D-I-TASSER Q13242-D1

D-I-TASSER results for Q13242-D1

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q13242 (151 residues)
MSGWADERGGEGDGRIYVGNLPTDVREKDLEDLFYKYGRIREIELKNRHGLVPFAFVRFE
DPRDAEDAIYGRNGYDYGQCRLRVEFPRTYGGRGGWPRGGRNGPPTRRSDRVYPERSTSY
GYSRSRSGSRGRDSPYQSRGSPHYFSPFRPY

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MSGWADERGGEGDGRIYVGNLPTDVREKDLEDLFYKYGRIREIELKNRHGLVPFAFVRFEDPRDAEDAIYGRNGYDYGQCRLRVEFPRTYGGRGGWPRGGRNGPPTRRSDRVYPERSTSYGYSRSRSGSRGRDSPYQSRGSPHYFSPFRPY
Prediction	CCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHCCCSSSSSSSCCCCCCCSSSSSSCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCSSCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
Confidence	9988877778999879981999999999999999722876899984599999528999799999999999819955589188998667889999999999999999999997777899999998899865678776668888888998999
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MSGWADERGGEGDGRIYVGNLPTDVREKDLEDLFYKYGRIREIELKNRHGLVPFAFVRFEDPRDAEDAIYGRNGYDYGQCRLRVEFPRTYGGRGGWPRGGRNGPPTRRSDRVYPERSTSYGYSRSRSGSRGRDSPYQSRGSPHYFSPFRPY
Prediction	8545446555676120000103460447204520562151340303457714000101043572045016714545144240303304546846644445444444346423434435443354444344334232445544423424358
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHCCCSSSSSSSCCCCCCCSSSSSSCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCSSCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
MSGWADERGGEGDGRIYVGNLPTDVREKDLEDLFYKYGRIREIELKNRHGLVPFAFVRFEDPRDAEDAIYGRNGYDYGQCRLRVEFPRTYGGRGGWPRGGRNGPPTRRSDRVYPERSTSYGYSRSRSGSRGRDSPYQSRGSPHYFSPFRPY

1h2uX

0.24

0.19

6.00

1.77

SPARKS-K

GDNEEQEKLLKKSCTLYVGNLSFYTTEEQIYELFSKSGDIKKIIMGLKKTACGFCFVEYYSRADAENAMRYINGTRLDDRIIRTDWDAGFKEGRQYGRGRSGGQVRDEYRQDYDAGRGGYGKL----------------------------

1h2uX

0.24

0.19

6.00

1.36

MUSTER

GDNEEQEKLLKKSCTLYVGNLSFYTTEEQIYELFSKSGDIKKIIMGLKKTACGFCFVEYYSRADAENAMRYINGTRLDDRIIRTDWDAGFKEGRQYGRGRSGGQVRDEYRQDYDAGRGGYGKL----------------------------

1h2uX

0.25

0.20

6.17

1.48

FFAS-3D

LSQYRDQHFRKKSCTLYVGNLSFYTTEEQIYELFSKSGDIKKIIMGMKKTACGFCFVEYYSRADAENAMRYINGTRLDDRIIRTDWDAGFKEGRQYGRGRSGGQVRDEYRQDYDAGRGGYGK-----------------------------

1x4aA

0.64

0.42

12.11

1.56

CNFpred

GGGVIRGPAGNNDCRIYVGNLPPDIRTKDIEDVFYKYGAIRDIDLKNRRGGPPFAFVEFEDPRDAEDAVYGRDGYDYDGYRLRVEFPRSGRGTGSGPSSG---------------------------------------------------

2ghpB

0.16

0.11

3.74

0.83

DEthreader

-------------TTVLVKNLPKSYNQNKVYKYFKHCGPIIHVDVADSLKNFRFARIEFARYDGALAAIT-KTHKVVGQNEIIVSHLTEC--TLWYIDCVKLNGLKIEG-----------------------S-FNNCCISVSLAD-----

7b0yb

0.22

0.17

5.44

1.65

SPARKS-K

DPHNDPNAQGDAFKTLFVARVNYDTTESKLRREFEVYGPIKRIHMVYSGKPRGYAFIEYEHERDMHSAYKHADGKKIDGRRVLVDVERGRTVKGWRPRRLGGGLGGTRRGGADVNIRHSG-------------------------------

5szwA

0.27

0.15

4.68

0.50

MapAlign

----EDCRGDIGRTNLIVNYLPQNMTQDELRSLFSSIGEVESAKLIRDGHSLGYGFVNYVTAKDAERAINTLNGLRLQSKTIKVSYARPS-------------------------------------------------------------

5szwA

0.26

0.15

4.71

0.30

CEthreader

DHMAEDCRGDIGRTNLIVNYLPQNMTQDELRSLFSSIGEVESAKLIRDGHSLGYGFVNYVTAKDAERAINTLNGLRLQSKTIKVSYARPS-------------------------------------------------------------

6n7pY

0.19

0.15

4.91

1.35

MUSTER

PNGLQELRESMKSSTIYVGNLSFYTSEEQIYELFSKCGTIKRIIMGLKFTPCGFCFIIYSCPDEALNALKYLSDTKLDEKTITIDLDPGFEDGRQFGRGKSGGQVSDELRFDFDASRGGFA------------------------------

7b0yb

0.23

0.18

5.62

0.85

HHsearch

DPHNDPNAQGDAFKTLFVARVNYDTTESKLRREFEVYGPIKRIHMVYSKSGRGYAFIEYEHERDMHSAYKHADGKKIDGRRVLVDVERGRTVKGWRPRRLGGGLGGT--------RRGGADVNIRHSG-----------------------

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.6533

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	1h2uX	0.73	1.94	0.228	0.815	model1_1h2uX.pdb.gz
2	6n7pY	0.72	1.89	0.182	0.801	model1_6n7pY.pdb.gz
3	3h2uB	0.61	3.51	0.141	0.788	model1_3h2uB.pdb.gz
4	3s8sA	0.56	2.82	0.154	0.669	model1_3s8sA.pdb.gz
5	3thpA	0.55	3.55	0.111	0.715	model1_3thpA.pdb.gz
6	2qfjB	0.53	2.46	0.213	0.616	model1_2qfjB.pdb.gz
7	2cq2A	0.50	2.34	0.154	0.570	model1_2cq2A.pdb.gz
8	1p1tA	0.50	2.86	0.208	0.583	model1_1p1tA.pdb.gz
9	1x5sA	0.49	1.84	0.273	0.550	model1_1x5sA.pdb.gz
10	1cvjA	0.49	3.16	0.176	0.583	model1_1cvjA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:1901363	0.95	heterocyclic compound binding
GO:0097159	0.95	organic cyclic compound binding
GO:0003676	0.93	nucleic acid binding
GO:0003723	0.80	RNA binding
GO:0044822	0.58	poly(A) RNA binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0009987	0.81	cellular process
GO:0044237	0.69	cellular metabolic process
GO:0044260	0.68	cellular macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0044238	0.68	primary metabolic process
GO:0034641	0.67	cellular nitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:0090304	0.66	nucleic acid metabolic process
GO:0016070	0.64	RNA metabolic process
GO:0065007	0.62	biological regulation
GO:0050789	0.61	regulation of biological process
GO:0050794	0.60	regulation of cellular process
GO:0016071	0.58	mRNA metabolic process
GO:0060255	0.57	regulation of macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0006396	0.57	RNA processing
GO:0080090	0.56	regulation of primary metabolic process
GO:0051171	0.56	regulation of nitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:0031323	0.56	regulation of cellular metabolic process
GO:0010468	0.56	regulation of gene expression
GO:0006397	0.54	mRNA processing
GO:0008380	0.53	RNA splicing
GO:0000398	0.51	mRNA splicing, via spliceosome
GO:0051252	0.50	regulation of RNA metabolic process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	1.00	intracellular part
GO:0043229	0.84	intracellular organelle
GO:0005634	0.82	nucleus
GO:0044446	0.70	intracellular organelle part
GO:0044428	0.68	nuclear part
GO:0032991	0.60	macromolecular complex

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	2vdcF	0.461	4.30	0.045	0.722	1.4.1.13	19
2	0.060	2vdcA	0.460	4.49	0.056	0.735	1.4.1.13	NA
3	0.060	2e5gA	0.438	2.21	0.181	0.503	2.7.7.52	82,84,87
4	0.060	2wgdA	0.421	5.61	0.071	0.801	2.3.1.41	145
5	0.060	3btaA	0.445	4.86	0.008	0.762	3.4.24.69	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.06	2kxnB	0.495	2.40	0.292	0.583	1.02	QNA	complex1.pdb.gz	19,20,44,45,46,54,56,58,80,81,82,83,87
2	0.05	1h2v1	0.563	1.26	0.256	0.596	1.35	III	complex2.pdb.gz	24,27,28,29,31,32,33,36,60,70,71,73,75,76,78,79
3	0.05	2rraA	0.517	2.40	0.287	0.583	1.19	QNA	complex3.pdb.gz	19,20,46,54,56,58,80,81,83,85,86,87,88,89,90
4	0.04	1urnB	0.491	2.39	0.198	0.563	1.06	RQA	complex4.pdb.gz	17,19,20,23,44,46,48,49,53,54,56,80,85,86,87,88,89
5	0.04	2j0s2	0.488	1.71	0.253	0.530	1.17	III	complex5.pdb.gz	15,17,19,41,42,44,46,49,52,54,56,85,86,87,88
6	0.04	1dz5A	0.470	2.58	0.198	0.556	1.01	RQA	complex6.pdb.gz	17,19,20,44,53,56,58,86,87,88,89
7	0.04	2x1aA	0.488	1.94	0.214	0.543	1.09	QNA	complex7.pdb.gz	20,21,22,23,53,80
8	0.03	1o0pA	0.488	2.46	0.218	0.576	0.83	III	complex8.pdb.gz	20,28,29,32,33,72,74,75,76
9	0.03	1a9n1	0.485	2.14	0.169	0.543	1.23	III	complex9.pdb.gz	28,29,31,32,33,35,36,38,39,42,75,76,77,78,79
10	0.03	2f9j0	0.481	2.46	0.202	0.556	0.91	III	complex10.pdb.gz	12,14,15,27,30,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,54,56,61,62,87

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.