D-I-TASSER Q9C0B7-D5

D-I-TASSER results for Q9C0B7-D5

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q9C0B7 (340 residues)
ATEAVSMAAQSTLNRKDLEGKIEEQQQTSHERPTDVAHSHLEQQQSHETAPQTGLQSNAP
IIPQGVNEPSTTTSQKSGSVTTEQLQEVLLSAYDPQIPTRAAALRTLSHWIEQREAKALE
MQEKLLKIFLENLEHEDTFVYLSAIQGVALLSDVYPEKILPDLLAQYDSSKDKHTPETRM
KVGEVLMRIVRALGDMVSKYREPLIHTFLRGVRDPDGAHRASSLANLGELCQRLDFLLGS
VVHEVTACLIAVAKTDGEVQVRRAAIHVVVLLLRGLSQKATEVLSAVLKDLYHLLKHVVC
LEPDDVAKLHAQLALEELDDIMKNFLFPPQKLEKKIMVLP

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| ATEAVSMAAQSTLNRKDLEGKIEEQQQTSHERPTDVAHSHLEQQQSHETAPQTGLQSNAPIIPQGVNEPSTTTSQKSGSVTTEQLQEVLLSAYDPQIPTRAAALRTLSHWIEQREAKALEMQEKLLKIFLENLEHEDTFVYLSAIQGVALLSDVYPEKILPDLLAQYDSSKDKHTPETRMKVGEVLMRIVRALGDMVSKYREPLIHTFLRGVRDPDGAHRASSLANLGELCQRLDFLLGSVVHEVTACLIAVAKTDGEVQVRRAAIHVVVLLLRGLSQKATEVLSAVLKDLYHLLKHVVCLEPDDVAKLHAQLALEELDDIMKNFLFPPQKLEKKIMVLP
Prediction	CCHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCHHHHHHCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCHHHHHHHHCHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCHHHHCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHCCCCCCCC
Confidence	9358999999998323554303666510124213455656665302321056665432067653112234443333114578999999998479985999999999999997089245657899999999983798389999999999999965659999999999972345789999999999999999984045467899999999998449978999999999999999825565456999999999999729957999999999999999827212433168999999999988640898899999999999999999997377143212211389
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| ATEAVSMAAQSTLNRKDLEGKIEEQQQTSHERPTDVAHSHLEQQQSHETAPQTGLQSNAPIIPQGVNEPSTTTSQKSGSVTTEQLQEVLLSAYDPQIPTRAAALRTLSHWIEQREAKALEMQEKLLKIFLENLEHEDTFVYLSAIQGVALLSDVYPEKILPDLLAQYDSSKDKHTPETRMKVGEVLMRIVRALGDMVSKYREPLIHTFLRGVRDPDGAHRASSLANLGELCQRLDFLLGSVVHEVTACLIAVAKTDGEVQVRRAAIHVVVLLLRGLSQKATEVLSAVLKDLYHLLKHVVCLEPDDVAKLHAQLALEELDDIMKNFLFPPQKLEKKIMVLP
Prediction	8453133003311454457453554443564334624453254345554344343433243145226544444445445333520440063052632301320030014005544441363163014102410636333022100300010063224400430053035347544142012003001400531353035204300300031043544311210031003003204430342033004001410443742400200030011004102542352247204301300320364261410130033005203500551024265035404627
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180                 200                 220                 240                 260                 280                 300                 320                 340

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCHHHHHHCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCHHHHHHHHCHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCHHHHCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHCCCCCCCC
ATEAVSMAAQSTLNRKDLEGKIEEQQQTSHERPTDVAHSHLEQQQSHETAPQTGLQSNAPIIPQGVNEPSTTTSQKSGSVTTEQLQEVLLSAYDPQIPTRAAALRTLSHWIEQREAKALEMQEKLLKIFLENLEHEDTFVYLSAIQGVALLSDVYPEKILPDLLAQYDSSKDKHTPETRMKVGEVLMRIVRALGDMVSKYREPLIHTFLRGVRDPDGAHRASSLANLGELCQRLDFLLGSVVHEVTACLIAVAKTDGEVQVRRAAIHVVVLLLRGLSQKATEVLSAVLKDLYHLLKHVVCLEPDDVAKLHAQLALEELDDIMKNFLFPPQKLEKKIMVLP

1qgkA

0.12

0.11

3.95

1.33

DEthreader

D-QYPPEHTSK-FYAKGALQYLVPILTQTL--T----KQ--DENDDD-DD-W--CKAAGRYDAAVAFILEGPEPSQLKPLVIQAMPTLIELMKDPSVVVRDTAAWTVGRICLPEAAINDVYLAPLLQCLIEGLSAEP-RVASNVCWAFSSLAAYCLSSSFELIVQKLLETDRPDGHNLRSSAYESLMEIVKNSAKDCYPAVQKTTLVIMERLVMRFNDLQSLLCATLQNVLRKVQHDALQISDVVMASLLRMFQTAGSGGVQEDALMAVSTLVE-V---LGGEFLKYMEAFKPFLGIGLKNYAEYQVCLAAVGLVGDLCRALQSNIIPAIGGE-KK----

1qgkA3

0.16

0.12

3.91

1.15

SPARKS-K

------------------------------------------------------------------------QHQDALQISDVVMASLLRMFQSTSGGVQEDALMAVSTLVEVLGGEFLKYMEAFKPFLGIGLKNAEYQVCLAAVGLVGDLCRALIIPFCDEVMQLLLENLGNVHRSVKPQILSVFGDIALAIGGEFKKYLEVVLNTLQQASQAQVNELRESCLEAYTGIVQGLKMLVQPRVEFILSFIDHIAGDEDTDGVVACAAGLIGDLCTAFGKDVLKLVEPMIHELLTEGRRS----KTNKAKTLARWATKELRKLKNQA---------------

1qbkB2

0.09

3.37

1.61

FFAS-3D

QDENVALEACEFWLTLAEQPICIILLKGDVEEDETIPDSEQDIRPRFHRSRTVAIDDDDTISDWNLRKCSAAALDVLANVYPHILPLLKELLFHHEWVVKESGILVLGAIAEGCQGI--PYLPELIPHLIQCLSDKKALVRSITCWTLSRYAHWVVSQPPDTYLKELLKRILDSNKRVQEAACSAFATLEEEACTELVPYLAYILDTLVFAFSKYQHKNLLILYDAIGTLADSVGHHLNKPEYIQLPPLIQKWNLKDEDKDLFPLLECLSSVATALQSGFLPYCEPVYQRCVNLVQKTLAQQDKPEVRQSSFALLGDLTKACFQHVKPCADFPILGTNL-

5vchA

0.13

0.10

3.45

1.24

CNFpred

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------IADLVKLALQIAVNSDEDIRVFAVQFVTSALVYRKSKINKLGPEITLAALKVASEEI-TPALTALRLISNASGELPSQVGVPIIEHLPTMLSSSNPFERRSILLAISVLVTGSPDYTLSQFDKIIPATVTGLKDSEAVVQLAALKCIVQLSTNLQDEVARYHEQYLPLVIDIIDSAKHVVIYKYATLALDGLLEFI---AHNDIIKYLDPLMNKLFQMLETQQSPKLRAAIVSAIGSCAFAAGSGFVP--YFKTSVQYLQ

3gjxA

0.08

0.07

2.92

1.17

DEthreader

LLYVLVRLMVSMRMTLCWGLNAIIASNIMEFMHET--H-------------------DGVQDMACDTFIKIAQKCRHQQFIDEILNNINTIICDLQPQQVHTFYEAVGYMIGAQTDVQEHLIEKYMLLPNQVWTVKQGSILKTNVRACKAVGHPFVIQLGRIYLDMLNVCLNISMRTVKRETLKLISGWVSRSDPMVAENVPPLLDAVLIDYQNPAA-REPEVLSTMAIIVNKLGGHITAEIPQIFDVFECTLNMIEYPEHRTNFFLLLQAVNSHCFPAFLAIPPAQFKLVLDSIIWAFK-HTMRNVADTGLQILFTLLQNVAQEAAQYLVEEISGNNQM

4plqA

0.11

0.09

3.27

1.15

SPARKS-K

GPGSELPQMVQQLNSPDQQELQSALRKLSQSGGNEQIQAVIDAG---------------------------------------ALPALVQLLSSPNEQILQEALWTLGNIA-SGGNEQIQAVIDALPALVQLLSSPNEQILQEALWTLGNIASGGIQAVIDAALPALVQLLSSPNEQILQEALWTLGNIASGGNEQIQAVIDAALPALVQLLSSPNEQILQEALWTLGNIASGGNEQIQAVIDAALPALVQLLSS-PNEQILQEALWTLGNIA-SGGNEQKQAVKEA--GAEPALEQL-QSSPNEKIQKEAQEALEKIQ---------------------

3w3tA

0.10

3.76

0.58

MapAlign

VDINSILPIFQSGFTDASDNVKIAAVYFKQLPKSEWSKLGILLPSLLNSLPRFLDDGKDDALASVFESLIELVELAPKLFKDQIIQFTDMVIKNKEPPARTTALELLTVFSENAPQMCQNYGQTLVMVTLIMMTEVEEVTYDHARQALDRVALKLGEYLAAPLFQYLQQMITSTEWRERFAAMMALSSAAEGCADVLIGEIPKILDMVIPLINDPHPRVQYGCCNVLGQISTDFSFIQRTAHDRILPALISKLTSECTSRVQTHAAAALVNFSEFA---SKDILEPYLDSLLTNLLVLLQ-SNKLYVQEQALTTIAFIAEAAKNKFIKYYDTLMPLLLN-

6xteA2

0.11

4.01

0.39

CEthreader

QQYLPVVMGPLMKTASIKPEVALLDTQDMENMSDDDGWEFVNLGDQQSFGIKTAGLEEKSTACQMLVCYAKELKEGFVEYTEQVVKLMVPLLFYFHDGVRVAAAESMPLLLECAREYLTQMWHFMCDALIKAIGEPDSDVLSEIMHSFAKCIEVMFEELGGILKAKLEEHFDDNDVYILTKVSDILHSIFSSYKEKVLPWFEQLLPLIVNLIPHRPWPDRQWGLCIFDDVIEHCSPASFKYAEYFLRPMLQYVCDN-SPEVRQAAAYGLGVMAQYGGDNYRPFCTEALPLLVRVIQSDSKTKENVNATENCISAVGKIMKFKPDCVNVEEVLPHWLSWLP

4plqA

0.12

0.10

3.51

0.98

MUSTER

-------------------------------GPGSELPQMVQQLNSPDQQELQSALRKLSQIASGGNEQIQAV------IDAGALPALVQLLSSPNEQILQEALWTLGNIASGGNEQIQAVIDAALPALVQLLSSPNEQILQEALWTLGNIASGGNQAVIDAALPALVQLLSSPNEQILQEALWTLGNIASGGNEQIQAVIDAALPALVQLLSSPNEQILQEALWTLGNIASGGNEQIQAVIDAALPALVQLLS-SPNEQILQEALWTLGNIAS-GGNEQKQAVKEA---AEPALEQLQS-SPNEKIQKEAQEALEKIQ---------------------

1qgkA3

0.16

0.12

3.99

0.90

HHsearch

------------------------------------------------------------------------QHQDALQISDVVMASLLRMFQSTSGGVQEDALMAVSTLVEVLGGEFLKYMEAFKPFLGIGLKNAEYQVCLAAVGLVGDLCRALQSNFCDEVMQLLLENLGNEHRSVKPQILSVFGDIALAIGGEFKKYLEVVLNTLQQASQAQLNELRESCLEAYTGIVQGLKGLVQPRVEFILSFIDHIAGDEHTDGVVACAAGLIGDLCTAFGKDVLKLVEAMIHELLTEGR----RSKTNKAKTLARWATKELRKLKNQA---------------

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.7273

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	1qgkA	0.77	3.50	0.096	0.915	model1_1qgkA.pdb.gz
2	4xriA	0.77	3.20	0.087	0.891	model1_4xriA.pdb.gz
3	6xjpC	0.75	3.83	0.068	0.926	model1_6xjpC.pdb.gz
4	6xteA2	0.75	3.58	0.100	0.894	model1_6xteA2.pdb.gz
5	3ea5B	0.74	3.72	0.099	0.912	model1_3ea5B.pdb.gz
6	1u6gC	0.74	3.61	0.083	0.894	model1_1u6gC.pdb.gz
7	3w3tA	0.74	4.23	0.116	0.935	model1_3w3tA.pdb.gz
8	4fgvA	0.74	3.93	0.062	0.926	model1_4fgvA.pdb.gz
9	7abhu	0.74	3.30	0.098	0.865	model1_7abhu.pdb.gz
10	5ifeC	0.73	3.46	0.103	0.874	model1_5ifeC.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0005215	0.63	transporter activity
GO:0008565	0.61	protein transporter activity
GO:0008139	0.61	nuclear localization sequence binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0009987	0.96	cellular process
GO:0044699	0.87	single-organism process
GO:0016043	0.81	cellular component organization
GO:0051234	0.77	establishment of localization
GO:0006810	0.76	transport
GO:0071702	0.75	organic substance transport
GO:0044765	0.72	single-organism transport
GO:0008152	0.72	metabolic process
GO:0015031	0.71	protein transport
GO:0065007	0.70	biological regulation
GO:0071704	0.69	organic substance metabolic process
GO:0050789	0.68	regulation of biological process
GO:0046907	0.68	intracellular transport
GO:0065003	0.66	macromolecular complex assembly
GO:0050794	0.66	regulation of cellular process
GO:0006913	0.66	nucleocytoplasmic transport
GO:0043170	0.65	macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0034622	0.65	cellular macromolecular complex assembly
GO:0006886	0.64	intracellular protein transport
GO:1902582	0.63	single-organism intracellular transport
GO:0071822	0.63	protein complex subunit organization
GO:0033365	0.63	protein localization to organelle
GO:0043623	0.62	cellular protein complex assembly
GO:0006606	0.62	protein import into nucleus
GO:0006996	0.57	organelle organization
GO:0022402	0.55	cell cycle process
GO:0006610	0.55	ribosomal protein import into nucleus
GO:0006607	0.55	NLS-bearing protein import into nucleus
GO:0000060	0.55	protein import into nucleus, translocation
GO:0000059	0.55	protein import into nucleus, docking
GO:1903047	0.53	mitotic cell cycle process
GO:0051726	0.51	regulation of cell cycle
GO:0071705	0.50	nitrogen compound transport
GO:0010564	0.50	regulation of cell cycle process
GO:0007346	0.50	regulation of mitotic cell cycle

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	1.00	intracellular part
GO:0043229	0.96	intracellular organelle
GO:0043227	0.96	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0043231	0.95	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0005737	0.94	cytoplasm
GO:0005634	0.94	nucleus
GO:0044446	0.93	intracellular organelle part
GO:0044428	0.86	nuclear part
GO:0044444	0.74	cytoplasmic part
GO:0016020	0.71	membrane
GO:0005829	0.70	cytosol
GO:0031090	0.54	organelle membrane
GO:0032991	0.53	macromolecular complex
GO:0034399	0.51	nuclear periphery
GO:0031965	0.51	nuclear membrane
GO:0005643	0.50	nuclear pore

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1w3bA	0.483	5.45	0.109	0.712	2.4.1.-	NA
2	0.060	1lf6A	0.411	6.72	0.071	0.700	3.2.1.3	NA
3	0.060	1hcuB	0.431	5.77	0.065	0.653	3.2.1.113	NA
4	0.060	3h09B	0.434	6.35	0.035	0.709	3.4.21.72	195
5	0.060	3draA	0.498	5.67	0.083	0.762	2.5.1.58 2.5.1.59	124

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.05	1pjnB	0.646	4.47	0.097	0.847	0.41	III	complex1.pdb.gz	102,105,142,145,146,179,183,188,190,191,192,225,228,229,232,264,267,271,274
2	0.04	3l6yE	0.625	4.45	0.074	0.827	0.49	III	complex2.pdb.gz	55,146,151,184,187,188,191,194,232,264
3	0.02	3btrC	0.648	4.55	0.082	0.856	0.44	III	complex3.pdb.gz	64,70,97,101,105,109,112,139,142,143
4	0.02	2c1m0	0.621	4.72	0.080	0.832	0.43	III	complex4.pdb.gz	105,147,184,190,191,192,194,225,228,229,232,262,263,267,270,274,308,337

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.