D-I-TASSER Q68E01-D2

D-I-TASSER results for Q68E01-D2

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q68E01 (131 residues)
LGADGVCMTFMKQIAGGGDVTAKNIWLAESVLDILTEQREWVLKSSILIAMAVYTYLRLI
VDHHGTAQLQALRQKEVDFCISLLRERFMECLMIGRDLVRLLQNVARIPEFELLWKDIIH
NPQALSPQFTG

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 \| \| \| \| \| \| LGADGVCMTFMKQIAGGGDVTAKNIWLAESVLDILTEQREWVLKSSILIAMAVYTYLRLIVDHHGTAQLQALRQKEVDFCISLLRERFMECLMIGRDLVRLLQNVARIPEFELLWKDIIHNPQALSPQFTG
Prediction	CCHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCHHHHHHHHHHCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCC
Confidence	97358999999981268999832489999999999999999971806899999999998762389820799999999999999999999999974699999998515726999999998593335999999
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 \| \| \| \| \| \| LGADGVCMTFMKQIAGGGDVTAKNIWLAESVLDILTEQREWVLKSSILIAMAVYTYLRLIVDHHGTAQLQALRQKEVDFCISLLRERFMECLMIGRDLVRLLQNVARIPEFELLWKDIIHNPQALSPQFTG
Prediction	74323001100220343442254113104300410353441046333101202220030032255465155025401510130035313401511330010024025154045015301431552457268
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCHHHHHHHHHHCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCC
LGADGVCMTFMKQIAGGGDVTAKNIWLAESVLDILTEQREWVLKSSILIAMAVYTYLRLIVDHHGTAQLQALRQKEVDFCISLLRERFMECLMIGRDLVRLLQNVARIPEFELLWKDIIHNPQALSPQFTG

4owtA

0.94

0.89

25.07

1.33

DEthreader

LGADGVC-TF-KQIA-GGDVTAKNIWLAESVLDILTEQREWVLKSSILIA-AVYTYLRLIVDHHGTAQLQALRQKEVDFCISLLRERF-ECL-IGRDLVRLLQNVARIPEFELLWKDIIHNPQPQFTGQLQ

4owtA2

0.99

0.88

24.59

1.86

SPARKS-K

-----------KQIAG-GDVTAKNIWLAESVLDILTEQREWVLKSSILIA-AVYTYLRLIVDHHGTAQLQALRQKEVDFCISLLRERF-EC-LIGRDLVRLLQNVARIPEFELLWKDIIHNPQALSPQFTG

4owtA

0.99

0.93

26.08

0.79

MapAlign

--VDGVC-TF-KQIA-GGDVTAKNIWLAESVLDILTEQREWVLKSSILIA-AVYTYLRLIVDHHGTAQLQALRQKEVDFCISLLRERF-ECL-IGRDLVRLLQNVARIPEFELLWKDIIHNPQALSPQFTG

4owtA

0.96

0.92

25.69

0.64

CEthreader

LGADGVCT--FKQIAG-GDVTAKNIWLAESVLDILTEQREWVLKSSILIA-AVYTYLRLIVDHHGTAQLQALRQKEVDFCISLLRERFE--CLIGRDLVRLLQNVARIPEFELLWKDIIHNPQALSPQFTG

4owtA

0.92

0.88

24.66

1.39

MUSTER

LGADGVCT--FKQIA-GGDVTAKNIWLAESVLDILTEQREWVLKS-SILIAAVYTYLRLIVDHHGTAQLQALRQKEVDFCISLLRERFECL--IGRDLVRLLQNVARIPEFELLWKDIIHNPQALSPQFTG

4owtA

0.98

0.94

26.31

4.99

HHsearch

LGADGVCT--FKQIAG-GDVTAKNIWLAESVLDILTEQREWVLKSSILIA-AVYTYLRLIVDHHGTAQLQALRQKEVDFCISLLRERF-ECL-IGRDLVRLLQNVARIPEFELLWKDIIHNPQALSPQFTG

4owtA2

0.93

0.82

23.15

1.94

FFAS-3D

-----------KQIAGG-DVTAKNIWLAESVLDILTEQREWVLKS-SILIAAVYTYLRLIVDHHGTAQLQALRQKEVDFCISLLRERFECL--IGRDLVRLLQNVARIPEFELLWKDIIHNPQALSPQFTG

4owtA2

0.91

0.81

22.73

0.82

EigenThreader

------------KQIAGGDVTAKNIWLAESVLDILTEQREWVLKSSILIAAVY-TYLRLIVDHHGTAQLQALRQKEVDFCISLLRERFECL--IGRDLVRLLQNVARIPEFELLWKDIIHNPQALSPQFTG

4owwA

1.00

0.99

27.79

1.32

CNFpred

LGADGVCMTFMKQIAG-GDVTAKNIWLAESVLDILTEQREWVLKSSILIAMAVYTYLRLIVDHHGTAQLQALRQKEVDFCISLLRERFMECLMIGRDLVRLLQNVARIPEFELLWKDIIHNPQALSPQFTG

4owtA2

0.93

0.82

23.15

1.33

DEthreader

-----------KQIA-GGDVTAKNIWLAESVLDILTEQREWVLKSSILIA-AVYTYLRLIVDHHGTAQLQALRQKEVDFCISLLRERF-ECL-IGRDLVRLLQNVARIPEFELLWKDIIHNPQPQFTGQLQ

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.843

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	4owtA	0.94	0.54	0.992	0.954	model1_4owtA.pdb.gz
2	6tgbA	0.71	2.87	0.056	0.947	model1_6tgbA.pdb.gz
3	2x1gF	0.71	3.25	0.157	0.970	model1_2x1gF.pdb.gz
4	4ifqA2	0.70	3.03	0.081	0.924	model1_4ifqA2.pdb.gz
5	4knhA1	0.62	3.70	0.099	0.924	model1_4knhA1.pdb.gz
6	2x19B2	0.61	3.88	0.057	0.931	model1_2x19B2.pdb.gz
7	5hb4B6	0.53	2.47	0.023	0.656	model1_5hb4B6.pdb.gz
8	2futA4	0.44	3.46	0.092	0.649	model1_2futA4.pdb.gz
9	1x87A2	0.42	4.35	0.097	0.702	model1_1x87A2.pdb.gz
10	1qyaB2	0.41	4.74	0.021	0.687	model1_1qyaB2.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0005048	0.51	signal sequence binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0090304	1.00	nucleic acid metabolic process
GO:0044260	1.00	cellular macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0050794	0.91	regulation of cellular process
GO:0051716	0.89	cellular response to stimulus
GO:0007093	0.89	mitotic cell cycle checkpoint
GO:0010212	0.88	response to ionizing radiation
GO:0006281	0.88	DNA repair
GO:0016070	0.70	RNA metabolic process
GO:0006396	0.65	RNA processing
GO:0016073	0.64	snRNA metabolic process
GO:0016180	0.63	snRNA processing

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044428	1.00	nuclear part
GO:0043234	1.00	protein complex
GO:0043231	1.00	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0005634	0.90	nucleus
GO:0070876	0.88	SOSS complex
GO:0044451	0.67	nucleoplasm part
GO:0032039	0.64	integrator complex

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1lf6A	0.560	4.02	0.087	0.855	3.2.1.3	110
2	0.060	1nxcA	0.602	3.85	0.041	0.916	3.2.1.113	NA
3	0.060	2q1fA	0.612	3.87	0.070	0.947	4.2.2.21	NA
4	0.060	1hcuB	0.598	3.92	0.087	0.916	3.2.1.113	NA
5	0.060	1gaiA	0.648	3.55	0.062	0.947	3.2.1.3	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.02	2fv20	0.625	3.28	0.089	0.939	0.39	III	complex1.pdb.gz	5,8,9,12,15,16,47,52,88
2	0.02	3l6yE	0.609	3.51	0.100	0.916	0.23	III	complex2.pdb.gz	6,7,9,10,12,13,16,17,55,97,100,101,104
3	0.01	1dogA	0.643	3.54	0.069	0.947	0.12	UUU	complex3.pdb.gz	105,106,107
4	0.01	2ie40	0.636	3.24	0.051	0.893	0.22	III	complex4.pdb.gz	95,96,97,100,101
5	0.01	3c2gA	0.626	3.62	0.032	0.939	0.21	III	complex5.pdb.gz	95,103,106,111

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.