D-I-TASSER Q5T1M5

D-I-TASSER results for Q5T1M5

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q5T1M5
Protein Name: FK506-binding protein 15
Gene Name: FKBP15

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q5T1M5 (1219 residues)
MFGAGDEDDTDFLSPSGGARLASLFGLDQAAAGHGNEFFQYTAPKQPKKGQGTAATGNQA
TPKTAPATMSTPTILVATAVHAYRYTNGQYVKQGKFGAAVLGNHTAREYRILLYISQQQP
VTVARIHVNFELMVRPNNYSTFYDDQRQNWSIMFESEKAAVEFNKQVCIAKCNSTSSLDA
VLSQDLIVADGPAVEVGDSLEVAYTGWLFQNHVLGQVFDSTANKDKLLRLKLGSGKVIKG
WEDGMLGMKKGGKRLLIVPPACAVGSEGVIGWTQATDSILVFEVEVRRVKFARDSGSDGH
SVSSRDSAAPSPIPGADNLSADPVVSPPTSIPFKSGEPALRTKSNSLSEQLAINTSPDAV
KAKLISRMAKMGQPMLPILPPQLDSNDSEIEDVNTLQGGGQPVVTPSVQPSLHPAHPALP
QMTSQAPQPSVTGLQAPSAALMQVSSLDSHSAVSGNAQSFQPYAGMQAYAYPQASAVTSQ
LQPVRPLYPAPLSQPPHFQGSGDMASFLMTEARQHNTEIRMAVSKVADKMDHLMTKVEEL
QKHSAGNSMLIPSMSVTMETSMIMSNIQRIIQENERLKQEILEKSNRIEEQNDKISELIE
RNQRYVEQSNLMMEKRNNSLQTATENTQARVLHAEQEKAKVTEELAAATAQVSHLQLKMT
AHQKKETELQMQLTESLKETDLLRGQLTKVQAKLSELQETSEQAQSKFKSEKQNRKQLEL
KVTSLEEELTDLRVEKESLEKNLSERKKKSAQERSQAEEEIDEIRKSYQEELDKLRQLLK
KTRVSTDQAAAEQLSLVQAELQTQWEAKCEHLLASAKDEHLQQYQEVCAQRDAYQQKLVQ
LQEKCLALQAQITALTKQNEQHIKELEKNKSQMSGVEAAASDPSEKVKKIMNQVFQSLRR
EFELEESYNGRTILGTIMNTIKMVTLQLLNQQEQEKEESSSEEEEEKAEERPRRPSQEQS
ASASSGQPQAPLNRERPESPMVPSEQVVEEAVPLPPQALTTSQDGHRRKGDSEAEALSEI
KDGSLPPELSCIPSHRVLGPPTSIPPEPLGPVSMDSECEESLAASPMAAKPDNPSGKVCV
REVAPDGPLQESSTRLSLTSDPEEGDPLALGPESPGEPQPPQLKKDDVTSSTGPHKELSS
TEAGSTVAGAALRPSHHSQRSSLSGDEEDELFKGATLKALRPKAQPEEEDEDEVSMKGRP
PPTPLFGDDDDDDDIDWLG

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q5T1M5-D1	1-1219	1219		MFGAGDEDDTDFLSPSGGARLASLFGLDQAAAGHGNEFFQYTAPKQPKKGQGTAATGNQATPKTAPATMSTPTILVATAVHAYRYTNGQYVKQGKFGAAVLGNHTAREYRILLYISQQQPVTVARIHVNFELMVRPNNYSTFYDDQRQNWSIMFESEKAAVEFNKQVCIAKCNSTSSLDAVLSQDLIVADGPAVEVGDSLEVAYTGWLFQNHVLGQVFDSTANKDKLLRLKLGSGKVIKGWEDGMLGMKKGGKRLLIVPPACAVGSEGVIGWTQATDSILVFEVEVRRVKFARDSGSDGHSVSSRDSAAPSPIPGADNLSADPVVSPPTSIPFKSGEPALRTKSNSLSEQLAINTSPDAVKAKLISRMAKMGQPMLPILPPQLDSNDSEIEDVNTLQGGGQPVVTPSVQPSLHPAHPALPQMTSQAPQPSVTGLQAPSAALMQVSSLDSHSAVSGNAQSFQPYAGMQAYAYPQASAVTSQLQPVRPLYPAPLSQPPHFQGSGDMASFLMTEARQHNTEIRMAVSKVADKMDHLMTKVEELQKHSAGNSMLIPSMSVTMETSMIMSNIQRIIQENERLKQEILEKSNRIEEQNDKISELIERNQRYVEQSNLMMEKRNNSLQTATENTQARVLHAEQEKAKVTEELAAATAQVSHLQLKMTAHQKKETELQMQLTESLKETDLLRGQLTKVQAKLSELQETSEQAQSKFKSEKQNRKQLELKVTSLEEELTDLRVEKESLEKNLSERKKKSAQERSQAEEEIDEIRKSYQEELDKLRQLLKKTRVSTDQAAAEQLSLVQAELQTQWEAKCEHLLASAKDEHLQQYQEVCAQRDAYQQKLVQLQEKCLALQAQITALTKQNEQHIKELEKNKSQMSGVEAAASDPSEKVKKIMNQVFQSLRREFELEESYNGRTILGTIMNTIKMVTLQLLNQQEQEKEESSSEEEEEKAEERPRRPSQEQSASASSGQPQAPLNRERPESPMVPSEQVVEEAVPLPPQALTTSQDGHRRKGDSEAEALSEIKDGSLPPELSCIPSHRVLGPPTSIPPEPLGPVSMDSECEESLAASPMAAKPDNPSGKVCVREVAPDGPLQESSTRLSLTSDPEEGDPLALGPESPGEPQPPQLKKDDVTSSTGPHKELSSTEAGSTVAGAALRPSHHSQRSSLSGDEEDELFKGATLKALRPKAQPEEEDEDEVSMKGRPPPTPLFGDDDDDDDIDWLG

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.3968

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	6vr4A	0.25	9.54	0.028	0.391	model1_6vr4A.pdb.gz
2	6edoA	0.25	9.67	0.034	0.390	model1_6edoA.pdb.gz
3	6w98A	0.24	8.94	0.042	0.362	model1_6w98A.pdb.gz
4	6fb3A	0.23	9.29	0.045	0.358	model1_6fb3A.pdb.gz
5	6sytA	0.23	9.24	0.019	0.354	model1_6sytA.pdb.gz
6	6r9tA	0.23	9.40	0.048	0.356	model1_6r9tA.pdb.gz
7	3jcrA	0.23	9.92	0.045	0.370	model1_3jcrA.pdb.gz
8	3qmzA	0.23	9.01	0.030	0.346	model1_3qmzA.pdb.gz
9	6l42A	0.23	9.77	0.044	0.360	model1_6l42A.pdb.gz
10	2vdcA	0.23	9.75	0.037	0.357	model1_2vdcA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0003824	0.93	catalytic activity
GO:0003755	0.91	peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase activity
GO:1901363	0.90	heterocyclic compound binding
GO:0097159	0.90	organic cyclic compound binding
GO:0008144	0.86	drug binding
GO:0005528	0.85	FK506 binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0009987	0.94	cellular process
GO:0061077	0.84	chaperone-mediated protein folding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	0.99	cell part
GO:0044424	0.98	intracellular part
GO:0016020	0.93	membrane
GO:0044446	0.91	intracellular organelle part
GO:0044444	0.89	cytoplasmic part
GO:0044432	0.83	endoplasmic reticulum part
GO:0044425	0.82	membrane part
GO:0005789	0.81	endoplasmic reticulum membrane

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	2vdcF	0.210	10.12	0.039	0.345	1.4.1.13	NA
2	0.060	2pffD	0.182	9.66	0.020	0.280	2.3.1.86	NA
3	0.060	2vz8A	0.190	10.13	0.030	0.308	2.3.1.85	NA
4	0.060	2r7oA	0.201	9.63	0.040	0.313	2.7.7.48	NA
5	0.060	2vdcA	0.228	9.75	0.037	0.357	1.4.1.13	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

No Binding sites was predicted

Click to view	Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.