA

0.34

0.33

10.01

1.33

DEthreader

-----PSLAADFVESKDVCKNYAEAKDVFLGMFLYEYARRHPDYSVVLLLRLAKTYETTLEKCCAAADPHECYAKVFDEFKPLVEEPQNLIKQNCELFEQLGEYKFQNALLVRYTKKVPQVSTPTLVEVSRNLGKVGSKCCKHPKRMPCAEDYLSVVLNQLCVLHEKTPVSDRVTKCCTESLVNRRPCFSALEVDETYVPKEFNAETFTFHADICTLSEKERQIKKQTALVELVKHKPKATKEQLKAVMDDFAAFVEKCCKADKETCFAEEGKKLAAA

5oklA

1.00

28.00

2.62

SPARKS-K

RPKDLSLREGKFTDSENVCQERDADPDTFFAKFTFEYSRRHPDLSIPELLRIVQIYKDLLRNCCNTENPPGCYRYAEDKFNETTEKSLKMVQQECKHFQNLGKDGLKYHYLIRLTKIAPQLSTEELVSLGEKMVTAFTTCCTLSEEFACVDNLADLVFGELCGVNENRTINPAVDHCCKTNFAFRRPCFESLKADKTYVPPPFSQDLFTFHADMCQSQNEELQRKTDRFLVNLVKLKHELTDEELQSLFTNFANVVDKCCKAESPEVCFNEESPKIGN

5oklA

1.00

0.98

27.40

1.58

MapAlign

----LSLREGKFTDSENVCQERDADPDTFFAKFTFEYSRRHPDLSIPELLRIVQIYKDLLRNCCNTENPPGCYRYAEDKFNETTEKSLKMVQQECKHFQNLGKDGLKYHYLIRLTKIAPQLSTEELVSLGEKMVTAFTTCCTLSEEFACVDNLADLVFGELCGVNENRTINPAVDHCCKTNFAFRRPCFESLKADKTYVPPPFSQDLFTFHADMCQSQNEELQRKTDRFLVNLVKLKHELTDEELQSLFTNFANVVDKCCKAESPEVCFNEESPKI--

5oklA

1.00

28.00

1.21

CEthreader

RPKDLSLREGKFTDSENVCQERDADPDTFFAKFTFEYSRRHPDLSIPELLRIVQIYKDLLRNCCNTENPPGCYRYAEDKFNETTEKSLKMVQQECKHFQNLGKDGLKYHYLIRLTKIAPQLSTEELVSLGEKMVTAFTTCCTLSEEFACVDNLADLVFGELCGVNENRTINPAVDHCCKTNFAFRRPCFESLKADKTYVPPPFSQDLFTFHADMCQSQNEELQRKTDRFLVNLVKLKHELTDEELQSLFTNFANVVDKCCKAESPEVCFNEESPKIGN

5oklA

1.00

28.00

2.32

MUSTER

RPKDLSLREGKFTDSENVCQERDADPDTFFAKFTFEYSRRHPDLSIPELLRIVQIYKDLLRNCCNTENPPGCYRYAEDKFNETTEKSLKMVQQECKHFQNLGKDGLKYHYLIRLTKIAPQLSTEELVSLGEKMVTAFTTCCTLSEEFACVDNLADLVFGELCGVNENRTINPAVDHCCKTNFAFRRPCFESLKADKTYVPPPFSQDLFTFHADMCQSQNEELQRKTDRFLVNLVKLKHELTDEELQSLFTNFANVVDKCCKAESPEVCFNEESPKIGN

5oklA

1.00

28.00

4.73

HHsearch

RPKDLSLREGKFTDSENVCQERDADPDTFFAKFTFEYSRRHPDLSIPELLRIVQIYKDLLRNCCNTENPPGCYRYAEDKFNETTEKSLKMVQQECKHFQNLGKDGLKYHYLIRLTKIAPQLSTEELVSLGEKMVTAFTTCCTLSEEFACVDNLADLVFGELCGVNENRTINPAVDHCCKTNFAFRRPCFESLKADKTYVPPPFSQDLFTFHADMCQSQNEELQRKTDRFLVNLVKLKHELTDEELQSLFTNFANVVDKCCKAESPEVCFNEESPKIGN

1n5uA

0.37

10.91

2.30

FFAS-3D

MPADLPSLAADFVESKDVCKNYAEAKDVFLGMFLYEYARRHPDYSVVLLLRLAKTYETTLEKCCAAADPHECYAKVFDEFKPLVEEPQNLIKQNCELFEQLGEYKFQNALLVRYTKKVPQVSTPTLVEVSRNLGKVGSKCCKHPERMPCAEDYLSVVLNQLCVLHEKTPVSDRVTKCCTESLVNRRPCFSALEVDETYVPKEFNAETFTFHADICTLSEKERQIKKQTALVELVKHKPKATKEQLKAVMDDFAAFVEKCCKADDKETCFAEEGKKLVA

1n5uA

0.19

6.13

2.03

EigenThreader

KDDNPNLPRLVRPEVDVMCTAFHDNEETFLKKYLYEIARRHPYFYAPELLFFAKRYKAAFTECCQAADKAACLLPKLDELRDEGKASSAKQRLKCASLQKFGERAFKAWAVARLSQRFPKAEFAEVSKLVTDLTKVHTECCHGD--LLECADDRADLAKYICENQDSI-SSKLKECCEK-PLLEKSHCIAEVENDEMPADLPSLAADFVESKDVCKNYAEAKDVFLGMFLYEYARRHPDYSVVLLLRLAKTYETTLEKCCAAADPHECYAKVFDEFKP

5oklA

1.00

28.00

2.49

CNFpred

RPKDLSLREGKFTDSENVCQERDADPDTFFAKFTFEYSRRHPDLSIPELLRIVQIYKDLLRNCCNTENPPGCYRYAEDKFNETTEKSLKMVQQECKHFQNLGKDGLKYHYLIRLTKIAPQLSTEELVSLGEKMVTAFTTCCTLSEEFACVDNLADLVFGELCGVNENRTINPAVDHCCKTNFAFRRPCFESLKADKTYVPPPFSQDLFTFHADMCQSQNEELQRKTDRFLVNLVKLKHELTDEELQSLFTNFANVVDKCCKAESPEVCFNEESPKIGN

5oklA

0.86

0.82

23.09

1.17

DEthreader

--------LREGKFT-DS-ENVCQERFFKFTFEYSRRH---PDLSIPELLRIVQIYKDLLRNCCNTENPPGCYRYAEDKFNETTEKSLKMVQQECKHFQNLGKDGLKYHYLIRLTKIAPQLSTEELVSLGEKMVTAFTTCCTLSEEFACVDNLADLVFGELCGVNENRTINPAVDHCCKTNFAFRRPCFESLKADKTYVPPPFSQDLFTFHADMCQSQNEELQRKTDRFLVNLVKKHELTDE-ELQSLFTNFANVVDKCCKAESPEVCFNEESPKINK

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.966

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	5oklA	0.97	1.29	1.000	1.000	model1_5oklA.pdb.gz
2	7yimA	0.91	2.01	0.397	0.996	model1_7yimA.pdb.gz
3	1n5uA	0.89	2.37	0.353	1.000	model1_1n5uA.pdb.gz
4	1kw2A	0.63	2.73	0.145	0.727	model1_1kw2A.pdb.gz
5	6bfiA	0.46	5.17	0.058	0.698	model1_6bfiA.pdb.gz
6	5a60A	0.45	5.84	0.048	0.709	model1_5a60A.pdb.gz
7	7a1dA	0.44	5.98	0.032	0.712	model1_7a1dA.pdb.gz
8	7qtta3	0.44	6.08	0.041	0.741	model1_7qtta3.pdb.gz
9	4iggA	0.43	5.88	0.062	0.676	model1_4iggA.pdb.gz
10	1w07B	0.42	6.15	0.043	0.701	model1_1w07B.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0097159	0.91	organic cyclic compound binding
GO:1901363	0.84	heterocyclic compound binding
GO:0008289	0.65	lipid binding
GO:0043167	0.64	ion binding
GO:0003677	0.57	DNA binding
GO:0030170	0.56	pyridoxal phosphate binding
GO:0019825	0.56	oxygen binding
GO:0015643	0.56	toxic substance binding
GO:0008144	0.56	drug binding
GO:0005504	0.56	fatty acid binding
GO:0036094	0.50	small molecule binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044699	1.00	single-organism process
GO:1902578	0.89	single-organism localization
GO:0065007	0.76	biological regulation
GO:0009987	0.73	cellular process
GO:0050789	0.72	regulation of biological process
GO:0050896	0.68	response to stimulus
GO:0050794	0.68	regulation of cellular process
GO:0044763	0.68	single-organism cellular process
GO:0065008	0.67	regulation of biological quality
GO:0051704	0.66	multi-organism process
GO:0048519	0.63	negative regulation of biological process
GO:0048523	0.61	negative regulation of cellular process
GO:0009605	0.61	response to external stimulus
GO:0031667	0.59	response to nutrient levels
GO:0006950	0.59	response to stress
GO:0051659	0.57	maintenance of mitochondrion location
GO:0043066	0.57	negative regulation of apoptotic process
GO:0019836	0.57	hemolysis by symbiont of host erythrocytes
GO:0009267	0.57	cellular response to starvation

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	0.62	cell part
GO:0044421	0.60	extracellular region part
GO:0005615	0.55	extracellular space
GO:0005576	0.54	extracellular region
GO:0044424	0.50	intracellular part

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	3f93A	0.343	6.73	0.048	0.644	3.2.1.-	77
2	0.060	2q1fA	0.324	6.66	0.036	0.583	4.2.2.21	NA
3	0.060	2fonB	0.417	5.95	0.049	0.680	1.3.3.6	255,272
4	0.060	1xnyA	0.390	5.85	0.047	0.655	6.4.1.3	137
5	0.060	2occN	0.300	6.46	0.042	0.525	1.9.3.1	134

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.67	2xvqB	0.896	2.35	0.342	1.000	0.96	9DS	complex1.pdb.gz	90,91,94,95,110,114,133,136,141,154
2	0.50	2xw0A	0.888	2.47	0.342	1.000	1.10	9NF	complex2.pdb.gz	90,91,94,95,97,106,110,113,114,116,133,136,141,150,154,186,190
3	0.48	2bxeA	0.890	2.44	0.342	1.000	0.84	1FL	complex3.pdb.gz	90,91,94,106,113,133,137,153
4	0.39	2bxqA	0.878	2.47	0.353	1.000	0.83	IMN	complex4.pdb.gz	97,100,106,109,110,113,114,133
5	0.06	2vufB	0.847	2.45	0.327	0.946	0.85	FUA	complex5.pdb.gz	97,106,107,133,134,137,138,141,142

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.