D-I-TASSER Q8NE28-D6

D-I-TASSER results for Q8NE28-D6

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q8NE28 (103 residues)
ELAAFKVVVQEEGGSGLSLIKETYQLHRDDPEVVENVGMLLVHLASYEEILPELVSSSMK
ALLQEIKERFTSSLVSDSSAFSKPGLPPGGSPQLGCTTSGGLE

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 \| \| \| \| \| ELAAFKVVVQEEGGSGLSLIKETYQLHRDDPEVVENVGMLLVHLASYEEILPELVSSSMKALLQEIKERFTSSLVSDSSAFSKPGLPPGGSPQLGCTTSGGLE
Prediction	CCCCSSSSSCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
Confidence	9520123432689852699999999944698999999999999999999999999855799999999871522101012221479999999999988667889
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 \| \| \| \| \| ELAAFKVVVQEEGGSGLSLIKETYQLHRDDPEVVENVGMLLVHLASYEEILPELVSSSMKALLQEIKERFTSSLVSDSSAFSKPGLPPGGSPQLGCTTSGGLE
Prediction	8422131134565340140034005324742410320030023135165025304655045005404751544424335334547454464564624655548
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCSSSSSCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
ELAAFKVVVQEEGGSGLSLIKETYQLHRDDPEVVENVGMLLVHLASYEEILPELVSSSMKALLQEIKERFTSSLVSDSSAFSKPGLPPGGSPQLGCTTSGGLE

5oo7A

0.07

2.79

1.17

DEthreader

PKHVRSCIVYDHSSSFWAGLKVQ--PILADEVQTFKALITIHKVLQEHPTLREAM--ANRGWIDSLSRGMMGGPLIREYVHFLKLSFDLMLQIDFQIFSHFR-

4r0zA5

0.10

0.09

3.19

1.06

SPARKS-K

----APSKITFLSLLGPQILVSILREYSDHRKLIYTVVRCIRSLSVCPSNKPALISLGCLPALYVELCTAKD-ERSQTAILVAMRNLSDSA------------

7lcyA

0.11

0.10

3.51

1.17

DEthreader

GILELFTCDVIR-LGGLDAVLFECR--TSDLETLRHCASALANLSLYGANQEEMILRKVPMWLFPLAF-H-NDDNIKYYACLAVLVANVPVLAHFME------

5xgcA2

0.10

3.60

1.05

SPARKS-K

GDESMQKLFEGGKGSVFQRVLSWIP--SNNHQLQLAGALAIANFARNDANCIHMVDNGIVEKLMDLLDRHVGNVTVQHAALSALRNLAIPVINKAMLSAGVTE

3nowA

0.06

2.53

0.63

MapAlign

TTFVNLCITVLANEGITTALCALA-KT-ESHNSQELIARVLNAVCGLKELRGKVVQEGGVKALLRMALEG--TEKGKRHATQARIGITINPEVSFSGQRSLDV

3nowA

0.07

2.80

0.34

CEthreader

VDFINKRITVLANEGITTALCALAK--TESHNSQELIARVLNAVCGLKELRGKVVQEGGVKALLRMALE--GTEKGKRHATQALARIGITINPEVSFSGQRSL

2z6gA1

0.17

5.41

0.69

MUSTER

KEASRHAIM--RSPQMVSAIVRTMQN-TNDVETARCTSGTLHNLSHHREGLLAIFKSGGIPALVNMLG--SPVDSVLFHAITTLHNLLLHQEGMAVRLAGGLQ

4r0zA3

0.15

4.91

0.89

HHsearch

ACACGTLSNCNCSHGGIDALVTAIRRLPEVEEVTEPALCALRHCTAREEAQSELRFCQAFPVILDQLE--TLRTPVIKAALGVIRNSALLQTNIELTQEQTAN

4r0zA5

0.13

0.09

3.05

0.64

FFAS-3D

------------SLLGPQILVSILREYSDHRKLIYTVVRCIRSLSVCPSNKPALISLGCLPALYVELCT-AKDERSQTAILVAM-------------------

3tt9A

0.11

3.85

0.52

EigenThreader

ISAAATFIKRVNQLRGILKLLQLLKV--QNEDVQRAVCGALRNLVFDNDNKLEVAELNGVPRLLQVLKQT-RDLETKKQITGLLWNLSSNDKLKNLMITEALL

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.7325

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	7anwA	0.82	1.95	0.140	0.971	model1_7anwA.pdb.gz
2	7lcyA	0.81	1.94	0.102	0.952	model1_7lcyA.pdb.gz
3	6wpkA	0.81	1.96	0.153	0.952	model1_6wpkA.pdb.gz
4	4plqA	0.80	2.03	0.112	0.952	model1_4plqA.pdb.gz
5	7jtkX	0.80	2.09	0.162	0.961	model1_7jtkX.pdb.gz
6	3tt9A	0.80	2.04	0.101	0.961	model1_3tt9A.pdb.gz
7	6sa8A	0.79	2.05	0.102	0.952	model1_6sa8A.pdb.gz
8	4rv1A	0.79	2.11	0.141	0.961	model1_4rv1A.pdb.gz
9	5xgcA	0.79	2.19	0.081	0.961	model1_5xgcA.pdb.gz
10	4db6A	0.79	2.08	0.102	0.952	model1_4db6A.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0004674	1.00	protein serine/threonine kinase activity
GO:1901363	0.57	heterocyclic compound binding
GO:0097159	0.57	organic cyclic compound binding
GO:0005524	0.56	ATP binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0009987	0.93	cellular process
GO:0071704	0.87	organic substance metabolic process
GO:0044238	0.87	primary metabolic process
GO:0044237	0.86	cellular metabolic process
GO:0006796	0.85	phosphate-containing compound metabolic process
GO:0006468	0.84	protein phosphorylation
GO:0044699	0.76	single-organism process
GO:0065007	0.68	biological regulation
GO:0050794	0.66	regulation of cellular process
GO:0044767	0.64	single-organism developmental process
GO:0048856	0.63	anatomical structure development
GO:0044763	0.62	single-organism cellular process
GO:0044707	0.61	single-multicellular organism process
GO:0009653	0.60	anatomical structure morphogenesis
GO:0016043	0.58	cellular component organization
GO:0048583	0.56	regulation of response to stimulus
GO:0080090	0.55	regulation of primary metabolic process
GO:0060255	0.55	regulation of macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0031323	0.55	regulation of cellular metabolic process
GO:0009966	0.55	regulation of signal transduction
GO:0048522	0.54	positive regulation of cellular process
GO:0046777	0.54	protein autophosphorylation
GO:0022607	0.53	cellular component assembly
GO:0050896	0.52	response to stimulus
GO:0043933	0.52	macromolecular complex subunit organization
GO:0009967	0.52	positive regulation of signal transduction
GO:0006996	0.52	organelle organization
GO:1901700	0.51	response to oxygen-containing compound
GO:0065009	0.51	regulation of molecular function
GO:0060828	0.51	regulation of canonical Wnt signaling pathway
GO:0051716	0.51	cellular response to stimulus
GO:0051179	0.51	localization
GO:0048523	0.51	negative regulation of cellular process
GO:0031325	0.51	positive regulation of cellular metabolic process
GO:0030177	0.51	positive regulation of Wnt signaling pathway
GO:0010604	0.51	positive regulation of macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0010033	0.51	response to organic substance
GO:0009605	0.51	response to external stimulus
GO:1903533	0.50	regulation of protein targeting
GO:1901701	0.50	cellular response to oxygen-containing compound
GO:0071417	0.50	cellular response to organonitrogen compound
GO:0071407	0.50	cellular response to organic cyclic compound
GO:0065008	0.50	regulation of biological quality
GO:0044093	0.50	positive regulation of molecular function
GO:0010468	0.50	regulation of gene expression
GO:0006461	0.50	protein complex assembly

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	1.00	intracellular part
GO:0043231	0.99	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0005737	0.97	cytoplasm
GO:0044444	0.96	cytoplasmic part
GO:0044446	0.95	intracellular organelle part
GO:0005829	0.94	cytosol
GO:0016020	0.93	membrane
GO:0005886	0.90	plasma membrane
GO:0005634	0.90	nucleus
GO:0044425	0.89	membrane part
GO:0043234	0.89	protein complex
GO:0042995	0.88	cell projection
GO:0070062	0.87	extracellular exosome
GO:0044459	0.87	plasma membrane part
GO:0043005	0.87	neuron projection
GO:0099568	0.86	cytoplasmic region
GO:0098590	0.86	plasma membrane region
GO:0030426	0.86	growth cone
GO:0030425	0.86	dendrite
GO:1990909	0.85	Wnt signalosome
GO:0098562	0.85	cytoplasmic side of membrane
GO:0044456	0.85	synapse part
GO:0043025	0.85	neuronal cell body
GO:0033267	0.85	axon part
GO:0031090	0.85	organelle membrane
GO:0005902	0.85	microvillus
GO:0005739	0.85	mitochondrion
GO:0097487	0.84	multivesicular body, internal vesicle
GO:0044754	0.84	autolysosome
GO:0044753	0.84	amphisome
GO:0043204	0.84	perikaryon
GO:0043195	0.84	terminal bouton
GO:0032839	0.84	dendrite cytoplasm
GO:0032473	0.84	cytoplasmic side of mitochondrial outer membrane
GO:0030424	0.84	axon
GO:0016234	0.84	inclusion body
GO:0005901	0.84	caveola
GO:0005798	0.84	Golgi-associated vesicle
GO:0005794	0.84	Golgi apparatus
GO:0005783	0.84	endoplasmic reticulum
GO:0005768	0.84	endosome
GO:0005759	0.84	mitochondrial matrix
GO:0005743	0.84	mitochondrial inner membrane
GO:0005741	0.84	mitochondrial outer membrane
GO:0005622	0.84	intracellular
GO:0005615	0.84	extracellular space
GO:0044428	0.64	nuclear part
GO:0005654	0.57	nucleoplasm

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.067	1ujkB	0.674	2.90	0.080	0.971	3.4.23.46	4,6,32
2	0.060	1pn9B	0.561	3.43	0.062	0.835	2.5.1.18	23,24
3	0.060	1z1wA	0.564	3.31	0.043	0.883	3.4.11.-	NA
4	0.060	3dsxA	0.568	3.53	0.121	0.952	2.5.1.60	NA
5	0.060	3ismC	0.590	3.94	0.092	0.942	3.6.1.3	46,51

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.04	3obvB	0.746	2.69	0.110	0.971	0.69	SUC	complex1.pdb.gz	34,35,38,39,42
2	0.03	2gl7D	0.766	2.15	0.131	0.942	0.76	III	complex2.pdb.gz	17,21,39,43,47
3	0.03	2gl7A	0.753	2.59	0.082	0.952	0.86	III	complex3.pdb.gz	19,23,28,30,33,40,44
4	0.03	3obvC	0.750	2.63	0.110	0.971	0.57	SUC	complex4.pdb.gz	17,34,35,38
5	0.03	3nmxA	0.756	2.27	0.082	0.942	0.57	III	complex5.pdb.gz	35,39,42,43,46,47,51,78,79,82,85,86,89
6	0.02	3nmxC	0.753	2.28	0.082	0.942	0.50	III	complex6.pdb.gz	17,21,24

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.