D-I-TASSER Q5JTZ5

D-I-TASSER results for Q5JTZ5

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q5JTZ5
Protein Name: Uncharacterized protein C9orf152
Gene Name: C9orf152

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q5JTZ5 (239 residues)
MEGLPCPCPALPHFWQLRSHLMAEGSRTQAPGKGPPLSIQFLRAQYEGLKRQQRTQAHLL
VLPKGGNTPAPAESMVNAVWINKERRSSLSLEEADSEVEGRLEEAAQGCLQAPKSPWHTH
LEMHCLVQTSPQDTSHQVHHRGKLVGSDQRLPPEGDTHLFETNQMTQQGTGIPEAAQLPC
QVGNTQTKAVESGLKFSTQCPLSIKNPHRSGKPAYYPFPQRKTPRISQAARNLGLYGSA

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q5JTZ5-D1	1-239	239		MEGLPCPCPALPHFWQLRSHLMAEGSRTQAPGKGPPLSIQFLRAQYEGLKRQQRTQAHLLVLPKGGNTPAPAESMVNAVWINKERRSSLSLEEADSEVEGRLEEAAQGCLQAPKSPWHTHLEMHCLVQTSPQDTSHQVHHRGKLVGSDQRLPPEGDTHLFETNQMTQQGTGIPEAAQLPCQVGNTQTKAVESGLKFSTQCPLSIKNPHRSGKPAYYPFPQRKTPRISQAARNLGLYGSA

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.4448

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	5a9q8	0.45	5.34	0.020	0.686	model1_5a9q8.pdb.gz
2	3f3fD	0.44	5.41	0.030	0.703	model1_3f3fD.pdb.gz
3	3hmjG	0.43	5.81	0.043	0.720	model1_3hmjG.pdb.gz
4	4hhrA	0.42	6.16	0.041	0.741	model1_4hhrA.pdb.gz
5	1cqeB2	0.37	6.69	0.043	0.711	model1_1cqeB2.pdb.gz
6	1cvuA2	0.36	6.52	0.043	0.661	model1_1cvuA2.pdb.gz
7	1zbsA	0.35	5.73	0.035	0.586	model1_1zbsA.pdb.gz
8	2c2nA	0.30	6.15	0.069	0.548	model1_2c2nA.pdb.gz
9	1s9cG	0.30	6.19	0.021	0.544	model1_1s9cG.pdb.gz
10	1mhlC	0.30	6.78	0.038	0.582	model1_1mhlC.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0005096	0.73	GTPase activator activity
GO:0017137	0.66	Rab GTPase binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0065007	0.88	biological regulation
GO:0050794	0.84	regulation of cellular process
GO:0006810	0.80	transport
GO:0071702	0.78	organic substance transport
GO:0046907	0.78	intracellular transport
GO:0045184	0.78	establishment of protein localization
GO:0008104	0.78	protein localization
GO:0006886	0.77	intracellular protein transport
GO:0043087	0.74	regulation of GTPase activity
GO:0033043	0.69	regulation of organelle organization
GO:0090630	0.68	activation of GTPase activity
GO:0031338	0.68	regulation of vesicle fusion
GO:1902115	0.65	regulation of organelle assembly
GO:1902017	0.64	regulation of cilium assembly
GO:0044699	0.55	single-organism process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	1.00	intracellular part
GO:0043226	0.91	organelle
GO:0012505	0.76	endomembrane system
GO:0072372	0.72	primary cilium
GO:0005622	0.71	intracellular
GO:0016020	0.67	membrane
GO:0043229	0.66	intracellular organelle
GO:0044444	0.62	cytoplasmic part
GO:0043227	0.62	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0044422	0.61	organelle part
GO:0044446	0.59	intracellular organelle part
GO:0043234	0.59	protein complex
GO:0043231	0.59	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1gaiA	0.381	5.88	0.034	0.653	3.2.1.3	NA
2	0.060	3b7wA	0.383	6.21	0.073	0.665	6.2.1.2	NA
3	0.060	2vn7A	0.385	5.86	0.039	0.661	3.2.1.3	230
4	0.060	2vkzG	0.426	5.81	0.043	0.720	2.3.1.38 3.1.2.14	204
5	0.060	1qbaA	0.378	6.11	0.031	0.669	3.2.1.52	67,86,90

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.01	2uv8G	0.425	5.71	0.049	0.716	0.12	FMN	complex1.pdb.gz	83,99,117,230
2	0.01	3n8yA	0.393	6.53	0.056	0.720	0.20	DIF	complex2.pdb.gz	47,225,226,229,230,233,234
3	0.01	1diqA	0.398	5.62	0.034	0.669	0.14	PCR	complex3.pdb.gz	117,235,237
4	0.01	1eqgB	0.380	6.54	0.059	0.716	0.21	IBP	complex4.pdb.gz	49,229,230,234
5	0.01	1prhA	0.381	6.57	0.027	0.720	0.11	HEM	complex5.pdb.gz	39,42,45,114,219
6	0.01	1q4gB	0.370	6.14	0.047	0.653	0.24	UUU	complex6.pdb.gz	62,65,66
7	0.01	2ipiB	0.388	6.13	0.050	0.703	0.14	FAD	complex7.pdb.gz	198,203,237
8	0.01	1pgeA	0.380	6.56	0.023	0.716	0.13	ISF	complex8.pdb.gz	116,117,234,236,237
9	0.01	1f0xB	0.403	5.81	0.040	0.707	0.12	FAD	complex9.pdb.gz	63,64,65,66,68,99,189,190
10	0.01	3d2hA	0.407	6.13	0.025	0.711	0.11	FAD	complex10.pdb.gz	105,110,112,113,117,205,233,234,237

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.