D-I-TASSER P62308-D1

D-I-TASSER results for P62308-D1

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>P62308 (76 residues)
MSKAHPPELKKFMDKKLSLKLNGGRHVQGILRGFDPFMNLVIDECVEMATSGQQNNIGMV
VIRGNSIIMLEALERV

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 \| \| \| MSKAHPPELKKFMDKKLSLKLNGGRHVQGILRGFDPFMNLVIDECVEMATSGQQNNIGMVVIRGNSIIMLEALERV
Prediction	CCCCCCHHHHHHCCCSSSSSSCCCSSSSSSSSSSCCCSSSSSCCCSSSSCCCCSSSSCSSSSSCCSSSSSSSCCCC
Confidence	9976765799866975999985994999999983673058861719996069565702799937939999822369
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 \| \| \| MSKAHPPELKKFMDKKLSLKLNGGRHVQGILRGFDPFMNLVIDECVEMATSGQQNNIGMVVIRGNSIIMLEALERV
Prediction	8666426504621744030304443403020313153010003404232457753411100011310010133378
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60

                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCCHHHHHHCCCSSSSSSCCCSSSSSSSSSSCCCSSSSSCCCSSSSCCCCSSSSCSSSSSCCSSSSSSSCCCC
MSKAHPPELKKFMDKKLSLKLNGGRHVQGILRGFDPFMNLVIDECVEMATSGQQNNIGMVVIRGNSIIMLEALERV

1i8fF

0.24

7.37

1.50

DEthreader

SKCFLGATLQDSIGKQVLVKLRDSHEIRGILRSFDQHVNLLLEDAEEII-DGNVYKRGTMVVRGENVLFISPVPG-

3swnA

0.23

0.22

7.03

2.29

SPARKS-K

-TILPLELIDKCIGSNLWVIMKSEREFAGTLVGFDDYVNIVLKDVTEYDTVGVTEKHSEMLLNGNGMCMLIPGGKP

1d3bL

0.23

0.21

6.59

0.76

MapAlign

-----SSKMLQHIDYRMRCILQDGRIFIGTFKAFDKHMNLILCDCDEFRKREEKRVLGLVLLRGENLVSMTVEG--

1d3bL

0.21

6.67

0.52

CEthreader

-TVGKSSKMLQHIDYRMRCILQDGRIFIGTFKAFDKHMNLILCDCDEFRKREEKRVLGLVLLRGENLVSMTVEGPP

5mqfd

1.00

0.97

27.26

2.41

MUSTER

--KAHPPELKKFMDKKLSLKLNGGRHVQGILRGFDPFMNLVIDECVEMATSGQQNNIGMVVIRGNSIIMLEALERV

5mkl11

0.28

8.46

1.43

HHsearch

KIENPLKSLKTALNKIVLVKLKNGEEYVGRLEQSDGTMNLVLKDCTEYREGDPVAKYGRVLIRGSNILFISIDYES

5mqfd

1.00

0.97

27.26

1.39

FFAS-3D

--KAHPPELKKFMDKKLSLKLNGGRHVQGILRGFDPFMNLVIDECVEMATSGQQNNIGMVVIRGNSIIMLEALERV

5ganm

0.16

5.24

0.77

EigenThreader

LEEFPMSLINDAMRTPVIISLRNNHKIIARVKAFDRHCNMVLENVKELWNVINRRFISKLFLRGDSVIVVLKTP--

1vu24

1.00

0.92

25.79

1.77

CNFpred

----HPPELKKFMDKKLSLKLNGGRHVQGILRGFDPFMNLVIDECVEMATSGQQNNIGMVVIRGNSIIMLEALE--

5mqfd

0.93

0.91

25.49

1.33

DEthreader

KAH-PPE-LKKFMDKKLSLKLNGGRHVQGILRGFDPFMNLVIDECVEMATSGQQNNIGMVVIRGNSIIMLEALERV

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.8391

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	1i8fF	0.89	1.44	0.270	0.974	model1_1i8fF.pdb.gz
2	1d3bL	0.86	1.69	0.213	0.987	model1_1d3bL.pdb.gz
3	3jcr7	0.86	1.16	0.366	0.934	model1_3jcr7.pdb.gz
4	3jb9J	0.85	1.59	0.438	0.947	model1_3jb9J.pdb.gz
5	5mqfd	0.85	1.85	0.932	0.961	model1_5mqfd.pdb.gz
6	1i5lC	0.85	1.28	0.270	0.934	model1_1i5lC.pdb.gz
7	3jb9E	0.85	1.23	0.282	0.934	model1_3jb9E.pdb.gz
8	3swnA	0.85	1.34	0.227	0.934	model1_3swnA.pdb.gz
9	2fwkA	0.85	1.36	0.224	0.934	model1_2fwkA.pdb.gz
10	5nrlr	0.84	1.76	0.528	0.947	model1_5nrlr.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0003723	1.00	RNA binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0009987	1.00	cellular process
GO:0008152	0.98	metabolic process
GO:0044260	0.97	cellular macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0044238	0.97	primary metabolic process
GO:0034641	0.97	cellular nitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:0016070	0.96	RNA metabolic process
GO:0006396	0.87	RNA processing
GO:0016071	0.82	mRNA metabolic process
GO:0006397	0.72	mRNA processing
GO:0008380	0.70	RNA splicing
GO:0000398	0.68	mRNA splicing, via spliceosome

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0030529	1.00	intracellular ribonucleoprotein complex
GO:0044446	0.93	intracellular organelle part
GO:0044428	0.91	nuclear part
GO:0030532	0.87	small nuclear ribonucleoprotein complex
GO:0097525	0.86	spliceosomal snRNP complex
GO:0097526	0.84	spliceosomal tri-snRNP complex
GO:0044444	0.75	cytoplasmic part
GO:0043229	0.74	intracellular organelle
GO:0005681	0.69	spliceosomal complex
GO:0043232	0.66	intracellular non-membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0043234	0.64	protein complex
GO:0036464	0.62	cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein granule
GO:0071013	0.60	catalytic step 2 spliceosome
GO:0071004	0.55	U2-type prespliceosome
GO:0005689	0.53	U12-type spliceosomal complex

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.085	1qmcA	0.468	2.29	0.102	0.645	2.7.7.49	61
2	0.060	3i3tC	0.518	3.28	0.067	0.763	3.4.19.12	46
3	0.060	1zq1A	0.461	3.47	0.032	0.789	6.3.5.-	NA
4	0.060	2ej9A	0.614	2.44	0.136	0.763	6.3.4.15	NA
5	0.060	1mirA	0.520	2.99	0.077	0.803	3.4.22.1	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.09	1i5lK	0.848	1.06	0.296	0.921	1.47	RQA	complex1.pdb.gz	36,37,39,63,64,65
2	0.05	1lnxB	0.857	1.41	0.247	0.934	0.83	URI	complex2.pdb.gz	10,30,31,32
3	0.05	1b340	0.824	1.73	0.205	0.961	1.14	III	complex3.pdb.gz	5,9,20,22,26,38,64,65,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74
4	0.05	1m8vC	0.818	1.50	0.211	0.921	0.98	RQA	complex4.pdb.gz	6,7,10,33,34
5	0.05	1b341	0.778	1.77	0.188	0.908	1.25	III	complex5.pdb.gz	25,32,33,34,35,39,40,43,47,55,58,59,60,61,62,63,65
6	0.04	3gibB	0.701	2.30	0.190	0.829	1.22	QNA	complex6.pdb.gz	20,21,24,25,26,27,28,44,60,68,69,71
7	0.04	3gibA	0.690	1.93	0.180	0.803	1.22	QNA	complex7.pdb.gz	20,24,25,26,27,28,44,60,68,69,71
8	0.04	1y960	0.731	2.21	0.171	0.882	0.94	III	complex8.pdb.gz	6,7,9,10,13,14,23,25,27,32,33,34,35,36,39,41,58,59,60,61,62,63,65
9	0.04	3resB	0.673	1.25	0.193	0.750	0.84	ADP	complex9.pdb.gz	20,24,26
10	0.04	3rerF	0.679	1.77	0.186	0.776	0.88	ADP	complex10.pdb.gz	21,25,27

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.