D-I-TASSER Q92993-D1

D-I-TASSER results for Q92993-D1

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q92993 (73 residues)
MAEVGEIIEGCRLPVLRRNQDNEDEWPLAEILSVKDISGRKLFYVHYIDFNKRLDEWVTH
ERLDLKKIQFPKK

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 \| \| \| MAEVGEIIEGCRLPVLRRNQDNEDEWPLAEILSVKDISGRKLFYVHYIDFNKRLDEWVTHERLDLKKIQFPKK
Prediction	CCCHHHCSCCSSSSSSSSCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSSSSCCCCSSSSSSSCCCCHHHHHCCCHHHCCCCCCCCCCC
Confidence	9873422236299999714689994887899999961994299999727421245322632224432445789
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 \| \| \| MAEVGEIIEGCRLPVLRRNQDNEDEWPLAEILSVKDISGRKLFYVHYIDFNKRLDEWVTHERLDLKKIQFPKK
Prediction	7643751342030204254576764334041242455774430101035245424531756414274263468
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60

                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCHHHCSCCSSSSSSSSCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSSSSCCCCSSSSSSSCCCCHHHHHCCCHHHCCCCCCCCCCC
MAEVGEIIEGCRLPVLRRNQDNEDEWPLAEILSVKDISGRKLFYVHYIDFNKRLDEWVTHERLDLKKIQFPKK

2ekoA

0.94

0.89

24.99

1.33

DEthreader

---GGEIIEGCRLPVLRRNQDNEDEWPLAEILSVKDISGRKLFYVHYIDNRR-LDEWVTHERLDLKKIQFPKK

2ekoA

0.93

26.15

2.45

SPARKS-K

GSSGGEIIEGCRLPVLRRNQDNEDEWPLAEILSVKDISGRKLFYVHYIDFNRRLDEWVTHERLDLKKIQFPKK

2ekoA

0.97

0.90

25.34

0.55

MapAlign

---GGEIIEGCRLPVLRRNQDNEDEWPLAEILSVKDISGRKLFYVHYIDFNRRLDEWVTHERLDLKKIQFP--

2ekoA

0.93

26.15

0.38

CEthreader

GSSGGEIIEGCRLPVLRRNQDNEDEWPLAEILSVKDISGRKLFYVHYIDFNRRLDEWVTHERLDLKKIQFPKK

2ekoA

0.93

26.15

2.29

MUSTER

GSSGGEIIEGCRLPVLRRNQDNEDEWPLAEILSVKDISGRKLFYVHYIDFNRRLDEWVTHERLDLKKIQFPKK

1wgsA

0.35

0.33

9.82

1.75

HHsearch

GEPEVTVEIGETYLCRRP----DSTWHSAEVIQSRVNEGREEFYVHYVGFNRRLDEWVDKNRLALTKTVKDAV

2ekoA

0.93

26.15

1.35

FFAS-3D

GSSGGEIIEGCRLPVLRRNQDNEDEWPLAEILSVKDISGRKLFYVHYIDFNRRLDEWVTHERLDLKKIQFPKK

6yhsL

0.14

4.70

0.67

EigenThreader

KTDLPEFAPGDTVVVQVKVGDRELQAFEGVVIAKKNRGLNSAFTVRKISSGVGVERVFQTVVIEVKRRGDVRR

4qqgA

1.00

0.97

27.23

1.40

CNFpred

MAEVGEIIEGCRLPVLRRNQDNEDEWPLAEILSVKDISGRKLFYVHYIDFNKRLDEWVTHERLDLKKIQFP--

2ro0A

0.47

0.42

12.37

1.33

DEthreader

--NSDDIIIKCQCWVQK-N----DEERLAEILSINTRKAPPKFYVHYVNYNKRLDEWITTDRINLKEVLYPKL

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.7804

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	2ekoA	0.89	1.36	0.915	0.973	model1_2ekoA.pdb.gz
2	2ro0A	0.80	1.40	0.441	0.931	model1_2ro0A.pdb.gz
3	3m9qA	0.72	2.48	0.096	0.890	model1_3m9qA.pdb.gz
4	3m9pA	0.72	2.41	0.116	0.877	model1_3m9pA.pdb.gz
5	4pl6A	0.71	1.30	0.298	0.781	model1_4pl6A.pdb.gz
6	1wgsA	0.69	1.97	0.382	0.836	model1_1wgsA.pdb.gz
7	2efiA	0.67	2.02	0.206	0.808	model1_2efiA.pdb.gz
8	2budA	0.66	2.28	0.203	0.836	model1_2budA.pdb.gz
9	3ut1A1	0.65	2.09	0.154	0.822	model1_3ut1A1.pdb.gz
10	2k3yA	0.64	2.40	0.239	0.849	model1_2k3yA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0003824	0.89	catalytic activity
GO:0016740	0.88	transferase activity
GO:0004402	0.87	histone acetyltransferase activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0009987	0.99	cellular process
GO:0065007	0.94	biological regulation
GO:0050789	0.94	regulation of biological process
GO:0019222	0.91	regulation of metabolic process
GO:0071704	0.88	organic substance metabolic process
GO:0050794	0.88	regulation of cellular process
GO:0044238	0.88	primary metabolic process
GO:0044237	0.88	cellular metabolic process
GO:0060255	0.87	regulation of macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0044260	0.87	cellular macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0009889	0.85	regulation of biosynthetic process
GO:0010468	0.83	regulation of gene expression
GO:0031326	0.81	regulation of cellular biosynthetic process
GO:0019219	0.81	regulation of nucleobase-containing compound metabolic process
GO:2000112	0.80	regulation of cellular macromolecule biosynthetic process
GO:0016043	0.80	cellular component organization
GO:0006325	0.79	chromatin organization
GO:0006464	0.77	cellular protein modification process
GO:0006355	0.77	regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
GO:0016573	0.76	histone acetylation
GO:0048522	0.74	positive regulation of cellular process
GO:0050896	0.70	response to stimulus
GO:0045893	0.70	positive regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
GO:0006974	0.69	cellular response to DNA damage stimulus
GO:1901360	0.56	organic cyclic compound metabolic process
GO:0034641	0.56	cellular nitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:0090304	0.55	nucleic acid metabolic process
GO:0048519	0.53	negative regulation of biological process
GO:0048523	0.52	negative regulation of cellular process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	1.00	intracellular part
GO:0044446	0.96	intracellular organelle part
GO:0044428	0.95	nuclear part
GO:0043229	0.80	intracellular organelle
GO:0032991	0.75	macromolecular complex
GO:0043234	0.74	protein complex
GO:0043227	0.71	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:1990234	0.70	transferase complex
GO:0044451	0.70	nucleoplasm part
GO:0043231	0.70	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0005634	0.69	nucleus
GO:0000123	0.69	histone acetyltransferase complex
GO:0005654	0.65	nucleoplasm
GO:0044427	0.58	chromosomal part
GO:0035267	0.57	NuA4 histone acetyltransferase complex

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.066	1vieA	0.569	2.24	0.086	0.753	1.5.1.3	NA
2	0.060	1pciA	0.630	2.81	0.097	0.959	3.4.22.30	NA
3	0.060	3f75A	0.631	2.89	0.056	0.945	3.4.22.15	NA
4	0.060	8pchA	0.647	2.66	0.042	0.931	3.4.22.16	NA
5	0.060	2o6xA	0.645	2.80	0.056	0.945	3.4.22.15	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Click to view	Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
	1	0.01	2auzA	0.640	3.09	0.069	0.959	0.14	CT2	complex1.pdb.gz	10,46,59

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.