D-I-TASSER Q7Z4J2-D1

D-I-TASSER results for Q7Z4J2-D1

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q7Z4J2 (276 residues)
MNSKRMLLLVLFAFSLMLVERYFRNHQVEELRLSDWFHPRKRPDVITKTDWLAPVLWEGT
FDRRVLEKHYRRRNITVGLAVFATGRFAEEYLRPFLHSANKHFMTGYRVIFYIMVDAFFK
LPDIEPSPLRTFKAFKVGTERWWLDGPLVHVKSLGEHIASHIQDEVDFLFSMAANQVFQN
EFGVETLGPLVAQLHAWWYFRNTKNFPYERRPTSAACIPFGQGDFYYGNLMVGGTPHNIL
DFIKEYLNGVIHDIKNGLNSTYEKHLNKYFYLNKPT

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MNSKRMLLLVLFAFSLMLVERYFRNHQVEELRLSDWFHPRKRPDVITKTDWLAPVLWEGTFDRRVLEKHYRRRNITVGLAVFATGRFAEEYLRPFLHSANKHFMTGYRVIFYIMVDAFFKLPDIEPSPLRTFKAFKVGTERWWLDGPLVHVKSLGEHIASHIQDEVDFLFSMAANQVFQNEFGVETLGPLVAQLHAWWYFRNTKNFPYERRPTSAACIPFGQGDFYYGNLMVGGTPHNILDFIKEYLNGVIHDIKNGLNSTYEKHLNKYFYLNKPT
Prediction	CCCCSSSSSSSCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCHHHCCCCCCCCCSSSSCCCCCCSSSCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCSSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCSSSSSSSSCCHHHCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCSSSSSSCCSSSSCCCCHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSCCCCCCCCSSSSCSSCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCSHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCC
Confidence	995058987541134778888741157776664443798889864763588784543686999999999876187499999982157999999999999997079940799998489223778777998269999954778875236999999999999999731988999626518854877445344666218213168822299866856740347999974886233288199999999999999999998097116778877888645999
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MNSKRMLLLVLFAFSLMLVERYFRNHQVEELRLSDWFHPRKRPDVITKTDWLAPVLWEGTFDRRVLEKHYRRRNITVGLAVFATGRFAEEYLRPFLHSANKHFMTGYRVIFYIMVDAFFKLPDIEPSPLRTFKAFKVGTERWWLDGPLVHVKSLGEHIASHIQDEVDFLFSMAANQVFQNEFGVETLGPLVAQLHAWWYFRNTKNFPYERRPTSAACIPFGQGDFYYGNLMVGGTPHNILDFIKEYLNGVIHDIKNGLNSTYEKHLNKYFYLNKPT
Prediction	863320000001110212043225666265041451142453340101141300000121224610452056360200000000220033005400510442104625020000013245036153464140312416646203300231041035103620253000000000012035501131024010100011133546512141244030002674321000000101316202400420250044037440302112100210242438
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180                 200                 220                 240                 260

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCSSSSSSSCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCHHHCCCCCCCCCSSSSCCCCCCSSSCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCSSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCSSSSSSSSCCHHHCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCSSSSSSCCSSSSCCCCHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSCCCCCCCCSSSSCSSCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCSHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCC
MNSKRMLLLVLFAFSLMLVERYFRNHQVEELRLSDWFHPRKRPDVITKTDWLAPVLWEGTFDRRVLEKHYRRRNITVGLAVFATGRFAEEYLRPFLHSANKHFMTGYRVIFYIMVDAFFKLPDIEPSPLRTFKAFKVGTERWWLDGPLVHVKSLGEHIASHIQDEVDFLFSMAANQVFQNEFGVETLGPLVAQLHAWWYFRNTKNFPYERRPTSAACIPFGQGDFYYGNLMVGGTPHNILDFIKEYLNGVIHDIKNGLNSTYEKHLNKYFYLNKPT

1vztA

0.54

0.46

13.28

1.17

DEthreader

-----------------------------------------WFNPFRVVTMTAPVVWEGTYNRAVLDNYYAKQKITVGLTVFAVGRYIEHYLEEFLTSANKHFMVGHPVIFYIMVDDVSRMPLIELGPLRSFKVFKIKPEKRWQDISMMRMKTIGEHIVAHIQHEVDFLFCMDVDQVFQDKFGVETLGESVAQLQAGWYKADPNDFTYERRKESAAYIPFGEGDFYYHAAIFGGTPTQVLNITQECFKGILKDKKNDIEAHDESHLNKYFLLNKPT

1vztA

0.57

0.51

14.69

4.06

SPARKS-K

-----------------------------KLKLSDWFNPFKRPEVVTMTKWKAPVVWEGTYNRAVLDNYYAKQKITVGLTVFAVGRYIEHYLEEFLTSANKHFMVGHPVIFYIMVDDVSRMPLIELGPLRSFKVFKIKPEKRWQDISMMRMKTIGEHIVAHIQHEVDFLFCMDVDQVFQDKFGVETLGESVAQLQAGWYKADPNDFTYERRKESAAYIPFGEGDFYYHAAIFGGTPTQVLNITQECFKGILKDKKNDIEAQWESHLNKYFLLNKPT

1vztA

0.57

0.48

13.86

1.55

MapAlign

-----------------------------------------RPEVVTMTKWKAPVVWEGTYNRAVLDNYYAKQKITVGLTVFAVGRYIEHYLEEFLTSANKHFMVGHPVIFYIMVDDVSRMPLIELGPLRSFKVFKIKPEKRWQDISMMRMKTIGEHIVAHIQHEVDFLFCMDVDQVFQDKFGVETLGESVAQLQAGWYKADPNDFTYERRKESAAYIPFGEGDFYYHAAIFGGTPTQVLNITQECFKGILKDKKNDIEAQDESHLNKYFLLNKPT

1vztA

0.57

0.51

14.69

1.36

CEthreader

-----------------------------KLKLSDWFNPFKRPEVVTMTKWKAPVVWEGTYNRAVLDNYYAKQKITVGLTVFAVGRYIEHYLEEFLTSANKHFMVGHPVIFYIMVDDVSRMPLIELGPLRSFKVFKIKPEKRWQDISMMRMKTIGEHIVAHIQHEVDFLFCMDVDQVFQDKFGVETLGESVAQLQAGWYKADPNDFTYERRKESAAYIPFGEGDFYYHAAIFGGTPTQVLNITQECFKGILKDKKNDIEAHDESHLNKYFLLNKPT

1vztA

0.57

0.51

14.69

2.88

MUSTER

-----------------------------KLKLSDWFNPFKRPEVVTMTKWKAPVVWEGTYNRAVLDNYYAKQKITVGLTVFAVGRYIEHYLEEFLTSANKHFMVGHPVIFYIMVDDVSRMPLIELGPLRSFKVFKIKPEKRWQDISMMRMKTIGEHIVAHIQHEVDFLFCMDVDQVFQDKFGVETLGESVAQLQAGWYKADPNDFTYERRKESAAYIPFGEGDFYYHAAIFGGTPTQVLNITQECFKGILKDKKNDIEAQWESHLNKYFLLNKPT

1vztA

0.57

0.51

14.69

7.60

HHsearch

-----------------------------KLKLSDWFNPFKRPEVVTMTKWKAPVVWEGTYNRAVLDNYYAKQKITVGLTVFAVGRYIEHYLEEFLTSANKHFMVGHPVIFYIMVDDVSRMPLIELGPLRSFKVFKIKPEKRWQDISMMRMKTIGEHIVAHIQHEVDFLFCMDVDQVFQDKFGVETLGESVAQLQAGWYKADPNDFTYERRKESAAYIPFGEGDFYYHAAIFGGTPTQVLNITQECFKGILKDKKNDIEAQWESHLNKYFLLNKPT

1vztA

0.57

0.51

14.69

3.13

FFAS-3D

-----------------------------KLKLSDWFNPFKRPEVVTMTKWKAPVVWEGTYNRAVLDNYYAKQKITVGLTVFAVGRYIEHYLEEFLTSANKHFMVGHPVIFYIMVDDVSRMPLIELGPLRSFKVFKIKPEKRWQDISMMRMKTIGEHIVAHIQHEVDFLFCMDVDQVFQDKFGVETLGESVAQLQAGWYKADPNDFTYERRKESAAYIPFGEGDFYYHAAIFGGTPTQVLNITQECFKGILKDKKNDIEAQWESHLNKYFLLNKPT

2rj7A

0.33

0.30

8.92

1.65

EigenThreader

----------------------FMVSLPRMVYPQPKVLTPCRKDVLVVTPWLAPIVWEGTFNIDILNEQFRLQNTTIGLTVFAI-KKYVAFLKLFLETAEKHFMVGHRVHYYVFTDQPAAVPRVTLG--TGRQLSVVRAYKR---WQDVSMRRMEMISERRFLSEVDYLVCVDVDMEFRDHVGVEILTPLFGTLHPGFYGSSREAFTYERRPQSQAYIPKDEGDFYYMGAFFGGSVQEVQRLTRACHQAMMVDQANGIEAVWESHLNKYLLRHKPT

1vzuA

0.57

0.51

14.79

3.33

CNFpred

-----------------------------KLKLSDWFNPFKRPEVVTMTKWKAPVVWEGTYNRAVLDNYYAKQKITVGLTVFAVGRYIEHYLEEFLTSANKHFMVGHPVIFYIMVDDVSRMPLIELGPLRSFKVFKIKPEKRWQDISMMRMKTIGEHIVAHIQHEVDFLFCMDVDQVFQDKFGVETLGESVAQLQAWWYKADPNDFTYERRKESAAYIPFGEGDFYYHAAIFGGTPTQVLNITQECFKGILKDKKNDIEAHDESHLNKYFLLNKPT

2rj7A

0.34

0.29

8.67

1.17

DEthreader

----------------------------------------PCRKVLVVTP-LAPIVWEGTFNIDILNEQFRLQNTTIGLTVFAIKKYVA-FLKLFLETAEKHFMVGHRVHYYVFTDQPAAVPRVTLGTGRQLSVLEVRAYKRWQDVSMRRMEMISFCE-RRFLSEVDYLVCVDVDMEFRDHVGVEILTPLFGTLHPGFYGSSREAFTYERRPQSQAYIPKDEGDFYYMGAFFGGSVQEVQRLTRACHQAMMVDQANGIEAHDESHLNKYLLRHKPT

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.795

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	1vztA	0.89	0.45	0.571	0.895	model1_1vztA.pdb.gz
2	2rj7A	0.86	1.44	0.333	0.884	model1_2rj7A.pdb.gz
3	4ayjA	0.68	1.69	0.286	0.710	model1_4ayjA.pdb.gz
4	5a07A	0.61	4.29	0.056	0.801	model1_5a07A.pdb.gz
5	7booA	0.59	4.08	0.062	0.772	model1_7booA.pdb.gz
6	6wlbA	0.58	4.33	0.095	0.757	model1_6wlbA.pdb.gz
7	6iwqA	0.58	4.21	0.093	0.754	model1_6iwqA.pdb.gz
8	1s4nA	0.58	3.80	0.049	0.743	model1_1s4nA.pdb.gz
9	4bqhA	0.57	4.68	0.055	0.797	model1_4bqhA.pdb.gz
10	6ej7A	0.57	4.33	0.074	0.764	model1_6ej7A.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0003824	0.94	catalytic activity
GO:0016740	0.93	transferase activity
GO:0016757	0.91	transferase activity, transferring glycosyl groups
GO:0016758	0.83	transferase activity, transferring hexosyl groups
GO:0008378	0.67	galactosyltransferase activity
GO:0008194	0.66	UDP-glycosyltransferase activity
GO:0008376	0.64	acetylgalactosaminyltransferase activity
GO:0046872	0.61	metal ion binding
GO:0004380	0.56	glycoprotein-fucosylgalactoside alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0071704	0.98	organic substance metabolic process
GO:0044699	0.98	single-organism process
GO:0044238	0.98	primary metabolic process
GO:0044237	0.98	cellular metabolic process
GO:0044763	0.97	single-organism cellular process
GO:0044710	0.97	single-organism metabolic process
GO:0044723	0.94	single-organism carbohydrate metabolic process
GO:0070085	0.90	glycosylation
GO:0043170	0.87	macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0044260	0.85	cellular macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0019538	0.85	protein metabolic process
GO:0033580	0.83	protein galactosylation at cell surface

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	0.99	intracellular part
GO:0044444	0.98	cytoplasmic part
GO:0044446	0.88	intracellular organelle part
GO:0044431	0.84	Golgi apparatus part
GO:0031985	0.80	Golgi cisterna
GO:0016020	0.56	membrane
GO:0043226	0.53	organelle
GO:0043227	0.52	membrane-bounded organelle

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.344	1zi4A	0.792	1.43	0.352	0.815	2.4.1.37 2.4.1.40	263
2	0.163	2rj7A	0.859	1.44	0.333	0.884	2.4.1.37 2.4.1.40	NA
3	0.066	1ss9A	0.543	3.29	0.110	0.656	2.4.1.44	NA
4	0.066	1fggA	0.508	3.58	0.079	0.641	2.4.1.135	NA
5	0.066	1vgwB	0.470	3.64	0.087	0.587	2.7.7.60	91,173

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.68	2jcjA	0.887	0.59	0.575	0.895	1.24	UUU	complex1.pdb.gz	82,83,84,87,143,146,147,150,173,174,175,195,197,226,263
2	0.33	1gww0	0.890	0.43	0.575	0.895	1.43	III	complex2.pdb.gz	73,74,118,121,123,125,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,160,161,164,165
3	0.32	1vzuA	0.890	0.46	0.575	0.895	0.87	LAT	complex3.pdb.gz	195,197,198,207,226,228,263
4	0.28	3iojA	0.861	1.39	0.333	0.884	0.86	UDP	complex4.pdb.gz	82,84,87,146,150,174,175
5	0.07	3ioh0	0.849	1.67	0.333	0.884	1.06	III	complex5.pdb.gz	43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,54,60,61,62,66,69,185,199,201,202,203,206,221,222,224,225,272,273,274

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.