D-I-TASSER Q12768

D-I-TASSER results for Q12768

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q12768
Protein Name: WASH complex subunit 5
Gene Name: WASHC5

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q12768 (1159 residues)
MLDFLAENNLCGQAILRIVSCGNAIIAELLRLSEFIPAVFRLKDRADQQKYGDIIFDFSY
FKGPELWESKLDAKPELQDLDEEFRENNIEIVTRFYLAFQSVHKYIVDLNRYLDDLNEGV
YIQQTLETVLLNEDGKQLLCEALYLYGVMLLVIDQKIEGEVRERMLVSYYRYSAARSSAD
SNMDDICKLLRSTGYSSQPGAKRPSNYPESYFQRVPINESFISMVIGRLRSDDIYNQVSA
YPLPEHRSTALANQAAMLYVILYFEPSILHTHQAKMREIVDKYFPDNWVISIYMGITVNL
VDAWEPYKAAKTALNNTLDLSNVREQASRYATVSERVHAQVQQFLKEGYLREEMVLDNIP
KLLNCLRDCNVAIRWLMLHTADSACDPNNKRLRQIKDQILTDSRYNPRILFQLLLDTAQF
EFILKEMFKQMLSEKQTKWEHYKKEGSERMTELADVFSGVKPLTRVEKNENLQAWFREIS
KQILSLNYDDSTAAGRKTVQLIQALEEVQEFHQLESNLQVCQFLADTRKFLHQMIRTINI
KEEVLITMQIVGDLSFAWQLIDSFTSIMQESIRVNPSMVTKLRATFLKLASALDLPLLRI
NQANSPDLLSVSQYYSGELVSYVRKVLQIIPESMFTSLLKIIKLQTHDIIEVPTRLDKDK
LRDYAQLGPRYEVAKLTHAISIFTEGILMMKTTLVGIIKVDPKQLLEDGIRKELVKRVAF
ALHRGLIFNPRAKPSELMPKLKELGATMDGFHRSFEYIQDYVNIYGLKIWQEEVSRIINY
NVEQECNNFLRTKIQDWQSMYQSTHIPIPKFTPVDESVTFIGRLCREILRITDPKMTCHI
DQLNTWYDMKTHQEVTSSRLFSEIQTTLGTFGLNGLDRLLCFMIVKELQNFLSMFQKIIL
RDRTVQDTLKTLMNAVSPLKSIVANSNKIYFSAIAKTQKIWTAYLEAIMKVGQMQILRQQ
IANELNYSCRFDSKHLAAALENLNKALLADIEAHYQDPSLPYPKEDNTLLYEITAYLEAA
GIHNPLNKIYITTKRLPYFPIVNFLFLIAQLPKLQYNKNLGMVCRKPTDPVDWPPLVLGL
LTLLKQFHSRYTEQFLALIGQFICSTVEQCTSQKIPEIPADVVGALLFLEDYVRYTKLPR
RVAEAHVPNFIFDEFRTVL

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q12768-D1	1-434,541-718	612		MLDFLAENNLCGQAILRIVSCGNAIIAELLRLSEFIPAVFRLKDRADQQKYGDIIFDFSYFKGPELWESKLDAKPELQDLDEEFRENNIEIVTRFYLAFQSVHKYIVDLNRYLDDLNEGVYIQQTLETVLLNEDGKQLLCEALYLYGVMLLVIDQKIEGEVRERMLVSYYRYSAARSSADSNMDDICKLLRSTGYSSQPGAKRPSNYPESYFQRVPINESFISMVIGRLRSDDIYNQVSAYPLPEHRSTALANQAAMLYVILYFEPSILHTHQAKMREIVDKYFPDNWVISIYMGITVNLVDAWEPYKAAKTALNNTLDLSNVREQASRYATVSERVHAQVQQFLKEGYLREEMVLDNIPKLLNCLRDCNVAIRWLMLHTADSACDPNNKRLRQIKDQILTDSRYNPRILFQLLLDTAQFEFILKEMFKQMLSEKEEVLITMQIVGDLSFAWQLIDSFTSIMQESIRVNPSMVTKLRATFLKLASALDLPLLRINQANSPDLLSVSQYYSGELVSYVRKVLQIIPESMFTSLLKIIKLQTHDIIEVPTRLDKDKLRDYAQLGPRYEVAKLTHAISIFTEGILMMKTTLVGIIKVDPKQLLEDGIRKELVKRV
2	Q12768-D2	435-540	106		KQTKWEHYKKEGSERMTELADVFSGVKPLTRVEKNENLQAWFREISKQILSLNYDDSTAAGRKTVQLIQALEEVQEFHQLESNLQVCQFLADTRKFLHQMIRTINI
3	Q12768-D3	719-831	113		AFALHRGLIFNPRAKPSELMPKLKELGATMDGFHRSFEYIQDYVNIYGLKIWQEEVSRIINYNVEQECNNFLRTKIQDWQSMYQSTHIPIPKFTPVDESVTFIGRLCREILRI
4	Q12768-D4	832-1159	328		TDPKMTCHIDQLNTWYDMKTHQEVTSSRLFSEIQTTLGTFGLNGLDRLLCFMIVKELQNFLSMFQKIILRDRTVQDTLKTLMNAVSPLKSIVANSNKIYFSAIAKTQKIWTAYLEAIMKVGQMQILRQQIANELNYSCRFDSKHLAAALENLNKALLADIEAHYQDPSLPYPKEDNTLLYEITAYLEAAGIHNPLNKIYITTKRLPYFPIVNFLFLIAQLPKLQYNKNLGMVCRKPTDPVDWPPLVLGLLTLLKQFHSRYTEQFLALIGQFICSTVEQCTSQKIPEIPADVVGALLFLEDYVRYTKLPRRVAEAHVPNFIFDEFRTVL

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.48

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	3p8cB	0.45	3.69	0.057	0.493	model1_3p8cB.pdb.gz
2	3p8cA	0.40	5.16	0.045	0.467	model1_3p8cA.pdb.gz
3	3javA	0.32	8.49	0.051	0.460	model1_3javA.pdb.gz
4	6r9tA	0.31	9.60	0.028	0.490	model1_6r9tA.pdb.gz
5	6mu1A	0.31	8.83	0.043	0.458	model1_6mu1A.pdb.gz
6	6ez8A	0.31	9.39	0.043	0.480	model1_6ez8A.pdb.gz
7	7cpxA	0.30	9.72	0.043	0.473	model1_7cpxA.pdb.gz
8	6zwmA	0.29	8.92	0.035	0.437	model1_6zwmA.pdb.gz
9	6eqoA	0.29	9.62	0.039	0.458	model1_6eqoA.pdb.gz
10	6z2wE	0.29	8.30	0.038	0.413	model1_6z2wE.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:1901363	0.29	heterocyclic compound binding
GO:0097159	0.29	organic cyclic compound binding
GO:0008092	0.19	cytoskeletal protein binding
GO:0097367	0.17	carbohydrate derivative binding
GO:0043167	0.16	ion binding
GO:0005215	0.16	transporter activity
GO:0003824	0.16	catalytic activity
GO:0000166	0.16	nucleotide binding
GO:0046872	0.15	metal ion binding
GO:0035639	0.15	purine ribonucleoside triphosphate binding
GO:0032555	0.15	purine ribonucleotide binding
GO:0032550	0.15	purine ribonucleoside binding
GO:0019899	0.14	enzyme binding
GO:0003676	0.14	nucleic acid binding
GO:0022892	0.13	substrate-specific transporter activity
GO:0022857	0.13	transmembrane transporter activity
GO:0005524	0.13	ATP binding
GO:0048365	0.12	Rac GTPase binding
GO:0015075	0.12	ion transmembrane transporter activity
GO:0003779	0.11	actin binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044763	1.00	single-organism cellular process
GO:0016043	1.00	cellular component organization
GO:0044767	0.80	single-organism developmental process
GO:0048869	0.79	cellular developmental process
GO:0006810	0.70	transport
GO:0022607	0.62	cellular component assembly

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0071203	1.00	WASH complex
GO:0043226	0.52	organelle
GO:0043229	0.50	intracellular organelle
GO:0043227	0.50	membrane-bounded organelle

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	2pffA	0.266	10.02	0.035	0.434	2.3.1.41 2.3.1.86	NA
2	0.060	1kktA	0.230	5.99	0.040	0.283	3.2.1.113	NA
3	0.060	2q1fA	0.246	9.45	0.037	0.383	4.2.2.21	NA
4	0.060	1i8qA	0.231	6.96	0.034	0.302	4.2.2.1	NA
5	0.060	2pffD	0.224	10.51	0.021	0.381	2.3.1.86	143

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.01	3hazA	0.249	8.79	0.044	0.372	0.12	NAD	complex1.pdb.gz	29,153,154,161
2	0.01	1xmsA	0.107	6.69	0.055	0.139	0.24	ANP	complex2.pdb.gz	19,20,21,22,25,26,27
3	0.01	1llwA	0.246	9.60	0.032	0.392	0.10	AKG	complex3.pdb.gz	20,23,143,144
4	0.01	1ofdA	0.229	9.95	0.051	0.374	0.13	AKG	complex4.pdb.gz	24,27,147,148
5	0.01	1llzA	0.242	9.62	0.033	0.385	0.15	FMN	complex5.pdb.gz	23,24,25,142,144,292
6	0.01	1ofdA	0.229	9.95	0.051	0.374	0.13	FMN	complex6.pdb.gz	24,25,28,31,605
7	0.01	3cmvD	0.253	9.43	0.046	0.392	0.21	ANP	complex7.pdb.gz	22,23,24,25,26,27,31
8	0.01	2uvbA	0.262	9.78	0.049	0.419	0.10	NAP	complex8.pdb.gz	99,159,163,186
9	0.01	1xmvA	0.105	6.51	0.041	0.135	0.21	ADP	complex9.pdb.gz	21,22,23,24,31,148,150
10	0.01	1llwA	0.246	9.60	0.032	0.392	0.14	FMN	complex10.pdb.gz	26,27,28,152,153,292,294

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.