D-I-TASSER Q0VG06-D2

D-I-TASSER results for Q0VG06-D2

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q0VG06 (246 residues)
GADATLLQSPVVLCGLPDGQLCCVILKALVTSRSAPGDPNALVKILHHLEEPVIFIGALK
TEPQAAEAAENFLPDEDVHCDCLVAFGHHGRMLAIKASWDESGKLVPELREYCLPGPVLC
AACGGGGRVYHSTPSDLCVVDLSRGSTPLGPEQPEEGPGGLPPMLCPASLNICSVVSLSA
SPRTHEGGTKLLALSAKGRLMTCSLDLDSEMPGPARMTTESAGQKIKELLSGIGNISERV
SFLKKA

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| GADATLLQSPVVLCGLPDGQLCCVILKALVTSRSAPGDPNALVKILHHLEEPVIFIGALKTEPQAAEAAENFLPDEDVHCDCLVAFGHHGRMLAIKASWDESGKLVPELREYCLPGPVLCAACGGGGRVYHSTPSDLCVVDLSRGSTPLGPEQPEEGPGGLPPMLCPASLNICSVVSLSASPRTHEGGTKLLALSAKGRLMTCSLDLDSEMPGPARMTTESAGQKIKELLSGIGNISERVSFLKKA
Prediction	CCCCHHHCCCSSSSSCCCCSSSSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHCCCCSSSSSHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCSSSSSCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCC
Confidence	822022149889995799818999854112566789998750366641135434321011266531111246777776542201000488099998334778862410134305896554121589759995388549999437899888777787877787532667789862799840477899854899982598699997379987786654568887479999999876566665654149
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| GADATLLQSPVVLCGLPDGQLCCVILKALVTSRSAPGDPNALVKILHHLEEPVIFIGALKTEPQAAEAAENFLPDEDVHCDCLVAFGHHGRMLAIKASWDESGKLVPELREYCLPGPVLCAACGGGGRVYHSTPSDLCVVDLSRGSTPLGPEQPEEGPGGLPPMLCPASLNICSVVSLSASPRTHEGGTKLLALSAKGRLMTCSLDLDSEMPGPARMTTESAGQKIKELLSGIGNISERVSFLKKA
Prediction	744221250200000113210000003122344634444422040023043000101203134454543553455562212000101441210002043556441223035220401000001246220110033201002024543544355267435433320213414011000002234345332201001351200302152556454445143451153035104302402532532578
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180                 200                 220                 240

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCHHHCCCSSSSSCCCCSSSSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHCCCCSSSSSHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCSSSSSCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCC
GADATLLQSPVVLCGLPDGQLCCVILKALVTSRSAPGDPNALVKILHHLEEPVIFIGALKTEPQAAEAAENFLPDEDVHCDCLVAFGHHGRMLAIKASWDESGKLVPELREYCLPGPVLCAACGGGGRVYHSTPSDLCVVDLSRGSTPLGPEQPEEGPGGLPPMLCPASLNICSVVSLSASPRTHEGGTKLLALSAKGRLMTCSLDLDSEMPGPARMTTESAGQKIKELLSGIGNISERVSFLKKA

3j80g2

0.13

0.08

2.83

0.38

CEthreader

PKNLVDDGRITFVSAGMDKIVRSWSLNS-----------YRIEADFIGHNNYINVVQPS------------------PDGSLAASAGKDGQIYVWNLK------HKSAFMNFDAKDEVFALAFSSRFWLTAATASGIKIYDL--------------ENEVLIDELKPEFAGYPHAVSLAWS----ADGQTLFAGYTDNVIRVWQVMTAN-------------------------------------

6rlbC

0.07

2.64

0.62

EigenThreader

VTCCCLSKAFLLFAGTAHGSVVVWDLRELHYSVTLFWTFRTATFSTVNHRSPLQAVEPISLSPF------STQEEMSGLSFHIASLDESGVLNVWVSISDLGLMPGGRVKLVHSALTLNVKFLSDPNHFIIGTDMGISHGTRQDLRVAPKLPQ-------QHGIRPVKVNVIDFSFLAGCSDGSTDSHAVTGLQWSPAVFLVQDDTSSGSLKRRWAAPEVDECNRLRLLLQ---------------

6vbu91

0.15

0.14

4.77

0.60

FFAS-3D

-VDNTGNGQDKIIVGSFMGYLRIFPILQVEVGKFVSGTEMLHLAVLH---SRKLCVYSVSGTLGNVEHGNQYSFGGVKGRDLICIQSVDGMLMVFEQ---ESYAFGRFLPGSLLPGPL--AYSSRTDSFITVSSCQVESYKYQVLAFAVVDWTLNIGEQAIDICIVSFIQSASSVFVLGERNFKDNGQIQIVTLSDDGHLQCSYLGTDPSKVESRELNYDELDMELKELQKVIKNVNK--------

3i2nA

0.16

0.13

4.34

0.85

SPARKS-K

GGLGIGEGAPEIVTGSRDGTVKVWDPVANMEPVQGENKRDCWTVAFGNAEERVVCAGYLFDLRNMALRWETNIKNKDISMNKLVATSLEGKFHVFDMRTQHPTKGFASVSEKAHKSTVWQVRHLQNRELFLTAGGALHLWKYEYPIQRKDSEGIEMGVAGSVSLLQNVTLSTQPISSLDWS---PDKRGLCVCSSFDQTVRVLIVTK---------------------------------------

3acpA

0.11

0.07

2.50

1.60

CNFpred

---------KYVIAGHVSGVITVHNVFSK----------EQTIQLPSKFTCSCNSLTVDG-----------------NNANYIYAGYENGMLAQWDLRS----PECPVGEFLIN-TPINNVYFAAGALFVSSGFDTSIKLDII-----SDPESERPAIE---ETPTFLVSNDDEVSQFCYVSD--ESNGEVLEVGKNNFCALYNLSNP--------------------------------------

1l5gA

0.10

0.08

2.86

1.00

DEthreader

SKDFTAVDDFVSGVPRARTLGMVYIYDGKN--------M-SSLYNFTGEQAYFGFSVAATDIN------------GDDYADVFIGAPLVGQVSVSLQR-A---SGDFQTTKLNGFEAFSAIAPLGDNDIAIAAYGIVYIFN-GR--ST----------GLNAVPSQILEGQWPSFYSMKGATDIKNGYPDLIVGAFVDRAILYRARPVPILNQFTPA-----------------GVVRNNEALLAG

6jp6A2

0.10

0.07

2.56

0.45

MapAlign

----SQSGDFLLVTVYSDSTIKIWHY--------RENQNKFDLIMQGRYTCCLFNVVFIALK----------------EELLVVISPTDGHLVVYNISVDISGDLVLPVAQLPVHSGVKSLDYVASATILTGGDNGLGLSNLKL---------DDSNKVTLKTSDFIAAAASSTITSGMLING----GKEVITTSVDQVIRAWEITAGKLS-----------------------------------

5oqld

0.12

0.11

3.87

0.54

MUSTER

EGGPSLSFHRTFAASSGQGCIRIWDLEHSTAGQAQWPSFVDTITDVCFNQVETSVIGSVATDRSLRTNMPVIKTVLHFACNRIVFNPMEAMNLAVASEARNFDKALNIQKGH--VAAVMDVEFSPTGEELVSGSYD--TIRL------------RRDAGHSRDVYHTKRMQRVFRTMWT-----MDSK-YILTGSDDGNVRLWRAN-ASERSGVKATRQRQALEYNNALLDRYGHL-PEIRRIRRH

2oajA2

0.13

0.10

3.38

0.52

HHsearch

KTAINNSNIGFVGIAYAAGSLMLIDRRGPAIIYMEIREIS-G-----AQSACVTCIEFVIMEYGD----------DGYSSILMVCGTDMGEVITYKIL-PASGKFDVQLMDITSKGPIHKIDAFSKGIVLITGFDDIRLITLGKSKST----------HK----GF-KY-PLAATGLISTVNNDRKNLTVIITLEINGHLRVFTIPD-FKEQMSEHIP----------------------------

3dwlH

0.11

0.08

2.95

0.36

CEthreader

LSLDWHPNNVLLAAGCADRKAYVLSAYVRDVDKPEASLPFNTVCAEYPSGGWVHAVGFSPSG------------------NALAYAGHDSSVTIAYPSAPEQPPR-ALITVKLSQLPLRSLLWANESAIVAAGYYSPILLQGNEAGTSKTSFTHTGNTGEGREESSLPTVHQNMIATLRPYAGTPGNITAFTSSGTDGRVVLWTL-----------------------------------------

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.576

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	7wb4n	0.58	3.74	0.074	0.736	model1_7wb4n.pdb.gz
2	3nvqA	0.57	4.47	0.066	0.776	model1_3nvqA.pdb.gz
3	4i0oA	0.57	3.66	0.086	0.724	model1_4i0oA.pdb.gz
4	6qp7A	0.57	4.25	0.062	0.760	model1_6qp7A.pdb.gz
5	6jp6A	0.57	4.12	0.062	0.732	model1_6jp6A.pdb.gz
6	1olzA	0.56	4.26	0.110	0.764	model1_1olzA.pdb.gz
7	5nrlP	0.56	4.43	0.058	0.760	model1_5nrlP.pdb.gz
8	5ch1A	0.56	4.02	0.100	0.728	model1_5ch1A.pdb.gz
9	3fcsA	0.56	3.80	0.089	0.711	model1_3fcsA.pdb.gz
10	5cwwB	0.56	3.74	0.113	0.703	model1_5cwwB.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0005102	0.48	receptor binding
GO:1901363	0.41	heterocyclic compound binding
GO:0097159	0.41	organic cyclic compound binding
GO:0099600	0.37	transmembrane receptor activity
GO:0038023	0.37	signaling receptor activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0036297	1.00	interstrand cross-link repair

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0045111	1.00	intermediate filament cytoskeleton
GO:0005737	1.00	cytoplasm
GO:0005654	1.00	nucleoplasm

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	2agsA	0.538	4.28	0.085	0.744	3.2.1.18	NA
2	0.060	1k3iA	0.482	4.23	0.024	0.658	1.1.3.9	NA
3	0.060	1kb0A	0.482	4.17	0.061	0.638	1.1.99.-	NA
4	0.060	2w68C	0.284	5.34	0.007	0.443	3.2.1.18	NA
5	0.060	1s0kA	0.536	4.37	0.060	0.744	3.2.1.18	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.01	1fwxA	0.538	3.28	0.088	0.654	0.59	CUA	complex1.pdb.gz	86,90,92
2	0.01	2vdnA	0.525	3.51	0.108	0.658	0.44	III	complex2.pdb.gz	13,20,21,54
3	0.01	3ijeA	0.550	3.51	0.075	0.687	0.50	UUU	complex3.pdb.gz	87,119,131
4	0.01	2pm63	0.530	3.40	0.070	0.646	0.42	III	complex4.pdb.gz	12,14,54,88,118,133

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.