D-I-TASSER Q8TE68

D-I-TASSER results for Q8TE68

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q8TE68
Protein Name: Epidermal growth factor receptor kinase substrate 8-like protein 1
Gene Name: EPS8L1

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q8TE68 (723 residues)
MSTATGPEAAPKPSAKSIYEQRKRYSTVVMADVSQYPVNHLVTFCLGEDDGVHTVEDASR
KLAVMDSQGRVWAQEMLLRVSPDHVTLLDPASKEELESYPLGAIVRCDAVMPPGRSRSLL
LLVCQEPERAQPDVHFFQGLRLGAELIREDIQGALHNYRSGRGERRAAALRATQEELQRD
RSPAAETPPLQRRPSVRAVISTVERGAGRGRPQAKPIPEAEEAQRPEPVGTSSNADSASP
DLGPRGPDLAVLQAEREVDILNHVFDDVESFVSRLQKSAEAARVLEHRERGRRSRRRAAG
EGLLTLRAKPPSEAEYTDVLQKIKYAFSLLARLRGNIADPSSPELLHFLFGPLQMIVNTS
GGPEFASSVRRPHLTSDAVALLRDNVTPRENELWTSLGDSWTRPGLELSPEEGPPYRPEF
FSGWEPPVTDPQSRAWEDPVEKQLQHERRRRQQSAPQVAVNGHRDLEPESEPQLESETAG
KWVLCNYDFQARNSSELSVKQRDVLEVLDDSRKWWKVRDPAGQEGYVPYNILTPYPGPRL
HHSQSPARSLNSTPPPPPAPAPAPPPALARPRWDRPRWDSCDSLNGLDPSEKEKFSQMLI
VNEELQARLAQGRSGPSRAVPGPRAPEPQLSPGSDASEVRAWLQAKGFSSGTVDALGVLT
GAQLFSLQKEELRAVSPEEGARVYSQVTVQRSLLEDKEKVSELEAVMEKQKKKVEGEVEM
EVI

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q8TE68-D1	1-245,428-621	439		MSTATGPEAAPKPSAKSIYEQRKRYSTVVMADVSQYPVNHLVTFCLGEDDGVHTVEDASRKLAVMDSQGRVWAQEMLLRVSPDHVTLLDPASKEELESYPLGAIVRCDAVMPPGRSRSLLLLVCQEPERAQPDVHFFQGLRLGAELIREDIQGALHNYRSGRGERRAAALRATQEELQRDRSPAAETPPLQRRPSVRAVISTVERGAGRGRPQAKPIPEAEEAQRPEPVGTSSNADSASPDLGPRVTDPQSRAWEDPVEKQLQHERRRRQQSAPQVAVNGHRDLEPESEPQLESETAGKWVLCNYDFQARNSSELSVKQRDVLEVLDDSRKWWKVRDPAGQEGYVPYNILTPYPGPRLHHSQSPARSLNSTPPPPPAPAPAPPPALARPRWDRPRWDSCDSLNGLDPSEKEKFSQMLIVNEELQARLAQGRSGPSRAVP
2	Q8TE68-D2	246-427	182		GPDLAVLQAEREVDILNHVFDDVESFVSRLQKSAEAARVLEHRERGRRSRRRAAGEGLLTLRAKPPSEAEYTDVLQKIKYAFSLLARLRGNIADPSSPELLHFLFGPLQMIVNTSGGPEFASSVRRPHLTSDAVALLRDNVTPRENELWTSLGDSWTRPGLELSPEEGPPYRPEFFSGWEPP
3	Q8TE68-D3	622-723	102		GPRAPEPQLSPGSDASEVRAWLQAKGFSSGTVDALGVLTGAQLFSLQKEELRAVSPEEGARVYSQVTVQRSLLEDKEKVSELEAVMEKQKKKVEGEVEMEVI

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.4

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	7dxjA	0.28	7.89	0.028	0.441	model1_7dxjA.pdb.gz
2	5yz0A	0.27	7.49	0.039	0.396	model1_5yz0A.pdb.gz
3	6z2wE	0.25	8.13	0.038	0.400	model1_6z2wE.pdb.gz
4	6zymA	0.25	6.71	0.034	0.355	model1_6zymA.pdb.gz
5	5l5kA	0.25	8.41	0.037	0.407	model1_5l5kA.pdb.gz
6	7cpxA	0.25	8.92	0.029	0.429	model1_7cpxA.pdb.gz
7	6rw9A	0.25	8.51	0.040	0.403	model1_6rw9A.pdb.gz
8	6um1A	0.24	7.63	0.037	0.365	model1_6um1A.pdb.gz
9	5x6oC	0.24	7.77	0.039	0.369	model1_5x6oC.pdb.gz
10	6xjaP	0.24	8.12	0.035	0.379	model1_6xjaP.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0008092	0.63	cytoskeletal protein binding
GO:0003779	0.58	actin binding
GO:0098772	0.50	molecular function regulator

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0065007	0.91	biological regulation
GO:0050789	0.89	regulation of biological process
GO:0050794	0.88	regulation of cellular process
GO:0007165	0.76	signal transduction
GO:0044699	0.70	single-organism process
GO:0009987	0.68	cellular process
GO:0044763	0.61	single-organism cellular process
GO:0051128	0.60	regulation of cellular component organization
GO:0044087	0.58	regulation of cellular component biogenesis
GO:0035556	0.53	intracellular signal transduction

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	0.98	cell part
GO:0044424	0.92	intracellular part
GO:0044425	0.65	membrane part
GO:0044459	0.64	plasma membrane part
GO:0016020	0.60	membrane
GO:0043226	0.56	organelle
GO:0005737	0.51	cytoplasm

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	2qllA	0.221	8.44	0.021	0.362	2.4.1.1	NA
2	0.060	2w00B	0.232	7.08	0.048	0.329	3.1.21.3	489
3	0.060	2vdcA	0.218	7.93	0.034	0.338	1.4.1.13	NA
4	0.060	1u22A	0.221	7.95	0.044	0.342	2.1.1.14	504
5	0.060	3eqlM	0.210	8.20	0.048	0.333	2.7.7.6	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.01	2ecpA	0.221	8.27	0.048	0.354	0.19	PLP	complex1.pdb.gz	487,488,489,522,523,525
2	0.01	2w00A	0.206	7.15	0.030	0.295	0.11	ATP	complex2.pdb.gz	499,523,524,525
3	0.01	3t8vA	0.225	7.13	0.047	0.329	0.11	BTJ	complex3.pdb.gz	490,523,524
4	0.01	2w74B	0.164	7.61	0.016	0.246	0.16	ATP	complex4.pdb.gz	497,498,499,500,504,521,522,523,524
5	0.01	1mo8A	0.100	6.27	0.027	0.137	0.37	ATP	complex5.pdb.gz	507,515,516,517,522,525
6	0.01	3ebhA	0.224	7.02	0.052	0.325	0.10	BES	complex6.pdb.gz	482,483,484,485
7	0.01	3kdpC	0.234	8.10	0.043	0.369	0.11	III	complex7.pdb.gz	522,523,532,533,534

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.