D-I-TASSER Q96BD0

D-I-TASSER results for Q96BD0

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q96BD0
Protein Name: Solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 4A1
Gene Name: SLCO4A1

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q96BD0 (722 residues)
MPLHQLGDKPLTFPSPNSAMENGLDHTPPSRRASPGTPLSPGSLRSAAHSPLDTSKQPLC
QLWAEKHGARGTHEVRYVSAGQSVACGWWAFAPPCLQVLNTPKGILFFLCAAAFLQGMTV
NGFINTVITSLERRYDLHSYQSGLIASSYDIAACLCLTFVSYFGGSGHKPRWLGWGVLLM
GTGSLVFALPHFTAGRYEVELDAGVRTCPANPGAVCADSTSGLSRYQLVFMLGQFLHGVG
ATPLYTLGVTYLDENVKSSCSPVYIAIFYTAAILGPAAGYLIGGALLNIYTEMGRRTELT
TESPLWVGAWWVGFLGSGAAAFFTAVPILGYPRQLPGSQRYAVMRAAEMHQLKDSSRGEA
SNPDFGKTIRDLPLSIWLLLKNPTFILLCLAGATEATLITGMSTFSPKFLESQFSLSASE
AATLFGYLVVPAGGGGTFLGGFFVNKLRLRGSAVIKFCLFCTVVSLLGILVFSLHCPSVP
MAGVTASYGGSLLPEGHLNLTAPCNAACSCQPEHYSPVCGSDGLMYFSLCHAGCPAATET
NVDGQKVYRDCSCIPQNLSSGFGHATAGKCTSTCQRKPLLLVFIFVVIFFTFLSSIPALT
ATLRCVRDPQRSFALGIQWIVVRILGGIPGPIAFGWVIDKACLLWQDQCGQQGSCLVYQN
SAMSRYILIMGLLYKVLGVLFFAIACFLYKPLSESSDGLETCLPSQSSAPDSATDSQLQS
SV

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q96BD0-D1	1-83	83		MPLHQLGDKPLTFPSPNSAMENGLDHTPPSRRASPGTPLSPGSLRSAAHSPLDTSKQPLCQLWAEKHGARGTHEVRYVSAGQS
2	Q96BD0-D2	84-369	286		VACGWWAFAPPCLQVLNTPKGILFFLCAAAFLQGMTVNGFINTVITSLERRYDLHSYQSGLIASSYDIAACLCLTFVSYFGGSGHKPRWLGWGVLLMGTGSLVFALPHFTAGRYEVELDAGVRTCPANPGAVCADSTSGLSRYQLVFMLGQFLHGVGATPLYTLGVTYLDENVKSSCSPVYIAIFYTAAILGPAAGYLIGGALLNIYTEMGRRTELTTESPLWVGAWWVGFLGSGAAAFFTAVPILGYPRQLPGSQRYAVMRAAEMHQLKDSSRGEASNPDFGKTI
3	Q96BD0-D3	370-476,576-722	254		RDLPLSIWLLLKNPTFILLCLAGATEATLITGMSTFSPKFLESQFSLSASEAATLFGYLVVPAGGGGTFLGGFFVNKLRLRGSAVIKFCLFCTVVSLLGILVFSLHCRKPLLLVFIFVVIFFTFLSSIPALTATLRCVRDPQRSFALGIQWIVVRILGGIPGPIAFGWVIDKACLLWQDQCGQQGSCLVYQNSAMSRYILIMGLLYKVLGVLFFAIACFLYKPLSESSDGLETCLPSQSSAPDSATDSQLQSSV
4	Q96BD0-D4	477-575	99		PSVPMAGVTASYGGSLLPEGHLNLTAPCNAACSCQPEHYSPVCGSDGLMYFSLCHAGCPAATETNVDGQKVYRDCSCIPQNLSSGFGHATAGKCTSTCQ

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.49

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	4gbyA	0.56	3.79	0.118	0.633	model1_4gbyA.pdb.gz
2	6h7dA	0.55	3.98	0.123	0.625	model1_6h7dA.pdb.gz
3	7crzA	0.54	3.74	0.102	0.611	model1_7crzA.pdb.gz
4	6thaA	0.53	3.33	0.114	0.582	model1_6thaA.pdb.gz
5	6e8jA	0.53	3.73	0.155	0.598	model1_6e8jA.pdb.gz
6	4ybqA	0.52	4.29	0.089	0.605	model1_4ybqA.pdb.gz
7	4ldsA2	0.25	2.93	0.116	0.276	model1_4ldsA2.pdb.gz
8	4zowA1	0.25	2.43	0.140	0.267	model1_4zowA1.pdb.gz
9	2d0pA	0.22	8.65	0.035	0.370	model1_2d0pA.pdb.gz
10	1z6aA	0.20	7.76	0.046	0.306	model1_1z6aA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0008514	1.00	organic anion transmembrane transporter activity
GO:0015347	0.97	sodium-independent organic anion transmembrane transporter activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0015711	1.00	organic anion transport
GO:0043252	0.98	sodium-independent organic anion transport
GO:0009987	0.63	cellular process
GO:0044763	0.56	single-organism cellular process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	1.00	cell part
GO:0005887	0.98	integral component of plasma membrane
GO:0016020	0.65	membrane

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	3b9jJ	0.170	6.09	0.034	0.227	1.17.1.4 1.17.3.2	265
2	0.060	1b0pA	0.290	8.49	0.054	0.474	1.2.7.1	NA
3	0.060	1n1hA	0.332	8.47	0.051	0.542	2.7.7.48	NA
4	0.060	3c46B	0.307	8.14	0.038	0.478	2.7.7.6	NA
5	0.060	3dy5A	0.285	7.82	0.055	0.432	1.13.11.40 4.2.1.92	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.04	1ea0A	0.297	8.41	0.044	0.486	0.16	FMN	complex1.pdb.gz	124,125,234,317
2	0.04	3rkoC	0.299	6.36	0.081	0.410	0.22	CA7	complex2.pdb.gz	131,234,237,239
3	0.03	2vdcB	0.314	8.39	0.056	0.508	0.16	FMN	complex3.pdb.gz	127,128,130,308,317
4	0.01	2uv8G	0.296	8.52	0.037	0.486	0.14	FMN	complex4.pdb.gz	127,128,129,133,282,316
5	0.01	1ofdA	0.325	8.80	0.051	0.551	0.11	AKG	complex5.pdb.gz	125,128,235,287
6	0.01	1llwA	0.308	8.47	0.039	0.510	0.17	FMN	complex6.pdb.gz	271,272,273,275,276,277,279
7	0.01	1n38A	0.331	8.47	0.037	0.537	0.11	QNA	complex7.pdb.gz	124,126,144,280
8	0.01	1ofeA	0.304	8.29	0.049	0.489	0.24	ONL	complex8.pdb.gz	127,283,284,285,290
9	0.01	1b0pA	0.290	8.49	0.054	0.474	0.35	SF4	complex9.pdb.gz	128,131,132,145
10	0.01	2uvaG	0.298	8.62	0.038	0.496	0.17	FMN	complex10.pdb.gz	128,234,276,277,279,283,284

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.