D-I-TASSER Q8NE71-D1

D-I-TASSER results for Q8NE71-D1

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q8NE71 (301 residues)
MPKAPKQQPPEPEWIGDGESTSPSDKVVKKGKKDKKIKKTFFEELAVEDKQAGEEEKVLK
EKEQQQQQQQQQQKKKRDTRKGRRKKDVDDDGEEKELMERLKKLSVPTSDEEDEVPAPKP
RGGKKTKGGNVFAALIQDQSEEEEEEEKHPPKPAKPEKNRINKAVSEEQQPALKGKKGKE
EKSKGKAKPQNKFAALDNEEEDKEEEIIKEKEPPKQGKEKAKKAEQGSEEEGEGEEEEEE
GGESKADDPYAHLSKKEKKKLKKQMEYERQVASLKAANAAENDFSVSQAEMSSRQAMLEN
A

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MPKAPKQQPPEPEWIGDGESTSPSDKVVKKGKKDKKIKKTFFEELAVEDKQAGEEEKVLKEKEQQQQQQQQQQKKKRDTRKGRRKKDVDDDGEEKELMERLKKLSVPTSDEEDEVPAPKPRGGKKTKGGNVFAALIQDQSEEEEEEEKHPPKPAKPEKNRINKAVSEEQQPALKGKKGKEEKSKGKAKPQNKFAALDNEEEDKEEEIIKEKEPPKQGKEKAKKAEQGSEEEGEGEEEEEEGGESKADDPYAHLSKKEKKKLKKQMEYERQVASLKAANAAENDFSVSQAEMSSRQAMLENA
Prediction	CCCCCCCCCCCHHHCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCHHHCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHCCCHHHHCHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCC
Confidence	9998645643211114566786145443123100022112111012333442012234421001234443333311111112212212443201112334443045544322234445554433323331122111234521001012445554322122344421111321123444430001234644200124432101121111023554321112333111111013454323332211224531123312333320210332101012220110110113567777788876419
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MPKAPKQQPPEPEWIGDGESTSPSDKVVKKGKKDKKIKKTFFEELAVEDKQAGEEEKVLKEKEQQQQQQQQQQKKKRDTRKGRRKKDVDDDGEEKELMERLKKLSVPTSDEEDEVPAPKPRGGKKTKGGNVFAALIQDQSEEEEEEEKHPPKPAKPEKNRINKAVSEEQQPALKGKKGKEEKSKGKAKPQNKFAALDNEEEDKEEEIIKEKEPPKQGKEKAKKAEQGSEEEGEGEEEEEEGGESKADDPYAHLSKKEKKKLKKQMEYERQVASLKAANAAENDFSVSQAEMSSRQAMLENA
Prediction	7556457557555446666565555544566575465555345645566555666564565765566555666656556565665664666576664465465465645556655546566556556556445535665666656675556565655665565555565565566665564565566566656554666566665645657556655665555466656555567665556655545564563556455646544546554454545644555453545525545443668
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180                 200                 220                 240                 260                 280                 300

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCCCCCCCHHHCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCHHHCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHCCCHHHHCHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCC
MPKAPKQQPPEPEWIGDGESTSPSDKVVKKGKKDKKIKKTFFEELAVEDKQAGEEEKVLKEKEQQQQQQQQQQKKKRDTRKGRRKKDVDDDGEEKELMERLKKLSVPTSDEEDEVPAPKPRGGKKTKGGNVFAALIQDQSEEEEEEEKHPPKPAKPEKNRINKAVSEEQQPALKGKKGKEEKSKGKAKPQNKFAALDNEEEDKEEEIIKEKEPPKQGKEKAKKAEQGSEEEGEGEEEEEEGGESKADDPYAHLSKKEKKKLKKQMEYERQVASLKAANAAENDFSVSQAEMSSRQAMLENA

6yvuB

0.13

0.12

4.25

1.50

SPARKS-K

VAYGKKRFRVDGKLIDISGTMNHVAKGLMKLKVDDYTP----EEVDKIERELSERENNFRVASDTVHEMEEELKKLRDHEPDLESQISKAEMEADSLASELTLAEQQVKEAEMAVKAVSD----------------KAQLNVVMKNLERLRGEYNDSETKTKKEKIKGLQDEIMKIIKLQMQNSKVESVCQKLDILVAKLKKVKSASKKSGGDVVKLLQNSERDVELSSDELKVIEEQLKHTKLALAENDTNMNETLNLKVELKEQSEQLKEQMEDMEESINEFKSIEIEMKNKLEKLNSL

2tmaA

0.14

0.13

4.34

1.09

MUSTER

MDAIKKKQMLKLDKENALDRAEQAEADKKAAEDRSKQLE---DELVSLQKKLKGTEDELDKYSEALKDAQEKLELAEKKATDAEADVASLNRRIQLVEEELDRAQERLATALQKLEEAEKAADESERG------MKVIESRAQKDEEKMEIQEIQLKEAKHIAEDADRKYEEVARKLVIIESDLERAEERAELSEGKCAELEEEIKTVTNNKSLEAQAEKYSQKEDKYEEEIKVLSDKLKEAETRAEFAERSVTKLE----KSIDDLEDELYAQKLKYKA-------SEELDHALNDMTSI

1vt4I

0.06

2.69

0.75

CEthreader

GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG---GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG

7kdtA

0.05

2.44

0.68

EigenThreader

GKYEQAIQCYTEAISLCPLSTFYQNRAAAFEQLQKWKEVAQDCTKAVELNPKYVKALFRRAKAHEKLECLEDVTAVCILEGFQNLKLLGKEKAKEKYKKAKQYMEEENYDKIISECSKEIDAEGKYMAEALLLRATFYLNANAAKPDLDKVISLKEANVKLRANALIKRGSMYMQQQQPLLSTQDFNMAADIDPQNADVYHHADFDECIRLRPESALAQAQKCFALYRQAYTGNNAQALTDQQQFGKADEMYDKCIDLETTYVHKGLLQLGLELISKAIEIDCDFAYETMGTIEVQRAINL

2bsgA

0.13

0.12

4.18

0.56

FFAS-3D

LPDGPAEGQSRISWIKNGEELGADTQYGSEGSMNRGILKTSLETANSDIKTIQINKKDISDLKTLTSEHTEILNGTNNTVDSILADIIRNDNNTDVITSQGIRLSLTIEVGNLREELVYSR----------LNEIDTKQTTVESDISAIKTSISIITASINLEIKQRLTVIETSIIKGQIKDNTTSILRANVSWLNQIVSLLNRVSTIETSVSGLNNAVQNLQVEIGNNSAGIKGQVVALNTLVNGTNPNGS-TVEERGLTNSIKANETNIASVTQENTAKG----NISSLQGDVQALQEA

7ko4P

0.15

0.13

4.47

1.42

SPARKS-K

-------------------------------------LKLDKENALDRAEQAEADKKAAEDRSKQLEDELVSLQKKLKGTEDELDKYSEALKDAQEKLELAEKKATDAEADVASLNRRIQLVEEELDRAQERLATALQKLEEAEKAADESERGMKVIESRAQKDEEKMEIQEIQLKEAKHIAEDADRKYEEVARKLVIIESDLERAEERAELSEGKCAELEEELKTVTNKSLEAQAEKYSQKEDRYEEEIKVLSDKLKEAETRAEFAERSVTKLEKSIDDLEDELYAQKLKYKAISEELDH

6w2wA

0.15

0.06

2.01

0.51

CNFpred

----------------------------------------RVKQLAEKAKEATDKEE------------------------------------VIEIVKELAELAKQSTDPNVVAEI-----------VYQLAEVAEHSTDPELIKEILQEALRLAEEQ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------DEELAEAARLALKAARLLEEARQLLSKDPENEAAKECLKAVRAALEAA

6rw8A

0.09

0.05

2.00

0.67

DEthreader

QTEPRIIPIWS--GTALH-AA---D----N-IYGFAV-GGS-RFGALFNASAIGIEISASATRIAADKISQSEIYRR-RRQEWEIQRNNAEAEIKQIDAQLATLAVEAVLKNYETQAQ-----AFLQSNAA-YN-LRGRLSIYYQFYDAVCLEYQYLNNTRRIKQILSKAIASGQFQ-MDFDLPFELPVADTG------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

6w0pA

0.04

2.08

1.00

MapAlign

LDLRSGLYQRTFTWLTNQAKIKIINSIGLTVKTLTTNQTLTSTNIIDKNGNQKLSQQRDIALTKLVKKNQKFFNHFYQKSDILIDGSDSDQQGIRYCLFQMIQAYHGFDPTNTIGAKGLTGEAYSGHAFLIMFRYNTLEEAKARAKELDSICFPVATRNGKEACNLWQHASTGVFYAIYHYMKIYNDHKFMQNYGIEMLVEISKFLLSRGQYNQDKTKFSILDKCGFTKKDLAKMKDASRKVLMFMFLYMEEFSQKQLLANYNYYEPRSPSIHSIIASKIGLEKDANNFFGFAAWMNIVYG

5nnvA

0.15

0.12

3.90

0.82

MUSTER

-------------------------------------------------------------AKEEELAESSAISAKEAKIEDTRDKIQALDESVDELQQVLLVTSEELEKLEGRKEVLKERKKNAVQNQEQLEEAIVQFQQKETVLKEELSK-QEAVFETLQAEVKQLRAQVKEKQQLSNELTELKIAAAKKEQACKG-EEDNLARLKKELTETELALKEAKEDLSFLTSESSSTSGEEKLEEA-----AKHKLNDKTKTIELIALRRDQRIKLQHGLDTYERELKEKRLYKQKTTLL---

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.4733

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	1v7vA	0.43	6.28	0.073	0.738	model1_1v7vA.pdb.gz
2	6w2jA	0.43	6.28	0.058	0.744	model1_6w2jA.pdb.gz
3	4c1oA	0.43	6.55	0.056	0.748	model1_4c1oA.pdb.gz
4	1ulvA	0.43	6.70	0.086	0.751	model1_1ulvA.pdb.gz
5	5azaA	0.42	6.37	0.076	0.718	model1_5azaA.pdb.gz
6	3c68A	0.42	6.79	0.063	0.774	model1_3c68A.pdb.gz
7	5fjsA	0.42	6.76	0.050	0.761	model1_5fjsA.pdb.gz
8	4j5tA	0.42	6.80	0.062	0.771	model1_4j5tA.pdb.gz
9	1eu8A	0.33	5.53	0.061	0.495	model1_1eu8A.pdb.gz
10	3i4lA	0.33	6.66	0.069	0.585	model1_3i4lA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0043022	1.00	ribosome binding
GO:0008494	1.00	translation activator activity
GO:0005524	1.00	ATP binding
GO:0003723	0.56	RNA binding
GO:0044822	0.50	poly(A) RNA binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0045727	1.00	positive regulation of translation
GO:0042254	1.00	ribosome biogenesis
GO:0006413	1.00	translational initiation
GO:0071704	0.63	organic substance metabolic process
GO:0044238	0.60	primary metabolic process
GO:0043170	0.58	macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0044260	0.57	cellular macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0034641	0.57	cellular nitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:1901576	0.51	organic substance biosynthetic process
GO:0044249	0.51	cellular biosynthetic process
GO:1901564	0.50	organonitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:0044271	0.50	cellular nitrogen compound biosynthetic process
GO:0009059	0.50	macromolecule biosynthetic process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	1.00	intracellular part
GO:0005737	0.88	cytoplasm
GO:0044444	0.80	cytoplasmic part
GO:0043226	0.76	organelle
GO:0044446	0.75	intracellular organelle part
GO:0043229	0.75	intracellular organelle
GO:0032991	0.71	macromolecular complex
GO:0044428	0.70	nuclear part
GO:0043232	0.69	intracellular non-membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0030529	0.69	intracellular ribonucleoprotein complex
GO:0042788	0.66	polysomal ribosome
GO:0005654	0.66	nucleoplasm
GO:0005635	0.66	nuclear envelope

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	2j5wA	0.381	6.88	0.059	0.704	1.16.3.1	NA
2	0.060	1l9mB	0.354	7.09	0.055	0.661	2.3.2.13	NA
3	0.060	1peuA	0.364	6.39	0.039	0.615	1.17.4.1	NA
4	0.060	2pflA	0.367	6.40	0.045	0.621	2.3.1.54	NA
5	0.060	3ikmD	0.390	6.38	0.043	0.648	2.7.7.7	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

No Binding sites was predicted

Click to view	Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.