D-I-TASSER Q7Z2W4

D-I-TASSER results for Q7Z2W4

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q7Z2W4
Protein Name: Zinc finger CCCH-type antiviral protein 1
Gene Name: ZC3HAV1

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q7Z2W4 (902 residues)
MADPEVCCFITKILCAHGGRMALDALLQEIALSEPQLCEVLQVAGPDRFVVLETGGEAGI
TRSVVATTRARVCRRKYCQRPCDNLHLCKLNLLGRCNYSQSERNLCKYSHEVLSEENFKV
LKNHELSGLNKEELAVLLLQSDPFFMPEICKSYKGEGRQQICNQQPPCSRLHICDHFTRG
NCRFPNCLRSHNLMDRKVLAIMREHGLNPDVVQNIQDICNSKHMQKNPPGPRAPSSHRRN
MAYRARSKSRDRFFQGSQEFLASASASAERSCTPSPDQISHRASLEDAPVDDLTRKFTYL
GSQDRARPPSGSSKATDLGGTSQAGTSQRFLENGSQEDLLHGNPGSTYLASNSTSAPNWK
SLTSWTNDQGARRKTVFSPTLPAARSSLGSLQTPEAVTTRKGTGLLSSDYRIINGKSGTQ
DIQPGPLFNNNADGVATDITSTRSLNYKSTSSGHREISSPRIQDAGPASRDVQATGRIAD
DADPRVALVNDSLSDVTSTTSSRVDDHDSEEICLDHLCKGCPLNGSCSKVHFHLPYRWQM
LIGKTWTDFEHMETIEKGYCNPGIHLCSVGSYTINFRVMSCDSFPIRRLSTPSSVTKPAN
SVFTTKWIWYWKNESGTWIQYGEEKDKRKNSNVDSSYLESLYQSCPRGVVPFQAGSRNYE
LSFQGMIQTNIASKTQKDVIRRPTFVPQWYVQQMKRGPDHQPAKTSSVSLTATFRPQEDF
CFLSSKKYKLSEIHHLHPEYVRVSEHFKASMKNFKIEKIKKIENSELLDKFTWKKSQMKE
EGKLLFYATSRAYVESICSNNFDSFLHETHENKYGKGIYFAKDAIYSHKNCPYDAKNVVM
FVAQVLVGKFTEGNITYTSPPPQFDSCVDTRSNPSVFVIFQKDQVYPQYVIEYTEDKACV
IS

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q7Z2W4-D1	1-67	67		MADPEVCCFITKILCAHGGRMALDALLQEIALSEPQLCEVLQVAGPDRFVVLETGGEAGITRSVVAT
2	Q7Z2W4-D2	68-145	78		TRARVCRRKYCQRPCDNLHLCKLNLLGRCNYSQSERNLCKYSHEVLSEENFKVLKNHELSGLNKEELAVLLLQSDPFF
3	Q7Z2W4-D3	146-230	85		MPEICKSYKGEGRQQICNQQPPCSRLHICDHFTRGNCRFPNCLRSHNLMDRKVLAIMREHGLNPDVVQNIQDICNSKHMQKNPPG
4	Q7Z2W4-D4	231-333	103		PRAPSSHRRNMAYRARSKSRDRFFQGSQEFLASASASAERSCTPSPDQISHRASLEDAPVDDLTRKFTYLGSQDRARPPSGSSKATDLGGTSQAGTSQRFLEN
5	Q7Z2W4-D5	334-502	169		GSQEDLLHGNPGSTYLASNSTSAPNWKSLTSWTNDQGARRKTVFSPTLPAARSSLGSLQTPEAVTTRKGTGLLSSDYRIINGKSGTQDIQPGPLFNNNADGVATDITSTRSLNYKSTSSGHREISSPRIQDAGPASRDVQATGRIADDADPRVALVNDSLSDVTSTTSS
6	Q7Z2W4-D6	503-696	194		RVDDHDSEEICLDHLCKGCPLNGSCSKVHFHLPYRWQMLIGKTWTDFEHMETIEKGYCNPGIHLCSVGSYTINFRVMSCDSFPIRRLSTPSSVTKPANSVFTTKWIWYWKNESGTWIQYGEEKDKRKNSNVDSSYLESLYQSCPRGVVPFQAGSRNYELSFQGMIQTNIASKTQKDVIRRPTFVPQWYVQQMKR
7	Q7Z2W4-D7	697-902	206		GPDHQPAKTSSVSLTATFRPQEDFCFLSSKKYKLSEIHHLHPEYVRVSEHFKASMKNFKIEKIKKIENSELLDKFTWKKSQMKEEGKLLFYATSRAYVESICSNNFDSFLHETHENKYGKGIYFAKDAIYSHKNCPYDAKNVVMFVAQVLVGKFTEGNITYTSPPPQFDSCVDTRSNPSVFVIFQKDQVYPQYVIEYTEDKACVIS

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.45

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	6um1A	0.31	8.46	0.039	0.471	model1_6um1A.pdb.gz
2	6rw9A	0.30	8.35	0.050	0.465	model1_6rw9A.pdb.gz
3	5u1sA	0.30	9.17	0.036	0.492	model1_5u1sA.pdb.gz
4	4bedB	0.29	8.90	0.048	0.472	model1_4bedB.pdb.gz
5	6wjvA	0.29	8.98	0.030	0.470	model1_6wjvA.pdb.gz
6	5cskA	0.29	8.73	0.033	0.456	model1_5cskA.pdb.gz
7	6u5vB	0.29	9.17	0.034	0.472	model1_6u5vB.pdb.gz
8	6yufD	0.29	9.09	0.029	0.470	model1_6yufD.pdb.gz
9	3hmjG	0.29	9.42	0.049	0.480	model1_3hmjG.pdb.gz
10	5ganA	0.29	9.38	0.027	0.478	model1_5ganA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:1901363	0.72	heterocyclic compound binding
GO:0097159	0.72	organic cyclic compound binding
GO:0003676	0.68	nucleic acid binding
GO:0003723	0.60	RNA binding
GO:0044822	0.55	poly(A) RNA binding
GO:0003824	0.55	catalytic activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0009987	1.00	cellular process
GO:0065007	0.87	biological regulation
GO:0050789	0.87	regulation of biological process
GO:0080090	0.80	regulation of primary metabolic process
GO:0060255	0.80	regulation of macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0050794	0.80	regulation of cellular process
GO:0050896	0.79	response to stimulus
GO:0048519	0.77	negative regulation of biological process
GO:0031323	0.72	regulation of cellular metabolic process
GO:0019219	0.70	regulation of nucleobase-containing compound metabolic process
GO:0051252	0.68	regulation of RNA metabolic process
GO:0048523	0.68	negative regulation of cellular process
GO:0048518	0.68	positive regulation of biological process
GO:0045071	0.66	negative regulation of viral genome replication
GO:0010604	0.65	positive regulation of macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0009896	0.61	positive regulation of catabolic process
GO:0048583	0.59	regulation of response to stimulus
GO:0048522	0.58	positive regulation of cellular process
GO:0031347	0.58	regulation of defense response
GO:0002682	0.58	regulation of immune system process
GO:0031325	0.57	positive regulation of cellular metabolic process
GO:0051173	0.56	positive regulation of nitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:0008152	0.56	metabolic process
GO:0045935	0.55	positive regulation of nucleobase-containing compound metabolic process
GO:0016032	0.55	viral process
GO:0051254	0.54	positive regulation of RNA metabolic process
GO:0044238	0.54	primary metabolic process
GO:0043170	0.54	macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0044237	0.53	cellular metabolic process
GO:0009615	0.53	response to virus
GO:0002697	0.53	regulation of immune effector process
GO:0061014	0.52	positive regulation of mRNA catabolic process
GO:0050688	0.52	regulation of defense response to virus
GO:0050776	0.50	regulation of immune response
GO:0044260	0.50	cellular macromolecule metabolic process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	1.00	intracellular part
GO:0043226	0.81	organelle
GO:0005737	0.81	cytoplasm
GO:0043229	0.80	intracellular organelle
GO:0043231	0.78	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0044444	0.70	cytoplasmic part
GO:0005794	0.52	Golgi apparatus

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1ffyA	0.217	8.66	0.027	0.338	6.1.1.5	NA
2	0.060	3fwmA	0.215	8.19	0.037	0.327	2.4.1.129	NA
3	0.060	1mc0A	0.148	6.64	0.022	0.200	3.1.4.17	NA
4	0.060	3g61A	0.217	9.53	0.035	0.370	3.6.3.44	NA
5	0.060	2uv8G	0.271	9.72	0.029	0.470	2.3.1.86	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

No Binding sites was predicted

Click to view	Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.