D-I-TASSER Q96KV6-D3

D-I-TASSER results for Q96KV6-D3

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q96KV6 (45 residues)
MPSRSPCVVILPVIMIILMIPIAICIYWINNLQKEKKDSHLMTFN

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 \| \| MPSRSPCVVILPVIMIILMIPIAICIYWINNLQKEKKDSHLMTFN
Prediction	CCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCC
Confidence	998771245799999999999999999999999864112132469
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 \| \| MPSRSPCVVILPVIMIILMIPIAICIYWINNLQKEKKDSHLMTFN
Prediction	767342210323333333333322222104414664555334538
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40

                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCC
MPSRSPCVVILPVIMIILMIPIAICIYWINNLQKEKKDSHLMTFN

1vw42

0.09

3.40

1.67

DEthreader

REDLIKHQTIEKCWSIYQQQQRERRNLQLELQYKSIERSMNLLQE

3dl8C

0.03

0.02

1.38

1.58

SPARKS-K

-----KATISVIIFSLAIGVYLWILDLTFTKIISFILSLR-----

3jacA

0.00

1.00

1.05

MapAlign

GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG

7jg5b

0.04

2.20

1.67

DEthreader

ADYEKEMAEARAQASALRDEARAAGRSVVDEKRAQASGEVAQTLT

6exnD2

0.00

0.96

1.28

SPARKS-K

LENLRKKNLEMSQRAEMINRSKHAQQEKAVTTDDLDNLVDQVF--

6k61F

0.18

5.80

0.92

MapAlign

IVDGRLDRAGDFLIPSILFLYIAGWIGWGFAWPAAAVKELLSGEL

4ikvA

0.00

1.00

0.59

CEthreader

RGFFGHPKGLFTLFFTEFWERFSYYGMRAILVYYMYYEVSKGGLG

5o31L

0.18

5.80

0.55

MUSTER

QMTMPYYLKTTALIVTILGFILALEISNMTKNLKYHYPSNAFKFS

6jxrn

0.17

0.13

4.40

0.48

HHsearch

KPFGVLSATILYEILLGKLYAVLVSALVLMAMVKRK---------

1pw4A2

0.05

0.04

2.13

0.49

FFAS-3D

TVDFFGWDGGFMVMIGGSILAVILLIVVMIGEKRRHEQLLQE---

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.4828

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	2iakA	0.84	1.54	0.022	1.000	model1_2iakA.pdb.gz
2	7jg5G	0.84	1.32	0.089	1.000	model1_7jg5G.pdb.gz
3	1e1rG	0.84	1.28	0.044	1.000	model1_1e1rG.pdb.gz
4	6pf2A	0.84	1.29	0.000	1.000	model1_6pf2A.pdb.gz
5	2a9uA	0.83	1.62	0.044	1.000	model1_2a9uA.pdb.gz
6	6fkfg	0.83	1.31	0.067	1.000	model1_6fkfg.pdb.gz
7	6focG	0.83	1.24	0.089	1.000	model1_6focG.pdb.gz
8	5lm1A2	0.83	1.35	0.044	1.000	model1_5lm1A2.pdb.gz
9	4ro1A	0.83	1.33	0.022	1.000	model1_4ro1A.pdb.gz
10	6q45G	0.83	1.26	0.044	1.000	model1_6q45G.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0046961	0.44	proton-transporting ATPase activity, rotational mechanism
GO:0046933	0.44	proton-transporting ATP synthase activity, rotational mechanism
GO:0044822	0.44	poly(A) RNA binding
GO:0016896	0.38	exoribonuclease activity, producing 5'-phosphomonoesters
GO:0008408	0.38	3'-5' exonuclease activity
GO:0008187	0.38	poly-pyrimidine tract binding
GO:0046983	0.37	protein dimerization activity
GO:0042802	0.37	identical protein binding
GO:0008017	0.37	microtubule binding
GO:0046872	0.34	metal ion binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0071704	0.59	organic substance metabolic process
GO:0048523	0.59	negative regulation of cellular process
GO:0044710	0.59	single-organism metabolic process
GO:0044238	0.59	primary metabolic process
GO:0050710	0.51	negative regulation of cytokine secretion
GO:0046007	0.51	negative regulation of activated T cell proliferation
GO:0031324	0.51	negative regulation of cellular metabolic process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0043226	0.97	organelle
GO:0043227	0.96	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0044464	0.95	cell part
GO:0031988	0.95	membrane-bounded vesicle
GO:0070062	0.94	extracellular exosome
GO:0044425	0.89	membrane part
GO:0044459	0.83	plasma membrane part
GO:0016021	0.83	integral component of membrane
GO:0005887	0.82	integral component of plasma membrane
GO:0044424	0.58	intracellular part
GO:0016020	0.54	membrane
GO:0043229	0.51	intracellular organelle

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.109	3e7kH	0.748	1.12	0.093	0.911	2.7.11.1	NA
2	0.093	1qleD	0.696	1.63	0.048	0.867	1.9.3.1	NA
3	0.088	3brvC	0.637	1.75	0.029	0.778	2.7.11.10	NA
4	0.073	1ybzA	0.736	1.36	0.073	0.911	5.4.99.5	NA
5	0.067	1z8yN	0.581	1.45	0.056	0.800	3.4.21.90	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

No Binding sites was predicted

Click to view	Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.