D-I-TASSER Q6F5E7-D1

D-I-TASSER results for Q6F5E7-D1

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q6F5E7 (133 residues)
MRDLSERRLGQPELKAEQQMPLEPVRARLSVGLACCCSHTTAEASSLEHGDKVFGQGFPS
PLEEIKRLLKISRALQARSVPSTQEKAKCLSGEPGQPEGKGQETYPGPGKVEGKAEPAMR
KDDVCPGMKCISG

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 \| \| \| \| \| \| MRDLSERRLGQPELKAEQQMPLEPVRARLSVGLACCCSHTTAEASSLEHGDKVFGQGFPSPLEEIKRLLKISRALQARSVPSTQEKAKCLSGEPGQPEGKGQETYPGPGKVEGKAEPAMRKDDVCPGMKCISG
Prediction	CCCHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCHHHHHHHCCCSCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
Confidence	9324454326711224432783466665542043221454122322102550024789974999999999999997426874365532027999998888864578997334556643223577877512479
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 \| \| \| \| \| \| MRDLSERRLGQPELKAEQQMPLEPVRARLSVGLACCCSHTTAEASSLEHGDKVFGQGFPSPLEEIKRLLKISRALQARSVPSTQEKAKCLSGEPGQPEGKGQETYPGPGKVEGKAEPAMRKDDVCPGMKCISG
Prediction	7552575424555253656241531434132000001333345354164334211531342164044014124215455255356425126464454645457424244526454543345741143351278
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCHHHHHHHCCCSCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
MRDLSERRLGQPELKAEQQMPLEPVRARLSVGLACCCSHTTAEASSLEHGDKVFGQGFPSPLEEIKRLLKISRALQARSVPSTQEKAKCLSGEPGQPEGKGQETYPGPGKVEGKAEPAMRKDDVCPGMKCISG

4qtqA1

0.08

3.21

0.54

CEthreader

--KMPSTANAKLNEQGEISADIGGIAVSVHAQ-SCTEDSPGIMLCNRSPVVEVTFPGAKPIALEPEALYVDSNSTFYHGPLDDTYKKNRVVVWSGKEGNYGGPSYSVYLFDAAQKTLVFNQSLSDITVMANGL

6vvsF

0.05

2.22

0.55

EigenThreader

VQQRRDMQWICRDGDRAKNHLLEANLRLVVSLAKRYTGRGMDLIQEGNLGLIRAVEKFYATWWIRQAITRAMADQARTIRIPVHMVEVINKLGRIQRELREPTMDITIQQYAREPISLDQTIGDEGDSQLGDF

6em3B

0.24

0.13

3.98

0.40

FFAS-3D

---------------------------------------------------------FVPSKNEAKRVMKIVRAIREGRIIPPKKLKEMKEKEPKLPPPTNEESYNPPEEYLENTEYSERERNFIPQK-----

5yfpD

0.11

3.83

0.68

SPARKS-K

TRKIITAWLQNGILMDQEQKILETLFHEESIELFKEIPHFYQAGKGLSKSDL-FNNLTLDTILQFSASVLWILNWLPGLKKAINIDEVSQEPMLDADRLRSSWTFSESMDLNYS-NPSSSPNSLGNLKILLDD

5ncyA

0.17

0.06

1.97

0.47

CNFpred

----------------------PSVALRFGLIMEAYCRGSTHHMKVLM-----------KQGEALSKLKALNDFVKVSS------------------------------------------------------

2r3vA

0.06

0.05

2.02

0.83

DEthreader

-LSE-VLLVS--APGKVIGEHVALAVSLNLRTFLRLQPLDIVVWSELP--P-GA-----GL--GSSAAYSVCLAAALLTVCEPNPLNRW--T--K----EDELNKGDNAVWGPGVSIHSSLD-VQQALDG---

5m3cA

0.06

2.61

0.74

MapAlign

HDPLTGLPNRLLFESRLNHALDEARERPGAVLFIDLRLGGDEFIILLPGLIALFPKDGDDAPTLVKNADAAMYRAKELRRALERDELQLYYQPKLSLESGLLVGAEALVRWYHPLFGEISPERFIPLAEDC--

6fmlG

0.15

5.05

0.59

MUSTER

KKWTPVHALFQPKAVAEIVLRDLMNIARVKYRELGLCRLEKAARPRASAPPIEVVCDSRSAVIERENIMFHPAMRKALFGPTPSEIKEASFGPRPVTLYPPRALLPAPD--HDKQRFTNITVPSMARFVTDSG

2hdhA2

0.19

0.11

3.41

0.44

HHsearch

----------------------EAI--------RLYERGD-ASKEDIDTA--KLGAGYPGPFELLDTTKFIVDGWHELHQPSPSLNKLVAENKFGKKTGEGFYKYKAA-------------------------

7a23B

0.11

4.05

0.52

CEthreader

WEFSEANQSKVKEILSYYPSNYKQSAVIPLLDLAQQQNGGWLPVSAMNAVAKVIEVAPIRVYEVATFYSMFNRAKVGKYHLLESALLDHLGVKRGEVTKDGLFSVEMECMGCCVNAPMITVADYSNGSEGYTY

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.5438

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	5nj3A	0.49	4.47	0.044	0.797	model1_5nj3A.pdb.gz
2	4xzcA1	0.49	4.24	0.045	0.804	model1_4xzcA1.pdb.gz
3	6xjhA	0.49	4.61	0.066	0.812	model1_6xjhA.pdb.gz
4	7lkpA	0.49	4.28	0.053	0.782	model1_7lkpA.pdb.gz
5	3wdjA4	0.48	4.10	0.074	0.752	model1_3wdjA4.pdb.gz
6	5xjyA	0.48	4.52	0.050	0.804	model1_5xjyA.pdb.gz
7	1i5pA	0.48	4.37	0.000	0.797	model1_1i5pA.pdb.gz
8	1bf2A	0.48	4.10	0.074	0.767	model1_1bf2A.pdb.gz
9	4rfsS	0.48	4.53	0.102	0.812	model1_4rfsS.pdb.gz
10	2fhfA	0.48	4.72	0.113	0.842	model1_2fhfA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0009055	0.67	electron carrier activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044699	0.93	single-organism process
GO:0044763	0.60	single-organism cellular process
GO:0008152	0.58	metabolic process
GO:0044238	0.54	primary metabolic process
GO:0071704	0.53	organic substance metabolic process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	1.00	cell part
GO:0044424	0.94	intracellular part
GO:0044444	0.67	cytoplasmic part
GO:0043231	0.44	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0005576	0.33	extracellular region
GO:0016020	0.31	membrane

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	2i62C	0.478	4.13	0.047	0.737	2.1.1.1	9
2	0.060	1ohdA	0.479	4.82	0.025	0.835	3.1.3.16 3.1.3.48	79,85
3	0.060	2h12E	0.457	4.93	0.059	0.835	2.3.3.1	34
4	0.060	1e1hC	0.418	4.80	0.045	0.684	3.4.24.69	4,6
5	0.060	2ifcC	0.457	4.93	0.060	0.835	2.3.3.1	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.01	2fhfA	0.478	4.72	0.113	0.842	0.34	GLC	complex1.pdb.gz	5,10,32
2	0.01	3rodB	0.477	3.99	0.066	0.737	0.16	NCA	complex2.pdb.gz	12,33,46
3	0.01	3kpuB	0.465	4.05	0.019	0.729	0.18	ES1	complex3.pdb.gz	4,5,7,36
4	0.01	2an4B	0.475	4.08	0.047	0.737	0.15	OTR	complex4.pdb.gz	13,31,128
5	0.01	3rodC	0.473	3.94	0.075	0.729	0.21	NCA	complex5.pdb.gz	12,33,46
6	0.01	2g70A	0.469	4.05	0.038	0.729	0.17	HNT	complex6.pdb.gz	8,9,132
7	0.01	3kqyA	0.476	4.09	0.038	0.737	0.15	ES0	complex7.pdb.gz	4,5,9,31,128
8	0.01	2g71B	0.465	4.05	0.019	0.729	0.11	FTS	complex8.pdb.gz	26,35,92
9	0.01	2i62A	0.480	4.05	0.048	0.729	0.19	SAH	complex9.pdb.gz	4,9,43,71
10	0.01	2g71A	0.464	4.20	0.038	0.729	0.14	FTS	complex10.pdb.gz	14,31,32,91

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.