D-I-TASSER Q8TEY7-D5

D-I-TASSER results for Q8TEY7-D5

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q8TEY7 (94 residues)
EAQKERRRISNLLNIMEPSLLQFYISRQWLNKFKTFAEPGPISNNDFLCIHGGVPPRKAG
YIEDLVLMLPQNIWDNLYSRYGGGPAVNHLYICH

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 \| \| \| \| EAQKERRRISNLLNIMEPSLLQFYISRQWLNKFKTFAEPGPISNNDFLCIHGGVPPRKAGYIEDLVLMLPQNIWDNLYSRYGGGPAVNHLYICH
Prediction	CHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHCCSSSSCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCC
Confidence	7799999999999966788956998189999999606799928722116588978550665133157649999999999969987767777789
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 \| \| \| \| EAQKERRRISNLLNIMEPSLLQFYISRQWLNKFKTFAEPGPISNNDFLCIHGGVPPRKAGYIEDLVLMLPQNIWDNLYSRYGGGPAVNHLYICH
Prediction	8466336404501652577423110235015404721723414235011656605364363055202302460053027424220414563418
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80

                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHCCSSSSCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCC
EAQKERRRISNLLNIMEPSLLQFYISRQWLNKFKTFAEPGPISNNDFLCIHGGVPPRKAGYIEDLVLMLPQNIWDNLYSRYGGGPAVNHLYICH

3jyuA

0.17

0.16

5.24

1.17

DEthreader

DVETQKTELGAL-G-TTLQAQWYLIDSRWFKQWKKYLFPGPIDNSGL-FSDSTLKE-HL--IDLDYVLVPAEAWNKLLNWYGCQQPIVREVYLL

4melA1

0.19

6.17

2.09

SPARKS-K

GLDSQWRQIEESGRERRAGESWFLVEKHWYKQWEAYVFPGCINNATLFQDEINWRLKEGLVEGEDYVLLPAAAWHYLVSWYGGQPPIERKVIEL

1w6vA

0.20

0.19

6.13

1.29

MapAlign

-LDTQRSDIATLLKTLRKGDTWYLVDSRWFKQWFDNVYPGPIDNSGLLKDGDAQSLKEHLIDELDYILLPTEGWNKLVSWYTLMQPIARKV---

1w6vA

0.20

6.46

1.46

CEthreader

DLDTQRSDIATLLKTLRKGDTWYLVDSRWFKQWKKYVGPGPIDNSGLLKDGDAQSLKEHLIDELDYILLPTEGWNKLVSWYTLMEPIARKVVEQ

4melA1

0.20

6.46

1.87

MUSTER

GLDSQWRQIENGERPLRAGESWFLVEKHWYKQWEAYVFPGCINNATLFQDEINWRLKEGLVEGEDYVLLPAAAWHYLVSWYGGQPPIERKVIEL

1w6vA

0.24

0.23

7.31

2.63

HHsearch

DLDTQRSDIATLLKTSRKGDTWYLVDSRWFKQWKKYVYPGPIDNSGLLKDGDA-QSLKEHLIDELYILLPTEGWNKLVSWYTGQEPIARKVVEQ

1w6vA

0.21

6.74

1.49

FFAS-3D

DLDTQRSDIATLLKTSRKGDTWYLVDSRWFKQWKKYVYPGPIDNSGLLKDGDAQSLKEHLIDELDYILLPTEGWNKLVSWYTGQEPIARKVVEQ

3ppaA1

0.22

0.20

6.38

0.97

EigenThreader

-LDTQRSDIATLLKTSLRKGDTWYVDSRWFKQWKKYVYPGPIDNSGLLKQSLKLIDELD------YILLPTEGWNKLVSWYTEQEPIARKVVEQ

4memA

0.21

6.74

1.45

CNFpred

DLDQQWRQIGNGRERPRAGESWFLVEKHWYKQWEAYTFPGSINNSGLFEDQISWHLRERLVEGDDYVLLPAPAWNYLVSWYGLQPPIERKVIEL

1w6vA

0.21

0.19

6.09

1.17

DEthreader

DLDTQRSDIATLLKTSLRKDTWYLVDSRWFKQWKKYVYPGPIDNSGLLKDDQSLKE--H--LILDYILLPTEGWNKLVSWYTLMEPIARK----

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.7783

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	1w6vA	0.90	1.37	0.202	1.000	model1_1w6vA.pdb.gz
2	4melA1	0.88	1.76	0.194	0.989	model1_4melA1.pdb.gz
3	3jyuA1	0.86	1.47	0.174	0.979	model1_3jyuA1.pdb.gz
4	3ppaA1	0.86	1.57	0.213	0.947	model1_3ppaA1.pdb.gz
5	3zheA	0.38	4.22	0.033	0.713	model1_3zheA.pdb.gz
6	2nn6B	0.36	4.26	0.047	0.670	model1_2nn6B.pdb.gz
7	4ebjA1	0.33	4.93	0.087	0.649	model1_4ebjA1.pdb.gz
8	1itfA	0.33	4.45	0.128	0.575	model1_1itfA.pdb.gz
9	3lrkA2	0.33	3.74	0.035	0.521	model1_3lrkA2.pdb.gz
10	3c3dA2	0.31	4.54	0.025	0.585	model1_3c3dA2.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0008234	1.00	cysteine-type peptidase activity
GO:0004197	0.90	cysteine-type endopeptidase activity
GO:0004843	0.62	thiol-dependent ubiquitin-specific protease activity
GO:0043167	0.55	ion binding
GO:0046872	0.54	metal ion binding
GO:0046914	0.53	transition metal ion binding
GO:0008270	0.52	zinc ion binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044260	1.00	cellular macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0044238	1.00	primary metabolic process
GO:0019538	0.98	protein metabolic process
GO:0016579	0.97	protein deubiquitination
GO:0065007	0.94	biological regulation
GO:0050794	0.93	regulation of cellular process
GO:0009966	0.88	regulation of signal transduction
GO:0071108	0.87	protein K48-linked deubiquitination
GO:0070536	0.87	protein K63-linked deubiquitination
GO:0008277	0.87	regulation of G-protein coupled receptor protein signaling pathway
GO:0044699	0.63	single-organism process
GO:0044763	0.55	single-organism cellular process
GO:0016043	0.52	cellular component organization
GO:0006996	0.51	organelle organization
GO:0022402	0.50	cell cycle process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	1.00	cell part
GO:0044424	0.99	intracellular part
GO:0043229	0.98	intracellular organelle
GO:0044446	0.96	intracellular organelle part
GO:0005813	0.89	centrosome
GO:0044444	0.51	cytoplasmic part

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	2vczC	0.437	4.10	0.069	0.777	5.3.99.2	24
2	0.060	1m0uA	0.449	4.05	0.068	0.798	2.5.1.18	NA
3	0.060	2ouyA	0.459	4.04	0.045	0.798	3.1.4.17	NA
4	0.060	3ge1A	0.448	3.83	0.051	0.766	2.7.1.30	40,42
5	0.060	2gsqA	0.465	4.23	0.033	0.830	2.5.1.18	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.01	10gsA	0.463	4.14	0.054	0.840	0.17	VWW	complex1.pdb.gz	25,33,40
2	0.01	1glpA	0.465	4.02	0.076	0.830	0.23	GTS	complex2.pdb.gz	32,41,84
3	0.01	16gs0	0.466	4.12	0.065	0.840	0.11	III	complex3.pdb.gz	63,64,85
4	0.01	2oa7B	0.468	4.13	0.076	0.840	0.21	GTX	complex4.pdb.gz	30,33,40
5	0.01	1uwkA	0.481	4.11	0.101	0.883	0.10	URO	complex5.pdb.gz	24,25,26,40
6	0.01	1so2B	0.454	4.46	0.056	0.872	0.18	666	complex6.pdb.gz	29,32,33,76,77,79,80
7	0.01	6gssB	0.465	4.13	0.065	0.840	0.23	GTT	complex7.pdb.gz	30,31,41
8	0.01	3csiC	0.466	4.12	0.054	0.840	0.15	LZ6	complex8.pdb.gz	5,6,9,43
9	0.01	1so20	0.480	4.52	0.089	0.872	0.17	III	complex9.pdb.gz	73,77,78,81
10	0.01	1gtiA	0.465	4.02	0.065	0.830	0.19	GTB	complex10.pdb.gz	36,41,42

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.