D-I-TASSER Q9HA92-D1

D-I-TASSER results for Q9HA92-D1

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q9HA92 (346 residues)
MALPGARARGWAAAARAAQRRRRVENAGGSPSPEPAGRRAALYVHWPYCEKRCSYCNFNK
YIPRRLEEAAMQKCLVTEAQTLLRLSGVQRVESVFFGGGTPSLASPHTVAAVLEAVAQAA
HLPADLEVTLEANPTSAPGSRLAEFGAAGVNRLSIGLQSLDDTELRLLGRTHSACDALRT
LAEARRLFPGRVSVDLMLGLPAQQVGPWLGQLQELLHHCDDHLSLYQLSLERGTALFAQV
QRGALPAPDPELAAEMYQRGRAVLREAGFHQYEVSNFARNGALSTHNWTYWQCGQYLGVG
PGAHGRFMPQGAGGHTREARIQTLEPDNWMKEVMLFGHGTRKRVPL

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MALPGARARGWAAAARAAQRRRRVENAGGSPSPEPAGRRAALYVHWPYCEKRCSYCNFNKYIPRRLEEAAMQKCLVTEAQTLLRLSGVQRVESVFFGGGTPSLASPHTVAAVLEAVAQAAHLPADLEVTLEANPTSAPGSRLAEFGAAGVNRLSIGLQSLDDTELRLLGRTHSACDALRTLAEARRLFPGRVSVDLMLGLPAQQVGPWLGQLQELLHHCDDHLSLYQLSLERGTALFAQVQRGALPAPDPELAAEMYQRGRAVLREAGFHQYEVSNFARNGALSTHNWTYWQCGQYLGVGPGAHGRFMPQGAGGHTREARIQTLEPDNWMKEVMLFGHGTRKRVPL
Prediction	CCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHCCCHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHCCCCSSSSSCCCCCHHHHHHHCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCSSSSSCCSCCCCCHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCSSSSCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHCCCCCSSSSSCCSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSCCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCC
Confidence	9999998888987333221345034432123577889975999971221244889998235279865999999999999998875499845399977883226999999999999999759999967999708998999999999981998899752359979999839999999999999999992999578883268999999999999999993198958733242279981365534389999799999999999999999919954664201599822121341058996599806813143477667763111212179999999999848831118669
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MALPGARARGWAAAARAAQRRRRVENAGGSPSPEPAGRRAALYVHWPYCEKRCSYCNFNKYIPRRLEEAAMQKCLVTEAQTLLRLSGVQRVESVFFGGGTPSLASPHTVAAVLEAVAQAAHLPADLEVTLEANPTSAPGSRLAEFGAAGVNRLSIGLQSLDDTELRLLGRTHSACDALRTLAEARRLFPGRVSVDLMLGLPAQQVGPWLGQLQELLHHCDDHLSLYQLSLERGTALFAQVQRGALPAPDPELAAEMYQRGRAVLREAGFHQYEVSNFARNGALSTHNWTYWQCGQYLGVGPGAHGRFMPQGAGGHTREARIQTLEPDNWMKEVMLFGHGTRKRVPL
Prediction	7724111111102034125524424334224436557310000000000341020010121235744243105101510531173276340310404431102031710340051027205147502000001063034610420271300311010100246104304441427202400520271405201024010025022630350043017150430000020104203025326646162255621340042015204724362250033035321032022015433300010000010134344332232315414264004201221111354178
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180                 200                 220                 240                 260                 280                 300                 320                 340

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHCCCHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHCCCCSSSSSCCCCCHHHHHHHCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCSSSSSCCSCCCCCHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCSSSSCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHCCCCCSSSSSCCSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSCCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCC
MALPGARARGWAAAARAAQRRRRVENAGGSPSPEPAGRRAALYVHWPYCEKRCSYCNFNKYIPRRLEEAAMQKCLVTEAQTLLRLSGVQRVESVFFGGGTPSLASPHTVAAVLEAVAQAAHLPADLEVTLEANPTSAPGSRLAEFGAAGVNRLSIGLQSLDDTELRLLGRTHSACDALRTLAEARRLFPGRVSVDLMLGLPAQQVGPWLGQLQELLHHCDDHLSLYQLSLERGTALFAQVQRGALPAPDPELAAEMYQRGRAVLREAGFHQYEVSNFARNGALSTHNWTYWQCGQYLGVGPGAHGRFMPQGAGGHTREARIQTLEPDNWMKEVMLFGHGTRKRVPL

1oltA1

0.21

0.20

6.23

1.33

DEthreader

-----------------LEFSEDFGQAFLQAVARYPERPLSLYVHIPFCHKLCYFCCNKIVTRQQHKADQYLDALEQEIVHRAPLFAGRHVSQLHWGGGTPTYLNKAQISRLMKLLRENFQFNADAEISIEVDPREIELDVLDHLRAEGFNRLSMGVQDFNKEVQRLVNREQDEEFIFALLNHAREIGFTSTNIDLIYGLPKQTPESFAFTLKRVAELNPDRLSVFNYAHLTIFAAQRKI-KDADLPSP-QQKLDILQETIAFLTQSGYQFIGMDHFARPDDELHQGYTTQGDTDLLGMGV-SAISMIG------DCYAQNQKEL-KQYYQQVDEQGNALWRGIAL

1oltA1

0.23

0.22

6.80

1.67

SPARKS-K

YYTSYPTALEFSEDFGEQAFLQAVA--------RYPERPLSLYVHIPFCHKLCYFCGCNKIVTRQQHKADYLDALEQEIVHRAPLFAGRHVSQLHWGGGTPTYLNKAQISRLMKLLRENFQFNADAEISIEVDPREIELDVLDHLRAEGFNRLSMGVQDFNKEVQRLVNREQDEEFIFALLNHAREIGFTSTNIDLIYGLPKQTPESFAFTLKRVAELNPDRLSVFNYAHLPTIFAAQRKIKDADL-PSPQQKLDILQETIAFLTQSGYQFIGMDHFARPDDELRNFQGYTTQGDLLGMGVSAISMIG--------DCYAQNQKELKQYYQQVDEQGNALWRGIAL

1oltA

0.22

0.21

6.64

1.00

MapAlign

---------YTSYPTALEFSEDFGEQAFLQAVARYPERPLSLYVHIPFCHKLCYFCGCNKIVTRQHKADQYLDALEQEIVHRAPLFAGRHVSQLHWGGGTPTYLNKAQISRLMKLLRENFQFNADAEISIEVDPREIELDVLDHLRAEGFNRLSMGVQDFNKEVQRLVNREQDEEFIFALLNHAREIF-TSTNIDLIYGLPKQTPESFAFTLKRVAELNPDRLSVFNYAHLPIFAAQRKI--KDADLPSPQQKLDILQETIAFLTQSGYQFIGMDHFARPDDELVLHRNFQGDTDLLGMGVSAISMIG--------DCYAQNQKELKQYYQQVDEQGNALWRGIAL

1oltA

0.22

0.21

6.75

0.97

CEthreader

DWDLALIKYYTSYPTALEFSEDFGEQAFLQAVARYPERPLSLYVHIPFCHKLCYFCGCNKIVTRQHKADQYLDALEQEIVHRAPLFAGRHVSQLHWGGGTPTYLNKAQISRLMKLLRENFQFNADAEISIEVDPREIELDVLDHLRAEGFNRLSMGVQDFNKEVQRLVNREQDEEFIFALLNHAREIGFTSTNIDLIYGLPKQTPESFAFTLKRVAELNPDRLSVFNYAHLPTIF-AAQRKIKDADLPSPQQKLDILQETIAFLTQSGYQFIGMDHFARPDDELFQGYTTQGDTDLLGMGVSAISMIG--------DCYAQNQKELKQYYQQVDEQGNALWRGIAL

1oltA

0.22

0.21

6.66

1.56

MUSTER

IDWDLAYYTSYPTALEFSEDFGEQAFLQAV--ARYPERPLSLYVHIPFCHKLCYFCGCNKIVTRQHKADQYLDALEQEIVHRAPLFAGRHVSQLHWGGGTPTYLNKAQISRLMKLLRENFQFNADAEISIEVDPREIELDVLDHLRAEGFNRLSMGVQDFNKEVQRLVNREQDEEFIFALLNHAREIGFTSTNIDLIYGLPKQTPESFAFTLKRVAELNPDRLSVFNYAHLPTI-FAAQRKIKDADLPSPQQKLDILQETIAFLTQSGYQFIGMDHFARPDDVAQREGVLHGDTDLLGMGVSAISMIGD--------CYAQNQKELKQYYQQVDEQGNALWRGIAL

1oltA

0.22

0.21

6.57

3.15

HHsearch

IDWDLALIKYYTYP--TA---LEFSEFLAV--ARYPERPLSLYVHIPFCHKLCYFCGCNKIVTRQQKADQYLDALEQEIVHRAPLFAGRHVSQLHWGGGTPTYLNKAQISRLMKLLRENFQFNADAEISIEVDPREIELDVLDHLRAEGFNRLSMGVQDFNKEVQRLVNREQDEEFIFALLNHARIGFT-STNIDLIYGLPKQTPESFAFTLKRVAELNPDRLSVFNYAHLPTIFAAQRKI-KDADLPSPQQKLDILQETIAFLTQSGYQFIGMDHFARPDDEAQREGVLHGDTDLLGMGVSAISMI--------GDCYAQNQKELKQYYQQVDEQGNALWRGIAL

1oltA1

0.23

0.22

6.80

2.70

FFAS-3D

ALIKYPTALEFSEDFGEQAFLQAV--------ARYPERPLSLYVHIPFCHKLCYFCGCNKIVTRQHKADQYLDALEQEIVHRAPLFAGRHVSQLHWGGGTPTYLNKAQISRLMKLLRENFQFNADAEISIEVDPREIELDVLDHLRAEGFNRLSMGVQDFNKEVQRLVNREQDEEFIFALLNHAREIGFTSTNIDLIYGLPKQTPESFAFTLKRVAELNPDRLSVFNYAHLPTIFAAQR-KIKDADLPSPQQKLDILQETIAFLTQSGYQFIGMDHFARPGVLHRNFQGYTTQGDLLGMGVSAISMIGD--------CYAQNQKELKQYYQQVDEQGNALWRGIAL

1oltA1

0.21

0.19

6.14

1.20

EigenThreader

LEFSEDFGEQAFLQAVA----------------RYPERPLSLYVHIPFCHKLCYFCGCN-KIRQQHKADQYLDALEQEIVHRAPLFAGRHVSQLHWGGGTPTYLNKAQISRLMKLLRENF-----QFISIEVDPREIELDVLDHLRAEGFNRLSMGVQDFNKEVQRLVNREQDEEFIFALLNHAREIGFTSTNIDLIYGLPKQTPESFAFTLKRVAELNPDRLSVFYAHLPTIFAAQRKI--KDADLPSPQQKLDILQETIAFLTQSGYQFIGMDFARPDDELAVAQREGQGDTDLLGMGVSAISMIG--------DCYAQNQKELKQYYQQVDEQGNALWRGIAL

1oltA

0.24

0.21

6.40

2.10

CNFpred

-------------------------------------RPLSLYVHIPFCHKLCYFCGCNKIVTRQHKADQYLDALEQEIVHRAPLFAGRHVSQLHWGGGTPTYLNKAQISRLMKLLRENFQFNADAEISIEVDPREIELDVLDHLRAEGFNRLSMGVQDFNKEVQRLVNREQDEEFIFALLNHAREIGFTSTNIDLIYGLPKQTPESFAFTLKRVAELNPDRLSVFNYAHLPIFAAQRKIK--DADLPSPQQKLDILQETIAFLTQSGYQFIGMDHFARPDDELAVA-GYTTQTDLLGMGVSAISMIG--------DCYAQNQKELKQYYQQVDEQGNALWRGIAL

1oltA

0.21

0.20

6.23

1.33

DEthreader

-----------------LEFSEDFGQAFLQAVARYPERPLSLYVHIPFCHKLCYFCCNKIVTRQQHKADQYLDALEQEIVHRAPLFAGRHVSQLHWGGGTPTYLNKAQISRLMKLLRENFQFNADAEISIEVDPREIELDVLDHLRAEGFNRLSMGVQDFNKEVQRLVNREQDEEFIFALLNHAREIGFTSTNIDLIYGLPKQTPESFAFTLKRVAELNPDRLSVFNYAHLTIFAAQRKI-KDADLPSP-QQKLDILQETIAFLTQSGYQFIGMDHFARPDDELHQGYTTQGDTDLLGMGV-SAISMIG------DCYAQNQKEL-KQYYQQVDEQGNALWRGIAL

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.8184

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	1oltA	0.91	1.63	0.218	0.945	model1_1oltA.pdb.gz
2	6wteA	0.62	4.73	0.124	0.798	model1_6wteA.pdb.gz
3	4k36A	0.61	4.30	0.093	0.780	model1_4k36A.pdb.gz
4	4jc0A	0.61	4.40	0.125	0.780	model1_4jc0A.pdb.gz
5	6fd2B	0.60	3.96	0.094	0.743	model1_6fd2B.pdb.gz
6	5wggA	0.60	4.44	0.114	0.772	model1_5wggA.pdb.gz
7	6efnA	0.60	4.12	0.105	0.751	model1_6efnA.pdb.gz
8	1tv8A	0.58	4.98	0.126	0.783	model1_1tv8A.pdb.gz
9	1ktcA	0.42	5.67	0.045	0.613	model1_1ktcA.pdb.gz
10	4aibA	0.39	5.53	0.069	0.569	model1_4aibA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0003824	0.93	catalytic activity
GO:0051539	0.84	4 iron, 4 sulfur cluster binding
GO:0046872	0.67	metal ion binding
GO:0016740	0.63	transferase activity
GO:0016491	0.52	oxidoreductase activity
GO:0016627	0.51	oxidoreductase activity, acting on the CH-CH group of donors
GO:1901363	0.50	heterocyclic compound binding
GO:0097159	0.50	organic cyclic compound binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:1901360	1.00	organic cyclic compound metabolic process
GO:0046483	1.00	heterocycle metabolic process
GO:0034641	1.00	cellular nitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:0006725	1.00	cellular aromatic compound metabolic process
GO:1901576	0.91	organic substance biosynthetic process
GO:0044271	0.90	cellular nitrogen compound biosynthetic process
GO:1901362	0.89	organic cyclic compound biosynthetic process
GO:0019438	0.89	aromatic compound biosynthetic process
GO:0018130	0.89	heterocycle biosynthetic process
GO:0044238	0.80	primary metabolic process
GO:0044260	0.78	cellular macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0006139	0.73	nucleobase-containing compound metabolic process
GO:0044699	0.71	single-organism process
GO:1901564	0.68	organonitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:0043412	0.67	macromolecule modification
GO:1901566	0.66	organonitrogen compound biosynthetic process
GO:0006779	0.64	porphyrin-containing compound biosynthetic process
GO:0044710	0.63	single-organism metabolic process
GO:0016070	0.62	RNA metabolic process
GO:0055114	0.54	oxidation-reduction process
GO:0050794	0.52	regulation of cellular process
GO:0034660	0.50	ncRNA metabolic process
GO:0006396	0.50	RNA processing

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	1.00	intracellular part
GO:0005737	0.88	cytoplasm
GO:0044444	0.62	cytoplasmic part

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	3gnrA	0.480	5.79	0.042	0.717	3.2.1.21	NA
2	0.060	2dgaA	0.485	5.97	0.044	0.740	3.2.1.21	NA
3	0.060	1r30B	0.511	4.79	0.131	0.670	2.8.1.6	NA
4	0.060	1icpA	0.484	5.41	0.061	0.694	1.3.1.42	NA
5	0.060	3cb8A	0.518	3.66	0.121	0.630	1.97.1.4	52,55,99

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.34	1oltA	0.906	1.63	0.218	0.945	1.30	UUU	complex1.pdb.gz	49,53,55,56,57,58,60,98,99,100,131,132,133,135,156,158,170,195,197,226,227,228,229,236
2	0.18	1oltA	0.906	1.63	0.218	0.945	1.43	SAM	complex2.pdb.gz	43,45,97,98,131,302,303,304
3	0.14	2fb3A	0.579	4.95	0.126	0.780	1.13	UUU	complex3.pdb.gz	49,51,53,56,97,99,100,131,132,133,156
4	0.11	3rf9A	0.535	4.42	0.142	0.688	0.81	SF4	complex4.pdb.gz	49,51,52,53,56,99
5	0.10	3c8fA	0.528	3.41	0.116	0.630	0.96	UUU	complex5.pdb.gz	49,51,52,53,56,57,60,61,98,99,131,133,156,158,195

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Qiqige Wuyun, Yang Li, Quancheng Liu, Xiaogen Zhou, Yiheng Zhu, P. Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang. Integrating deep learning potentials with I-TASSER for single- and multi-domain protein structure prediction. Submitted. 2023.