D-I-TASSER Q6UWL2-D4

D-I-TASSER results for Q6UWL2-D4

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q6UWL2 (127 residues)
VCQEGFESPGGKITSVCTEKGTWRESTLTCTEILTKINDVSLFNDTCVRWQINSRRINPK
ISYVISIKGQRLDPMESVREETVNLTTDSRTPEVCLALYPGTNYTVNISTAPPRRSMPAV
IGFQTAE

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 \| \| \| \| \| \| VCQEGFESPGGKITSVCTEKGTWRESTLTCTEILTKINDVSLFNDTCVRWQINSRRINPKISYVISIKGQRLDPMESVREETVNLTTDSRTPEVCLALYPGTNYTVNISTAPPRRSMPAVIGFQTAE
Prediction	CCCCCCSCCCCCSSSSSCCCCSSSSCSSSSSSSSSSSCCSSSSSCCSSSSSCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSSSSSCCCHHHHHSSSSSSSCCCCCCSSSSSCCCCCCSSSSSSSSCCCCCCCSSSSSSSCC
Confidence	9635513589953567558862860206766532130435787141121113666667169999999864225212101124774127899614344269876599999707887422899988169
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 \| \| \| \| \| \| VCQEGFESPGGKITSVCTEKGTWRESTLTCTEILTKINDVSLFNDTCVRWQINSRRINPKISYVISIKGQRLDPMESVREETVNLTTDSRTPEVCLALYPGTNYTVNISTAPPRRSMPAVIGFQTAE
Prediction	7145325336443331135635165241304413440441211242114133556635342212020434434434323542241335642240003034434030303334463313011224358
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCCSCCCCCSSSSSCCCCSSSSCSSSSSSSSSSSCCSSSSSCCSSSSSCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSSSSSCCCHHHHHSSSSSSSCCCCCCSSSSSCCCCCCSSSSSSSSCCCCCCCSSSSSSSCC
VCQEGFESPGGKITSVCTEKGTWRESTLTCTEILTKINDVSLFNDTCVRWQINSRRINPKISYVISIKGQRLDPMESVREETVNLTTDSRTPEVCLALYPGTNYTVNISTAPPRRSMPAVIGFQTAE

3erbA

0.18

0.13

4.34

1.13

CNFpred

ECEDGFILRG-SPVRQCRPNGMWDGETAVCDNGAGHCPNPGIS--LGAVRTGFRFGHGDKVRYRCSS--------------NLVLTGS--SERECQG--NGVWSGTEPICRQP--------------

3gawA

0.16

0.13

4.45

1.30

HHsearch

TCNEGYQLLGEINYRECDTDG-WTNDIPICEVV--KCLPVTAPENGKIVSSDREYHFGQAVRFVC--------NSGYKIEG-DEEMHCSDD---------GFWSKEKPKCVEISCKSPDVINGSPIS

3f7pE

0.10

3.76

0.48

CEthreader

VELTNLYPYCDYEMKVCAYGASSLVSCRTHQEVPSEPGRLAFNVVSSLSWAEPAETNGEITAYEVCYGLVNDDNRPIGPMKKVLVDNPKNRMLLIENLRESQPYRYTVKARNGAGWGPEREAIINLA

3grwA

0.10

0.09

3.46

0.62

EigenThreader

QWSVVPSDRGNYTCVVENF--GSIRQTYTLDVLERSPHRPILQLGSCKVYS------DAQPHIQWLKHVEVNGSKVPYVTVLKSWISESVEADVRLVSERDGGEYLCRATNF---IGVAEKAFWLSV

4jmgA2

0.17

0.12

3.87

0.54

FFAS-3D

-------------------------TKLEVVAATP--------TSLLISWDAWSGSDWPVSYYRITYG-----ETGGNSPVQEFTVPGSSYTATISGLSPGVDYTITVYAGYDYYQSPISINYRT--

3erbA

0.10

0.09

3.17

0.90

SPARKS-K

SCPQGLYPSPA--SRLCKSSGQWQTPKAVCKPV--RCPAPVSFENGIYTPRLGSYPVGGNVSFECE--------DGF-ILRGSPVRQCRPN---------GMWDGETAVCDNGHCPNPGISLGAVRT

2qy0A

0.20

0.10

3.28

1.10

CNFpred

TCKQGYQLIEGSFTAVCQDDGTWHRAMPRCKIK--DCGQPRNLPNGDFRYTMGVNTYKARIQYYCHE------------------------------------------------------------

6pcvA

0.05

0.04

1.93

0.83

DEthreader

GCNNGFMHHVLEKSE-------FRDEQYFRFHAEDFKLVENIYLTEHGVVYEYVSTA-RCHVLEKIVEPRGCGLTCPTNCHINLMEVSYSYTQHCELTNVDYH--CQMVVSMRKQGPRVE-------

2atyA

0.07

2.91

0.66

MapAlign

SCSGTFRLIGEKLLCITKDKVDGTWDAPKCETPYRHGDSVTFAMNGNKSVWCQANNMWGPKAPQLYTIPPQMAKDKVSLTCMITDFFPEDITVEWQWWEAGNTFTCSVLHEGLHNHHTEKSLSHSP-

4jmgA2

0.21

0.17

5.24

0.69

MUSTER

--------VGGSGGSVSSV------TKLEVVAATPT----SL----LISWDAWSGSDWPVSYYRITYGETGGNSP-----VQEFTVPGSSYTATISGLSPGVDYTITVYAGYDGYQSPISINYRT--

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.4284

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	4es8A	0.47	4.38	0.052	0.811	model1_4es8A.pdb.gz
2	1n26A	0.46	4.90	0.107	0.843	model1_1n26A.pdb.gz
3	6iaaA	0.46	4.85	0.085	0.843	model1_6iaaA.pdb.gz
4	5cylA	0.45	4.49	0.059	0.756	model1_5cylA.pdb.gz
5	4qr8A	0.45	4.87	0.054	0.811	model1_4qr8A.pdb.gz
6	5k6lA	0.45	4.71	0.078	0.811	model1_5k6lA.pdb.gz
7	3l24A	0.45	5.01	0.043	0.827	model1_3l24A.pdb.gz
8	2x42A	0.45	4.92	0.067	0.827	model1_2x42A.pdb.gz
9	1chmA	0.45	4.89	0.050	0.819	model1_1chmA.pdb.gz
10	1pqzA	0.45	4.64	0.035	0.787	model1_1pqzA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0022857	0.52	transmembrane transporter activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0050896	0.87	response to stimulus
GO:0009605	0.86	response to external stimulus
GO:0050982	0.85	detection of mechanical stimulus

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0016020	0.97	membrane
GO:0044464	0.94	cell part
GO:0044425	0.90	membrane part
GO:0016021	0.80	integral component of membrane
GO:0044424	0.64	intracellular part
GO:0005886	0.56	plasma membrane
GO:0043226	0.54	organelle
GO:0043227	0.52	membrane-bounded organelle

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	2c9aA	0.323	4.65	0.033	0.567	3.1.3.48	NA
2	0.060	2z8kD	0.264	5.12	0.048	0.504	2.3.2.2	NA
3	0.060	1itkB	0.417	5.01	0.045	0.772	1.11.1.6 1.11.1.7	NA
4	0.060	2wgqB	0.418	4.11	0.051	0.661	1.4.3.21	65
5	0.060	1e27A	0.404	5.18	0.037	0.787	3.1.26.4	69,94

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.01	3l7gC	0.443	5.01	0.060	0.827	0.13	M44	complex1.pdb.gz	78,102,104
2	0.01	3ac8A	0.289	4.49	0.043	0.465	0.15	KSK	complex2.pdb.gz	102,104,105,106
3	0.01	2c0oB	0.432	4.34	0.040	0.717	0.12	L2G	complex3.pdb.gz	69,96,102,104,105,106,107
4	0.01	2hckB	0.426	4.53	0.041	0.717	0.21	QUE	complex4.pdb.gz	69,102,103,105
5	0.01	1ebpB	0.437	4.47	0.083	0.772	0.22	III	complex5.pdb.gz	100,101,102,103,104
6	0.01	2hk5A	0.294	4.37	0.054	0.457	0.13	1BM	complex6.pdb.gz	104,106,107
7	0.01	3bymA	0.289	4.61	0.043	0.472	0.11	AM0	complex7.pdb.gz	70,98,102,104,105
8	0.01	2rd55	0.298	5.22	0.029	0.551	0.17	III	complex8.pdb.gz	68,81,82,83
9	0.01	2rd58	0.245	4.55	0.083	0.433	0.33	III	complex9.pdb.gz	69,71,98,99,100,101,123
10	0.01	2og8A	0.282	4.15	0.022	0.441	0.10	1N8	complex10.pdb.gz	66,94,106,107,108

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.