D-I-TASSER Q96LW4-D1

D-I-TASSER results for Q96LW4-D1

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q96LW4 (234 residues)
MNRKWEAKLKQIEERASHYERKPLSSVYRVGYFNSIGTSVETIEGFQCSPYPEVDHFVLS
LVNKDGIKGGIRRWNYFFPEELLVYDICKYRWCENIGRAHKSNNIMILVDLKNEVWYQKC
HDPVCKAENFKSDCFPLPAEVCLLFLFKEEEEFTTDEADETRSNETQNPHKPSPSRLSTG
ASADAVWDNGIDDAYFLEATEDAELAEAAENSLLSYNSEVDEIPDELIIEVLQE

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MNRKWEAKLKQIEERASHYERKPLSSVYRVGYFNSIGTSVETIEGFQCSPYPEVDHFVLSLVNKDGIKGGIRRWNYFFPEELLVYDICKYRWCENIGRAHKSNNIMILVDLKNEVWYQKCHDPVCKAENFKSDCFPLPAEVCLLFLFKEEEEFTTDEADETRSNETQNPHKPSPSRLSTGASADAVWDNGIDDAYFLEATEDAELAEAAENSLLSYNSEVDEIPDELIIEVLQE
Prediction	CCCCCCCCCSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCSSSSSSSSCCCCSSSSSSCCCSSSCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHCCCCCHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHC
Confidence	973113453033432333467775112221134555467665567778998389999999972389871799999837973899992486433134875553648999986898799962782247667678997799889752136632331233210233234457888873224444410135667668689999877764034444543334566567885999999739
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MNRKWEAKLKQIEERASHYERKPLSSVYRVGYFNSIGTSVETIEGFQCSPYPEVDHFVLSLVNKDGIKGGIRRWNYFFPEELLVYDICKYRWCENIGRAHKSNNIMILVDLKNEVWYQKCHDPVCKAENFKSDCFPLPAEVCLLFLFKEEEEFTTDEADETRSNETQNPHKPSPSRLSTGASADAVWDNGIDDAYFLEATEDAELAEAAENSLLSYNSEVDEIPDELIIEVLQE
Prediction	764425641440454145465544444444442443535354364344221230151034004656241301102214743101010352300320534141200000000553101000212504246143642500540041134455542456445544546555345454543455335433455444342015005416416437543253546355142420250168
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180                 200                 220

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCCCCCSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCSSSSSSSSCCCCSSSSSSCCCSSSCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHCCCCCHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHC
MNRKWEAKLKQIEERASHYERKPLSSVYRVGYFNSIGTSVETIEGFQCSPYPEVDHFVLSLVNKDGIKGGIRRWNYFFPEELLVYDICKYRWCENIGRAHKSNNIMILVDLKNEVWYQKCHDPVCKAENFKSDCFPLPAEVCLLFLFKEEEEFTTDEADETRSNETQNPHKPSPSRLSTGASADAVWDNGIDDAYFLEATEDAELAEAAENSLLSYNSEVDEIPDELIIEVLQE

6sliB

0.06

2.50

0.62

CEthreader

DVIGASSKGFESDKLMLLSQGKTGNSLSLPEHRVAEYAYLSFFSRFNYGFDKWMYIDFSVRNDQSAWFYSVGGMFDIYNKDLRLKMSYGTTGNSEILSWEKQSQFNFGLAAGEVDFYVRTTNDMLIDVPMPYFSQYQNVGSMKNTGVDLSLKGTIYQNKDWNVYASANFNYNRQEITKLFFGLNKYMLPNTGTIWEIGYPNSFYMAEYAGIDKKTGKQLWYVPGQVDAKVTTSQ

5bv9A

0.08

3.03

0.63

EigenThreader

YGHMTTSEAYSYWLWLEVLYGHYTR---DWIPVN---EDGNDEQPHKPYPDQ--YGELKSTYGTNETYLMHWYVNTKEPAAQWRYTNAYGMYDKYFQTILMAWYTSWGGGLANWSWRIGASHCHQ---GYQNKPSSATGASDWEKTLKRQLEFYVWLQSKEGAIAGSWNGDYSAYPAGRSAPVYHDPPSNNWFGMQAWPMERVAELYYIFVKDGDKTSENVQMAKSCITKWVNY

2lt2A

0.11

0.06

2.34

0.43

FFAS-3D

-----SKIEEFLTAEEEKAIVDAIRDAEKNTSGEIRVHLEKTSEI-------DVFDRAMDVFHNLK-----------------------------MDNTKLQNGVLIYVAVEDKTFVIYG-DKGINDV--------VSDDFWDTTRNAIQLQFK----------------------------------QGNFKQGLVDGIEKA--GMALAKYFPWKKDDIDELPNTIS------

5cqcA1

0.12

0.10

3.59

0.72

SPARKS-K

PETSWE--VNKGMNSSRLHKLYSLIFLFRDSDYVAGYHVDAKSDGWVNDKLDRRLSEISEFCSKATQPATFILPFVEMPTD------------ITKGVQH---QVLLTISYKSKQLTPTVYDSIGRDTYSESLSRTTCDEILTQSIEKAIKDFTLGKFTRAAYNTEGN-------------------CGSYTFRTIKEVISSSAQVQDIESCIKYRN-----LGVVDIESALTE

6asyA

0.11

0.07

2.65

0.72

CNFpred

---------------ISAMVLTKMKETAE-VTHAVVTVPA--------YFNDAQRQATKDAGTIA--GLNVMRIINE-EKNILVFDLGG------------GTFDVSLLTIDNGVFEVVATNGDT----------HLGGEDFDQRVMEHFIKLYKKK---TGKDVRKDN---------------------RAVQKLRREVEKAKRALQARIEIESFYDFSETLTRAKFEELNMD

4ut1A

0.07

0.05

1.94

0.67

DEthreader

---TAITNYFTLAQL--AG--YSQLRQS-------------TQNSY---------SKLSQLAGVQVVQ-------------------YSVFLSGGQPLVVGNASYQLATVASELTIVSKGVAS-QPG-PTQYLPDVLGGLLFR--L---Q--G-LDGF-SL-ATA--NGSAIAAANAALQLVNTLTGAYAGYVNAIGNAASQLKASSAAQTALVGQITQA--------------

6sliB

0.05

2.34

0.84

MapAlign

AGAEDLYGNYDSLKDEYGKTLFPVDFNHDADWLKALFKTAPTSQGDI----------SFSGGSQGTSYYASIGYFDQEPANFKYSGRLNFESRINEWLKVGANLSGAIANRRSSESHQANNGFAQQAGVDITNTRTAGNPDLSWEKQSQFNFGLAAGAFNNRLSAEVDFYVRTTNDMLIDVPMPYISGFFSQYQNVGSMKNTGVDLSLKGTIYQNKDWNVYASANFNYNRQEIT

2z6bA

0.09

0.08

3.09

0.56

MUSTER

PTGQYPRRLGNDTNGGEVGYDSSSNVIQDSNLDTAINPDDRPLSEIPTDPNMSMAEMLRRDE-------GLRLKVYWDTEGYPTIGIG-----HLIMKQPVRDMAQINKVLSKQV-----------GREITGNPGSITMEEATTLFERDLADMQRDIKSHSKVGPVWQAVNRSRQMALENMAFQMGVGGVAKFNTMLTAMLAGDWEKAYKAGRDSLWYQQTKGRASRVTMIILT

2pffB

0.11

0.10

3.70

0.79

HHsearch

QFNKILPEPTEGFAADDGKFLSSLVEPSKVGQVLNLFNCYLEQENDTTLVKELIKNYITARIMAFDKKSNSALFRAVGGNAQLVAIFTDDYFEELRQTYHV-----LVGDLIEKVFTQGLNNPSNT--PDKDYLLSIPISCPLIGVIQLAVVTAPGELRSY---LKGATGHSQGLVTAVAIAETDSWES--FFVSVRKAITVLFFIGVR-CYE---AYPNTSLPPSILEDSLEE

6qp7A2

0.06

0.05

2.29

0.48

CEthreader

DTVIFRTDLYNTSAKRLEYKFKRTLKYDSKWLDKPNFVGSFDIGEYVYFFFRETAVEYINCGKAVYSRIARVCKKDVLLAHNWATYLKARLNCSIFPFYFNEIQSVYQLPSDKSRFFATFTTSTNGLIGSAVCSFH----------INEIQAAFNGKFKEQSSSNSAWLPVLNSRVPEPRPGTCVNDTSNLPDTVLNFIRSHPLMDKAVNHEHNNPVYYKRDL-----------

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.5834

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	3owaA	0.45	5.91	0.031	0.773	model1_3owaA.pdb.gz
2	2z1qB	0.45	5.77	0.040	0.752	model1_2z1qB.pdb.gz
3	3swoA	0.44	5.95	0.053	0.769	model1_3swoA.pdb.gz
4	4ut1A	0.44	5.28	0.058	0.688	model1_4ut1A.pdb.gz
5	1sirA	0.44	6.02	0.043	0.761	model1_1sirA.pdb.gz
6	1w07B	0.42	6.56	0.047	0.791	model1_1w07B.pdb.gz
7	1is2A	0.39	6.66	0.036	0.731	model1_1is2A.pdb.gz
8	2wssA2	0.30	6.10	0.029	0.504	model1_2wssA2.pdb.gz
9	2cm9A	0.30	5.00	0.031	0.440	model1_2cm9A.pdb.gz
10	1ukwA2	0.27	5.47	0.081	0.449	model1_1ukwA2.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0003896	1.00	DNA primase activity
GO:0003887	1.00	DNA-directed DNA polymerase activity
GO:0003682	0.96	chromatin binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0008152	0.92	metabolic process
GO:0019985	0.91	translesion synthesis
GO:0009411	0.91	response to UV
GO:0006264	0.87	mitochondrial DNA replication
GO:0031297	0.51	replication fork processing

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044444	1.00	cytoplasmic part
GO:0043231	1.00	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0005634	0.96	nucleus
GO:0005759	0.88	mitochondrial matrix

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	2r0nA	0.435	5.98	0.043	0.756	1.3.99.7	61,117
2	0.060	1udyA	0.397	5.99	0.034	0.701	1.3.99.3	NA
3	0.060	2wpnB	0.398	5.77	0.044	0.675	1.12.7.2	NA
4	0.060	1rx0A	0.411	6.22	0.069	0.756	1.3.99.-	NA
5	0.060	2wghB	0.411	5.51	0.041	0.684	1.17.4.1	63

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.01	3hnfB	0.339	5.83	0.033	0.573	0.40	TTP	complex1.pdb.gz	93,94,96
2	0.01	3hnfA	0.368	6.31	0.033	0.667	0.45	TTP	complex2.pdb.gz	65,66,67,98,99,100,101
3	0.01	3hncA	0.367	6.21	0.028	0.658	0.40	TTP	complex3.pdb.gz	66,67,103
4	0.01	1ivhB	0.417	6.00	0.039	0.731	0.40	FAD	complex4.pdb.gz	64,69,87,118
5	0.01	2wghB	0.411	5.51	0.041	0.684	0.48	DTP	complex5.pdb.gz	91,97,98
6	0.01	2rfqC	0.410	5.75	0.035	0.688	0.68	1PS	complex6.pdb.gz	64,65,66,91,99
7	0.01	2jifD	0.412	5.99	0.085	0.714	0.41	FAD	complex7.pdb.gz	61,69,107

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.