D-I-TASSER Q96SR6-D2

D-I-TASSER results for Q96SR6-D2

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q96SR6 (85 residues)
IFPSYSYLEEDGKTEDVLVKFKEYQDRHSRPLIFINHKKLIKERSNIYGKTFTLGKNRIS
KTILCEYKPDGKVLKNISELVIRNI

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 \| \| \| \| IFPSYSYLEEDGKTEDVLVKFKEYQDRHSRPLIFINHKKLIKERSNIYGKTFTLGKNRISKTILCEYKPDGKVLKNISELVIRNI
Prediction	CCCCCCCCHHHCCCHHHHHHHHCCCCCCSSSSSSSSCCCCSCCCCCCCCCCSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHCCC
Confidence	9888777545422113555411135544026898726620001264226610366675321257555677751341277750379
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 \| \| \| \| IFPSYSYLEEDGKTEDVLVKFKEYQDRHSRPLIFINHKKLIKERSNIYGKTFTLGKNRISKTILCEYKPDGKVLKNISELVIRNI
Prediction	7245442366315355314635745752223122244442356655336431417444234523461443434152114313458
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80

                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCCCCHHHCCCHHHHHHHHCCCCCCSSSSSSSSCCCCSCCCCCCCCCCSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHCCC
IFPSYSYLEEDGKTEDVLVKFKEYQDRHSRPLIFINHKKLIKERSNIYGKTFTLGKNRISKTILCEYKPDGKVLKNISELVIRNI

5t0uA1

0.12

0.09

3.33

1.96

SPARKS-K

----------THKCHLC--------GRAFRTLLRNHLNTHTGTRCPDCDMAFVTSGELHTHEKPFKCSMCDYASVEVSKLKRHIR

3w5kB

0.12

0.06

2.09

2.46

CNFpred

------------------------------------------FSCPHCSRAFADRSNTHSDVKKYQCQACARTFSRMSLLHKHQE

6w1cE3

0.02

1.64

0.57

CEthreader

ASQIGLTKTDTHDHTKIRYAEGHDIAEAARSTLKVHSSSECTVTGTMGHFILAKCPPGERISVSFVDSKNEHRTCRIAYHHEQRL

2q7nA

0.04

1.92

0.63

EigenThreader

GSSPTKPLIHLQTVAIHI---LNIPVSENGYPPDVPQWNPGRITGLVGPRNTTNETNVTERVAPHDPYTFRVRCTFWKWSRWSDE

3w5kB

0.09

0.08

3.16

0.34

FFAS-3D

---NCKYCNKEYLSLGALKMHIRSHTLPCPWLLQGHVRTHTGPSCPHCSRAFADRSQTHSDVKKYQCQACARTFSRMSLLHKH--

2kmkA

0.12

0.11

3.71

1.94

SPARKS-K

-SFDCKICGKSFKRSSTLSTHLLIHSDT------------RPYPCQYCGKRFHQKSDMHTGEKPHKCQVCGKAFSQSSNLITHSR

6tlyA

0.12

0.06

2.09

2.15

CNFpred

------------------------------------------YRCEKCDYDVCNQCAEKFKEVHFLCAKCGKKFPSQTKLQYHSR

2wxwA

0.07

0.06

2.40

0.83

DEthreader

---------SPVDEKALQDQLVLVAAKLDTEDLAMVGMLANFLGILVLSPTFALLAVLSQYTPVVTKTGCS------FNTLVLN-

6w09E

0.10

0.09

3.52

0.82

MapAlign

--LQIGIKTDDSHDKLRYMDNHMPADAERARLFVRTSAPCTITGTMGHFILARCPKGETLTVTLMSQQSGNVKITVNTDKVINNC

5v3jE

0.16

5.45

0.73

MUSTER

AFHTPSQLSHHQKLHVGEKPYKQECGKAFPSQLSLHHRVHTDEKCKECGKAFMRPSHLHTGEKPHKCKECGKAFRYDTQLSLHLL

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.4231

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	5mr4C	0.46	3.85	0.137	0.776	model1_5mr4C.pdb.gz
2	1llwA1	0.46	4.28	0.062	0.871	model1_1llwA1.pdb.gz
3	4y9jA1	0.46	3.81	0.068	0.776	model1_4y9jA1.pdb.gz
4	2v5eA	0.46	3.96	0.068	0.776	model1_2v5eA.pdb.gz
5	1z7lA	0.46	4.27	0.079	0.812	model1_1z7lA.pdb.gz
6	3pplA	0.46	4.17	0.064	0.835	model1_3pplA.pdb.gz
7	3bg9A	0.46	4.28	0.012	0.847	model1_3bg9A.pdb.gz
8	1gg4A	0.45	4.10	0.049	0.824	model1_1gg4A.pdb.gz
9	2vdcA1	0.45	4.29	0.098	0.871	model1_2vdcA1.pdb.gz
10	6dc6A2	0.45	4.37	0.078	0.824	model1_6dc6A2.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0003700	1.00	transcription factor activity, sequence-specific DNA binding
GO:1901363	0.78	heterocyclic compound binding
GO:0097159	0.78	organic cyclic compound binding
GO:0003676	0.68	nucleic acid binding
GO:0003677	0.67	DNA binding
GO:0044212	0.65	transcription regulatory region DNA binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0006355	1.00	regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
GO:0048518	0.63	positive regulation of biological process
GO:0048523	0.62	negative regulation of cellular process
GO:0048522	0.62	positive regulation of cellular process
GO:2000113	0.61	negative regulation of cellular macromolecule biosynthetic process
GO:0045934	0.61	negative regulation of nucleobase-containing compound metabolic process
GO:0031325	0.61	positive regulation of cellular metabolic process
GO:0010629	0.61	negative regulation of gene expression
GO:0010604	0.61	positive regulation of macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0045893	0.60	positive regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
GO:0045892	0.60	negative regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
GO:0045944	0.59	positive regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter
GO:0000122	0.58	negative regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0043229	1.00	intracellular organelle
GO:0043231	0.99	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0005634	0.98	nucleus
GO:0044444	0.71	cytoplasmic part
GO:0044446	0.61	intracellular organelle part
GO:0005739	0.60	mitochondrion

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1sb8A	0.449	4.22	0.053	0.835	5.1.3.7	56
2	0.060	1w0cA	0.426	3.71	0.027	0.741	1.5.1.33	NA
3	0.060	1seoD	0.294	4.96	0.030	0.671	3.4.19.5	NA
4	0.060	1xizB	0.436	4.53	0.095	0.800	2.7.1.69	NA
5	0.060	1ea0A	0.462	4.31	0.083	0.882	1.4.1.13	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.01	2xjaB	0.349	4.56	0.000	0.694	0.16	ADP	complex1.pdb.gz	11,12,13,14,15
2	0.01	3tw6C	0.331	5.09	0.025	0.729	0.12	COA	complex2.pdb.gz	11,20,21
3	0.01	1ea0B	0.433	4.28	0.104	0.847	0.14	OMT	complex3.pdb.gz	12,21,22,48
4	0.01	1sb8A	0.449	4.22	0.053	0.835	0.11	UD2	complex4.pdb.gz	5,28,30
5	0.01	1sb80	0.449	4.22	0.053	0.835	0.14	III	complex5.pdb.gz	14,15,18,22,23,26,27,67,70,71
6	0.01	2qf7A	0.453	4.34	0.025	0.835	0.20	COA	complex6.pdb.gz	9,13,14
7	0.01	1ofdA	0.427	4.09	0.066	0.824	0.30	F3S	complex7.pdb.gz	17,18,48
8	0.01	2qf7A	0.453	4.34	0.025	0.835	0.21	SAP	complex8.pdb.gz	8,12,45

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.