D-I-TASSER Q58FG0

D-I-TASSER results for Q58FG0

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q58FG0
Protein Name: Putative heat shock protein HSP 90-alpha A5
Gene Name: HSP90AA5P

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q58FG0 (334 residues)
MGFHHVGQAGLELLTSGHPALERRPEYLEERRIKEIVKKHSQFIGYPITLFVEKKRNKQV
SDAEAEKKEDKRKKKKESNDKPEIEDVGSDEEEEKKDADKKKKKSKEKYIDQELNKTKPI
WTRNPDAITNEEYGEFHQSLTNNWEDHLAVKHFSVEGQLEELKDSRRVMKANQKHIYYIT
GETKDQVANSAFVECLQKHGLEVIYMIELIDKYCVQQLKELESKTVVSVAKEGLELPEDE
EEKKKQEEKKTKFENLCKIMKDMLEKKVKKVVVSNCMEDPQRHTNKIYRMIKLGLGVDEY
DPTANDINAAITKEMPPLRGGDDTSRMEEVGGSG

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q58FG0-D1	1-334	334		MGFHHVGQAGLELLTSGHPALERRPEYLEERRIKEIVKKHSQFIGYPITLFVEKKRNKQVSDAEAEKKEDKRKKKKESNDKPEIEDVGSDEEEEKKDADKKKKKSKEKYIDQELNKTKPIWTRNPDAITNEEYGEFHQSLTNNWEDHLAVKHFSVEGQLEELKDSRRVMKANQKHIYYITGETKDQVANSAFVECLQKHGLEVIYMIELIDKYCVQQLKELESKTVVSVAKEGLELPEDEEEKKKQEEKKTKFENLCKIMKDMLEKKVKKVVVSNCMEDPQRHTNKIYRMIKLGLGVDEYDPTANDINAAITKEMPPLRGGDDTSRMEEVGGSG

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.55

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	5fwkA	0.67	3.63	0.575	0.793	model1_5fwkA.pdb.gz
2	7l7iA	0.66	3.48	0.656	0.772	model1_7l7iA.pdb.gz
3	2cg9B	0.65	3.60	0.372	0.772	model1_2cg9B.pdb.gz
4	2o1uA	0.55	4.95	0.245	0.716	model1_2o1uA.pdb.gz
5	7kluA	0.54	4.37	0.164	0.701	model1_7kluA.pdb.gz
6	3hjcA	0.50	3.55	0.394	0.578	model1_3hjcA.pdb.gz
7	3q6mA	0.49	3.50	0.682	0.572	model1_3q6mA.pdb.gz
8	2iopA2	0.34	3.76	0.224	0.407	model1_2iopA2.pdb.gz
9	1vknA	0.25	6.11	0.036	0.398	model1_1vknA.pdb.gz
10	1lfwA1	0.22	6.37	0.044	0.356	model1_1lfwA1.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0030234	0.54	enzyme regulator activity
GO:0019904	0.54	protein domain specific binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0050896	0.95	response to stimulus
GO:0006950	0.81	response to stress
GO:0042221	0.79	response to chemical
GO:0009628	0.79	response to abiotic stimulus
GO:0009266	0.78	response to temperature stimulus
GO:0009408	0.77	response to heat
GO:0009409	0.65	response to cold
GO:0046677	0.64	response to antibiotic

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	1.00	intracellular part
GO:0043226	0.97	organelle
GO:0043229	0.96	intracellular organelle
GO:0043227	0.96	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0043231	0.95	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0005737	0.90	cytoplasm
GO:0005634	0.85	nucleus
GO:0044444	0.62	cytoplasmic part

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	2vz8A	0.348	6.73	0.026	0.593	2.3.1.85	NA
2	0.060	2hpiA	0.312	6.74	0.044	0.539	2.7.7.7	NA
3	0.060	3dnyT	0.229	7.67	0.038	0.449	3.6.5.3	NA
4	0.060	2q1fA	0.397	6.12	0.053	0.626	4.2.2.21	NA
5	0.060	1z0hB	0.211	5.91	0.043	0.332	3.4.24.69	232

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.19	2cg9A	0.621	3.95	0.379	0.766	0.13	ATP	complex1.pdb.gz	176,200,204,233,234
2	0.03	2iopA	0.466	4.62	0.232	0.599	0.19	ADP	complex2.pdb.gz	179,180,192
3	0.01	2g25B	0.330	7.09	0.074	0.587	0.11	TDK	complex3.pdb.gz	190,196,234,235
4	0.01	1l8aA	0.334	6.86	0.040	0.581	0.12	TDP	complex4.pdb.gz	232,234,235
5	0.01	2g25A	0.335	6.94	0.081	0.587	0.22	TDK	complex5.pdb.gz	193,196,200,232
6	0.01	3lq4B	0.331	6.29	0.065	0.530	0.14	TDP	complex6.pdb.gz	199,234,235,236
7	0.01	2nm1A	0.205	7.23	0.033	0.380	0.17	III	complex7.pdb.gz	226,230,232,233
8	0.01	3q0aA	0.251	6.73	0.030	0.422	0.21	GTP	complex8.pdb.gz	200,231,234
9	0.01	2np0A	0.322	6.97	0.038	0.569	0.16	III	complex9.pdb.gz	190,191,192,233,242,243

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.