D-I-TASSER Q9H6A0-D2

D-I-TASSER results for Q9H6A0-D2

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q9H6A0 (115 residues)
VDFSSLLHCLSFEQILQIFASAVLERKIIFLAEGLSTLSQCIHAAAALLYPFSWAHTYIP
VVPESLLATVCCPTPFMVGVQMRFQQEVMDSPMEEVLLVNLCEGTFLMSVGDEKD

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 \| \| \| \| \| VDFSSLLHCLSFEQILQIFASAVLERKIIFLAEGLSTLSQCIHAAAALLYPFSWAHTYIPVVPESLLATVCCPTPFMVGVQMRFQQEVMDSPMEEVLLVNLCEGTFLMSVGDEKD
Prediction	CCHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCSSSSSSCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCSSSSSCCHHHHHHHHCCCCSSSSSCCHHHHHHHCCCCCCSSSSSCCCCSSSCCCCCCCC
Confidence	9878999879998999999999975929999699889999999999999461577438853798899898199988998624377787527889889999169979937887899
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 \| \| \| \| \| VDFSSLLHCLSFEQILQIFASAVLERKIIFLAEGLSTLSQCIHAAAALLYPFSWAHTYIPVVPESLLATVCCPTPFMVGVQMRFQQEVMDSPMEEVLLVNLCEGTFLMSVGDEKD
Prediction	6514201530416200200100023320001034343021003002200422434100012025402410403200000023622641474415200000015440433574788
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCSSSSSSCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCSSSSSCCHHHHHHHHCCCCSSSSSCCHHHHHHHCCCCCCSSSSSCCCCSSSCCCCCCCC
VDFSSLLHCLSFEQILQIFASAVLERKIIFLAEGLSTLSQCIHAAAALLYPFSWAHTYIPVVPESLLATVCCPTPFMVGVQMRFQQEVMDSPMEEVLLVNLCEGTFLMSVGDEKD

3tw8A

0.34

0.33

9.89

1.33

DEthreader

SRLTEYFVAVDVNNMLQLYASMLHERRIVIISSKLSTLTACIHGSAALLYPMYWQHIYIPVLPPHLLDYCCAPMPYLIGIHSSLIERVKNKSLEDVVMLNVDTNTLES-P-FS--

6ekkA2

0.31

9.45

2.76

SPARKS-K

RNLTEYFVAVDVNNMLHLYASMLYERRILIICSKLSTLTACIHGSAAMLYPMYWQHVYIPVLPPHLLDYCCAPMPYLIGIHLSLMEKVRNMALDDVVILNVDTNTLETPFDDLQS

6ekkA

0.32

0.30

9.17

1.55

MapAlign

RNLTEYFVAVDVNNMLHLYASMLYERRILIICSKLSTLTACIHGSAAMLYPMYWQHVYIPVLPPHLLDYCCAPMPYLIGIHLSLMEKVRNMALDDVVILNVDTNTLETPF-----

6ekkA2

0.31

9.45

1.66

CEthreader

RNLTEYFVAVDVNNMLHLYASMLYERRILIICSKLSTLTACIHGSAAMLYPMYWQHVYIPVLPPHLLDYCCAPMPYLIGIHLSLMEKVRNMALDDVVILNVDTNTLETPFDDLQS

3tw8A2

0.34

10.16

1.82

MUSTER

RNLTEYFVAVDVNNMLQLYASMLHERRIVIISSKLSTLTACIHGSAALLYPMYWQHIYIPVLPPHLLDYCCAPMPYLIGIHSSLIERVKNKSLEDVVMLNVDTNTLESPFSDLNN

3tw8A2

0.34

10.16

4.20

HHsearch

RNLTEYFVAVDVNNMLQLYASMLHERRIVIISSKLSTLTACIHGSAALLYPMYWQHIYIPVLPPHLLDYCCAPMPYLIGIHSSLIERVKNKSLEDVVMLNVDTNTLESPFSDLNN

6ekkA2

0.32

0.31

9.43

1.95

FFAS-3D

RNLTEYFVAVDVNNMLHLYASMLYERRILIICSKLSTLTACIHGSAAMLYPMYWQHVYIPVLPPHLLDYCCAPMPYLIGIHLSLMEKVRNMALDDVVILNVDTNTLETPFDD---

3tw8A

0.34

10.16

1.12

EigenThreader

RNLTEYFVAVDVNNMLQLYASMLHERRIVIISSKLSTLTACIHGSAALLYPMYWQHIYIPVLPPHLLDYCCAPMPYLIGIHSSLIERVKNKSLEDVVMLNVDTNTLESPFSDLNN

6ekkA

0.31

9.45

1.54

CNFpred

RNLTEYFVAVDVNNMLHLYASMLYERRILIICSKLSTLTACIHGSAAMLYPMYWQHVYIPVLPPHLLDYCCAPMPYLIGIHLSLMEKVRNMALDDVVILNVDTNTLETPFDDLQS

3tw8A2

0.34

0.33

9.89

1.33

DEthreader

SRLTEYFVAVDVNNMLQLYASMLHERRIVIISSKLSTLTACIHGSAALLYPMYWQHIYIPVLPPHLLDYCCAPMPYLIGIHSSLIERVKNKSLEDVVMLNVDTNTLES-P-FS--

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.8612

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	6ekkA2	0.98	0.65	0.313	1.000	model1_6ekkA2.pdb.gz
2	3tw8A	0.97	0.66	0.339	1.000	model1_3tw8A.pdb.gz
3	4ihqA2	0.75	2.87	0.096	1.000	model1_4ihqA2.pdb.gz
4	3jc8Ba3	0.74	3.03	0.052	1.000	model1_3jc8Ba3.pdb.gz
5	2oap2	0.73	2.88	0.071	0.983	model1_2oap2.pdb.gz
6	5fl3A	0.71	3.08	0.089	0.965	model1_5fl3A.pdb.gz
7	1g6oA	0.71	2.82	0.083	0.939	model1_1g6oA.pdb.gz
8	6lt0B	0.70	2.80	0.095	0.913	model1_6lt0B.pdb.gz
9	1p9wA	0.70	3.04	0.079	0.957	model1_1p9wA.pdb.gz
10	4ksrA	0.69	2.99	0.079	0.948	model1_4ksrA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0005088	0.75	Ras guanyl-nucleotide exchange factor activity
GO:0017112	0.74	Rab guanyl-nucleotide exchange factor activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0065007	0.68	biological regulation
GO:0050789	0.66	regulation of biological process
GO:0050794	0.64	regulation of cellular process
GO:0009987	0.59	cellular process
GO:0050896	0.58	response to stimulus
GO:0051179	0.55	localization
GO:0044699	0.50	single-organism process
GO:0006810	0.50	transport

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	0.97	cell part
GO:0044424	0.90	intracellular part
GO:0016020	0.83	membrane
GO:0044444	0.67	cytoplasmic part
GO:0043226	0.60	organelle
GO:0043229	0.58	intracellular organelle
GO:0043227	0.53	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0043231	0.52	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	3f9vA	0.605	3.32	0.055	0.904	3.-.-.-	NA
2	0.060	1g8pA	0.638	3.44	0.133	0.948	6.6.1.1	NA
3	0.060	1e19A	0.590	3.84	0.055	0.930	2.7.2.2	NA
4	0.060	1skyE	0.509	4.47	0.053	0.904	3.6.3.14 3.6.1.34	NA
5	0.060	2awnB	0.596	3.20	0.106	0.835	3.6.3.19	107

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.02	2oap1	0.740	2.77	0.070	0.991	0.30	ANP	complex1.pdb.gz	6,14,62,79
2	0.02	1p9wA	0.719	2.95	0.078	0.965	0.27	ANP	complex2.pdb.gz	31,35,58,59,60
3	0.02	2oap2	0.744	2.74	0.070	0.991	0.23	ANP	complex3.pdb.gz	34,35,36,37,38,39,40,79
4	0.01	1xpoD	0.647	3.45	0.054	0.948	0.22	BCM	complex4.pdb.gz	35,102,105
5	0.01	1xprD	0.652	3.44	0.055	0.939	0.19	QNA	complex5.pdb.gz	28,45,104
6	0.01	3iceC	0.674	3.28	0.045	0.948	0.29	RQA	complex6.pdb.gz	77,78,80
7	0.01	1xpoC	0.648	3.52	0.045	0.948	0.30	BCM	complex7.pdb.gz	34,38,101
8	0.01	1xpoA	0.652	3.47	0.054	0.948	0.26	QNA	complex8.pdb.gz	45,80,102
9	0.01	1pvoF	0.643	3.42	0.055	0.939	0.23	QNA	complex9.pdb.gz	98,103,104,105
10	0.01	1xpuF	0.641	3.43	0.055	0.939	0.24	FPD	complex10.pdb.gz	35,39,104

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.