D-I-TASSER Q96CW5-D3

D-I-TASSER results for Q96CW5-D3

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q96CW5 (129 residues)
LLDHMQAMRRYLLLGQGDFIRHLMDLLKPELVRPATTLYQHNLTGILETAVRATNAQFDS
PEILRRLDVRLLEVSPGDTGWDVFSLDYHVDGPIATVFTRECMSHYLRVFNFLWRAKRME
YILTDIRKG

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 \| \| \| \| \| \| LLDHMQAMRRYLLLGQGDFIRHLMDLLKPELVRPATTLYQHNLTGILETAVRATNAQFDSPEILRRLDVRLLEVSPGDTGWDVFSLDYHVDGPIATVFTRECMSHYLRVFNFLWRAKRMEYILTDIRKG
Prediction	CHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCHHHCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCHHHHHCCCHHHCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSCCCCHHHSCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCC
Confidence	779999999999268887999999999999759976635889999999999972113573677614212202666676540247887646981332009999999999999999999999999998567
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 \| \| \| \| \| \| LLDHMQAMRRYLLLGQGDFIRHLMDLLKPELVRPATTLYQHNLTGILETAVRATNAQFDSPEILRRLDVRLLEVSPGDTGWDVFSLDYHVDGPIATVFTRECMSHYLRVFNFLWRAKRMEYILTDIRKG
Prediction	745204202311113412103200420363153435413443034104402431334434442343241423534454410210303131633022003570153023003100302303320353168
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCHHHCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCHHHHHCCCHHHCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSCCCCHHHSCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCC
LLDHMQAMRRYLLLGQGDFIRHLMDLLKPELVRPATTLYQHNLTGILETAVRATNAQFDSPEILRRLDVRLLEVSPGDTGWDVFSLDYHVDGPIATVFTRECMSHYLRVFNFLWRAKRMEYILTDIRKG

6v6bB

0.94

0.90

25.24

1.33

DEthreader

LLDHMQAMRRYLLLGQGDFIRHLMDLLKPELVRPATTLYQHNLTGILETAVRTNAQFDSP-EILRRLDVRLLE----DTGWDVFSLDYHVDGPIATVFTRECMSHYLRVFNFLWRAKRMEYILTDIRKG

3ripA2

0.23

0.22

7.04

2.10

SPARKS-K

LLGQLKIIKDFYLLGRGELFQAFIDTAQHMLKTPPTAVTEHDVNVAFQQSAHKV--LLDDDNLLPLLHLTIEY--HGASGWAALGLSYKVQWPLHILFTPAVLEKYNVVFKYLLSVRRVQAELQHCWAL

3ripA2

0.24

0.22

7.02

1.32

MapAlign

LLGQLKIIKDFYLLGRGELFQAFIDTAQHMLKTPPTVT-EHDVNVAFQQSAHKV--LLDDDNLLPLLHLTIE-Y-HGASGWAALGLSYKVQWPLHILFTPAVLEKYNVVFKYLLSVRRVQAELQHCW--

3ripA2

0.23

0.22

7.04

1.30

CEthreader

LLGQLKIIKDFYLLGRGELFQAFIDTAQHMLKTPPTAVTEHDVNVAFQQSAHKVLL--DDDNLLPLLHLTI--EYHGASGWAALGLSYKVQWPLHILFTPAVLEKYNVVFKYLLSVRRVQAELQHCWAL

6v6bB

0.99

0.96

26.92

1.76

MUSTER

LLDHMQAMRRYLLLGQGDFIRHLMDLLKPELVRPATTLYQHNLTGILETAVRATNAQFDSPEILRRLDVRLLED----TGWDVFSLDYHVDGPIATVFTRECMSHYLRVFNFLWRAKRMEYILTDIRKG

5flzB

0.33

9.79

3.07

HHsearch

YRDVVFALKNILLMGKSDFMDALIEKANDILATPSDSLPNYKLTRVLQEAVQLSSLRHLNSSVINGLDARVLDLGHGSVGWDVFTLDYILYPPLSLVLNVFGRKEYLRIFNFLWRFKKNNYFYQKEMLK

5flzA3

0.12

4.12

1.80

FFAS-3D

LINVLKHLQQIFLGQSGHNVLKFLTKNMGELTKHYRNDNNANYDKLLQNFELERQSENPNNLMRQLLMIQF--DTETKSAIYHLKFDINIPYPLNIIISRTCMIKYQIILRYQLVLQYHSRLLDETWM-

5flzA3

0.12

4.12

1.35

EigenThreader

LINVLKHLQQIFLGYQSGHNVLKFLTKMGELTKHYRNDNNANYDKLLQNFELERQSENPNNLMRQLLMIQFDTE--TKSAIYHLKFDINIPYPLNIIISRTCMIKYQIILRYQLVLQYHSRLLDETWMD

3ripA

0.22

6.83

1.38

CNFpred

LLGQLKIIKDFYLLGRGELFQAFIDTAQHMLKTPPTAVTEHDVNVAFQQSAHKVLL--DDDNLLPLLHLTIEYHG--ASGWAALGLSYKVQWPLHILFTPAVLEKYNVVFKYLLSVRRVQAELQHCWAL

6v6bC

0.30

0.29

8.70

1.33

DEthreader

ELAHLRSIKRYFLMDQGDFFVHFMDLAEEELRKPVEDITPPRLEALLELALRSTANTD-P--FKDDLKIDLMPHD--S-GLEAFSFDYIVKWPLSLIINRKALTRYQMLFRHMFYCKHVERQLCSVWIS

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.7883

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	6v6bB	0.92	1.13	1.000	0.969	model1_6v6bB.pdb.gz
2	6v6bC	0.89	1.55	0.302	0.961	model1_6v6bC.pdb.gz
3	3ripA2	0.88	1.71	0.216	0.969	model1_3ripA2.pdb.gz
4	6v6cL	0.84	2.01	0.306	0.954	model1_6v6cL.pdb.gz
5	5flzB	0.83	2.32	0.320	0.992	model1_5flzB.pdb.gz
6	7anzD	0.83	1.85	0.234	0.961	model1_7anzD.pdb.gz
7	7anzC	0.82	2.07	0.124	0.938	model1_7anzC.pdb.gz
8	5flzA	0.78	2.28	0.121	0.961	model1_5flzA.pdb.gz
9	6v69J	0.60	1.59	0.282	0.659	model1_6v69J.pdb.gz
10	3p5nA	0.56	3.98	0.044	0.853	model1_3p5nA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0043015	1.00	gamma-tubulin binding
GO:0008017	1.00	microtubule binding
GO:0005200	1.00	structural constituent of cytoskeleton
GO:0051011	0.99	microtubule minus-end binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:1903047	1.00	mitotic cell cycle process
GO:0051298	1.00	centrosome duplication
GO:0051225	1.00	spindle assembly
GO:0031122	1.00	cytoplasmic microtubule organization
GO:0007126	1.00	meiotic nuclear division
GO:0090307	0.99	mitotic spindle assembly
GO:0051415	0.99	interphase microtubule nucleation by interphase microtubule organizing center

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0005813	1.00	centrosome
GO:0000930	1.00	gamma-tubulin complex
GO:0000923	0.99	equatorial microtubule organizing center
GO:0005816	0.98	spindle pole body
GO:0008275	0.76	gamma-tubulin small complex

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1ayyD	0.334	4.69	0.071	0.605	3.5.1.26	NA
2	0.060	1n6bA	0.375	4.11	0.071	0.550	1.14.14.1	NA
3	0.060	1og5B	0.429	5.33	0.084	0.845	1.14.13.48 1.14.13.49 1.14.13.80	NA
4	0.060	1rm6A	0.480	4.49	0.059	0.752	1.3.99.20	NA
5	0.060	3c8yA	0.478	5.27	0.031	0.899	1.12.7.2	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.01	2w55H	0.451	4.79	0.056	0.760	0.10	UUU	complex1.pdb.gz	18,19,20,23,55,57
2	0.01	1ibk4	0.252	4.36	0.016	0.372	0.39	III	complex2.pdb.gz	17,42,46,53,55,57,58
3	0.01	3p5nA	0.558	3.98	0.044	0.853	0.15	RBF	complex3.pdb.gz	14,50,51,54
4	0.01	1twh2	0.367	4.67	0.071	0.651	0.14	III	complex4.pdb.gz	99,102,103,105,106,108,109,112,113,116,119
5	0.01	1ev70	0.515	4.44	0.073	0.861	0.16	III	complex5.pdb.gz	48,49,60,63,64
6	0.01	2po2A	0.503	4.30	0.073	0.798	0.15	CDP	complex6.pdb.gz	76,77,78,79,80
7	0.01	2w54F	0.457	4.82	0.049	0.760	0.17	HHR	complex7.pdb.gz	13,14,115
8	0.01	2w3rF	0.456	4.88	0.049	0.760	0.18	UUU	complex8.pdb.gz	22,24,85,86,110,111

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.