D-I-TASSER Q8N9H8-D2

D-I-TASSER results for Q8N9H8-D2

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q8N9H8 (246 residues)
VKDMKDRYYQLPIPRENVHLLASWEDLTRHEGALLQCHQVVGVDVEWTPVFVAGGRPRPS
LLQVAVEGHVFLLDVLALSQPPTGQGAQAFSRLVAQLLSDPSITKLGYGMVGDLQKLGTS
CPALAHVEKQILGGMDLLLVHRQMRVASVPAPAVDRARELRGLSLLVQQVLGTALDKTQQ
LSNWDRRPLCEEQVIYAAADAYCLLEVHQALCREPARFHLSEDLAGSRRPRHRERPGARK
PPGLQK

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| VKDMKDRYYQLPIPRENVHLLASWEDLTRHEGALLQCHQVVGVDVEWTPVFVAGGRPRPSLLQVAVEGHVFLLDVLALSQPPTGQGAQAFSRLVAQLLSDPSITKLGYGMVGDLQKLGTSCPALAHVEKQILGGMDLLLVHRQMRVASVPAPAVDRARELRGLSLLVQQVLGTALDKTQQLSNWDRRPLCEEQVIYAAADAYCLLEVHQALCREPARFHLSEDLAGSRRPRHRERPGARKPPGLQK
Prediction	CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSCCHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCSSSSSCHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHCHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHCHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCC
Confidence	987755454699999867998149999999999852698699980248887778878758999972991899960136776432214678999999981999179996216799999987241346564335524389999996201024432234421130999999996987882112378788999999999999999999999999999999819808888764222203677789987789
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| VKDMKDRYYQLPIPRENVHLLASWEDLTRHEGALLQCHQVVGVDVEWTPVFVAGGRPRPSLLQVAVEGHVFLLDVLALSQPPTGQGAQAFSRLVAQLLSDPSITKLGYGMVGDLQKLGTSCPALAHVEKQILGGMDLLLVHRQMRVASVPAPAVDRARELRGLSLLVQQVLGTALDKTQQLSNWDRRPLCEEQVIYAAADAYCLLEVHQALCREPARFHLSEDLAGSRRPRHRERPGARKPPGLQK
Prediction	774467523605147540413322620250045025734000000202222444442200000001553000000030342354442520151034005254000000002200210142132134232302000002200420213403443344324221023003202725153633333044340375004000200200030152037305736146314524554346446575375368
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180                 200                 220                 240

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSCCHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCSSSSSCHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHCHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHCHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCC
VKDMKDRYYQLPIPRENVHLLASWEDLTRHEGALLQCHQVVGVDVEWTPVFVAGGRPRPSLLQVAVEGHVFLLDVLALSQPPTGQGAQAFSRLVAQLLSDPSITKLGYGMVGDLQKLGTSCPALAHVEKQILGGMDLLLVHRQMRVASVPAPAVDRARELRGLSLLVQQVLGTALDKTQQLSNWDRRPLCEEQVIYAAADAYCLLEVHQALCREPARFHLSEDLAGSRRPRHRERPGARKPPGLQK

7jw6A

0.27

0.24

7.24

1.33

DEthreader

------MYLTMDLPDECLIIVNKADEFDRMLYHLQQ-ECVIYLASEWMQSV--CGDNQLCVLQIATGHNVYLIDCLA-RE---SLR-SEHWRLLGNIFNNVNIRKVGFSMVSDLSVLQRSLPLQ-LRLQMPHHYLDLRNLWLELKKQFGNVNR-A-G---DALTDLSLACLGKKLNKSNQCSNWANRPLRREQILYAAIDARCLMLIYNTLIEVSFIQAVIEKSIASNNFLRRG------------

7jw2A

0.26

0.23

7.02

2.01

SPARKS-K

-------AHTLRLDESHVHLVDSKDKFYAMLSDLCRQ-SMIAFASEWKP--TFGGANEVSLIQLATWDDVYMIDVMVSQLEP-----LDWAALAKNVFNRDDVLKLSFAPSTDISMFQKALPSFNVMYSSTSAILDLQLLWRHVERFDSFRFPYHEESVNQNLANLVRLCLGKKLDKSNQFSNWAQRPLRKEQLRYAALDAFCLLEIYDAIEKQLTHIQLPNEILNALLND---------------

7jw6A

0.27

0.23

6.99

1.00

MapAlign

--------LTMDLPDECLIIVNKADEFDRMLYHLQ-QECVIYLASEWMQ--SVCGDNQLCVLQIATGHNVYLIDCLSLR-------SEHWRLLGANIFNNVNIRKVGFSMVSDLSVLQRSLPLQL-RLQMPHHYLDLRNLWLELKKQRFGVELGNVNRAGDALTDLSLACLGKKLNKSNQCSNWANRPLRREQILYAAIDARCLMLIYNTLIERVSFIAVIEKSIAS-------------------

4nlbA

0.21

0.19

5.92

0.75

CEthreader

QLLLKTETPYLSLVTCPLTFVDTVEDLEALVAVLL-NETEIAVDLEHHDFYS--YQGFTCLMQISTRTQDFIVDCLKV---------RANMYLMAPVFLQPNIVKVFHGAREDVRWLQKDFGLY------IVNLFDTSIALQNL-------------HMPHSLAFAVDHFCQVKLNKKYQTADWRVRPIPAEMVSYAQQDTHFLLYVYDRLKQLLLNCNMLLHVFQESRLLSLERYEKPHLDPDVT

4nlbA

0.22

0.19

6.03

1.40

MUSTER

QLLLKTETPYLSLVTCPLTFVDTVEDLEALVAVLLN-ETEIAVDLEHHDFYS--YQGFTCLMQISTRTQDFIVDCLKV---------RANMYLMAPVFLQPNIVKVFHGAREDVRWLQKDFG------LYIVNLFDTSIALQNLHM-------------PHSLAFAVDHFCQVKLNKKYQTADWRVRPIPAEMVSYAQQDTHFLLYVYDRLKQLLLNCNMLLHVFQESRLLERYEKPHLDPDVTYK

4nlbA

0.21

0.19

5.92

2.33

HHsearch

QLLLKTETPYLSLVTCPLTFVDTVEDLEALVAVL-LNETEIAVDLEHHDFY--SYQGFTCLMQISTRTQDFIVDCLKVRA---------NMYLMAPVFLQPNIVKVFHGAREDVRWLQKDFG------LYIVNLFDTSIALQNL----------HMP---HSLAFAVDHFCQVKLNKKYQTADWRVRPIPAEMVSYAQQDTHFLLYVYDRLKQLLLNCNMLLHVFQESRLLSLEREKPLGRGGLSS

7jw2A

0.26

0.22

6.91

2.57

FFAS-3D

--------HTLRLDESHVHLVDSKDKFYAMLSDL-CRQSMIAFASEWKPT--FGGANEVSLIQLATWDDVYMIDVMVSQLE-----PLDWAALAKNVFNRDDVLKLSFAPSTDISMFQKALPSFNVSSQSTSAILDLQLLWRHVERFDSFRFPYHEESVNQNLANLVRLCLGKKLDKSNQFSNWAQRPLRKEQLRYAALDAFCLLEIYDAIEKQLTHIQLDNEILNALLND---------------

7jw2A

0.25

0.22

6.92

1.42

EigenThreader

-------AHTLRLDESHVHLVDSKDKFYAMLSDLC-RQSMIAFASEWKP--TFGGANEVSLIQLATWDDVYMIDVMVSQLE-----PLDWAALAKNVFNRDDVLKLSFAPSTDISMFQKALPSFNVMYSSTSAILDLQLLWRHVERFDSFRFPYHEESVNQNLANLVRLCLGKKLDKSNQFSNWAQRPLRKEQLRYAALDAFCLLEIYDAIEKQLTHIQLDPNEILNALLND--------------

7jw2A

0.25

0.22

6.79

1.67

CNFpred

-------AHTLRLDESHVHLVDSKDKFYAMLSDLCR-QSMIAFASEWKPTFGG--ANEVSLIQLATWDDVYMIDVMVSQL-----EPLDWAALAKNVFNRDDVLKLSFAPSTDISMFQKALPSFNVMYSSTSAILDLQLLWRHVERFDSFRFPYHEESVNQNLANLVRLCLGKKLDKSNQFSNWAQRPLRKEQLRYAALDAFCLLEIYDAIEKQLTHIQLPNEILNAL------------------

7jw2A

0.26

0.22

6.89

1.17

DEthreader

-------AHTLRLDESHVHLVDSKDKFYAMLSDLCR-QSMIAFASEWKPT-FGG-ANEVSLIQLATWDDVYMIDVMVSQ-----LE-PLDWAALAKVFNRDDVLKLSFAPSTDISMFQKALPSFNVMYSSTSAILDLQLLWRHVERFDFRHEE-S-V--NQNLANLVRLCLGKKLDKSNQFSNWAQRPLRKEQLRYAALDAFCLLEIYDAIEKQLTILDPNEILNALLND----------------

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.8313

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	7jw6A	0.83	1.97	0.270	0.890	model1_7jw6A.pdb.gz
2	7jw2A	0.80	1.89	0.262	0.870	model1_7jw2A.pdb.gz
3	4nlbA	0.79	1.73	0.214	0.837	model1_4nlbA.pdb.gz
4	3safA	0.79	1.84	0.208	0.842	model1_3safA.pdb.gz
5	2hbkA	0.77	2.31	0.181	0.837	model1_2hbkA.pdb.gz
6	3cymA	0.76	2.51	0.193	0.862	model1_3cymA.pdb.gz
7	1yt3A	0.74	2.18	0.214	0.817	model1_1yt3A.pdb.gz
8	3psfA	0.38	5.14	0.030	0.569	model1_3psfA.pdb.gz
9	2fk6A2	0.32	5.72	0.061	0.545	model1_2fk6A2.pdb.gz
10	3g1wA	0.32	5.10	0.042	0.484	model1_3g1wA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0016787	1.00	hydrolase activity
GO:0016788	0.94	hydrolase activity, acting on ester bonds
GO:0004518	0.93	nuclease activity
GO:0008408	0.92	3'-5' exonuclease activity
GO:1901363	0.56	heterocyclic compound binding
GO:0097159	0.56	organic cyclic compound binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0009987	0.98	cellular process
GO:0008152	0.97	metabolic process
GO:0090304	0.96	nucleic acid metabolic process
GO:0044260	0.96	cellular macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0044699	0.80	single-organism process
GO:0016070	0.78	RNA metabolic process
GO:0065007	0.77	biological regulation
GO:0044763	0.76	single-organism cellular process
GO:1901575	0.69	organic substance catabolic process
GO:0044248	0.69	cellular catabolic process
GO:0044265	0.68	cellular macromolecule catabolic process
GO:0034660	0.68	ncRNA metabolic process
GO:0034655	0.68	nucleobase-containing compound catabolic process
GO:0016043	0.68	cellular component organization
GO:0006996	0.67	organelle organization
GO:0006401	0.67	RNA catabolic process
GO:0006259	0.66	DNA metabolic process
GO:0051276	0.64	chromosome organization
GO:0016072	0.64	rRNA metabolic process
GO:0016071	0.64	mRNA metabolic process
GO:0006402	0.63	mRNA catabolic process
GO:0071027	0.62	nuclear RNA surveillance
GO:0043633	0.62	polyadenylation-dependent RNA catabolic process
GO:0016075	0.62	rRNA catabolic process
GO:0000956	0.62	nuclear-transcribed mRNA catabolic process
GO:0071044	0.61	histone mRNA catabolic process
GO:0071035	0.61	nuclear polyadenylation-dependent rRNA catabolic process
GO:0050789	0.59	regulation of biological process
GO:0006396	0.56	RNA processing
GO:1901576	0.55	organic substance biosynthetic process
GO:0050896	0.55	response to stimulus
GO:0044249	0.55	cellular biosynthetic process
GO:0034645	0.54	cellular macromolecule biosynthetic process
GO:0006950	0.54	response to stress
GO:0051179	0.53	localization
GO:0040007	0.52	growth
GO:0051641	0.51	cellular localization
GO:0034470	0.51	ncRNA processing
GO:0033554	0.51	cellular response to stress
GO:0006281	0.50	DNA repair

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	1.00	intracellular part
GO:0043231	0.97	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0005634	0.95	nucleus
GO:0005737	0.94	cytoplasm
GO:0044446	0.79	intracellular organelle part
GO:0032991	0.69	macromolecular complex
GO:0044428	0.64	nuclear part
GO:0043234	0.57	protein complex

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.067	1wljA	0.506	2.54	0.196	0.581	3.1.13.1	46
2	0.066	2oa8B	0.529	3.64	0.145	0.671	3.1.11.2	44,46,163,200
3	0.066	1w0hA	0.506	3.43	0.094	0.626	3.1.11.-	NA
4	0.066	2o4iA	0.528	3.52	0.145	0.663	3.1.11.2	117,136,200
5	0.060	9cgtA	0.439	6.07	0.069	0.768	2.4.1.19	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Click to view	Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
	1	0.29	2kzmA	0.721	2.93	0.173	0.846	1.17	QNA	complex1.pdb.gz	44,45,46,47,108,109,112,162,163,196,200
	2	0.26	1d9fA	0.722	2.93	0.173	0.846	0.91	UUU	complex2.pdb.gz	43,44,46,47,108,109,111,112,113,138,162,163,164,175,176,196,200

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.