D-I-TASSER Q6NT16-D1

D-I-TASSER results for Q6NT16-D1

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q6NT16 (221 residues)
MEALGDLEGPRAPGGDDPAGSAGETPGWLSREQVFVLISAASVNLGSMMCYSILGPFFPK
EAEKKGASNTIIGMIFGCFALFELLASLVFGNYLVHIGAKFMFVAGMFVSGGVTILFGVL
DRVPDGPVFIAMCFLVRVMDAVSFAAAMTASSSILAKAFPNNVATVLGSLETFSGLGLIL
GPPVGGFLYQSFGYEVPFIVLGCVVLLMVPLNMYILPNYES

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MEALGDLEGPRAPGGDDPAGSAGETPGWLSREQVFVLISAASVNLGSMMCYSILGPFFPKEAEKKGASNTIIGMIFGCFALFELLASLVFGNYLVHIGAKFMFVAGMFVSGGVTILFGVLDRVPDGPVFIAMCFLVRVMDAVSFAAAMTASSSILAKAFPNNVATVLGSLETFSGLGLILGPPVGGFLYQSFGYEVPFIVLGCVVLLMVPLNMYILPNYES
Prediction	CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCC
Confidence	99999988888999999877666775435433799999999999999998798999889999994997879999999999999999999999874417637999999999999999999987554468999999999999999977999999999972857899999999999999999999999999996054689999999999999999997468899
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MEALGDLEGPRAPGGDDPAGSAGETPGWLSREQVFVLISAASVNLGSMMCYSILGPFFPKEAEKKGASNTIIGMIFGCFALFELLASLVFGNYLVHIGAKFMFVAGMFVSGGVTILFGVLDRVPDGPVFIAMCFLVRVMDAVSFAAAMTASSSILAKAFPNNVATVLGSLETFSGLGLILGPPVGGFLYQSFGYEVPFIVLGCVVLLMVPLNMYILPNYES
Prediction	87354557446535765556555644541444200000102313132322310010011300652714422013122333323333313312101333233012201333332122012013233333331312231332131212331312010031346400201033113333233332331131023332331032113313212331100034278
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180                 200                 220

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCC
MEALGDLEGPRAPGGDDPAGSAGETPGWLSREQVFVLISAASVNLGSMMCYSILGPFFPKEAEKKGASNTIIGMIFGCFALFELLASLVFGNYLVHIGAKFMFVAGMFVSGGVTILFGVLDRVPDGPVFIAMCFLVRVMDAVSFAAAMTASSSILAKAFPNNVATVLGSLETFSGLGLILGPPVGGFLYQSFGYEVPFIVLGCVVLLMVPLNMYILPNYES

6h7dA

0.11

0.10

3.75

1.33

DEthreader

----------NEAKFQDLIDAVEAAVESKYRPALIFCSAIPFFQQIT-GINVIMF-YAPVLFKTLGFGDDAALMSAVITGVVNMLSTFVSIYAVDRYGRRLLFLEGGIQMFICQLLVGSFIARTLTPATADWILAFICVYVAGFAWWGPLGWLVPSEICPLIRPAGQAINVSVNMFFTFLIGQFFLTMLC-HMKFGLFYFFASMVAIMTVFIYFLLPETKV

3wdoA2

0.13

0.11

3.94

2.71

SPARKS-K

------------------RESGMVKGSFSKVLAEPRLLKLNFGIMCLHMLLMSTFVALPGQLADAGFPAEHWKVYLATMLIAFGSVVPFIIYAEVKRKMKQVFVFCVGLIVVAEIVLWNAQTQ------FWQLVVGVQLFFVAFNLMEALLPSLISKESPAYKGTAMGVYSTSQFLGVAIGGSLGGWIDGMFDGQGVFLAGAMLAAVWLAVAST-MKEPPY

4gbyA1

0.12

0.10

3.68

0.58

MapAlign

---------------------------YNSSYIFSITLVATLGGLLFGYDTAVISGTVESLNTVFVAANSLLGFCVASALIGCIIGGALGGYCSNRFGRRDSLKIAAVLFFISGVGSAWPEPVYLA-GYVPEFVIYRIIGGIGVGLASMLSPMYIAELAPHIRGKLVSFNQFAIIFGQLLVYCVNYFILNTDGWRYMFASECIPALLFLMLLYTVP-ESPR

4gbyA1

0.12

0.10

3.68

0.34

CEthreader

---------------------------YNSSYIFSITLVATLGGLLFGYDTAVISGTVESLNTVFVAANSLLGFCVASALIGCIIGGALGGYCSNRFGRRDSLKIAAVLFFISGVGSAWPEVPVYLAGYVPEFVIYRIIGGIGVGLASMLSPMYIAELAPHIRGKLVSFNQFAIIFGQLLVYCVNYFIARSGDWRYMFASECIPALLFLMLLYTV-PESPR

3wdoA2

0.13

0.11

3.94

1.72

MUSTER

------------------RESGMVKGSFSKVLAEPRLLKLNFGIMCLHMLLMSTFVALPGQLADAGFPAEHWKVYLATMLIAFGSVVPFIIYAEVKRKMKQVFVFCVGLIVVAEIVLWNAQT-------FWQLVVGVQLFFVAFNLMEALLPSLISKESPGYKGTAMGVYSTSQFLGVAIGGSLGGWIDGMFDGQGVFLAGAMLAAVWLAVAST-MKEPPY

4zowA

0.12

0.10

3.53

1.54

HHsearch

---------------------------RLGRQALLFPLCLVLYEFSTYIGNDMIQPGMLAVVEQYQAGIDWVPTSMTAYLAGGMFLQWLLGPLSDRIGRRPVMLAGVVWFIVTCLAILLAQNI-------EQFTLLRFLQGISLCFIGAVGYAAIRESFEAVCIKITALMANVALIAPLLGPLVGAAWIHVLPWEGMFVLFAALAAISFFGLQRAMPETAT

4zowA1

0.12

0.10

3.66

2.57

FFAS-3D

---------------------------RLGRQALLFPLCLVLYEFSTYIGNDMIQPGMLAVVEQYQAGIDWVPTSMTAYLAGGMFLQWLLGPLSDRIGRRPVMLAGVVWFIVTCLAILLAQN-------IEQFTLLRFLQGISLCFIGAVGYAAIRESFEAVCIKITALMANVALIAPLLGPLVGAAWIHVLPWEGMFVLFAALAAISFFGLQRAMPETAT

6kkiA

0.07

0.06

2.68

1.10

EigenThreader

QYFGWRMTFFAIGIGALITLLCLIKLLPSLPLLFRALMSIYLLTVVVVTAHYTAYSYIEPFVQNIAGFSANFATALLLLLGGAGIIGSVIFGKLGNQYASALVSTAIALLLVCLALLLPAANS------EIHLGVLSIFWGIAMMIIGLGMQVKVLALAPDATDVAMALFSGIFNIGIGAGALVGNQVSLHWSMSMIGYVGAVPAFAALIWSIIIFRRWPV

6e9nA

0.16

0.13

4.37

1.46

CNFpred

--------------------------------RYLTLVMIFITVVICYVDRANLAVASAHIQEEFGITKAEMGYVFSAFAWLYTLCQIPGGWFLDRVGSRVTYFIAIFGWSVATLFQGFATG-------LMSLIGLRAITGIFEAPAFPTNNRMVTSWFPHERASAVGFYTSGQFVGLAFLTPLLIWIQEMLSWHWVFIVTGGIGIIWSLIWFKVYQPPRL

7crzA

0.09

3.25

1.33

DEthreader

----------EENKIQEMKDESARMEVVSYRQPIIISIVLQLSQQLS-GINAVFYYSTG-IFKDAGVQ-EP-IYATIGAGVVNTIFTVVSLFLVERAGRRTLHMIGLGGMAFCSTLMTVSLLKDNYNGMSFVCIGAILVFVAFFEGPGPIPWFIVAELFSQPRPAAMAVAGCSNWTSNFLVGLLFPSAAHYLG-AYVFIIFTGFLITFLAFTFFKVPETRR

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.8611

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	4iu8A	0.80	2.30	0.090	0.909	model1_4iu8A.pdb.gz
2	6h7dA	0.79	2.96	0.110	0.941	model1_6h7dA.pdb.gz
3	6e8jA1	0.79	1.52	0.144	0.846	model1_6e8jA1.pdb.gz
4	4gbyA1	0.78	2.04	0.124	0.873	model1_4gbyA1.pdb.gz
5	3wdoA1	0.78	1.68	0.176	0.846	model1_3wdoA1.pdb.gz
6	7crzA	0.78	2.98	0.097	0.932	model1_7crzA.pdb.gz
7	6e9nA	0.78	1.55	0.163	0.833	model1_6e9nA.pdb.gz
8	4ybqA	0.77	3.06	0.096	0.941	model1_4ybqA.pdb.gz
9	4ikvA1	0.77	2.59	0.112	0.887	model1_4ikvA1.pdb.gz
10	4pypA	0.76	2.95	0.089	0.900	model1_4pypA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0005215	1.00	transporter activity
GO:0022857	0.98	transmembrane transporter activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0006810	0.97	transport
GO:0044699	0.83	single-organism process
GO:0009987	0.76	cellular process
GO:0055085	0.71	transmembrane transport
GO:0008152	0.63	metabolic process
GO:0006811	0.61	ion transport
GO:0071702	0.60	organic substance transport
GO:0044237	0.59	cellular metabolic process
GO:0006820	0.55	anion transport
GO:0071704	0.54	organic substance metabolic process
GO:0065007	0.52	biological regulation
GO:0044710	0.51	single-organism metabolic process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	0.99	cell part
GO:0016021	0.99	integral component of membrane
GO:0005887	0.93	integral component of plasma membrane
GO:0016020	0.62	membrane

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	2x1lA	0.447	5.24	0.090	0.710	6.1.1.10	11
2	0.060	1rqgA	0.437	5.53	0.050	0.724	6.1.1.10	NA
3	0.060	2a06C	0.459	4.65	0.051	0.670	1.10.2.2	53
4	0.060	3fr8B	0.455	5.16	0.049	0.697	1.1.1.86	NA
5	0.060	2vuxB	0.404	4.07	0.057	0.538	1.17.4.1	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.02	2q72A	0.497	5.49	0.086	0.796	0.59	IXX	complex1.pdb.gz	91,93,145
2	0.02	2qeiA	0.496	5.43	0.087	0.796	0.58	CXX	complex2.pdb.gz	103,106,107,110,202
3	0.01	2q6hA	0.498	5.55	0.081	0.801	0.51	CXX	complex3.pdb.gz	89,92,98,101,102,105,145
4	0.01	2qjyD	0.456	5.43	0.073	0.742	0.73	HEM	complex4.pdb.gz	42,46,47,50,106,107,111,112,114,115,143,144,147
5	0.01	3gjdA	0.498	5.52	0.072	0.801	0.66	BOG	complex5.pdb.gz	182,183,185,188
6	0.01	3l1lA	0.494	5.34	0.046	0.783	0.54	ARG	complex6.pdb.gz	53,110,111,114,115,118,202
7	0.01	1w69A	0.465	3.85	0.058	0.611	0.51	UUU	complex7.pdb.gz	106,109,142

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.