D-I-TASSER Q9BW92-D3

D-I-TASSER results for Q9BW92-D3

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q9BW92 (113 residues)
KWPLWLSPFQVVVIPVGSEQEEYAKEAQQSLRAAGLVSDLDADSGLTLSRRIRRAQLAHY
NFQFVVGQKEQSKRTVNIRTRDNRRLGEWDLPEAVQRLVELQNTRVPNAEEIF

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 \| \| \| \| \| KWPLWLSPFQVVVIPVGSEQEEYAKEAQQSLRAAGLVSDLDADSGLTLSRRIRRAQLAHYNFQFVVGQKEQSKRTVNIRTRDNRRLGEWDLPEAVQRLVELQNTRVPNAEEIF
Prediction	CCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCSSSSSCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHCCCCSSSSSCHHHHHCCSSSSSSCCCCCSCCSCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCHHHHHCC
Confidence	99987586248998518649999999999999819889995899998429999998709998999826776529389999289612102299999999999998444144348
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 \| \| \| \| \| KWPLWLSPFQVVVIPVGSEQEEYAKEAQQSLRAAGLVSDLDADSGLTLSRRIRRAQLAHYNFQFVVGQKEQSKRTVNIRTRDNRRLGEWDLPEAVQRLVELQNTRVPNAEEIF
Prediction	83341013300100202661351054016205746020200345764033202414464010000005513764412024167664461404401530361166335645768
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCSSSSSCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHCCCCSSSSSCHHHHHCCSSSSSSCCCCCSCCSCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCHHHHHCC
KWPLWLSPFQVVVIPVGSEQEEYAKEAQQSLRAAGLVSDLDADSGLTLSRRIRRAQLAHYNFQFVVGQKEQSKRTVNIRTRDNRRLGEWDLPEAVQRLVELQNTRVPNAEEIF

6t7kA

0.17

5.54

1.50

DEthreader

HLPPNVSKYKVVIVPIFEAIHSYCKDIEKILKNAQINCVYDDRASYSPGYKFNHWELRGIPIRIEVGPKDLQNNSCVIVRRDNNEKCNVKKESVLLETQQMLVDIHKNLFLKA

4hwtA2

0.50

0.49

14.11

2.06

SPARKS-K

KWPFWLSPRQVMVVPVGPTCDEYAQKVRQQFHDAKFMADIDLDPGCTLNKKIRNAQLAQYNFILVVGEKEKISGTVNIRTRDNKVHGERTISETIERLQQLKEFRSKQA----

5zy9C

0.44

0.41

11.92

0.79

MapAlign

KFPFWLSPRQVLIVTVGAAFVDYGYEVKDAMFRAGFDVDIDDTG-KTLNKKIREGQMAHYNFILVVGAHEKETRSVNIRTRDNKVTGTKTLEEAIAMFKELEETKA-------

5zy9C

0.44

0.42

12.19

0.59

CEthreader

KFPFWLSPRQVLIVTVGAAFVDYGYEVKDAMFRAGFDVDIDDT-GKTLNKKIREGQMAHYNFILVVGAHEKETRSVNIRTRDNKVTGTKTLEEAIAMFKELEETKAADE----

4hwtA2

0.50

0.49

14.11

2.09

MUSTER

KWPFWLSPRQVMVVPVGPTCDEYAQKVRQQFHDAKFMADIDLDPGCTLNKKIRNAQLAQYNFILVVGEKEKISGTVNIRTRDNKVHGERTISETIERLQQLKEFRSKQA----

1qf6A

0.31

0.30

9.11

1.45

HHsearch

FFPTWLAPVQVVIMNITDSQSEYVNELTQKLSNAGIRVKADLR-NEKIGFKIREHTLRRVPYMLVCGDKEVESGKVAVRTRRGKDLGSMDVNEVIEKLQQEIRSRSLKQLEE-

4hwtA2

0.50

0.49

14.11

2.01

FFAS-3D

KWPFWLSPRQVMVVPVGPTCDEYAQKVRQQFHDAKFMADIDLDPGCTLNKKIRNAQLAQYNFILVVGEKEKISGTVNIRTRDNKVHGERTISETIERLQQLKEFRSKQA----

5f9yA2

0.23

7.21

0.73

EigenThreader

GLPPKVAPVQVIIIPIIFEQKKICNEVECILKKAGVRVKIDDRSNYTPGWKYNHWEVKGVCLRFEVGPRDIEKRSVRVVVRDNMEKMDIPISELESKIPKLLEEFQNRLLFKA

4p3nA

0.51

14.86

1.37

CNFpred

KWPFWLSPRQVMVVPVGPTCDEYAQKVRQQFHDAKFMADIDLDPGCTLNKKIRNAQLAQYNFILVVGEKEKISGTVNIRTRDNKVHGERTISETIERLQQLKEFRSKQAEEEF

6t7kA3

0.17

5.54

1.50

DEthreader

VLPPNVSKYKVVIVPIFEAIHSYCKDIEKILKNAQINCVYDDRASYSPGYKFNHWELRGIPIRIEVGPKDLQNNSCVIVRRDNNEKCNVKKESVLLETQQMLVDIHKNLFLKA

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.8743

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	4hwtA	0.93	0.78	0.505	0.965	model1_4hwtA.pdb.gz
2	5zy9C	0.93	0.74	0.426	0.956	model1_5zy9C.pdb.gz
3	1qf6A3	0.93	1.21	0.306	0.982	model1_1qf6A3.pdb.gz
4	7l3oA	0.87	1.27	0.271	0.920	model1_7l3oA.pdb.gz
5	1nyqB	0.87	1.27	0.290	0.947	model1_1nyqB.pdb.gz
6	6vu9A	0.86	0.94	0.275	0.903	model1_6vu9A.pdb.gz
7	3ugqA	0.84	1.40	0.324	0.929	model1_3ugqA.pdb.gz
8	1h4sA2	0.83	1.90	0.223	0.956	model1_1h4sA2.pdb.gz
9	5f9yA2	0.83	2.00	0.221	0.965	model1_5f9yA2.pdb.gz
10	6t7kA	0.82	2.04	0.159	0.965	model1_6t7kA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0003824	0.99	catalytic activity
GO:1901363	0.98	heterocyclic compound binding
GO:0097159	0.98	organic cyclic compound binding
GO:0004812	0.98	aminoacyl-tRNA ligase activity
GO:0004829	0.96	threonine-tRNA ligase activity
GO:0003723	0.95	RNA binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0009987	0.98	cellular process
GO:0071704	0.97	organic substance metabolic process
GO:0044763	0.97	single-organism cellular process
GO:0044237	0.97	cellular metabolic process
GO:0044260	0.96	cellular macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0044238	0.96	primary metabolic process
GO:0034641	0.96	cellular nitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:1901564	0.95	organonitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:0044281	0.95	small molecule metabolic process
GO:0016070	0.95	RNA metabolic process
GO:0006418	0.94	tRNA aminoacylation for protein translation
GO:0006435	0.86	threonyl-tRNA aminoacylation

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	1.00	intracellular part
GO:0044444	0.73	cytoplasmic part
GO:0005737	0.70	cytoplasm
GO:0043226	0.50	organelle

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.066	1y80A	0.587	3.12	0.075	0.779	2.1.1.13	NA
2	0.066	2fewB	0.513	3.22	0.100	0.699	2.7.1.69	24,32
3	0.066	1v98A	0.470	3.31	0.099	0.690	1.8.1.9	NA
4	0.060	2i4nB	0.738	1.78	0.204	0.867	6.1.1.15	NA
5	0.060	1ggmB	0.807	1.48	0.275	0.903	6.1.1.14	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.11	1h4qB	0.831	1.86	0.223	0.956	0.11	UUU	complex1.pdb.gz	18,32,40,42
2	0.09	2i4mC	0.732	1.83	0.204	0.867	0.11	PSD	complex2.pdb.gz	14,16,35,92,95
3	0.07	1ggmA	0.806	1.49	0.275	0.903	0.17	GAP	complex3.pdb.gz	68,77,79,86,88
4	0.07	1ggmB	0.807	1.48	0.275	0.903	0.10	GAP	complex4.pdb.gz	35,37,68,94,95
5	0.05	2j3lA	0.754	1.85	0.200	0.885	0.10	P5A	complex5.pdb.gz	13,15,34,35,92
6	0.03	1kmnA	0.746	1.78	0.118	0.858	0.14	HSO	complex6.pdb.gz	63,64,66,77,78,79

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.