D-I-TASSER Q96E29

D-I-TASSER results for Q96E29

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q96E29
Protein Name: Transcription termination factor 3, mitochondrial
Gene Name: MTERF3

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q96E29 (417 residues)
MALSAQQIPRWFNSVKLRSLINAAQLTKRFTRPARTLLHGFSAQPQISSDNCFLQWGFKT
YRTSSLWNSSQSTSSSSQENNSAQSSLLPSMNEQSQKTQNISSFDSELFLEELDELPPLS
PMQPISEEEAIQIIADPPLPPASFTLRDYVDHSETLQKLVLLGVDLSKIEKHPEAANLLL
RLDFEKDIKQMLLFLKDVGIEDNQLGAFLTKNHAIFSEDLENLKTRVAYLHSKNFSKADV
AQMVRKAPFLLNFSVERLDNRLGFFQKELELSVKKTRDLVVRLPRLLTGSLEPVKENMKV
YRLELGFKHNEIQHMITRIPKMLTANKMKLTETFDFVHNVMSIPHHIIVKFPQVFNTRLF
KVKERHLFLTYLGRAQYDPAKPNYISLDKLVSIPDEIFCEEIAKASVQDFEKFLKTL

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q96E29-D1	1-120	120		MALSAQQIPRWFNSVKLRSLINAAQLTKRFTRPARTLLHGFSAQPQISSDNCFLQWGFKTYRTSSLWNSSQSTSSSSQENNSAQSSLLPSMNEQSQKTQNISSFDSELFLEELDELPPLS
2	Q96E29-D2	121-218	98		PMQPISEEEAIQIIADPPLPPASFTLRDYVDHSETLQKLVLLGVDLSKIEKHPEAANLLLRLDFEKDIKQMLLFLKDVGIEDNQLGAFLTKNHAIFSE
3	Q96E29-D3	219-289	71		DLENLKTRVAYLHSKNFSKADVAQMVRKAPFLLNFSVERLDNRLGFFQKELELSVKKTRDLVVRLPRLLTG
4	Q96E29-D4	290-356	67		SLEPVKENMKVYRLELGFKHNEIQHMITRIPKMLTANKMKLTETFDFVHNVMSIPHHIIVKFPQVFN
5	Q96E29-D5	357-417	61		TRLFKVKERHLFLTYLGRAQYDPAKPNYISLDKLVSIPDEIFCEEIAKASVQDFEKFLKTL

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.59

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	3m66A	0.63	1.44	0.989	0.647	model1_3m66A.pdb.gz
2	3n6sA	0.56	3.90	0.129	0.676	model1_3n6sA.pdb.gz
3	3ugmA	0.50	5.63	0.055	0.710	model1_3ugmA.pdb.gz
4	4cj9A	0.49	5.47	0.071	0.676	model1_4cj9A.pdb.gz
5	5d06A	0.44	7.63	0.050	0.782	model1_5d06A.pdb.gz
6	3iytA	0.44	6.93	0.038	0.731	model1_3iytA.pdb.gz
7	4fp9B	0.43	3.40	0.201	0.508	model1_4fp9B.pdb.gz
8	1wdlA	0.30	7.15	0.039	0.506	model1_1wdlA.pdb.gz
9	2pfvA	0.28	7.35	0.040	0.480	model1_2pfvA.pdb.gz
10	1rqgA	0.27	6.83	0.024	0.434	model1_1rqgA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0003676	1.00	nucleic acid binding
GO:0003677	0.83	DNA binding
GO:0044212	0.81	transcription regulatory region DNA binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0050794	0.83	regulation of cellular process
GO:2001141	0.82	regulation of RNA biosynthetic process
GO:2000112	0.82	regulation of cellular macromolecule biosynthetic process
GO:0010468	0.82	regulation of gene expression
GO:0009987	0.81	cellular process
GO:0006355	0.81	regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
GO:0045892	0.74	negative regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
GO:0008152	0.67	metabolic process
GO:0044237	0.56	cellular metabolic process
GO:0071704	0.54	organic substance metabolic process
GO:0044238	0.52	primary metabolic process
GO:0034641	0.51	cellular nitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:0043170	0.50	macromolecule metabolic process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044444	1.00	cytoplasmic part
GO:0043229	0.98	intracellular organelle
GO:0043231	0.97	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0005739	0.83	mitochondrion
GO:0044446	0.68	intracellular organelle part
GO:0044429	0.60	mitochondrial part

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1g8mA	0.350	7.37	0.033	0.609	3.5.4.10 2.1.2.3	NA
2	0.060	1bf2A	0.342	7.37	0.055	0.590	3.2.1.68	NA
3	0.060	2vuaA	0.249	7.16	0.060	0.420	3.4.24.69	NA
4	0.060	1jkyA	0.414	6.84	0.046	0.669	3.4.24.83	170
5	0.060	2hr7A	0.258	7.42	0.021	0.444	2.7.10.1	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.01	3mvbO	0.522	3.78	0.110	0.626	0.34	QNA	complex1.pdb.gz	207,210,211,213,214,245,248
2	0.01	1pwuB	0.413	6.86	0.059	0.669	0.17	GM6	complex2.pdb.gz	206,208,209
3	0.01	1pwvA	0.411	6.90	0.058	0.667	0.12	III	complex3.pdb.gz	155,156,198,206
4	0.01	1ofdB	0.386	7.12	0.041	0.657	0.30	F3S	complex4.pdb.gz	163,192,193,196,197,198,200
5	0.01	1pwwA	0.357	6.98	0.046	0.588	0.11	III	complex5.pdb.gz	221,225,228
6	0.01	1pwqA	0.415	6.74	0.053	0.664	0.35	SD2	complex6.pdb.gz	190,191,192,197,199,208,209,213
7	0.01	1pwwB	0.414	6.93	0.058	0.674	0.13	III	complex7.pdb.gz	195,196,248,252
8	0.01	1pwuA	0.416	6.70	0.053	0.659	0.20	GM6	complex8.pdb.gz	158,162,193,195,208
9	0.01	2bptA	0.325	6.95	0.029	0.532	0.26	III	complex9.pdb.gz	162,163,190,191,192,194,195,196

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.