D-I-TASSER Q13042

D-I-TASSER results for Q13042

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q13042
Protein Name: Cell division cycle protein 16 homolog
Gene Name: CDC16

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q13042 (620 residues)
MNLERLRKRVRQYLDQQQYQSALFWADKVASLSREEPQDIYWLAQCLYLTAQYHRAAHAL
RSRKLDKLYEACRYLAARCHYAAKEHQQALDVLDMEEPINKRLFEKYLKDESGFKDPSSD
WEMSQSSIKSSICLLRGKIYDALDNRTLATYSYKEALKLDVYCFEAFDLLTSHHMLTAQE
EKELLESLPLSKLCNEEQELLRFLFENKLKKYNKPSETVIPESVDGLQENLDVVVSLAER
HYYNCDFKMCYKLTSVVMEKDPFHASCLPVHIGTLVELNKANELFYLSHKLVDLYPSNPV
SWFAVGCYYLMVGHKNEHARRYLSKATTLEKTYGPAWIAYGHSFAVESEHDQAMAAYFTA
AQLMKGCHLPMLYIGLEYGLTNNSKLAERFFSQALSIAPEDPFVMHEVGVVAFQNGEWKT
AEKWFLDALEKIKAIGNEVTVDKWEPLLNNLGHVCRKLKKYAEALDYHRQALVLIPQNAS
TYSAIGYIHSLMGNFENAVDYFHTALGLRRDDTFSVTMLGHCIEMYIGDSEAYIGADIKD
KLKCYDFDVHTMKTLKNIISPPWDFREFEVEKQTAEETGLTPLETSRKTPDSRPSLEETF
EIEMNESDMMLETSMSDHST

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q13042-D1	1-162	162		MNLERLRKRVRQYLDQQQYQSALFWADKVASLSREEPQDIYWLAQCLYLTAQYHRAAHALRSRKLDKLYEACRYLAARCHYAAKEHQQALDVLDMEEPINKRLFEKYLKDESGFKDPSSDWEMSQSSIKSSICLLRGKIYDALDNRTLATYSYKEALKLDVY
2	Q13042-D2	163-279	117		CFEAFDLLTSHHMLTAQEEKELLESLPLSKLCNEEQELLRFLFENKLKKYNKPSETVIPESVDGLQENLDVVVSLAERHYYNCDFKMCYKLTSVVMEKDPFHASCLPVHIGTLVELN
3	Q13042-D3	280-314	35		KANELFYLSHKLVDLYPSNPVSWFAVGCYYLMVGH
4	Q13042-D4	315-366	52		KNEHARRYLSKATTLEKTYGPAWIAYGHSFAVESEHDQAMAAYFTAAQLMKG
5	Q13042-D5	367-620	254		CHLPMLYIGLEYGLTNNSKLAERFFSQALSIAPEDPFVMHEVGVVAFQNGEWKTAEKWFLDALEKIKAIGNEVTVDKWEPLLNNLGHVCRKLKKYAEALDYHRQALVLIPQNASTYSAIGYIHSLMGNFENAVDYFHTALGLRRDDTFSVTMLGHCIEMYIGDSEAYIGADIKDKLKCYDFDVHTMKTLKNIISPPWDFREFEVEKQTAEETGLTPLETSRKTPDSRPSLEETFEIEMNESDMMLETSMSDHST

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.87

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	4ui9J	0.72	3.20	0.982	0.805	model1_4ui9J.pdb.gz
2	2xpiA	0.65	4.40	0.338	0.802	model1_2xpiA.pdb.gz
3	4ui9X	0.59	4.48	0.142	0.727	model1_4ui9X.pdb.gz
4	4ui9C	0.59	4.26	0.127	0.698	model1_4ui9C.pdb.gz
5	4ui9O	0.58	5.93	0.092	0.789	model1_4ui9O.pdb.gz
6	2q7fA	0.27	3.12	0.144	0.295	model1_2q7fA.pdb.gz
7	2pl2A	0.26	2.23	0.145	0.279	model1_2pl2A.pdb.gz
8	3hymH1	0.25	2.83	0.906	0.276	model1_3hymH1.pdb.gz
9	1ya0B	0.25	5.70	0.059	0.331	model1_1ya0B.pdb.gz
10	3as4A	0.24	3.10	0.172	0.269	model1_3as4A.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0003824	0.56	catalytic activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0009987	0.93	cellular process
GO:0065007	0.69	biological regulation
GO:0044699	0.69	single-organism process
GO:0050789	0.67	regulation of biological process
GO:0050794	0.65	regulation of cellular process
GO:0008152	0.61	metabolic process
GO:0044238	0.59	primary metabolic process
GO:0044237	0.59	cellular metabolic process
GO:0043170	0.59	macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0044260	0.58	cellular macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0044763	0.57	single-organism cellular process
GO:0019538	0.55	protein metabolic process
GO:0044267	0.54	cellular protein metabolic process
GO:0006464	0.51	cellular protein modification process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	1.00	intracellular part
GO:0044428	0.96	nuclear part
GO:0032991	0.95	macromolecular complex
GO:0043234	0.94	protein complex
GO:1902494	0.74	catalytic complex
GO:1990234	0.73	transferase complex
GO:0043226	0.71	organelle
GO:0043229	0.70	intracellular organelle
GO:0000151	0.66	ubiquitin ligase complex
GO:0031461	0.65	cullin-RING ubiquitin ligase complex
GO:0000152	0.65	nuclear ubiquitin ligase complex
GO:0005680	0.64	anaphase-promoting complex
GO:0043227	0.58	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0043231	0.57	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0044444	0.55	cytoplasmic part
GO:0005634	0.53	nucleus

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1w3bB	0.427	4.37	0.122	0.505	2.4.1.-	159,176,201
2	0.060	1kc7A	0.334	7.58	0.045	0.523	2.7.9.1	NA
3	0.060	1w3bA	0.484	3.86	0.139	0.561	2.4.1.-	NA
4	0.060	2olsA	0.324	8.12	0.037	0.531	2.7.9.2	NA
5	0.060	3c5wA	0.215	5.17	0.061	0.277	3.1.3.16	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.05	2xpiA	0.653	4.40	0.338	0.802	0.12	III	complex1.pdb.gz	78,89,137
2	0.04	2xpiD	0.644	4.37	0.320	0.787	0.21	III	complex2.pdb.gz	19,41,132,135,165,266
3	0.01	1qgrA	0.353	7.31	0.083	0.542	0.12	III	complex3.pdb.gz	131,134,137,141,169,306
4	0.01	3taxA	0.399	6.98	0.080	0.573	0.16	UDP	complex4.pdb.gz	146,149,152
5	0.01	3ouwA	0.398	6.10	0.051	0.553	0.13	III	complex5.pdb.gz	71,75,138,142,172

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.