D-I-TASSER Q92752-D1

D-I-TASSER results for Q92752-D1

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q92752 (60 residues)
MGADGETVVLKNMLIGINLILLGSMIKPSECQLEVTTERVQRQSVEEEGGIANYNTSSKE

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 \| \| \| MGADGETVVLKNMLIGINLILLGSMIKPSECQLEVTTERVQRQSVEEEGGIANYNTSSKE
Prediction	CCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCSSSSSCCHHHCCCSCCCCCSSSCCCCCCC
Confidence	997775255422122210676651168554168974110102320236884414788889
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 \| \| \| MGADGETVVLKNMLIGINLILLGSMIKPSECQLEVTTERVQRQSVEEEGGIANYNTSSKE
Prediction	764646423133133423233313214446141523465264532666343342445468
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60

                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCSSSSSCCHHHCCCSCCCCCSSSCCCCCCC
MGADGETVVLKNMLIGINLILLGSMIKPSECQLEVTTERVQRQSVEEEGGIANYNTSSKE

2vdaA

0.03

1.90

1.17

DEthreader

EHPWVTKAIANAQRKVESRNFDIRKQLLEYDDVANDQRRAIYSQELDVETINSIEDKIRI

3renA

0.10

3.70

1.05

MapAlign

ANNRWNSFYYKFYAINIANSLLKHAEENETLVDYIDNYGKGNTTTLLYRKVFYEETQKYD

5hftB

0.07

2.80

0.75

CEthreader

AARLNDGRVMVGQPQTQAALFTRYILQGVPLQESISRPRWLKLEGRFEVLADFSEAMGHA

1aa0A

0.03

1.90

0.52

EigenThreader

IGNNSAGIKGQVVALNTLVNGERGLTNSIKANETNIASVTQEVNTAKGNISSLQGDVQAL

4xydA1

0.12

0.05

1.78

0.26

FFAS-3D

MKYQSQSIALVYFAVALGLFAIQVSG----------------------------------

3uauA2

0.07

2.80

0.83

SPARKS-K

TLKAQSQNEEQALIFDKALAILNNITQNDDYKLNLDLKNIPVSDYQGIDSIEKLSINNQD

5yfpG

0.12

0.05

1.78

0.44

CNFpred

--WEDHNVLLSCFISDCIDTLAVNLERK--------------------------------

4fzsA

0.06

0.05

2.22

1.17

DEthreader

-DNTALSRALSQLAEVEEKIEQLHQEQANDFFLLAELLSDYIRLIVAFSVKE-I------

1pbjA

0.05

2.35

0.92

MapAlign

DTIDITASLEDVLRNYTWDVLEAIAEGDDLAEVKVWEVERDLVTISPWRLLVEEDDEIIG

2jo1A

0.20

6.40

0.61

MUSTER

FTYDYQSLQIGGLVIAGILFILGILIVLSRCRCKFNQQQRTGEPDEEEGTFRSSIRRLST

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.5526

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	3dbyT1	0.60	2.80	0.085	0.883	model1_3dbyT1.pdb.gz
2	6n1mA3	0.59	2.82	0.034	0.867	model1_6n1mA3.pdb.gz
3	7lftA	0.59	3.27	0.102	0.933	model1_7lftA.pdb.gz
4	3syaA1	0.59	2.86	0.051	0.933	model1_3syaA1.pdb.gz
5	4k90A2	0.59	2.99	0.068	0.883	model1_4k90A2.pdb.gz
6	5a6eB	0.59	2.90	0.038	0.867	model1_5a6eB.pdb.gz
7	6anuf	0.59	2.88	0.036	0.883	model1_6anuf.pdb.gz
8	5lnxA2	0.58	3.04	0.068	0.900	model1_5lnxA2.pdb.gz
9	5h3oA3	0.58	3.30	0.085	0.933	model1_5h3oA3.pdb.gz
10	3pjzA3	0.58	2.76	0.057	0.883	model1_3pjzA3.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0005102	0.54	receptor binding
GO:0032403	0.52	protein complex binding
GO:0008289	0.51	lipid binding
GO:0046625	0.50	sphingolipid binding
GO:0005178	0.50	integrin binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0009987	0.84	cellular process
GO:0044699	0.77	single-organism process
GO:0044763	0.70	single-organism cellular process
GO:0065007	0.65	biological regulation
GO:0016043	0.65	cellular component organization
GO:0050789	0.64	regulation of biological process
GO:0030198	0.63	extracellular matrix organization
GO:0050794	0.62	regulation of cellular process
GO:0007155	0.61	cell adhesion
GO:0006928	0.59	movement of cell or subcellular component
GO:0048523	0.55	negative regulation of cellular process
GO:0007162	0.53	negative regulation of cell adhesion

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	0.82	cell part
GO:0044424	0.70	intracellular part
GO:0044422	0.64	organelle part
GO:0044446	0.63	intracellular organelle part
GO:0043226	0.63	organelle
GO:0043229	0.62	intracellular organelle
GO:0043227	0.62	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0043231	0.61	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0044421	0.60	extracellular region part
GO:0005634	0.60	nucleus
GO:0044428	0.59	nuclear part
GO:0005737	0.59	cytoplasm
GO:0005654	0.58	nucleoplasm
GO:0005578	0.57	proteinaceous extracellular matrix

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	3mddA	0.568	2.72	0.051	0.883	1.3.99.3	NA
2	0.060	2hzpA	0.558	3.62	0.071	0.883	3.7.1.3	NA
3	0.060	2w8oA	0.557	3.17	0.070	0.900	1.2.1.24	NA
4	0.060	2z8yP	0.573	3.26	0.121	0.900	2.3.1.169	NA
5	0.060	1l3sA	0.559	2.84	0.091	0.867	2.7.7.7	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.02	3i01O	0.571	3.04	0.121	0.883	0.62	NA	complex1.pdb.gz	5,6,9,10
2	0.01	3cf4A	0.572	2.87	0.085	0.833	0.42	SF4	complex2.pdb.gz	19,20,22,23,45
3	0.01	3cf4A	0.572	2.87	0.085	0.833	0.40	SF4	complex3.pdb.gz	15,16,17,20,22
4	0.01	3mddA	0.568	2.72	0.051	0.883	0.46	FAD	complex4.pdb.gz	12,15,48,49
5	0.01	1udyB	0.569	2.73	0.051	0.883	0.46	UUU	complex5.pdb.gz	11,14,17,43,50
6	0.01	1ub44	0.311	4.28	0.023	0.683	0.45	III	complex6.pdb.gz	15,17,21,22
7	0.01	1t9gB	0.453	2.88	0.039	0.683	0.41	FAD	complex7.pdb.gz	4,12,15,48,49
8	0.01	1egdD	0.448	3.06	0.037	0.700	0.41	FAD	complex8.pdb.gz	14,23,43,50
9	0.01	1egcD	0.456	2.89	0.059	0.683	0.48	FAD	complex9.pdb.gz	21,22,40

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.