D-I-TASSER Q6P3W2-D1

D-I-TASSER results for Q6P3W2-D1

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q6P3W2 (91 residues)
MMAVEQMPKKDWYSILGADPSANISDLKQKYQKLILMYHPDKQSTDVPAGTVEECVQKFI
EIDQAWKILGNEETKREYDLQRCEDDLRNVG

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 \| \| \| \| MMAVEQMPKKDWYSILGADPSANISDLKQKYQKLILMYHPDKQSTDVPAGTVEECVQKFIEIDQAWKILGNEETKREYDLQRCEDDLRNVG
Prediction	CCCCCHCHHCCHHHHHCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCC
Confidence	9762110011117884889999999999999999999589999998654222899999999999999957999999998513655567899
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 \| \| \| \| MMAVEQMPKKDWYSILGADPSANISDLKQKYQKLILMYHPDKQSTDVPAGTVEECVQKFIEIDQAWKILGNEETKREYDLQRCEDDLRNVG
Prediction	7443551564210511414571567302511342046313341474655644650362145154026214377226411542465536768
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80

                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCHCHHCCHHHHHCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCC
MMAVEQMPKKDWYSILGADPSANISDLKQKYQKLILMYHPDKQSTDVPAGTVEECVQKFIEIDQAWKILGNEETKREYDLQRCEDDLRNVG

2qsaA

0.22

0.19

5.91

1.17

DEthreader

----FAPGLENCYDVLEVNREFDKQKLAKAYRALARKHHPDRV-K-NKE-EKLLAEERFRVIATAYETLKDDEAKTNYDYYLDHPD-----

5vsoA

0.33

0.27

8.24

2.05

SPARKS-K

GEFGSMVKETKFYDILGVPVTATDVEIKKAYRKCALKYHPDKNPS-------EEAAEKFKEASAAYEILSDPEKRDIYDQFG---------

2kqxA

0.31

0.24

7.31

1.61

MapAlign

-------ELKDYYAIMGVKPTDDLKTIKTAYRRLARKYHPDVS-------KEPDAEARFKEVAEAWEVLSDEQRRAEYDQMWQHR------

2kqxA

0.31

0.24

7.31

1.16

CEthreader

-------ELKDYYAIMGVKPTDDLKTIKTAYRRLARKYHPDVSK-------EPDAEARFKEVAEAWEVLSDEQRRAEYDQMWQHR------

2l6lA

1.00

28.00

1.71

MUSTER

MMAVEQMPKKDWYSILGADPSANISDLKQKYQKLILMYHPDKQSTDVPAGTVEECVQKFIEIDQAWKILGNEETKREYDLQRCEDDLRNVG

2l6lA

1.00

28.00

1.87

HHsearch

MMAVEQMPKKDWYSILGADPSANISDLKQKYQKLILMYHPDKQSTDVPAGTVEECVQKFIEIDQAWKILGNEETKREYDLQRCEDDLRNVG

1wjzA

0.88

0.78

21.96

1.72

FFAS-3D

-MALEQTLKKDWYSILGADPSANMSDLKQKYQKLILLYHPDKQSADVPAGTMEECMQKFIEIDQAWKILGNEETKKKYDLQR---------

1wjzA

0.82

0.78

22.02

0.95

EigenThreader

GMALEQTLKKDWYSILGADPSANMSDLKQKYQKLILLYHPDKQSADVPAGTMEECMQKFIEIDQAWKILGNEETKKKYDLQRSG----PSS

2l6lA

1.00

28.00

1.01

CNFpred

MMAVEQMPKKDWYSILGADPSANISDLKQKYQKLILMYHPDKQSTDVPAGTVEECVQKFIEIDQAWKILGNEETKREYDLQRCEDDLRNVG

2dmxA

0.30

0.26

8.01

1.17

DEthreader

---G--SGMANYYEVLGVQASASPEDIKKAYRKLALRWHPDKN--PD---NKEEAEKKFKLVSEAYEVLSDSKKRSLYDRAGCDSAGGGAS

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.7348

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	1wjzA	0.76	1.86	0.805	0.868	model1_1wjzA.pdb.gz
2	2qsaA	0.74	2.12	0.193	0.879	model1_2qsaA.pdb.gz
3	2dmxA	0.71	2.77	0.271	0.879	model1_2dmxA.pdb.gz
4	6rzyA	0.71	1.56	0.343	0.769	model1_6rzyA.pdb.gz
5	2dn9A	0.70	1.99	0.253	0.791	model1_2dn9A.pdb.gz
6	4j80A	0.69	1.67	0.316	0.769	model1_4j80A.pdb.gz
7	2ctrA	0.68	2.41	0.287	0.802	model1_2ctrA.pdb.gz
8	7x3kA	0.68	2.53	0.216	0.857	model1_7x3kA.pdb.gz
9	3bvoA	0.68	2.23	0.191	0.835	model1_3bvoA.pdb.gz
10	2ctpA	0.68	2.01	0.308	0.769	model1_2ctpA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:1901363	0.47	heterocyclic compound binding
GO:0097159	0.47	organic cyclic compound binding
GO:0000166	0.35	nucleotide binding
GO:0017076	0.33	purine nucleotide binding
GO:0097367	0.32	carbohydrate derivative binding
GO:0051082	0.31	unfolded protein binding
GO:0032555	0.31	purine ribonucleotide binding
GO:0032550	0.31	purine ribonucleoside binding
GO:0035639	0.30	purine ribonucleoside triphosphate binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0009987	0.88	cellular process
GO:0065007	0.58	biological regulation

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	1.00	cell part
GO:0044424	0.99	intracellular part
GO:0044444	0.90	cytoplasmic part
GO:0043226	0.76	organelle
GO:0043229	0.71	intracellular organelle
GO:0043227	0.69	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0005829	0.66	cytosol
GO:0043231	0.64	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0005737	0.59	cytoplasm
GO:0044422	0.57	organelle part
GO:0016020	0.57	membrane
GO:0044446	0.56	intracellular organelle part

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1n4cA	0.554	2.88	0.189	0.747	3.1.3.48	NA
2	0.060	1zn3A	0.564	3.43	0.111	0.857	3.4.24.69	NA
3	0.060	3k9fA	0.561	3.22	0.099	0.835	5.99.1.-	NA
4	0.060	2j62A	0.528	3.19	0.048	0.736	3.2.1.52	34
5	0.060	1qlaD	0.553	3.57	0.046	0.857	1.3.99.1	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.01	2y3pB	0.572	3.27	0.110	0.846	0.25	SM8	complex1.pdb.gz	64,69,70
2	0.01	2y3pA	0.576	3.24	0.110	0.846	0.18	SM8	complex2.pdb.gz	27,31,65,66
3	0.01	2xctU	0.581	3.08	0.100	0.813	0.13	QNA	complex3.pdb.gz	17,61,68
4	0.01	2xctU	0.581	3.08	0.100	0.813	0.13	QNA	complex4.pdb.gz	12,13,17
5	0.01	1q16C	0.598	3.53	0.022	0.901	0.31	HEM	complex5.pdb.gz	23,27,61,64,65,68,69
6	0.01	1k90C	0.549	3.02	0.056	0.736	0.13	3AT	complex6.pdb.gz	11,13,65,66,71
7	0.01	1y5nC	0.591	3.45	0.022	0.901	0.26	PCI	complex7.pdb.gz	14,23,27
8	0.01	3cf4A	0.569	3.11	0.011	0.824	0.35	SF4	complex8.pdb.gz	13,14,16,17,19,29,30,31,65
9	0.01	1siwC	0.610	3.39	0.033	0.901	0.30	HEM	complex9.pdb.gz	11,30,69,72
10	0.01	1xfwA	0.569	2.84	0.056	0.736	0.23	CMP	complex10.pdb.gz	66,67,70

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.