D-I-TASSER Q86UU0-D2

D-I-TASSER results for Q86UU0-D2

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q86UU0 (243 residues)
NPPSGLMNPSLPFTSSPDPTPSQNPLSLMMTQMSKYAMPSSTPLYHNAIKTIATSDDELL
PDRPLLPPPPPPQGSGPGISNSQPSQMHLNSAAAQSPMGMNLPGQQPLSHEPPPAMLPSP
TPLGSNIPLHPNAQGTGGPPQNSMMMAPGGPDSLNAPCGPVPSSSQMMPFPPRLQQPHGA
MAPTGGGGGGPGLQQHYPSGMALPPEDLPNQPPGPMPPQQHLMGKAMAGRMGDAYPPGVL
PGV

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| NPPSGLMNPSLPFTSSPDPTPSQNPLSLMMTQMSKYAMPSSTPLYHNAIKTIATSDDELLPDRPLLPPPPPPQGSGPGISNSQPSQMHLNSAAAQSPMGMNLPGQQPLSHEPPPAMLPSPTPLGSNIPLHPNAQGTGGPPQNSMMMAPGGPDSLNAPCGPVPSSSQMMPFPPRLQQPHGAMAPTGGGGGGPGLQQHYPSGMALPPEDLPNQPPGPMPPQQHLMGKAMAGRMGDAYPPGVLPGV
Prediction	CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
Confidence	998788899998888999999999888767778877899888866688888888998889998988998898899999899998888999999889998899998998899999989999999999999899999999999988899999999899989989999999999999999998999999999999998899889999999999999999998888888999999999999989999
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| NPPSGLMNPSLPFTSSPDPTPSQNPLSLMMTQMSKYAMPSSTPLYHNAIKTIATSDDELLPDRPLLPPPPPPQGSGPGISNSQPSQMHLNSAAAQSPMGMNLPGQQPLSHEPPPAMLPSPTPLGSNIPLHPNAQGTGGPPQNSMMMAPGGPDSLNAPCGPVPSSSQMMPFPPRLQQPHGAMAPTGGGGGGPGLQQHYPSGMALPPEDLPNQPPGPMPPQQHLMGKAMAGRMGDAYPPGVLPGV
Prediction	836644454743444437354455344334442544433544334444354364465743473444444444444444445544444436564344345473454444467445544464644547434444444454347434444444454445444345445544454454444444443454444444444443444443476436435544435544445444554457434554468
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180                 200                 220                 240

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
NPPSGLMNPSLPFTSSPDPTPSQNPLSLMMTQMSKYAMPSSTPLYHNAIKTIATSDDELLPDRPLLPPPPPPQGSGPGISNSQPSQMHLNSAAAQSPMGMNLPGQQPLSHEPPPAMLPSPTPLGSNIPLHPNAQGTGGPPQNSMMMAPGGPDSLNAPCGPVPSSSQMMPFPPRLQQPHGAMAPTGGGGGGPGLQQHYPSGMALPPEDLPNQPPGPMPPQQHLMGKAMAGRMGDAYPPGVLPGV

4nl6A

0.10

0.09

3.49

1.22

SPARKS-K

GGVPEQEDSVLFRRGTGQSDDSD--------------IWDDTALIKAYDKAVASFKHALKNGDICETSGKPKTTPKRKPAKKNKSASLQQWKVGDKCSAIWSEDGCIYPATIASIDFKRENREEQNLSDLLSPICEVANNIEQNAQENENESQVSTDESENSSPGNKSDNIKPWNSFLPPPPPMPGPRLGPGKPGLKFNGPPPPPPPPPPHLLSCWLPPFPSGPPIIPPPP--PICPDSLDDA

6xr4A

0.07

2.78

1.08

MapAlign

NEFDELEIQGKLPDPVKEYGCAPWPMVEKLIKQCLKENPQERPTSAQVFDILNSARRILLPKNVIVECMVATNASIWLGCGHTDRGQLSFLDLNTEGYTSEEVADSRILCLALVHLPVEKESWIVSGTQSGTLRHTLEKMTDSVTCLYCNSFQKNFLLVGTADGKLAIFLNIGNVSTPLMCLSEVMWGGCGTKIFSFSNDFTIQKLIETRTSQLFSYAAFSDSNIITVVVDTALYIAKQNSPV

2akjA1

0.09

3.30

0.49

CEthreader

PEIIKGLESVGLTSLQSGMDNVRNPVGNPLAGIDPHEIVDTRP-FTNLISQFVTANSRGNLSITNLPRPCVIGSHDLYEHPHINDLAYMPATKNGKFGFNLLVGAIPLDAWVSAEDVVPVCKAMLEAFRDLGFRGNRQKCRMMWLIDELGMEAFRGEVEKRMPEQVLERASSEELVQKDWERREYLGVHPQKQQGLSFVGLHIPVGRLQ-------ADEMEELARIADVYGSGELRLTVEQNI

7kdtA

0.06

2.65

0.62

EigenThreader

IGNANAAKPDLDKVISLKEANVKLRANALIKRGSMYMQQQQPLLSTQDFNMAADIDPQNADVYHHRGQLKILLDQVEEAVADFDECIRLRPE-----SALAQAQKCFALYRQAYTGNNSSQIQAAMKGFEEVIKKFPRCAEGYALYAQALTDQQQMYDKCIDLEPDNATTYVHKGLLQLQWKQDLDRGLELISKAIEIDNKCDFAYETMGTIEVQRGNNKAINLAKSEMEMAHLYSLCDAAHA

3cnfB

0.14

0.13

4.52

0.50

FFAS-3D

NAQIRRIRPDLRYDDQIDIEAFRWSRYFLDEQLRRLSVGTNPRIARNGVRIMYLTDDDPDPDFVPDVPEGYVAVQ----YAHRLFSSSLANKRNRVTYTHPPTGMAYPSPTGRPHVHMTINERAGMSKLVADNIIASVIKSNWVVDIMTPSEGYTQHVDAESIMTAPKGKLFHLQFMDGLLRPEASGEDMRLIYPLQPISVARSMRAIVNHNEVDRPRE---MDTGTLSRNGDLLYSPVANG-

7jjvA

0.17

0.08

2.72

1.09

SPARKS-K

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------MQCDGLDGADGTSNGQAGASGLAGGPNCNGGKGGKGVGTAGGAGGVGGAGGTGNTNGGAGGSGNSDVAAGGAGAAGGAAGGAGTGGTGGNGGAGKPGGAPGAGGAGTAGSAGSPGQTTVL------------------------

3og2A

0.08

0.06

2.32

0.67

DEthreader

PSQALVFEVFYNNMAAG---V--TI--FN-IYMTFGGASR-DREKYSEL-KLQG--QFLKVS-Y--F-VVRHANYSST-DTA-----------------------SYTV-KL-PTSAGDLTIPQLGGSLTL--SKIHVYYSTALHEKKIVTIHTVLQW--TASSAVDRNSAYYWVPT--L-PGSSGSLMNPDSVIINGGY-LIRS--VA--IKG-ALSVQ-IIGIPYSVSLDWIAHPA--TGR

5a1uG

0.04

2.00

0.92

MapAlign

-VESEIKKEAGELKPEEEITVGPVQKLVTEMGTYATQSALSSSRPTKKEEAASLATTLTKIALRYVALVQEKKKQNSFVASDPVYAEAYVHVNQYDIVLDVLVVNQTSDTLQNCTLELATLGDLKLVEKPSPLTLAPHDANIKANVKCTDAEFRQMWAEFEWENKVTVNTNMTDLNDYLQHILKSTNMKCLTPEKALSGYCGFMAANLYARSIFGEDALANVSIEKPVHQGPDAAVTGHIRIR

4nl6A

0.14

0.12

4.21

0.68

MUSTER

SGGSGGGVPEQEFRRGTGQSDDSD-----------VAS--------HALKNGDICETSGKPKTTPKRKPAKKNKSQKKNTAASLQQWKVGDKCSASEDGCIYPATIASIDFKRETDLLSPICEVANNIEQNAQENENESQVSTDESENSRSPGNKSDNIKPKSAPWNSFLPPPPPMPGPRLGPGKPGLKFNGPPPPPPPPPPHLLSCWLPPFPSGPPI--------IPPPP--PICPDSLDDA

5u1dX

0.35

0.05

1.35

0.72

HHsearch

--------------------------------MSWALNMRVGPRYADARTAVH------DPERPLLRSP------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.4658

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	4pj3A	0.44	5.92	0.038	0.745	model1_4pj3A.pdb.gz
2	3sqrA	0.44	5.91	0.039	0.737	model1_3sqrA.pdb.gz
3	1kv9A1	0.44	5.84	0.053	0.737	model1_1kv9A1.pdb.gz
4	6l8aA	0.44	5.93	0.044	0.741	model1_6l8aA.pdb.gz
5	6w29A	0.43	5.76	0.060	0.737	model1_6w29A.pdb.gz
6	1yiqA1	0.43	5.60	0.038	0.716	model1_1yiqA1.pdb.gz
7	3o24A	0.43	6.07	0.050	0.761	model1_3o24A.pdb.gz
8	2d0vA	0.41	6.07	0.063	0.720	model1_2d0vA.pdb.gz
9	1kb0A	0.39	5.80	0.066	0.658	model1_1kb0A.pdb.gz
10	3i4zA	0.39	5.92	0.031	0.654	model1_3i4zA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0008013	0.87	beta-catenin binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0065007	0.87	biological regulation
GO:0050789	0.87	regulation of biological process
GO:0009987	0.87	cellular process
GO:0050794	0.86	regulation of cellular process
GO:0048518	0.75	positive regulation of biological process
GO:0019222	0.75	regulation of metabolic process
GO:0080090	0.74	regulation of primary metabolic process
GO:0060255	0.74	regulation of macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0048522	0.74	positive regulation of cellular process
GO:0031323	0.74	regulation of cellular metabolic process
GO:0009893	0.74	positive regulation of metabolic process
GO:0051171	0.73	regulation of nitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:0031325	0.73	positive regulation of cellular metabolic process
GO:0010604	0.73	positive regulation of macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0010628	0.72	positive regulation of gene expression
GO:0010557	0.72	positive regulation of macromolecule biosynthetic process
GO:0006355	0.72	regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
GO:0048583	0.71	regulation of response to stimulus
GO:0045893	0.71	positive regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
GO:0045944	0.70	positive regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter
GO:0009966	0.70	regulation of signal transduction
GO:0044699	0.69	single-organism process
GO:0017015	0.69	regulation of transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathway
GO:0032502	0.63	developmental process
GO:0044767	0.62	single-organism developmental process
GO:0051239	0.61	regulation of multicellular organismal process
GO:0048519	0.61	negative regulation of biological process
GO:2000026	0.60	regulation of multicellular organismal development
GO:0048523	0.60	negative regulation of cellular process
GO:0030512	0.59	negative regulation of transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathway
GO:0010718	0.59	positive regulation of epithelial to mesenchymal transition

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	1.00	cell part
GO:0044424	0.97	intracellular part
GO:0043229	0.95	intracellular organelle
GO:0043227	0.95	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0043231	0.94	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0044446	0.84	intracellular organelle part
GO:0044428	0.83	nuclear part
GO:0005634	0.83	nucleus
GO:0005654	0.81	nucleoplasm
GO:0043232	0.70	intracellular non-membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0005730	0.69	nucleolus

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1lrwC	0.405	5.96	0.051	0.683	1.1.99.8	NA
2	0.060	2vdcF	0.387	6.49	0.054	0.720	1.4.1.13	NA
3	0.060	1w6sC	0.397	6.05	0.043	0.691	1.1.99.8	NA
4	0.060	1m21A	0.400	5.72	0.062	0.671	3.5.1.-	NA
5	0.060	1hxgA	0.416	5.48	0.030	0.671	4.2.3.9 4.1.99.7	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.01	1kyaA	0.378	6.29	0.056	0.691	0.24	UUU	complex1.pdb.gz	78,89,190,191
2	0.01	2qt6A	0.360	6.47	0.035	0.675	0.22	CBS	complex2.pdb.gz	188,190,217
3	0.01	4a2dA	0.365	5.85	0.058	0.625	0.29	UUU	complex3.pdb.gz	75,77,180,181,193
4	0.01	2hrgA	0.327	5.85	0.063	0.564	0.24	CBS	complex4.pdb.gz	180,192,217

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.