D-I-TASSER Q8N5U6

D-I-TASSER results for Q8N5U6

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q8N5U6
Protein Name: RING finger protein 10
Gene Name: RNF10

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q8N5U6 (811 residues)
MPLSSPNAAATASDMDKNSGSNSSSASSGSSKGQQPPRSASAGPAGESKPKSDGKNSSGS
KRYNRKRELSYPKNESFNNQSRRSSSQKSKTFNKMPPQRGGGSSKLFSSSFNGGRRDEVA
EAQRAEFSPAQFSGPKKINLNHLLNFTFEPRGQTGHFEGSGHGSWGKRNKWGHKPFNKEL
FLQANCQFVVSEDQDYTAHFADPDTLVNWDFVEQVRICSHEVPSCPICLYPPTAAKITRC
GHIFCWACILHYLSLSEKTWSKCPICYSSVHKKDLKSVVATESHQYVVGDTITMQLMKRE
KGVLVALPKSKWMNVDHPIHLGDEQHSQYSKLLLASKEQVLHRVVLEEKVALEQQLAEEK
HTPESCFIEAAIQELKTREEALSGLAGSRREVTGVVAALEQLVLMAPLAKESVFQPRKGV
LEYLSAFDEETTEVCSLDTPSRPLALPLVEEEEAVSEPEPEGLPEACDDLELADDNLKEG
TICTESSQQEPITKSGFTRLSSSPCYYFYQAEDGQHMFLHPVNVRCLVREYGSLERSPEK
ISATVVEIAGYSMSEDVRQRHRYLSHLPLTCEFSICELALQPPVVSKETLEMFSDDIEKR
KRQRQKKAREERRRERRIEIEENKKQGKYPEVHIPLENLQQFPAFNSYTCSSDSALGPTS
TEGHGALSISPLSRSPGSHADFLLTPLSPTASQGSPSFCVGSLEEDSPFPSFAQMLRVGK
AKADVWPKTAPKKDENSLVPPAPVDSDGESDNSDRVPVPSFQNSFSQAIEAAFMKLDTPA
TSDPLSEEKGGKKRKKQKQKLLFSTSVVHTK

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q8N5U6-D1	1-631	631		MPLSSPNAAATASDMDKNSGSNSSSASSGSSKGQQPPRSASAGPAGESKPKSDGKNSSGSKRYNRKRELSYPKNESFNNQSRRSSSQKSKTFNKMPPQRGGGSSKLFSSSFNGGRRDEVAEAQRAEFSPAQFSGPKKINLNHLLNFTFEPRGQTGHFEGSGHGSWGKRNKWGHKPFNKELFLQANCQFVVSEDQDYTAHFADPDTLVNWDFVEQVRICSHEVPSCPICLYPPTAAKITRCGHIFCWACILHYLSLSEKTWSKCPICYSSVHKKDLKSVVATESHQYVVGDTITMQLMKREKGVLVALPKSKWMNVDHPIHLGDEQHSQYSKLLLASKEQVLHRVVLEEKVALEQQLAEEKHTPESCFIEAAIQELKTREEALSGLAGSRREVTGVVAALEQLVLMAPLAKESVFQPRKGVLEYLSAFDEETTEVCSLDTPSRPLALPLVEEEEAVSEPEPEGLPEACDDLELADDNLKEGTICTESSQQEPITKSGFTRLSSSPCYYFYQAEDGQHMFLHPVNVRCLVREYGSLERSPEKISATVVEIAGYSMSEDVRQRHRYLSHLPLTCEFSICELALQPPVVSKETLEMFSDDIEKRKRQRQKKAREERRRERRIEIEENKKQGKYPE
2	Q8N5U6-D2	632-811	180		VHIPLENLQQFPAFNSYTCSSDSALGPTSTEGHGALSISPLSRSPGSHADFLLTPLSPTASQGSPSFCVGSLEEDSPFPSFAQMLRVGKAKADVWPKTAPKKDENSLVPPAPVDSDGESDNSDRVPVPSFQNSFSQAIEAAFMKLDTPATSDPLSEEKGGKKRKKQKQKLLFSTSVVHTK

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.44

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	6eqoA	0.34	8.84	0.038	0.557	model1_6eqoA.pdb.gz
2	6vr4A	0.33	8.73	0.043	0.545	model1_6vr4A.pdb.gz
3	6r9tA	0.33	9.10	0.053	0.560	model1_6r9tA.pdb.gz
4	6g7eB	0.33	8.86	0.038	0.542	model1_6g7eB.pdb.gz
5	4pj3A	0.33	7.90	0.036	0.496	model1_4pj3A.pdb.gz
6	6h3iA	0.32	8.88	0.033	0.522	model1_6h3iA.pdb.gz
7	6hqvA	0.31	8.75	0.042	0.513	model1_6hqvA.pdb.gz
8	2vdcA	0.31	8.71	0.034	0.507	model1_2vdcA.pdb.gz
9	5a22A	0.31	8.84	0.031	0.510	model1_5a22A.pdb.gz
10	1llwA	0.31	8.79	0.037	0.508	model1_1llwA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0003824	0.80	catalytic activity
GO:0004842	0.76	ubiquitin-protein transferase activity
GO:1901363	0.71	heterocyclic compound binding
GO:0097159	0.71	organic cyclic compound binding
GO:0003676	0.63	nucleic acid binding
GO:0003677	0.58	DNA binding
GO:0044212	0.56	transcription regulatory region DNA binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0009987	0.87	cellular process
GO:0065007	0.86	biological regulation
GO:0050794	0.85	regulation of cellular process
GO:0080090	0.82	regulation of primary metabolic process
GO:0060255	0.82	regulation of macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0031323	0.82	regulation of cellular metabolic process
GO:0008152	0.78	metabolic process
GO:0071704	0.77	organic substance metabolic process
GO:0048518	0.77	positive regulation of biological process
GO:0044238	0.77	primary metabolic process
GO:0044237	0.76	cellular metabolic process
GO:0031325	0.76	positive regulation of cellular metabolic process
GO:0010604	0.76	positive regulation of macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0044260	0.75	cellular macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0048523	0.68	negative regulation of cellular process
GO:0051252	0.67	regulation of RNA metabolic process
GO:0010468	0.67	regulation of gene expression
GO:2001141	0.66	regulation of RNA biosynthetic process
GO:2000112	0.66	regulation of cellular macromolecule biosynthetic process
GO:0019538	0.65	protein metabolic process
GO:0006355	0.65	regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
GO:0006464	0.64	cellular protein modification process
GO:0045893	0.62	positive regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
GO:0032446	0.62	protein modification by small protein conjugation
GO:0045944	0.61	positive regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter
GO:0016567	0.61	protein ubiquitination
GO:0042127	0.59	regulation of cell proliferation
GO:0051240	0.53	positive regulation of multicellular organismal process
GO:0031643	0.52	positive regulation of myelination
GO:0010626	0.52	negative regulation of Schwann cell proliferation

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	1.00	intracellular part
GO:0043226	0.87	organelle
GO:0043229	0.86	intracellular organelle
GO:0043227	0.83	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0043231	0.82	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0005634	0.78	nucleus
GO:0044422	0.53	organelle part
GO:0044446	0.52	intracellular organelle part

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	2aryA	0.122	6.60	0.046	0.168	3.4.22.52	NA
2	0.060	2g49A	0.276	8.96	0.029	0.454	3.4.24.56	NA
3	0.060	1n1hA	0.254	9.30	0.027	0.443	2.7.7.48	NA
4	0.060	3ecqB	0.302	8.67	0.053	0.486	3.2.1.97	NA
5	0.060	2vdcA	0.312	8.71	0.034	0.507	1.4.1.13	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.01	2c3uA	0.297	8.67	0.038	0.483	0.24	SF4	complex1.pdb.gz	182,186,217
2	0.01	2c3oB	0.307	9.04	0.040	0.514	0.22	SF4	complex2.pdb.gz	236,237,238,239,240
3	0.01	1ce8G	0.278	9.30	0.037	0.475	0.17	IMP	complex3.pdb.gz	236,237,241
4	0.01	1m6vC	0.296	8.61	0.027	0.477	0.15	ADP	complex4.pdb.gz	208,209,210,237,238,241,242
5	0.01	1jdbE	0.296	8.64	0.027	0.478	0.23	PO4	complex5.pdb.gz	238,241,242

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.