D-I-TASSER Q14940-D2

D-I-TASSER results for Q14940-D2

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q14940 (295 residues)
AYRIRDQIWDVYYRLNIRDAISFVDQGGHVLSSTGLTLPSMPSRNSVAETSVTNLLRESG
SGACLDLQVIDTVRSGRDREDAVMHHLLCGGLYKPRRRYKASCSRHFISEDAQERQDKEV
FQQNMKRRLESFKSTKHNICFTKSKPRPRKTGRRKKDGVANAEATNGKHRGLGFQDTAAV
ILTVESEEEEEESDSSETEKEDDEGIIFVARATSEVLQEGKVSGSLEVCPSPRIIPPSPT
CAEKELPWKSGQGDLAVYVSSETTKIVPVDMQTGWNQSISSLESLASPPCNQAPI

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| AYRIRDQIWDVYYRLNIRDAISFVDQGGHVLSSTGLTLPSMPSRNSVAETSVTNLLRESGSGACLDLQVIDTVRSGRDREDAVMHHLLCGGLYKPRRRYKASCSRHFISEDAQERQDKEVFQQNMKRRLESFKSTKHNICFTKSKPRPRKTGRRKKDGVANAEATNGKHRGLGFQDTAAVILTVESEEEEEESDSSETEKEDDEGIIFVARATSEVLQEGKVSGSLEVCPSPRIIPPSPTCAEKELPWKSGQGDLAVYVSSETTKIVPVDMQTGWNQSISSLESLASPPCNQAPI
Prediction	CCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHCCCCCCCCHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCC
Confidence	9403568999999986999999999667756642121531221123467662232104689732125665415552136789999999985451165500233556788540247899999999999998754102577888787776544210035766666778887766668886545666655454567888874346887489727898544678888555678887777999983101067767888888535787642565533556653302444136898778999
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| AYRIRDQIWDVYYRLNIRDAISFVDQGGHVLSSTGLTLPSMPSRNSVAETSVTNLLRESGSGACLDLQVIDTVRSGRDREDAVMHHLLCGGLYKPRRRYKASCSRHFISEDAQERQDKEVFQQNMKRRLESFKSTKHNICFTKSKPRPRKTGRRKKDGVANAEATNGKHRGLGFQDTAAVILTVESEEEEEESDSSETEKEDDEGIIFVARATSEVLQEGKVSGSLEVCPSPRIIPPSPTCAEKELPWKSGQGDLAVYVSSETTKIVPVDMQTGWNQSISSLESLASPPCNQAPI
Prediction	7444444014004503243025104634434432223043234444344442441356544414231432563754444422412300363024315523332333414557456323421343044225524545363545464554445545565435445364264652434454534244455554645755545633420020204345643564633441544453443344244534412043366423322365233313141453245114315425434366668
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180                 200                 220                 240                 260                 280

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHCCCCCCCCHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCC
AYRIRDQIWDVYYRLNIRDAISFVDQGGHVLSSTGLTLPSMPSRNSVAETSVTNLLRESGSGACLDLQVIDTVRSGRDREDAVMHHLLCGGLYKPRRRYKASCSRHFISEDAQERQDKEVFQQNMKRRLESFKSTKHNICFTKSKPRPRKTGRRKKDGVANAEATNGKHRGLGFQDTAAVILTVESEEEEEESDSSETEKEDDEGIIFVARATSEVLQEGKVSGSLEVCPSPRIIPPSPTCAEKELPWKSGQGDLAVYVSSETTKIVPVDMQTGWNQSISSLESLASPPCNQAPI

7abiA

0.07

0.06

2.70

1.05

SPARKS-K

VYDVEP--LEKITDAYLDQYLWYEADKRRLFPPWIKPADTEPPPLLVYKWCQGINNLQDVWETCNVMLESRFEKMYEKIDLTLLNRLLRLIVDHAKNNVVINYKDMNHTNSYGIIRGLQFASFIVQYYGLVMDLLVLGLHRASEMAGPPQMPNDFLSFQDIATEAAHPIRLFCYIDRIHIFFRFTADEARDLIQRYLTEHPD----------PNNENIVGYNNKKCWPRDARMRLMKHDVNLGRAVFWDRLPRSVTTVQWENSFVSVYSKDNPNLLFNMCGFECRILPSYEEFTH

2yggA

0.23

0.05

1.59

1.16

HHsearch

--------------------------------------------------------------------AFALSK----DKEEEIRKILRNNLQKTRQR-LRSYNRHTLVADPYEEAWNQMLLRRQKAQL----EQKINNYLT---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2fgeA2

0.05

2.37

0.52

CEthreader

VPLFCQSLLEGTKDLTFVQLNQLIGRKTGGISVYPLTSSVRGKDEPCSKIIVRGKSAGRDDLFNLNCLLQEVQFTDQQRFKQFVSQSRARENRLRGSGHGIAAARDALNIAGWSEQGGLSYLEFLHTLEKKVDEDWEGISSSLEEIRRSLLARNGCIVNTADGKSLTNVEKSVAKFLDLLPENPSGGLVTWDGRLPLRNEAIVIPTQVNYVGKAGNIYSTGYELDGSAYVISKHISNTWLWDRVRVSGGAYGGFCDFDSHSGVFSYLSYRDPNLLKTLDIYDGTGDFLRGLDVDQ

4ui9O

0.04

1.99

0.63

EigenThreader

FGLPYLASLGIQSLVQQRAFAGELIDISIAQKTAIWRLYGRSTMALQQAQMLLSMESFAVALCHLAELHAEQGCFAAASEVLKHLKERFPLWMLCDQKIQFDRAMNDGKYHLADSLVTGITALNSEGVYRKAVVLQAQNQMSEAHKLLQKLLVHCQKLKNTEMVISVLLSVAELYWRSSS----PTIALPMLLQALALSKEYRLQYLASETVLNLAFAQLILGIPEQALSLLHMAIEGAILDKGRAMFLVAKCQVASAASYDQPKALEAAIENLNEAKNYFAKVDCKERIRDVVY

6wfqC

0.17

0.07

2.44

0.39

FFAS-3D

---SERELMAFFGRPSVREALAALKRKGLVQINNGERARVSRPSADTIESSLVRYAAEHATD--EQIDLLADNNAAFIRSDVDFHRVLAEIPGNPHEHNNVSYQQHIAIVDAIRRHDPDEADRALQSHLNS--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

4btgA3

0.10

0.09

3.53

0.91

SPARKS-K

--GFNLKVKDLNGSARGLTQAFAIGELKNQLSVGALQLP--LQFTRTFSASMTSELLWEAYVYRVGRTAT-YPFDANAVVSSVLTILGRLSPSTPKELDPARLRNTNGIDQLRSNLALFIYQDMVKQRIEAMSEVSPFKLRPINETSAIDHMGQPSHVVFAKEITAFTPVKLANNSNQRFLDVEPGISDRMSATLAPIGNNSNGAEMTLGFPSVVEVDESLEARAVAHNPEVVVSEHQGVAAEQGLVWNVRTELRIPVGYNAIEGGSIRTPEPL------EAIAYNKPQAKVLDL

1us7B

0.15

0.06

1.93

0.67

CNFpred

FVEKYEKQIKHFGMLRWDDSQKYLSDN----------------VHLVCEETANYLV-----IWCIDLEVEE---KCALMEQVAHQTIVMQFILELAKDPRACFRQFFTKIKTADRQYMEGFNDELEAFKERVRG-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

6mixA

0.06

0.04

1.73

0.67

DEthreader

-----------------------------TPSSVIYHLTQHWGLD-VPNLLISAWIIT-RTEKISEQTKE--R-GGVA--IK-IP------TTNGTPCVVAVIAQVALPVQIVRRRQLLAKASRSQDHENWDHLSDLHPTMTAALIWAVQNLSSSEEMLAL------------------------------------HLLYPNCERLPLSRIRQEHWPSFNDVELNRLN-NLHADSGAS------------------------IRWQVV--DR-RI-PLYANHKTLLQKAAAEGA

4f91B

0.06

2.48

0.76

MapAlign

---ISHDDLKGDPLLDQRRLDLVHTAALMLDKNNLVKYDKKTGNFQVTELGIASHYYITNDTVQTYNQLLKPTLSEIELFRVFSKESIEEPSAKINVLLQAFISQLKLEGFALMADMVYVTQSAGRLMRAIFEIVLNRGW--------------------AQLTDKTLNLCKMIDKRMWQSMCPLRQFRKLPEEVVKKIEKKNFPFERLYDLNHNEIGELIRMPKMGKTIHKYVHLFPKLELSVHLQPITRSTLKVELTIAQDEHLITFFVPVFEPLPPQYFIRVVSDRWLSCET

2atyA

0.07

2.79

0.58

MUSTER

TFRLIGEKS-----------LLCITKDKVDGTKPAPKCEYFNKYSSCPEPIVPGGYKIRGSTPYRHGDSVTACKTNFSMNGNKSVWCQANNMWGPTRLPTCVSVFPLEGSIEGRGGSELADPEVPRDCGCKPCICTVPEVSSVFIFPPKPKDVLTITLTVVDISKDDPEVQFSVEVHTAQTQPREEQFNSTFRSVSMHQDWLNGKEKCRVNAAFPAPIEKTISKTKGRPKAPQLYTIPPPKEQMAFFWQWNGQPAENYKNTQPIMNTNESYFVYSKLNVQKSNWEAG-EGLHNHH

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.4419

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	4av3A	0.43	5.74	0.025	0.675	model1_4av3A.pdb.gz
2	6eu6A	0.42	5.70	0.043	0.641	model1_6eu6A.pdb.gz
3	3o8oA	0.41	5.83	0.063	0.658	model1_3o8oA.pdb.gz
4	3cmmC	0.41	6.00	0.049	0.681	model1_3cmmC.pdb.gz
5	5aezA	0.41	5.60	0.052	0.627	model1_5aezA.pdb.gz
6	5l43A	0.41	6.33	0.024	0.688	model1_5l43A.pdb.gz
7	6elhA	0.41	6.13	0.034	0.675	model1_6elhA.pdb.gz
8	7bwmA	0.41	5.79	0.045	0.647	model1_7bwmA.pdb.gz
9	4jxoA	0.41	5.73	0.032	0.651	model1_4jxoA.pdb.gz
10	2b3yA	0.41	6.28	0.031	0.692	model1_2b3yA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0015385	1.00	sodium:proton antiporter activity
GO:0015079	0.71	potassium ion transmembrane transporter activity
GO:0015386	0.68	potassium:proton antiporter activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044699	0.93	single-organism process
GO:0009987	0.86	cellular process
GO:0006810	0.86	transport
GO:0065007	0.85	biological regulation
GO:0044763	0.84	single-organism cellular process
GO:0065008	0.82	regulation of biological quality
GO:0055067	0.81	monovalent inorganic cation homeostasis
GO:0006811	0.81	ion transport
GO:0030001	0.80	metal ion transport
GO:0006814	0.79	sodium ion transport
GO:0006885	0.78	regulation of pH
GO:0055085	0.76	transmembrane transport
GO:0030641	0.72	regulation of cellular pH
GO:1990118	0.70	sodium ion import into cell
GO:0098719	0.66	sodium ion import across plasma membrane
GO:0071805	0.54	potassium ion transmembrane transport
GO:0051453	0.54	regulation of intracellular pH

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	1.00	cell part
GO:0016020	1.00	membrane
GO:0005886	0.86	plasma membrane
GO:0044425	0.61	membrane part

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	2jk6A	0.378	6.02	0.048	0.610	1.8.1.12	NA
2	0.060	1dxlC	0.382	6.09	0.050	0.620	1.8.1.4	24
3	0.060	1zj9B	0.298	7.09	0.041	0.559	1.8.7.1	104,108
4	0.060	1jqnA	0.377	6.19	0.050	0.614	4.1.1.31	NA
5	0.060	1iv8A	0.358	6.64	0.047	0.634	5.4.99.15	78

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.01	2ahoA	0.384	5.92	0.062	0.617	0.18	GNP	complex1.pdb.gz	21,22,27,81,82
2	0.01	3bb0A	0.386	6.19	0.048	0.647	0.20	PO3	complex2.pdb.gz	27,28,29,96
3	0.01	2pncA	0.389	6.29	0.067	0.675	0.28	CLU	complex3.pdb.gz	21,25,91,92
4	0.01	2y08A	0.392	6.67	0.037	0.702	0.12	FAD	complex4.pdb.gz	28,29,59,92,99,100,103,113
5	0.01	1ox4B	0.283	7.10	0.043	0.536	0.26	POP	complex5.pdb.gz	24,26,94,95,96
6	0.01	2qn6A	0.359	6.14	0.059	0.590	0.25	GDP	complex6.pdb.gz	93,94,97
7	0.01	1gl9C	0.389	6.51	0.049	0.658	0.16	ANP	complex7.pdb.gz	27,89,90,91,92
8	0.01	3p3mB	0.384	5.92	0.065	0.614	0.11	GTP	complex8.pdb.gz	21,23,24,25,26
9	0.01	2nvkX	0.391	5.75	0.059	0.617	0.29	NAP	complex9.pdb.gz	21,22,89,90,91
10	0.01	2y3rA	0.395	6.49	0.054	0.688	0.21	TIR	complex10.pdb.gz	26,27,63,92

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.