D-I-TASSER Q86XI6

D-I-TASSER results for Q86XI6

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q86XI6
Protein Name: Protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 3B
Gene Name: PPP1R3B

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q86XI6 (285 residues)
MMAVDIEYRYNCMAPSLRQERFAFKISPKPSKPLRPCIQLSSKNEASGMVAPAVQEKKVK
KRVSFADNQGLALTMVKVFSEFDDPLDMPFNITELLDNIVSLTTAESESFVLDFSQPSAD
YLDFRNRLQADHVCLENCVLKDKAIAGTVKVQNLAFEKTVKIRMTFDTWKSYTDFPCQYV
KDTYAGSDRDTFSFDISLPEKIQSYERMEFAVYYECNGQTYWDSNRGKNYRIIRAELKST
QGMTKPHSGPDLGISFDQFGSPRCSYGLFPEWPSYLGYEKLGPYY

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q86XI6-D1	1-285	285		MMAVDIEYRYNCMAPSLRQERFAFKISPKPSKPLRPCIQLSSKNEASGMVAPAVQEKKVKKRVSFADNQGLALTMVKVFSEFDDPLDMPFNITELLDNIVSLTTAESESFVLDFSQPSADYLDFRNRLQADHVCLENCVLKDKAIAGTVKVQNLAFEKTVKIRMTFDTWKSYTDFPCQYVKDTYAGSDRDTFSFDISLPEKIQSYERMEFAVYYECNGQTYWDSNRGKNYRIIRAELKSTQGMTKPHSGPDLGISFDQFGSPRCSYGLFPEWPSYLGYEKLGPYY

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.6452

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	2eefA	0.45	2.57	0.878	0.505	model1_2eefA.pdb.gz
2	2y8nA	0.43	6.64	0.041	0.772	model1_2y8nA.pdb.gz
3	4cu6A	0.43	5.92	0.040	0.677	model1_4cu6A.pdb.gz
4	5dmyA	0.42	5.73	0.070	0.670	model1_5dmyA.pdb.gz
5	4ypjA	0.42	5.65	0.027	0.649	model1_4ypjA.pdb.gz
6	5fauA	0.42	6.56	0.058	0.751	model1_5fauA.pdb.gz
7	4pkcA	0.42	6.61	0.023	0.751	model1_4pkcA.pdb.gz
8	3gm8A	0.42	5.43	0.054	0.621	model1_3gm8A.pdb.gz
9	6xs4A	0.42	6.42	0.042	0.737	model1_6xs4A.pdb.gz
10	1r4lA	0.42	6.42	0.037	0.719	model1_1r4lA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0019899	0.86	enzyme binding
GO:0019903	0.67	protein phosphatase binding
GO:0003824	0.58	catalytic activity
GO:0016787	0.54	hydrolase activity
GO:0016788	0.51	hydrolase activity, acting on ester bonds
GO:0004721	0.50	phosphoprotein phosphatase activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044699	0.75	single-organism process
GO:0065007	0.73	biological regulation
GO:0009987	0.73	cellular process
GO:0050789	0.72	regulation of biological process
GO:0008152	0.72	metabolic process
GO:0050794	0.70	regulation of cellular process
GO:0071704	0.66	organic substance metabolic process
GO:0044238	0.66	primary metabolic process
GO:0044237	0.64	cellular metabolic process
GO:0044710	0.62	single-organism metabolic process
GO:0080090	0.61	regulation of primary metabolic process
GO:0044763	0.61	single-organism cellular process
GO:0031323	0.61	regulation of cellular metabolic process
GO:0060255	0.60	regulation of macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0043170	0.60	macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0044260	0.59	cellular macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0010906	0.58	regulation of glucose metabolic process
GO:0070873	0.57	regulation of glycogen metabolic process
GO:0044723	0.56	single-organism carbohydrate metabolic process
GO:0006091	0.55	generation of precursor metabolites and energy
GO:0055114	0.53	oxidation-reduction process
GO:0005977	0.52	glycogen metabolic process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	1.00	intracellular part
GO:0044444	0.94	cytoplasmic part
GO:0043226	0.70	organelle
GO:0043229	0.69	intracellular organelle
GO:0043227	0.69	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0043231	0.68	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0042587	0.67	glycogen granule
GO:0043234	0.51	protein complex

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1hn0A	0.380	6.32	0.049	0.642	4.2.2.20	NA
2	0.060	2zf5Y	0.393	5.46	0.050	0.614	2.7.1.30	NA
3	0.060	3jvpD	0.399	5.38	0.079	0.607	2.7.1.16	NA
4	0.060	3flcX	0.400	5.54	0.034	0.628	2.7.1.30	123,212
5	0.060	3eifA	0.382	5.62	0.061	0.586	3.4.21.110	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.01	2dpn0	0.397	5.49	0.064	0.621	0.10	III	complex1.pdb.gz	211,213,218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226
2	0.01	3ll3B	0.393	5.43	0.055	0.604	0.21	ADP	complex2.pdb.gz	147,148,149
3	0.01	2c6nA	0.407	6.58	0.038	0.719	0.14	LPR	complex3.pdb.gz	75,76,77,266
4	0.01	2w41A	0.402	5.61	0.039	0.628	0.23	ADP	complex4.pdb.gz	147,148,224,225
5	0.01	2bihA	0.398	5.44	0.066	0.586	0.11	MTV	complex5.pdb.gz	124,132,134,222,223,224,228
6	0.01	1qup0	0.392	4.43	0.096	0.537	0.24	III	complex6.pdb.gz	139,226,227,230,231
7	0.01	2vr3A	0.369	5.41	0.055	0.561	0.21	III	complex7.pdb.gz	116,134,135,213,219,220,221,222,223,224,225
8	0.01	1czsA	0.256	5.03	0.062	0.368	0.26	PHG	complex8.pdb.gz	163,227,229

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.